易仲怡, 杨文登(), 叶浩生()

广州大学教育学院, 广州 510006

收稿日期:2017-12-04出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29


基金资助:*广东省高校基础研究与应用研究重大项目(2016WZDXM022);*广东高校特色创新项目(2016WTSCX097)

Influence of soft and hard tactical experiences on gender role cognition

YI Zhongyi, YANG Wendeng(), YE Haosheng()

Education School of Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received:2017-12-04Online:2018-07-15Published:2018-05-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 文章从具身隐喻的角度, 探讨了软硬触觉经验与男女性别角色认知的交互影响。实验1采用行为实验法, 考察了软硬的触觉经验对性别分类的影响; 实验2采用内隐联想范式, 探讨了男女性别角色词的加工能否激活软硬的隐喻表征; 实验3通过概念启动和知觉判断任务, 考察了性别角色词的概念加工对物体软硬知觉的影响。得出以下结论：(1)社会性别分类表征和社会性别角色表征可通过软硬进行隐喻表征; (2)性别角色词概念的加工会影响物体软硬知觉的判断, 认知判断存在具身效应。

图/表 1

表1实验2内隐联想测验过程步骤

步骤	重复 次数	阶段	反应
			F键	J键
1	30	练习	石头硬	海绵软
2	30	练习	男性化角色词	女性化角色词
3	60	练习	男性化角色词+石头图	女性化角色词+海绵图
4	60	测验	男性化角色词+石头图	女性化角色词+海绵图
5	30	练习	女性化角色词	男性化角色词
6	60	练习	女性化角色词+石头图	男性化角色词+海绵图
7	60	测验	女性化角色词+石头图	男性化角色词+海绵图

表1实验2内隐联想测验过程步骤

步骤	重复 次数	阶段	反应
			F键	J键
1	30	练习	石头硬	海绵软
2	30	练习	男性化角色词	女性化角色词
3	60	练习	男性化角色词+石头图	女性化角色词+海绵图
4	60	测验	男性化角色词+石头图	女性化角色词+海绵图
5	30	练习	女性化角色词	男性化角色词
6	60	练习	女性化角色词+石头图	男性化角色词+海绵图
7	60	测验	女性化角色词+石头图	男性化角色词+海绵图

参考文献 39

[1]	Ackerman J. M., Nocera C. C., & Bargh J. A . ( 2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328, 1712-1715. doi: 10.1126/science.1189993URLpmid: 3005631
[2]	Anderson M. L. ( 2007). How to study the mind:An introduction to embodied cognition. In F. Santoianni & C. Sabatano (Eds.), Brain development in learning environments: Embodied and perceptual advancements (pp. 65-82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press. doi: 10.1080/10605851.1995.10641001URL
[3]	Barsalou, L.W . ( 2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
[4]	Bem, S.L . ( 1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 45, 196-205. doi: 10.1037//0022-006X.45.2.196URLpmid: 850004
[5]	Brauer J., Xiao Y. Q., Poulain T., Friederici A. D., & Schirmer A . ( 2016). Frequency of maternal touch predicts resting activity and connectivity of the developing social brain. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 3544-3552. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw137URLpmid: 27230216
[6]	Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge , MA: The MIT Press.
[7]	Delamont, S. ( 1990). Sex roles and the school (2nd ed.). London:Routledge. doi: 10.1007/BF02196292URL
[8]	Eagly, A.H., &Wood W. , ( 2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 340-357. doi: 10.1177/1745691613484767URLpmid: 26172976
[9]	Feingold, A. ( 1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429URLpmid: 7809307
[10]	Galbin, A. ( 2014). An introduction to social constructionism. Social Research Reports, 26, 82-92. doi: 10.5195/jffp.1995.375URL
[11]	Gallagher, S. ( 2014). Phenomenology and embodied cognition. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 9-18). Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
[12]	Greenwald A. G., McGhee D. E., & Schwartz J. L . ( 1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
[13]	Greenwald A. G., Nosek B. A., & Banaji M. R . ( 2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
[14]	Haier R. J., Jung R. E., Yeo R. A., Head K., & Alkire M. T . ( 2005). The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: Sex matters. NeuroImage, 25, 320-327. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.019URLpmid: 15734366
[15]	Judith, B. ( 2009). Gender trouble:Feminism and the subversion of identity (S. F. Song, Trans.). Shanghai, China: Shanghai Joint Publishing. (original work published in 1990).
	[ 朱迪斯·巴特勒. ( 2009). 性别麻烦:女性主义与身份的颠覆 (宋素凤译). 上海: 上海三联书店 ]
[16]	Lakoff G., & Johnson , M. ( 1980) . Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
[17]	Lakoff G., & Johnson, M. ( 1999) . Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought Chicago: University of Chicago Press The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[18]	Lindsey,L.L . ( 2011). Gender roles: A sociological perspective. Englewood, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall Publication.
[19]	Lozada, M., &Carro N. , ( 2016). Embodied action improves cognition in children: Evidence from a study based on Piagetian conservation tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 393.
[20]	Mandler, J.M . ( 1992). How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99, 587-604. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.587URLpmid: 1454900
[21]	Mealey, L. ( 2000). Sex differences. New York: Academic Press.
[22]	Mutekwe E., Maphosa C., Machingambi S., Ndofirepi A. P., & Wadesango N . ( 2013). Exploring the teachers'role in the social construction of gender through the hidden culture curriculum and pedagogy: A case of Zimbabwe. Journal of Social Science, 37, 307-318.
[23]	Paul, H.H., &Perry-Jenkins M. , ( 2016). Parents' gender ideology and gendered behavior as predictors of children's gender-role attitudes: A longitudinal exploration. Sex Roles, 74, 527-542. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0539-0URLpmid: 4945126
[24]	Roberto, A.J., &Li K.J . ( 2016). Gender roles: A sociological perspective. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 89, 272.
[25]	Robin, L. ( 2006). Emotional wiring different in men and women. Live Science. Retrieved April 19, 2006, from
[26]	Shapiro, L. ( 2014). Embodied cognitive (H. W. Lee & D. Dong, Trans.). Beijing, China: Huaxia Publishing House.
	[ 劳伦斯·夏皮罗. ( 2014). 具身认知 (李恒威, 董达译). 北京: 华夏出版社.]
[27]	Slepian M. L., Weisbuch M., Rule N. O., & Ambady N . ( 2011). Tough and tender: Embodied categorization of gender. Psychological Science, 22, 26-28. doi: 10.1177/0956797610390388URLpmid: 21106884
[28]	Slepian M. L., Rule N. O., & Ambady N . ( 2012). Proprioception and person perception: Politicians and professors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1621-1628. doi: 10.1177/0146167212457786URLpmid: 22956292
[29]	Spackman, J.S., &Yanchar S.C . ( 2014). Embodied cognition, representationalism, and mechanism: A review and analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44, 46-79. doi: 10.1111/jtsb.12028URL
[30]	van Horen ,F., &Mussweiler T. , ( 2014). Soft assurance: Coping with uncertainty through haptic sensations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.008URL
[31]	Deng, A. ( 2016). The influence of touch experience on economic decision making (Unpublished master’s thesis). Sichuan Normal University.
	[ 邓奥 . ( 2016). 触觉经验对经济决策的影响 (硕士学位论文). 四川师范大学.]
[32]	Duan, Y.Y . ( 2016). he transformation of female gender role in the social transition period--The research of tough girl phenomenon (Unpublished master’s thesis). Shandong University.
	[ 段瑶瑶 . ( 2016). 社会转型期女性性别角色的转变——关于“女汉子”现象的研究 (硕士学位论文). 山东大学.]
[33]	Li, X.D., &Ye H.S . ( 2015). Embodied cognition in Ancient Chinese Confucianism and Taoism. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47, 702-710.
	[ 黎晓丹, 叶浩生 . ( 2015). 中国古代儒道思想中的具身认知观. 心理学报, 47, 702-710.]
[34]	Liu D. Z., Huang H. X., Jia F. Q., Gong Q., Huang Q., & Li X . ( 2011). A new sex-role inventory (CSRI-50) indicates changes of sex role among chinese college students. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43, 639-649.
	[ 刘电芝, 黄会欣, 贾凤芹, 龚茜, 黄颀, 李霞 . ( 2011). 新编大学生性别角色量表揭示性别角色变迁. 心理学报, 43, 639-649.] doi: 10.3724/24/SP.J.1041.2011.00639URL
[35]	Xie J. S., Zhang C. Q., Wang R. M., & Lu Z . ( 2011). Paradigms in the study of perceptual symbol systems. Advances in Psychological Science, 19, 1293-1305.
	[ 谢久书, 张常青, 王瑞明, 陆直 . ( 2011). 知觉符号理论及其研究范式. 心理科学进展, 19, 1293-1305.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.01293URL
[36]	Ye, H.S . ( 2014). Theoretical analysis of the meaning of embodiment. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46, 1032-1042.
	[ 叶浩生 . ( 2014). “具身”涵义的理论辨析. 心理学报, 46, 1032-1042.]
[37]	Ye H. S. ( 2017). The principle and application of embodied cognition. Beijing, China: The Commercial Press.
	[ 叶浩生 . ( 2017). 具身认知的原理与应用. 北京: 商务印书馆.]
[38]	Yin R., Qu F. B., & Ye H. S . ( 2012). Research on embodied theories of conceptual representation. Advances in Psychological Science, 20, 1372-1381.
	[ 殷融, 曲方炳, 叶浩生 . ( 2012). 具身概念表征的研究及理论述评. 心理科学进展, 20, 1372-1381.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.01372URL
[39]	Zhao,Y.B . ( 2005). On gender roles in the pre-qin period (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). North-East Normal University, Jilin.
	[ 赵玉宝 . ( 2005). 先秦性别角色研究 (博士学位论文). 东北师范大学, 吉林.]

相关文章 15

[1]	苏佳佳,叶浩生. 中国神话中的具身心理学思想探索[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(3): 386-398.
[2]	王汉林,蒋泽亮,冯晓慧,鲁忠义. 道德概念的空间形象性：语言因素和具身因素的共同作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(2): 128-138.
[3]	马利军,马云霄,何晓清,刘海涛,张静宇. 相对熟悉度和同音线索在谐音型歇后语理解中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(12): 1306-1317.
[4]	叶浩生,曾红,杨文登. 生成认知：理论基础与实践走向[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(11): 1270-1280.
[5]	黎晓丹,丁道群,叶浩生. 身体姿势启动的内隐权力感对公平决策的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(1): 106-116.
[6]	宋晓蕾, 李洋洋, 杨倩, 游旭群. 反应手的不同状态对联合任务中观察学习的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 975-984.
[7]	叶浩生, 麻彦坤, 杨文登. 身体与认知表征：见解与分歧[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 462-472.
[8]	李恒,曹宇. 时间焦点对前后方向上内隐时空映射的影响——来自汉族和羌族的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(10): 1083-1093.
[9]	鲁忠义;贾利宁;翟冬雪. 道德概念垂直空间隐喻理解中的映射：双向性及不平衡性[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(2): 186-196.
[10]	黎晓丹; 杜建政; 叶浩生. 中国礼文化的具身隐喻效应：蜷缩的身体使人更卑微[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 746-756.
[11]	刘文娟;沈曼琼;李莹;王瑞明. 情绪概念加工与情绪面孔知觉的相互影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(2): 163-173.
[12]	苏得权;曾红;陈骐; 叶浩生. 用药动作线索诱发海洛因戒断者的镜像神经活动：一项fMRI研究[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1499-1506.
[13]	刘思耘;周宗奎;李娜. 网络使用经验对动作动词加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(8): 992-1003.
[14]	杨惠兰;何先友;赵雪汝;张维. 权力的概念隐喻表征：来自大小与颜色隐喻的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(7): 939-949.
[15]	黎晓丹;叶浩生. 中国古代儒道思想中的具身认知观[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(5): 702-710.

PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4223