删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

风险决策和跨期决策的过程比较:以确定效应和即刻效应为例

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

周蕾1,2,3, 李爱梅1, 张磊4, 李纾2,3(), 梁竹苑2,3()
1暨南大学管理学院, 广州 510632
2中国科学院行为科学重点实验室(中国科学院心理研究所), 北京 100101
3中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049
4德国汉堡大学医学院系统神经科学系, 汉堡 20246
收稿日期:2018-05-11出版日期:2019-03-25发布日期:2019-01-22
通讯作者:李纾,梁竹苑E-mail:lishu@psych.ac.cn;liangzy@psych.ac.cn

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71801110);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71471171);国家自然科学基金面上项目(31471005);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71571087);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(18YJC630268);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2018M633270);中国科学院行为科学重点实验室自主研究课题项目(Y5CX052003);广东省自科重大培育项目资助(2017A030308013)

Similarity in processes of risky choice and intertemporal choice: The case of certainty effect and immediacy effect

ZHOU Lei1,2,3, LI Ai-Mei1, ZHANG Lei4, LI Shu2,3(), LIANG Zhu-Yuan2,3()
1 Management School, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
2 CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China
3 Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4 Institute for Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany
Received:2018-05-11Online:2019-03-25Published:2019-01-22
Contact:LI Shu,LIANG Zhu-Yuan E-mail:lishu@psych.ac.cn;liangzy@psych.ac.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 风险决策和跨期决策与人类生存发展密切相关, 且两类决策在理论发展、行为效应及神经基础等方面具有相似性。为检验二者是否具有共同过程机制, 本研究以风险决策中的确定效应和跨期决策中的即刻效应为例, 采用眼动追踪技术比较了它们的局部、整体过程及模型拟合。辅以贝叶斯因子分析实验数据表明:二者的主要过程特征均相似, 且更符合非折扣模型假设; 二者在加工复杂程度等少数特征上有所不同; 确定和即刻信息在加工方向等特征上存在特异性。这表明二者可能具有共同的核心决策规则:两类决策更可能遵循非折扣模型预期的简捷、启发式规则, 而不是折扣模型所假设的补偿性、基于选项规则。本研究为建立两类决策的共同解释框架做出了有益尝试, 并为决策比较研究方法提供新的方向。



图1实验流程示意图
图1实验流程示意图



图2研究逻辑与分析框架
图2研究逻辑与分析框架



图3行为特征比较结果(M ± SE)
图3行为特征比较结果(M ± SE)



图4加工复杂程度过程特征比较结果(M ± SE)
图4加工复杂程度过程特征比较结果(M ± SE)



图5加工深度过程特征比较结果(M ± SE)
图5加工深度过程特征比较结果(M ± SE)



图6加工方向过程特征比较结果(M ± SE)
图6加工方向过程特征比较结果(M ± SE)



图7眼动轨迹相似性分数比较结果(M ± SE) (左:不含确定/即刻条件, 右:包含确定/即刻条件)
图7眼动轨迹相似性分数比较结果(M ± SE) (左:不含确定/即刻条件, 右:包含确定/即刻条件)



图8各任务条件中典型试次的眼动轨迹 注:箭头代表眼动轨迹的方向, S代表起始位置, E代表终止位置。
图8各任务条件中典型试次的眼动轨迹 注:箭头代表眼动轨迹的方向, S代表起始位置, E代表终止位置。


表1分层贝叶斯模型拟合结果
模型类别 模型 风险决策任务 跨期决策任务
WAIC 预测率 WAIC 预测率
折扣模型 指数模型 1169.51 61.79% 885.61 71.60%
双曲线模型 1325.38 54.91% 787.39 76.01%
非折扣模型 启发式模型 682.42 80.46% 595.59 84.32%

表1分层贝叶斯模型拟合结果
模型类别 模型 风险决策任务 跨期决策任务
WAIC 预测率 WAIC 预测率
折扣模型 指数模型 1169.51 61.79% 885.61 71.60%
双曲线模型 1325.38 54.91% 787.39 76.01%
非折扣模型 启发式模型 682.42 80.46% 595.59 84.32%


表2过程特征检验和模型拟合结果小结
决策特征 决策属性 分析指标 决策过程规则
风险任务 跨期任务
包含确定/
即刻选项
不含确定/
即刻选项
包含确定/
即刻选项
不含确定/
即刻选项
局部过程特征 加工复杂程度 单个注视点平均时长/长注视点比例 非补偿 非补偿 非补偿 非补偿
加工深度 注视量百分比 非补偿 非补偿 非补偿 非补偿
加工方向 SM值 无占优规则 基于维度 无占优规则 基于维度
整体过程特征 整体动态的眼动过程 眼动轨迹 无占优规则 基于维度 无占优规则 无占优规则
模型拟合 潜在的认知过程 分层贝叶斯模型拟合 基于维度 基于维度 基于维度 基于维度

表2过程特征检验和模型拟合结果小结
决策特征 决策属性 分析指标 决策过程规则
风险任务 跨期任务
包含确定/
即刻选项
不含确定/
即刻选项
包含确定/
即刻选项
不含确定/
即刻选项
局部过程特征 加工复杂程度 单个注视点平均时长/长注视点比例 非补偿 非补偿 非补偿 非补偿
加工深度 注视量百分比 非补偿 非补偿 非补偿 非补偿
加工方向 SM值 无占优规则 基于维度 无占优规则 基于维度
整体过程特征 整体动态的眼动过程 眼动轨迹 无占优规则 基于维度 无占优规则 无占优规则
模型拟合 潜在的认知过程 分层贝叶斯模型拟合 基于维度 基于维度 基于维度 基于维度







[1] Ahn W.-Y., Haines N., &Zhang L . ( 2017). Revealing neuro- computational mechanisms of reinforcement learning and decision-making with the hBayesDM package. Computational Psychiatry, 1, 24-57. doi: 10.1162/cpsy_a_00002
doi: 10.1162/CPSY_a_00002URL
[2] Allais M . ( 1953). Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axioms de l'ecole americaine [Rational man's behavior in face of risk: Critique of the American School's postulates and axioms]. Econometrica Quick Links, 21, 503-546.
[3] Böckenholt U., &Hynan L.S . ( 1994). Caveats on a process- tracing measure and a remedy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7( 2), 103-117. doi: 10.1002/bdm.3960070203
doi: 10.1002/bdm.3960070203URL
[4] Brandstätter E., Gigerenzer G., &Hertwig R . ( 2006). The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review, 113( 2), 409-432. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.409
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.409URLpmid: 2891015
[5] Brandstätter E., &Körner C. ( 2014). Attention in risky choice. Acta Psychologica, 152, 166-176. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014. 08.008
[6] Burnham K.P., &Anderson D.R . ( 2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33( 2), 261-304. doi: 10.1177/0049124104268644
[7] Dai J., &Busemeyer J.R . ( 2014). A probabilistic, dynamic, and attribute-wise model of intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143( 4), 1489-1514. doi: 10.1037/a0035976
doi: 10.1037/a0035976URLpmid: 4115005
[8] Ericson K. M. M., White J. M., Laibson D. I., &Cohen J. D . ( 2015). Money earlier or later? Simple heuristics explain intertemporal choices better than delay discounting does. Psychological Science, 26( 6), 826-833. doi: 10.1177/ 0956797615572232
doi: 10.1177/0956797615572232URLpmid: 4516222
[9] Fiedler S., &Glöckner A. ( 2012). The dynamics of decision making in risky choice: An eye-tracking analysis. Frontiers Psychology , 3, 335. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00335
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00335URLpmid: 3498888
[10] Figner B., Knoch D., Johnson E. J., Krosch A. R., Lisanby S. H., Fehr E., &Weber E. U . ( 2010). Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 13( 5), 538-539. doi: 10.1038/nn.2516
doi: 10.1038/nn.2516URLpmid: 20348919
[11] , , Fisher G., &Rangel A. ( 2013). Intertemporal discount rates are mediated by relative attention. Paper presented at Society for Judgment and Decision Making Annual Conference, Toronto, Canada.
[12] Franco-Watkins A. M., Mattson R. E., &Jackson M. D . ( 2016). Now or later? Attentional processing and intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29( 2-3), 206-217. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1895
doi: 10.1002/bdm.1895URL
[13] Frederick S., Loewenstein G., &O'donoghue T . ( 2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40( 2), 351-401. doi: 10.1257/ 002205102320161311
doi: 10.1257/002205102320161311URL
[14] Gelman A., Carlin J. B., Stern H. S., Dunson D. B., Vehtari A., &Rubin, D. B. ( 2014) . Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: CRC Press.
[15] Gelman A., &Rubin D.B . ( 1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7( 4), 457-472. doi: 10.1214/ss/1177011136
doi: 10.1214/ss/1177011136URL
[16] Glöckner A., &Herbold A-K . ( 2011). An eye-tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24( 1), 71-98. doi: 10.1002/bdm.684
doi: 10.1002/bdm.684URL
[17] Green L., Myerson J., &Ostaszewski P . ( 1999). Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25( 2), 418-427. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.418
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.418URLpmid: 10093208
[18] Green L., Myerson J., &Vanderveldt, A. . (2014) Delay and probability discounting. In: F. K. McSweeney & E. Murphy (Eds.), Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Operant and Classical Conditioning (pp. 307-337). Chichester, England: Wiley.
[19] Hardisty D.J., &Pfeffer J. ( 2016). Intertemporal uncertainty avoidance: When the future is uncertain, people prefer the present, and when the present is uncertain, people prefer the future. Management Science, 63( 2), 519-527. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2349
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2656662URL
[20] Horstmann N. ( 2009). How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes. Judgment and Decision Making, 4( 5), 335-354. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1393729
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1393729URL
[21] Hu C-P., Kong X-Z., Wagenmakers E-J., Ly A., &Peng K-P . ( 2018). The bayes factor and its implementation in JASP: A pratical primer. 26(6), 951-965. doi: 10.3724/SP. J.1042.2018.00951
[ 胡传鹏, 孔祥祯, Wagenmakers, E-J., Ly A., 彭凯平 . ( 2018). 贝叶斯因子及其在JASP中的实现. 心理科学进展, 26( 6), 951-965.]
[22] JASP Team . ( 2017). JASP (Version 0. 8.2) [Computer software]
[23] Jeffreys H. ( 1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[24] Kable J.W., &Glimcher P.W . ( 2007). The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 10( 12), 1625-1633. doi: 10.1038/nn2007
doi: 10.1038/nn2007URLpmid: 2845395
[25] Kahneman D., &Tversky A. ( 1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47( 2), 263-291. doi: 10.2307/1914185
doi: 10.2307/1914185URL
[26] Kahneman D., &Tversky A. ( 1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39( 4), 341-350.
doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341URL
[27] Kirby K.N., &Herrnstein R.J . ( 1995). Preference reversals due to myopic discounting of delayed reward. Psychological Science, 6( 2), 83-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00311.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00311.xURL
[28] Konstantinidis E., van Ravenzwaaij D., &Newell B. R . ( 2017). Exploring the decision dynamics of risky intertemporal choice. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 694-699. Retrieved from
[29] Kuhnen C.M., &Knutson B. ( 2005). The neural basis of financial risk taking. Neuron, 47( 5), 763-770. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.008
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.008URLpmid: 16129404
[30] Li S. ( 2004). A behavioral choice model when computational ability matters. Applied Intelligence, 20( 2), 147-163. doi: 10.1023/B:APIN.0000013337.01711.c7
doi: 10.1023/B:APIN.0000013337.01711.c7URL
[31] Li S., Su Y., &Sun Y . ( 2010). The effect of pseudo-immediacy on intertemporal choices . Journal of Risk Research. 13( 6), 781-787. doi: 10.1080/13669870903551704
doi: 10.1080/13669870903551704URL
[32] Liang Z-Y., Zhou L., &Su Y . ( 2016, Aug.). The hidden-zero effect in risky choice: An eye-tracking study. Paper presented at the 31th International Congress of Psychology, Yokohama, JAPAN.
[33] Luckman A., Donkin C., &Newell B. R . ( 2017). Can a single model account for both risky choices and inter-temporal choices? Testing the assumptions underlying models of risky inter-temporal choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 785-792. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1330-8
doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1330-8URLpmid: 28600719
[34] Loewenstein G., &Prelec D. ( 1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107( 2), 573-597. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0028
doi: 10.2307/2118482URL
[35] Ly A., Verhagen J., &Wagenmakers E.-J . ( 2016 a). An evaluation of alternative methods for testing hypotheses, from the perspective of Harold Jeffreys. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 43-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.01.003
doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.01.003URL
[36] Ly A., Verhagen J., &Wagenmakers E-J . ( 2016 b). Harold Jeffreys’s default Bayes factor hypothesis tests: Explanation, extension, and application in psychology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 19-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp. 2015.06.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2015.06.004URL
[37] Magen E., Dweck C., &Gross J. J . ( 2008). The hidden-zero effect: Representing a single choice as an extended sequence reduces impulsive choice. Psychological Science, 19( 7), 648-649. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02137.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02137.xURL
[38] Marsman M., &Wagenmakers E-J . ( 2017). Bayesian benefits with JASP. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14( 5), 545-555. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2016.1259614
doi: 10.1080/17405629.2016.1259614URL
[39] Mazur J.E . ( 1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin(Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value
[40] McClure S. M., Laibson D. I., Loewenstein G., &Cohen J. D . ( 2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306( 5695), 503-507. doi: 10.1126/science.1100907
[41] Myerson J., Green L., Hanson S. J., Holt D. D., &Estle S. J . ( 2003). Discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards: Processes and traits. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24( 5), 619-635. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(03)00005-9
doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(03)00005-9URL
[42] Noton D., &Stark L. ( 1971). Scanpaths in eye movements during pattern perception. Science, 171( 3968), 308-311. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3968.308
doi: 10.1126/science.171.3968.308URLpmid: 5538847
[43] Pascal B. ( 1670). Pensées (W. F. Trotter, Trans.). Retrieved Nov. 22, 2018, from
[44] Rao L-L, &Li S. ( 2011). New paradoxes in intertemporal choice. Judgment and Decision Making, 6( 2), 122-129.
[45] Rayner K. (Ed.) ( 2013). Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading. New York:Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2852-3
[46] Read D., Frederick S., &Scholten M . ( 2013). DRIFT: An analysis of outcome framing in intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39( 2), 573-588. doi: 10.1037/a0029177
doi: 10.1037/a0029177URLpmid: 22866891
[47] Read D., Loewenstein G., &Kalyanaraman S . ( 1999). Mixing virtue and vice: Combining the immediacy effect and the diversification heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12( 4), 257-273. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771 (199912)12:4%3C257::AID-BDM327%3E3.0.CO;2-6
[48] Reeck C., Wall D., &Johnson E. J . ( 2017). Search predicts and changes patience in intertemporal choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114( 45), 11890-11895. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707040114
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707040114URLpmid: 29078303
[49] Rouder J. N., Speckman P. L., Sun D. C., Morey R. D., &Iverson G . ( 2009). Bayesian t-tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225-237. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225URLpmid: 19293088
[50] Samuelson P.A . ( 1937). A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4( 2), 155-161.
doi: 10.2307/2967661URL
[51] Scheibehenne B., &Pachur T. ( 2015). Using Bayesian hierarchical parameter estimation to assess the generalizability of cognitive models of choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22( 2), 391-407. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0684-4
doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0684-4URLpmid: 25134469
[52] Schneider E., Streicher B., Lermer E., Sachs R., &Frey D . ( 2017). Measuring the zero-risk bias: Methodological artefact or decision-making strategy? Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225, 31-44. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000284
[53] Schulte-Mecklenbeck M., Johnson J. G., Böckenholt U., Goldstein D. G., Russo J. E., Sullivan N. J., &Willemsen M. C . ( 2017). Process-tracing methods in decision making: On growing up in the 70s. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26( 5), 442-450. doi: 10.1177/0963721417708229
doi: 10.1177/0963721417708229URL
[54] Schulte-Mecklenbeck M., Kühberger A., Gagl B., &Hutzler F . ( 2017). Inducing thought processes: Bringing process measures and cognitive processes closer together. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30( 5), 1001-1013. doi: 10.1002/bdm.2007
doi: 10.1002/bdm.2007URL
[55] Scholten M., &Read D. ( 2010). The psychology of intertemporal tradeoffs. Psychological Review, 117( 3), 925-944. doi: 10.1037/a001
doi: 10.1037/a0019619URLpmid: 20658858
[56] Simon H. A. ( 1982). Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason. Cambridge, US: MIT Press.
[57] Stewart N., Hermens F., &Matthews W. J . ( 2015). Eye movements in risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29( 2-3), 116-136. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1854
doi: 10.1002/bdm.1854URL
[58] Stevens J. R. ( 2011). Mechanisms for decisions about the future. In R. Menzel, & J. Fischer (Eds.) Animal thinking: Contemporary issues in comparative cognition (pp. 93- 104) . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[59] Stevenson M. K., Busemeyer J. R., &Naylor, J. C.. , ( 1990) . Judgment and decision-making theory. In D. M. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 283-374) . CA, US: Consulting Psychologists Press.
[60] Su Y., Rao L. L., Sun H. Y., Du X. L., Li X., &Li S . ( 2013). Is making a risky choice based on a weighting and adding process? An eye-tracking investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39( 6), 1765-1780. doi: 10.1037/a0032861
doi: 10.1037/a0032861URLpmid: 23687917
[61] Vehtari A., Gelman A., &Gabry J . ( 2015). Efficient implementation of leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC for evaluating fitted Bayesian models. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1507.04544. doi: 1007/s11222-016-9696-4
[62] Vincent B.T . ( 2016). Hierarchical Bayesian estimation and hypothesis testing for delay discounting tasks. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1608-1620. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015- 0672-2
doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0672-2URLpmid: 26542975
[63] Wagenmakers E-J., Love J., Marsman M., Jamil T., Ly A., Verhagen J., … van Doorn J . ( 2018 a). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II?: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25( 1), 58-76. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7URLpmid: 28685272
[64] Wagenmakers E.- J., Marsman M., Jamil T., Ly A., Verhagen J., Love J., … Morey R. D . ( 2018 b). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25( 1), 35-57. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3
doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3URL
[65] Wang Z-J., &Li S . ( 2012). Tests of the integrative model and priority heuristic model from the point of view of choice process: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44( 2), 179-198. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.00179
[ 汪祚军, 李纾 . ( 2012). 对整合模型和占优启发式模型的检验:基于信息加工过程的眼动研究证据. 心理学报, 44( 2), 179-198.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.00179URL
[66] Weber B.J., &Chapman G.B . ( 2005). The combined effects of risk and time on choice: Does uncertainty eliminate the immediacy effect? Does delay eliminate the certainty effect? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96( 2), 104-118. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.01.001
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.01.001URL
[67] Weber B.J., &Huettel S.A . ( 2008). The neural substrates of probabilistic and intertemporal decision making. Brain Research, 1234, 104-115. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.105
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.105URLpmid: 2629583
[68] Wei Z-H., &Li X.S . ( 2015). Decision process tracing: Evidence from eye-movement data. Advances in Psychological Science, 23( 12), 2029-2041. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.02029
[ 魏子晗, 李兴珊 . ( 2015). 决策过程的追踪: 基于眼动的证据. 心理科学进展, 23( 12), 2029-2041.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.02029URL
[69] Wu F., Gu Q., Shi Z-H., Gao Z-F., &Shen M-W . ( 2018). Striding over the “classical statistical inference trap” —Application of Bayes factors in psychological studies. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 24(3), 195-202.
[ 吴凡, 顾全, 施壮华, 高在峰, 沈模卫 . ( 2018). 跳出传统假设检验方法的陷阱——贝叶斯因子在心理学研究领域的应用. 应用心理学, 24(3), 195-202.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2018.03.001URL
[70] Wu Y., Zhou X-L., &Luo Y-J . ( 2010). The neuroscience of intertemporal choices and decision-making under risk and uncertainty. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 84( 1), 76-80.
[ 吴燕, 周晓林, 罗跃嘉 . ( 2010). 跨期选择和风险决策的认知神经机制. 心理与行为研究, 8( 1), 76-80.]
[71] Zhang Y-Y., Xu L-J., Rao L-L., Zhou L., Zhou, Y, Jiang, T-Z, Li, S., &Liang Z-Y . ( 2016). Gain-loss asymmetry in neural correlates of temporal discounting: An approach-avoidance motivation perspective. Scientific Reports, 6, 31902. doi: 10.1038/srep31902
doi: 10.1038/srep31902URLpmid: 4997255
[72] Zhou L . ( 2017). Process comparison of risky choice and intertemporal choice: Evidence from eye-tracking method (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
[ 周蕾 ( 2017). 风险决策与跨期决策的过程比较:基于眼动研究的证据 (博士学位论文). 中国科学院大学.]
[73] Zhou L., Zhang Y-Y., Li S., &Liang, Z-Y .( 2018). New paradigms for the old question: Challenge the expectation rule held by risky decision-making theories. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 12, e17. doi: 10.1017/prp.2018.4
[74] Zhou L., Zhang Y-Y., Wang Z-J., Rao L-L., Wang W., Li S., Li X. S., &Liang Z-Y . ( 2016). A scanpath analysis of the risky decision-making process. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 29( 2-3), 169-182. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1943
doi: 10.1002/bdm.1943URL




[1]宋锡妍, 程亚华, 谢周秀甜, 龚楠焰, 刘雷. 愤怒情绪对延迟折扣的影响:确定感和控制感的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 456-468.
[2]张银玲, 虞祯, 买晓琴. 社会价值取向对自我-他人风险决策的影响及其机制[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(7): 895-908.
[3]王盼盼, 何嘉梅. 情景预见对跨期决策的影响机制[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(1): 38-54.
[4]杨玲,王斌强,耿银凤,姚东伟,曹华,张建勋,许琼英. 虚拟和真实金钱奖赏幅度对海洛因戒断者风险决策的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(4): 507-516.
[5]王鹏, 王晓田, 高娟, 黎夏岚, 徐静. 适应性时间管理:死亡意识对时间知觉和跨期决策的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(12): 1341-1350.
[6]徐岚, 陈全, 崔楠, 陆凯丽. 享受当下, 还是留待未来?——时间观对跨期决策的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(1): 96-105.
[7]李爱梅, 王海侠, 孙海龙, 熊冠星, 杨韶丽. “长计远虑”的助推效应:怀孕与环境跨期决策 *[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(8): 858-867.
[8]陈嘉欣;何贵兵. “金钱−环境”复合收益的风险决策:价值取向的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(4): 500-512.
[9]刘扬;孙彦. 时间分解效应及其对跨期决策的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(4): 362-370.
[10]刘洪志;江程铭;饶俪琳;李纾. “时间折扣”还是“单维占优”? ——跨期决策的心理机制[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(4): 522-532.
[11]李爱梅;彭元;熊冠星. 孕妇更长计远虑?——怀孕对女性跨期决策偏好的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(11): 1360-1370.
[12]陆青云;陶芳标;侯方丽;孙莹. 青少年应激下皮质醇应答与风险决策相关性的性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(5): 647-655.
[13]荆伟;方俊明;赵微. 自闭症谱系障碍儿童在多重线索下习得词语的眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(3): 385-395.
[14]徐四华;方卓;饶恒毅. 真实和虚拟金钱奖赏影响风险决策行为[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(8): 874-886.
[15]徐四华. 网络成瘾者的行为冲动性—— 来自爱荷华赌博任务的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(11): 1523-1534.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4406
相关话题/过程 心理 检验 科学 实验