删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

面孔表情及注视方向对面孔加工特异性的影响——基于知觉负荷理论的视角 *

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

张凯莉, 周霈, 王沛()
上海师范大学心理学系, 上海 200234
收稿日期:2016-01-08出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28
通讯作者:王沛E-mail:wangpei1970@163.com

基金资助:* 国家社会科学重大招标项目(17ZDA327)

The affects of facial expression and gaze direction on face processing: Based on perceptual load theory

ZHANG Kaili, ZHOU Pei, WANG Pei()
Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
Received:2016-01-08Online:2018-06-10Published:2018-04-28
Contact:WANG Pei E-mail:wangpei1970@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 知觉负荷理论认为, 当前任务知觉负荷的高低决定了选择性注意过程中的资源分配状况。面孔加工具有特异性, 不论知觉负荷的高低, 作为干扰刺激的面孔都能得到一定程度的加工。不过面孔的表情和面孔的注视方向可能会受到知觉负荷的影响。其中, 面孔的负性情绪相比正性和中性情绪, 较少受知觉负荷的影响; 正性和中性情绪相比负性情绪, 更易受到知觉负荷的影响。面孔直视的注视方向不需要主观注意, 较少受知觉负荷的影响; 非直视的注视方向则容易受到知觉负荷的影响。今后可将研究范围拓展到种族、性别、年龄等范畴, 探讨不同知觉负荷条件对于这些面孔信息的影响。


[1] 田夏, 刘培朵, 陈安涛 . ( 2012). 熟悉面孔在不同知觉负荷条件下的表征方式. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 34( 4), 139-145.
[2] 魏萍, 周晓林 . ( 2005). 从知觉负载理论来理解选择性注意. 心理科学进展, 13( 4), 413-420.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2005.04.005URL
[3] 吴彬星, 张智君, 孙雨生 . ( 2015). 面孔熟悉度对面孔性别与表情相互作用的调节. 心理学报, 47( 10), 1201-1212.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01201URL
[4] Barratt, D., & Bundesen, C. (2012). Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings. Cognition & Emotion, 26( 7), 1223-1237.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.645279URLpmid: 22416914
[5] Blagrove, E., & Watson, D. G . ( 2010). Visual marking and facial affect: Can an emotional face be ignored? Emotion, 10( 2), 147-168.
doi: 10.1037/a0017743URLpmid: 20364892
[6] Burton A. M., Bindemann M., Langton S. R. H., Schweinberger S. R., & Jenkins R . ( 2009). Gaze perception requires focused attention: Evidence from an interference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35( 1), 108-118.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.108URLpmid: 19170474
[7] Calder A. J., Lawrence A. D., Keane J., Scott S. K., Owen A. M., Christoffels I., & Young A. W . ( 2002). Reading the mind from eye gaze. Neuropsychologia, 40( 8), 1129-1138.
doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00008-8URL
[8] Caudek, C. (2013). The fidelity of visual memory for faces and non-face objects. Acta Psychologica, 143( 1), 40-51.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.12.002URLpmid: 23500113
[9] Compton, R. J . ( 2003). The interface between emotion and attention: A review of evidence from psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 2( 2), 115-129.
doi: 10.1177/1534582303255278URLpmid: 13678519
[10] Conty L., N'Diaye K., Tijus C., & George N . ( 2007). When eye creates the contact! ERP evidence for early dissociation between direct and averted gaze motion processing. Neruopsychologia, 45( 13), 3024-3037.
doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12244.xURLpmid: 17644145
[11] Damjanovic L., Pinkham A. E., Clarke P., & Phillips J . ( 2014). Enhanced threat detection in experienced riot police officers: Cognitive evidence from the face-in-the- crowd effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67( 5), 1004-1018.
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.839724URLpmid: 24152089
[12] de Fockert, J. W., & Gautrey, B. (2013). Greater visual averaging of face identity for own-gender faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20( 3), 468-473.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0381-8URLpmid: 23355045
[13] Downing P. E., Bray D., Rogers J., & Childs C . ( 2004). Bodies capture attention when nothing is expected. Cognition, 93( 1), B27-B38.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.010URLpmid: 15110728
[14] Eitam B., Glass-Hackel R., Aviezer H., Dienes Z., Shoval R., & Higgins E. T . ( 2014). Are task irrelevant faces unintentionally processed? Implicit learning as a test case. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40( 5), 1741-1747.
doi: 10.1037/a0037627URLpmid: 25151101
[15] Eltiti S., Wallace D., & Fox E . ( 2005). Selective target processing: Perceptual load or distractor salience? Perception & Psychophysics, 67( 5), 876-885.
doi: 10.3758/BF03193540URLpmid: 16334059
[16] Farroni T., Csibra G., Simion F., & Johnson M. H . ( 2002). Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99( 14), 9602-9605.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.152159999URLpmid: 12082186
[17] Fox E., Yates A., & Ashwin C . ( 2012). Trait anxiety and perceptual load as determinants of emotion processing in a fear conditioning paradigm. Emotion, 12( 2), 236-249.
doi: 10.1037/a0025321URLpmid: 21875186
[18] Freeman J. B., Ambady N., & Holcomb P. J . ( 2010). The face-sensitive N170 encodes social category information. Neuroreport, 21( 1), 24-28.
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283320d54URLpmid: 19864961
[19] Frischen A., Bayliss A. P., & Tipper S. P . ( 2007). Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133( 4), 694-724.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694URLpmid: 17592962
[20] Grammer K., Fink B., M?ller A. P., & Thornhill R . ( 2003). Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews, 78( 3), 385-407.
doi: 10.1017/S1464793102006085URLpmid: 14558590
[21] Güntekin, B., & Ba?ar, E. (2014). A review of brain oscillations in perception of faces and emotional pictures. Neuropsychologia, 58, 33-51.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.03.014URLpmid: 24709570
[22] Gupta, R., & Srinivasan, N. (2015). Only irrelevant sad but not happy faces are inhibited under high perceptual load. Cognition and Emotion, 29( 4), 747-754.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.933735URLpmid: 24998248
[23] Hains, P., & Baillargeon, J. (2010). Le r?le de la charge perceptuelle dans le traitement de distracteurs visuels : le visage humain est-il vraiment particulier. L'Année Psychologique, 110( 2), 181-195.
doi: 10.4074/S0003503310002010URL
[24] Hains, P., & Baillargeon, J. (2011). La face animale et le visage humain sont-ils équivalents ? Une étude dans le cadre de la théorie de la charge perceptuelle. L’Année psychologique, 111( 3), 449-463.
doi: 10.4074/S0003503311003010URL
[25] Hauthal N., Neumann M. F., & Schweinberger S. R . ( 2012). Attentional spread in deaf and hearing participants: Face and object distractor processing under perceptual load. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74( 6), 1312-1320.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0320-1URLpmid: 22638944
[26] He, C., & Chen, A. (2010). Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load. Psychological Research PRPF, 74( 3), 268-276.
doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0252-0URLpmid: 19652997
[27] Herzmann G., Schweinberger S. R., Sommer W., & Jentzsch I . ( 2004). What's special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach. Psychophysiology, 41( 5), 688-701.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00196.xURLpmid: 15318875
[28] Hess U., Adams R. B., Jr., Grammer K., & Kleck R. E . ( 2009). Face gender and emotion expression: Are angry women more like men? Journal of Vision, 9( 12):19.
doi: 10.1167/9.12.19URLpmid: 20053110
[29] Holmes A., Mogg K., de Fockert J., Nielsen M. K., & Bradley B. P . ( 2014). Electrophysiological evidence for greater attention to threat when cognitive control resources are depleted. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14( 2), 827-835.
doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0212-4URLpmid: 24165903
[30] Jung K., Ruthruff E., & Gaspelin N . ( 2013). Automatic identification of familiar faces. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75( 7), 1438-1450.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0468-3URLpmid: 23749679
[31] Kaltwasser L., Hildebrandt A., Recio G., Wilhelm O., & Sommer W . ( 2014). Neurocognitive mechanisms of individual differences in face cognition: A replication and extension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14( 2), 861-878.
doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0234-yURLpmid: 24379165
[32] Kleinke, C. L . ( 1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100( 1), 78-100.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.78URLpmid: 3526377
[33] Kloth N., Damm M., Schweinberger S. R., & Wiese H . ( 2015). Aging affects sex categorization of male and female faces in opposite ways. Acta Psychological, 158, 78-86.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.04.005URLpmid: 25974392
[34] Komes J., Schweinberger S. R., & Wiese H . ( 2014). Preserved fine-tuning of face perception and memory: Evidence from the own-race bias in high- and low-performing older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 60.
doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00060URLpmid: 3983485
[35] Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21( 3), 451-468.
doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.451URLpmid: 7790827
[36] Lavie, N. (2010). Attention, distraction, and cognitive control under load. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19( 3), 143-148.
doi: 10.1177/0963721410370295URL
[37] Lavie, N., & de Fockert, J. W . ( 2003). Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65( 2), 202-212.
doi: 10.3758/BF03194795URLpmid: 12713239
[38] Lavie N., Hirst A., de Fockert J. W., & Viding E . ( 2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133( 3), 339-354.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.339URLpmid: 15355143
[39] Lavie N., Lin Z., Zokaei N., & Thoma V . ( 2009). The role of perceptual load in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35( 5), 1346-1358.
doi: 10.1037/a0016454URLpmid: 19803641
[40] Lavie N., Ro T., & Russell C . ( 2003). The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces. Psychological Science, 14( 5), 510-515.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.03453URLpmid: 12930485
[41] Lipp, O. V., Derakshan, N. (2005). Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task. Emotion, 5( 3), 365-369.
doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.365URLpmid: 16187873
[42] Maquestiaux F., Lagu?-Beauvais M., Bherer L., & Ruthruff E . ( 2008). Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment. Memory & Cognition, 36(7), 1262-1282.
doi: 10.3758/MC.36.7.1262URLpmid: 18927042
[43] Minamoto T., Shipstead Z., Osaka N., & Engle R. W . ( 2015). Low cognitive load strengthens distractor interference while high load attenuates when cognitive load and distractor possess similar visual characteristics. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77( 5), 1659-1673.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0866-9URLpmid: 25813738
[44] Murray J. E., Judge M., & Chen Y . ( 2012). Ignored faces produce figural face aftereffects. PLoS One, 7( 9), e45928.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045928URLpmid: 3448676
[45] Murray J. E., Machado L., & Knight B . ( 2011). Race and gender of faces can be ignored. Psychological Research, 75( 4), 324-333.
doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0310-7URLpmid: 20949279
[46] Neath, K. N., & Itier, R. J . ( 2015). Fixation to features and neural processing of facial expressions in a gender discrimination task. Brain and Cognition, 99, 97-111.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.05.007URLpmid: 26277653
[47] Neumann M. F., Mohamed T. N., & Schweinberger S. R . ( 2011). Face and object encoding under perceptual load: ERP evidence. NeuroImage, 54( 4), 3021-3027.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.075URLpmid: 21044688
[48] Neumann, M. F., & Schweinberger, S. R . ( 2009). N250r ERP repetition effects from distractor faces when attending to another face under load: Evidence for a face attention resource. Brain Research, 1270, 64-77.
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2006.05.021URLpmid: 19306855
[49] ?hman A., Lundqvist D., & Esteves F . ( 2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80( 3), 381-396.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.381URL
[50] Okon-Singer H., Lichtenstein-Vidne L., & Cohen N . ( 2013). Dynamic modulation of emotional processing. Biological Psychology, 92( 3), 480-491.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.05.010URLpmid: 22676964
[51] Olk, B., & Garay-Vado, A. M . ( 2011). Attention to faces: Effects of face inversion. Vision Research, 51( 14), 1659-1666.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.05.007URLpmid: 21624383
[52] Pageler N. M., Menon V., Merin N. M., Eliez S., Brown W. E., & Reiss A. L . ( 2003). Effect of head orientation on gaze processing in fusiform gyrus and superior temporal sulcus. NeuroImage, 20( 1), 318-329.
doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00229-5URLpmid: 14527592
[53] Palanica, A., & Itier, R. J . ( 2012). Attention capture by direct gaze is robust to context and task demands. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 36( 2), 123-134.
doi: 10.1007/s10919-011-0128-zURLpmid: 4072644
[54] Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. (2007). Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact. Neuropsychologia, 45( 1), 75-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.025URLpmid: 16797607
[55] Persike M., Meinhardt-Injac B., & Meinhardt G . ( 2013). The preview benefit for familiar and unfamiliar faces. Vision Research, 87, 1-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.05.005URLpmid: 23694681
[56] Quinn, K. A., & Macrae, C. N . ( 2011). The face and person perception: Insights from social cognition. British Journal of Psychology, 102( 4), 849-867.
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02030.xURLpmid: 21988388
[57] Raveh, D., & Lavie, N. (2015). Load-induced inattentional deafness. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77( 2), 483-492.
[58] Reddy L., Reddy L., & Koch C . ( 2006). Face identification in the near-absence of focal attention. Vision Research, 46( 15), 2336-2343.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.020URLpmid: 16542699
[59] Reddy L., Wilken P., & Koch C . ( 2004). Face-gender discrimination is possible in the near-absence of attention. Journal of Vision, 4( 2), 106-117.
doi: 10.1167/4.8.106URL
[60] Rellecke J., Bakirtas A. M., Sommer W., & Schacht A . ( 2011). Automaticity in attractive face processing: Brain potentials from a dual task. Neuroreport, 22( 14), 706-710.
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834a89adURL
[61] Rezlescu C., Penton T., Walsh V., Tsujimura H., Scott S. K., & Banissy M. J . ( 2015). Dominant voices and attractive faces: The contribution of visual and auditory information to integrated person impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 39( 4), 355-370.
doi: 10.1007/s10919-015-0214-8URL
[62] Santangelo, V., & Spence, C. (2008). Is the exogenous orienting of spatial attention truly automatic? Evidence from unimodal and multisensory studies. Consciousness and Cognition, 17( 3), 989-1015.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.02.006URLpmid: 18472279
[63] Sato, S., & Kawahara, J. I . ( 2015). Attentional capture by completely task-irrelevant faces. Psychological Research, 79( 4), 523-533.
doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0599-8URLpmid: 25030814
[64] Sato W., Yoshikawa S., Kochiyama T., & Matsumura M . ( 2004). The amygdala processes the emotional significance of facial expressions: An fMRI investigation using the interaction between expression and face direction. NeuroImage, 22( 2), 1006-1013.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.030URLpmid: 15193632
[65] Senju, A., & Johnson, M. H . ( 2009). The eye contact effect: Mechanisms and development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13( 3), 127-134.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.009URLpmid: 19217822
[66] Shipstead Z., Harrison T. L., & Engle R. W . ( 2012). Working memory capacity and visual attention: Top-down and bottom-up guidance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65( 3), 401-407.
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.655698URLpmid: 22404647
[67] Soares S. C., Rocha M., Neiva T., Rodrigues P., & Silva C. F . ( 2015). Social anxiety under load: The effects of perceptual load in processing emotional faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 479.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00479URLpmid: 4404732
[68] Sreenivasan K. K., Goldstein J. M., Lustig A. G., Rivas L. R., & Jha A. P . ( 2009). Attention to faces modulates early face processing during low but not high face discriminability. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71( 4), 837-846.
doi: 10.3758/APP.71.4.837URLpmid: 2854015
[69] Steffener J., Brickman A. M., Rakitin B. C., Gazes Y., & Stern Y . ( 2009). The impact of age-related changes on working memory functional activity. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 3( 2), 142-153.
doi: 10.1007/s11682-008-9056-xURLpmid: 19536354
[70] Valuch C., Pflüger L. S., Wallner B., Laeng B., & Ansorge U . ( 2015). Using eye tracking to test for individual differences in attention to attractive faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 42.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00042URLpmid: 25698993
[71] van Rullen, R. (2006). On second glance: Still no high-level pop-out effect for faces. Vision Research, 46( 18), 3017-3027.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.009URLpmid: 16125749
[72] Wang H., Sun P., Ip C., Zhao X., & Fu S . ( 2015). Configural and featural face processing are differently modulated by attentional resources at early stages: An event-related potential study with rapid serial visual presentation. Brain Research, 1602, 75-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.01.017URLpmid: 25601005
[73] Wiese H., Kloth N., Güllmar D., Reichenbach J. R., & Schweinberger S. R . ( 2012). Perceiving age and gender in unfamiliar faces: An fMRI study on face categorization. Brain and Cognition, 78( 2), 163-168.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.012URLpmid: 22104172
[74] Wirth B. E., Fisher K., Towler J., & Eimer M . ( 2015). Facial misidentifications arise from the erroneous activation of visual face memory. Neuropsychologia, 77, 387-399.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.021URL
[75] Xu S., Zhang S., & Geng H . ( 2011). Gaze-induced joint attention persists under high perceptual load and does not depend on awareness. Vision Research, 51( 18), 2048-2056.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.023URLpmid: 21840332
[76] Yang P., Wang M., Jin Z., & Li L . ( 2015). Visual short-term memory load modulates the early attention and perception of task-irrelevant emotional faces. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 490.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00490URLpmid: 4558536
[77] Yates A., Ashwin C., & Fox E . ( 2010). Does emotion processing require attention? The effects of fear conditioning and perceptual load. Emotion, 10( 6), 822-830.
doi: 10.1037/a0020325URLpmid: 21058839
[78] Yokoyama T., Ishibashi K., Hongoh Y., & Kita S . ( 2011). Attentional capture by change in direct gaze. Perception, 40( 7), 785-797.
doi: 10.1068/p7003URLpmid: 22128551
[79] Yokoyama T., Sakai H., Noguchi Y., & Kita S . ( 2014). Perception of direct gaze does not require focus of attention. Scientific Report, 4, 3858.
doi: 10.1038/srep03858URLpmid: 24618808




[1]何蔚祺, 李帅霞, 赵东方. 群体面孔情绪感知的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 761-772.
[2]贺则宇, 张紫琦, 李可轩, 何蔚祺. 空间频率影响恐惧面孔表情加工的神经通路[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 579-587.
[3]陈圣栋, 陈永强, 高伟, 罗利, 杨洁敏, 袁加锦. 认知加工的自动化现象:从二分法到渐进观[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1556-1563.
[4]程刚, 贾云丞, 丁芳媛, 张大均, 陈加, 龙女. 表情对婴儿面孔图式效应的调节及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(5): 761-772.
[5]黄欢, 刘博, 周晨琛, 姬鸣. 前瞻记忆意图后效中执行错误的机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(9): 1600-1607.
[6]荆伟, 刘仔琴. 孤独症者面孔加工中眼部注视不足, 是回避还是忽视?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 476-487.
[7]王昊, 杨志刚. 面孔空想性错视及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 1952-1960.
[8]郝艳斌, 王福兴, 谢和平, 安婧, 王玉鑫, 刘华山. 自闭症谱系障碍者的面孔加工特点——眼动研究的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(1): 26-41.
[9]李帅霞;李萍; 王伟; 何蔚祺;罗文波. 基于眼部线索的面孔表情加工及神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(2): 221-229.
[10]张琪;尹天子;冉光明. 动态面孔表情优势效应的心理机制及神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(9): 1514-1522.
[11]魏柳青;张学民. 多身份追踪中基于范畴的分组效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(9): 1383-1392.
[12]李晓白;朱棋;刘嘉. 行为遗传学:解决面孔特异性问题争论的新思[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(2): 284-293.
[13]徐岩,张亚旭,周晓林. 面孔加工的认知神经科学研究:回顾与展望[J]. 心理科学进展, 2003, 11(1): 35-43.
[14]李健;朱祖祥. 错觉性结合现象研究的方法:对注意的直接操纵[J]. 心理科学进展, 1999, 7(2): 1-6.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4336
相关话题/心理 科学 神经 面孔 信息

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 语言认知神经科学研究中的脑沟形态分析 *
    崔新1,苏萌萌2,舒华1()1北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京1008752首都师范大学初等教育学院,北京100048收稿日期:2017-02-22出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:舒华E-mail:shuhua@bnu.edu.cn基金资助:* ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 喜欢悲伤音乐的心理机制 *
    王丁,王超,李红()深圳大学心理与社会学院,深圳518060收稿日期:2017-05-23出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:李红E-mail:lihongszu@szu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31671150);广东省普通高校创新团队建设项 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基本心理需要及其满足 *
    吴才智(),荣硕,朱芳婷,谌燕,郭永玉青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,华中师范大学心理学院,人的发展与心理健康湖北省重点实验室,武汉430079收稿日期:2017-10-17出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:吴才智E-mail:dsxq888@126.com ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 光照对社会心理和行为的影响 *
    陈庆伟1,2,汝涛涛2(),周菊燕1,李静华1,熊晓1,李笑然4,周国富2,3,4()1华南师范大学心理学院,光与身心健康研究中心,广州5106312华南师范大学,国家绿色光电子国际联合研究中心,广州5100063华南师范大学,华南先进光电子研究院,广东省光信息材料与技术重点实验室&彩色动态电子纸显 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 大数据时代心理学文本分析技术 ——“主题模型”的应用
    曹奔1;夏勉1;任志洪2,3;林秀彬1;徐升1;赖丽足1;王琪1;江光荣1(1华中师范大学心理学院暨湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室,青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,武汉430079)(2福州大学应用心理学系,福州350108)(3DepartmentofCounselingPsycholo ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 定制化信息对家庭节能行为决策过程影响的追踪研究
    王建明1;孙彦2(1浙江财经大学工商管理学院,杭州310018)(2中国科学院行为科学重点实验室,中国科学院心理研究所,北京100101)收稿日期:2017-04-17出版日期:2018-04-15发布日期:2018-02-27通讯作者:王建明,E-mail:sjwjm@qq.comE-mail:E ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 目标导向−习惯学习系统的神经机制
    董晨杰1;梁晶晶1;董玉媛2;郑钟艳1;彭子文3(1华南师范大学心理学院,广州510631)(2重庆师范大学教育科学学院,重庆401331)(3深圳市精神卫生中心/深圳市康宁医院儿少精神科,深圳518020)收稿日期:2017-05-01出版日期:2018-04-15发布日期:2018-02-28通 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 心理学视角下的人生目标
    王彤;黄希庭(西南大学心理学部,重庆400715)收稿日期:2017-07-24出版日期:2018-04-15发布日期:2018-02-28通讯作者:黄希庭,E-mail:xthuang@swu.edu.cnE-mail:E-mail:xthuang@swu.edu.cn基金资助:重庆市人文社会科学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 汉字阅读的语义神经回路及其与语音回路的协作机制
    杨剑峰;党敏;张瑞;王小娟(陕西省行为与认知神经科学重点实验室,陕西师范大学心理学院,西安710062)收稿日期:2017-06-13出版日期:2018-03-15发布日期:2018-01-31通讯作者:杨剑峰,E-mail:yangjf@snnu.edu.cnE-mail:E-mail:yangj ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • Gamma神经振荡和信息整合加工
    钱浩悦;黄逸慧;高湘萍(上海师范大学教育学院心理系,上海200234)收稿日期:2017-01-10出版日期:2018-03-15发布日期:2018-01-31通讯作者:高湘萍,E-mail:gaoxp@shnu.edu.cnE-mail:E-mail:gaoxp@shnu.edu.cn基金资助:G ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01