HTML
--> --> --> -->3.1. Characteristics of the C-mode in the reanalysis data
3.1.1. Atmospheric features of the C-modeFigure 1 displays the first two leading EOF patterns of tropical Pacific surface wind anomalies in different reanalysis products. The datasets show considerable agreement with one another. The first EOF pattern (EOF1) is characterized by a meridionally quasi-symmetric wind distribution with equatorial westerly anomalies over the western-central Pacific, which describes the anomalous Walker circulation associated with ENSO (Figs. 1a, c, e and g). The second EOF mode (EOF2) exhibits a meridionally antisymmetric circulation with a distinct anomalous Northwest Pacific anticyclone and southward shift of the equatorial central-Pacific westerly wind anomalies (Figs. 1b, d, f and h), which is the characteristic atmospheric response to the C-mode (Stuecker et al., 2013, 2015b).
Figure1. The leading two EOF spatial patterns of tropical Pacific surface wind anomalies (units: m s-1) for (a, b) NCEP-NCAR, (c, d) NCEP-DOE, (e, f) ERA-40 and (g, h) 20CR. Shading indicates the regressed zonal wind anomalies. Percentages of variance explained by the EOF patterns are given in parentheses.
The PC time series are also highly correlated among the different reanalysis datasets (Fig. 2). The correlation coefficient of the PCs between each dataset and the NCEP-NCAR data is higher than 0.9, except for the PC2 between ERA-40 and NCEP-NCAR, which still reaches 0.84. Hereinafter, we use the NCEP-NCAR reanalysis data to validate the model simulation of the C-mode atmospheric variability.
Figure2. (a) PC1 and (b) PC2 in different reanalysis datasets. Numbers after the colon are the correlation coefficients between each dataset and the NCEP-NCAR reanalysis.
Figure3. (a) PC1 and Ni?o3.4 index for the reanalysis; (b) PC1cos and PC2 for the reanalysis. PC2 and Ni?o3.4 indices for models at (c) N96, (e) N216 and (g) N512. PC1 and PC2cos for models at (d) N96, (f) N216 and (h) N512. Correlation coefficients between two curves are given in the top right.
The PC1 time series is highly correlated (r=0.85) with the Ni?o3.4 index (Fig. 3a), further verifying that EOF1 captures the main ENSO mode in the reanalysis. To better understand the relationship between the ENSO mode and the combination mode, we followed (Stuecker et al., 2013) to utilize a theoretical approximation to the C-mode time series by multiplying PC1 by a sinusoidal function with the annual cycle; that is, $$ {\rm PC1cos}={\rm PC1}_{\rm obs}(t)\times \cos(\omega_at-\varphi) . $$
The ωa in this equation denotes the angular frequency of the annual cycle, t denotes time and φ represents a one-month shift. This time series represents the combination tones of the ENSO signal and the annual cycle by its mathematical nature. In the reanalysis, PC1cos shows remarkable agreement with the observed PC2 (Fig. 3b). The correlation coefficient is 0.63.
To further understand the combination tones, we calculate the power density spectra for both the PC1 and PC2 time series in the reanalysis (Fig. 4a). The spectrum for PC1 exhibits pronounced levels of variability, mostly in the interannual period band of 2-8 years, while PC2 exhibits a significant spectral peak at a period of ~15 months and a weaker one at ~10 months. Actually, these two peaks align well with the two shifted frequency bands of ENSO-annual cycle combination tones, which is the sum tone as 1+f E and the difference tone as 1-f E, where f E denotes the ENSO characteristic interannual frequency band.
Figure4. Spectra curves of PC1 (blue) and PC2 (red), where the dashed lines indicate the statistical significance at the 95% confidence level. Grey rectangles indicate the near-annual combination tone frequency bands.
3.1.2. Asymmetric SST response of the C-mode
Besides the surface atmospheric response of the C-mode, the nonlinear processes in the ocean-atmosphere coupled system may also result in combination tones in oceanic variables (Jin et al., 1994; Stein et al., 2014). (Zhang et al., 2016b) pointed out the Ni?o-A index can capture the SST response to the C-mode very well. Figure 5 demonstrates the SST anomalies and 850-hPa horizontal wind anomalies regressed onto the Ni?o3.4 and Ni?o-A indices in different observational datasets. The spatial SST distribution related to ENSO is characterized as a meridionally symmetrical SSTA pattern (Figs. 5a, c and e). Also, the Ni?o-A index-associated SST anomaly pattern exhibits negative SST anomalies over the northern central tropical Pacific and positive SST anomalies over the southwestern and southeastern tropical Pacific (Figs. 5b, d and f), which exhibits a very similar structure to the forced C-mode SST pattern (Zhang et al., 2016b). The anomalous anticyclone over northwestern Pacific can be seen more clearly in the 850-hPa wind field. The results of different observational datasets also show great similarity. We use the HadISST dataset to validate the model simulation of the C-mode oceanic variability afterwards.
Figure5. SST (contours; units: K) and 850-hPa wind (vectors; units: m s-1) anomalies regressed onto the Ni?o3.4 (left panels) and Ni?o-A (right panels) indices for (a, b) HadISST, (c, d) ERSST and (e, f) OISST data. Black dots represent the 99% confidence level of the SST. Only regions with at least either of the two components of wind at the 95% confidence level are shown.
Figure6. (a) PC2 (NCEP-NCAR dataset) and standardized Ni?o-A (HadISST dataset) indices for the observation. (b-d) PC1 and standardized Ni?o-A indices for model outputs. Correlation coefficients between two curves are given in the top right.
The Ni?o-A index is highly correlated with the PC2 in the reanalysis data (Fig. 6a), verifying it represents the oceanic features of the C-mode. The spectral analysis indicates that the Ni?o3.4 index spectrum shows a significant 2-8-year peak, and the Ni?o-A index peaks at combination tone periods of ~10 months and ~15 months (Fig. 7a), which is in agreement with Fig. 4. This implies the Ni?o-A index also exhibits the combination tone frequency based on the ENSO period and the annual cycle.
Figure7. Spectra curves of standardized Ni?o3.4 (blue) and Ni?o-A (red) for the observation and model results. Dashed lines indicate the statistical significance at the 95% confidence level.
2
3.2. Simulated C-mode in different model resolutions Simulated spatial patterns of the C-mode
If we compare the first two leading EOFs simulated by HadGEM3 (Fig. 8) with the corresponding patterns in the reanalysis (Fig. 1), they show significantly different spatial distributions. Unlike the equatorially symmetric EOF1 in the reanalysis, the EOF1 patterns in all three versions of the model exhibit remarkable meridionally antisymmetric structures, with strong shear of anomalous zonal wind across the equator, which bears great resemblance to the EOF2 pattern in the reanalysis, although the anomalous Philippine anticyclones in the models are weaker than in the reanalysis. Meanwhile, the EOF2 patterns in the models show a meridionally symmetric feature, resembling the EOF1 rather than the EOF2 pattern in the reanalysis.Figure8. The leading two EOF spatial patterns of tropical Pacific surface wind anomalies (units: m s-1) for HadleyGEM3 with different resolutions of (a, b) N96, (c, d) N216 and (e, f) N512. Shading indicates the regressed zonal wind anomalies. Percentages of variance explained by the EOF patterns are given in parentheses.
Figure9. SST (contours; units: K) and 850-hPa wind (vectors; units: m s-1) anomalies regressed onto the Ni?o3.4 (left panels) and Ni?o-A indices (right panels) for the model results at three resolutions. Black dots represent the 99% confidence level of the SST. Only regions with at least either of the two components of wind at the 95% confidence level are shown.
This reversed similarity relationship can be more directly seen in Table 1. The pattern correlation coefficients of the same EOF patterns between the models and the NCEP-NCAR reanalysis are very low, with an absolute value of ~0.25 in the case of EOF2. On the other hand, they get much higher when we switch the order of the compared observed EOF. The correlation coefficient between the N96-simulated EOF2 and the observed EOF1 can reach 0.79, and it becomes slightly lower as the resolution gets higher. Moreover, models with better ability to reproduce the ENSO mode can also simulate the C-mode spatial pattern more realistically, which is in accordance with the CMIP5 results (Ren et al., 2016). The results indicate that HadGEM3 can capture the spatial structures of the ENSO mode and the C-mode in the surface wind field. However, it tends to emphasize the C-mode component too much, such that the C-mode turns into the dominant pattern in the tropical Pacific surface wind variability, instead of the ENSO mode as in the reanalysis.
3.2.1. Simulated combination tone features
As mentioned above, the ENSO mode in the simulation is represented by EOF2 instead of EOF1; thus, we compare the PC2 in the simulation with the Ni?o3.4 indices. They agree with each other well, with correlation coefficients around 0.5 in all three simulations (Figs. 3c, e and g). The correlation coefficients grow slightly higher as the model resolution gets higher, which is opposite to the spatial pattern trend (Table 1).
For the model theoretical approximation to the C-mode time series, a similar method was applied, except we used PC2 as the ENSO signal and the theoretical C-mode signal was PC2cos. The PC1s are also well correlated with the theoretical C-mode time series (Figs. 3d, f and h). The middle resolution (N216) model shows the best performance, with the correlation coefficient reaching 0.41. However, the spectra of the first two leading PCs in the model simulation are difficult to distinguish from each other (Figs. 4b, c and d). The ENSO signal (PC2) peaks around the 2-8-year period bands, but also exhibits high-frequency signals, especially at the 1-f E frequency band. This is notable in the left-hand panel of Fig. 3, in which the PC2s contain detectable high-frequency variability compared with either the PC1 in the reanalysis or the Ni?o3.4 indices in the simulation. The combination tones (PC1) can capture the 1-f E and 1+f E frequency peaks well, but they also show a significant peak in the ENSO mode characteristic low-frequency band, which is not the case in the reanalysis (Fig. 4a).
3.2.2. Asymmetric SST response of the C-mode in the simulation
Figure 9 demonstrates the SST anomalies and 850-hPa horizontal wind anomalies regressed onto the Ni?o3.4 and Ni?o-A indices in the simulations. All three configurations of the model can capture the spatial SST distribution related to the ENSO mode and the C-mode very well, although the C-mode-related warm center over the eastern Pacific is stronger and extends to the central Pacific compared to the observation. The Ni?o-A index is highly correlated with the PC1s in the model simulations (Figs. 6b-d). The correlation coefficients get higher as the resolution gets higher, which reaches 0.78 in the N512 simulation. This is similar to the relationship between the Ni?o3.4 index and PC2 in the simulation, as illustrated in the left-hand panel of Fig. 3. This implies that, for both the ENSO mode and C-mode, the atmospheric responses (PCs) are more consistent with the oceanic responses (Ni?o indices) as the model resolution gets finer.
We also investigate the power spectra of the Ni?o3.4 and Ni?o-A indices in the simulations (Figs. 7b-d). In agreement with Fig. 4, the simulated Ni?o3.4 and Ni?o-A spectra show a similar performance to PC1 and PC2; the peak frequency bands are overlapped, and therefore they are not easily distinguishable from each other.
3.2.3. Possible mechanism of the model misrepresentation
The C-mode emerges from the nonlinear interaction between the ENSO mode and the annual cycle background. It plays an important role in ENSO's phase-lock feature by being responsible for the sudden weakening and southward shift of equatorial westerly anomalies during the termination process of strong El Ni?o events (Stuecker et al., 2013). We evaluate the phase relationship between PC1 and PC2 by compositing the PCs with respect to the annual cycle evolution for the El Ni?o events selected by the Ni?o3.4 indices of each dataset (Fig. 10). The PC1s of the simulations are able to generally capture the temporal evolution of the C-mode index represented by PC2 in the reanalysis. However, the rapid phase switch around late winter in the reanalysis is not reproduced by the models. As the ENSO mode itself is concerned, the PC2s in the models show a shift in the peak time by about three months compared to the reanalysis. The performance of the middle resolution (N216) model is relatively better, of which the PC1 also matches the theoretical C-mode the best (Fig. 3f). This implies that the unrealistic periodic characteristic of the C-mode in the simulation is partly attributable to the distorted ENSO evolution. Therefore, improving the performance of the ENSO signal period in models is crucial to better simulating the C-mode.
Figure10. Climatological annual evolution of the zonal mean (between 160°E and 160°W) precipitation (units: mm d-1) from the CMAP dataset and the model simulation.
Previous studies have pointed out the southward shift of zonal surface wind anomalies is attributable to the meridional seasonal march of western Pacific background warm SSTs and corresponding intensification of the SPCZ due to the seasonal evolution of solar insolation (Harrison and Vecchi, 1999; Spencer, 2004; Lengaigne et al., 2006; McGregor et al., 2012). The reduced climatological wind speed related to the SPCZ intensification leads to anomalous boundary layer Ekman pumping and a reduced surface momentum damping of the combined boundary layer/lower-troposphere surface wind response to El Ni?o, which allows the associated zonal wind anomalies to shift south of the equator (McGregor et al., 2012). Besides, (Ham and Kug, 2014) used CMIP3 and CMIP5 archives to reveal that the climatological mean precipitation over the central/eastern Pacific ITCZ plays an important role in ENSO phase transition by affecting the location of the ENSO-related convection and the wind stress. Figure 11 displays the climatological annual evolution of the precipitation over the central Pacific. The models simulate excessive mean precipitation over the ITCZ through late spring to winter. Also, the SPCZ intensification starts in October in the simulation, while in the observation it occurs in winter. The unrealistic simulation of the climatological precipitation over the central Pacific could be a factor in the relatively poor representation of the ENSO phase-lock (Fig. 10), and affects the C-mode dynamic process by providing a distorted annual cycle background.
Figure11. PC1 (solid) and PC2 (dashed) composites of the El Ni?o events for the reanalysis and the model results. In the composite, year(0) denotes the developing phase and year(1) the decaying phase.
2
3.3. Simulated C-mode climate impacts on East Asian rainfall
Previous studies have indicated the C-mode is essential to the linkage between the East Asian climate and ENSO (Li et al., 2016a; Zhang et al., 2016a, 2016b), especially the Yangtze River summer rainfall (Zhang et al., 2016b). Taking the C-mode signal into consideration could improve the predictability of the summer precipitation in El Ni?o events. We use the middle resolution (N216) results as an example to check the ability of HadGEM3 to reproduce this connection between the East Asian summer rainfall and ENSO (Fig. 12). Figure 12a demonstrates the average precipitation anomalies in the decaying summer (June-July-August) of the two strongest El Ni?o events in the N216 simulation, with increased rainfall over the Yangtze River Valley and decreased rainfall over the southeast of China. Using the Ni?o3.4 index alone can only reconstruct a small fraction of the precipitation anomaly (Fig. 12b). Including the Ni?o-A index can significantly improve the rainfall reconstruction, especially over the Yangtze River Valley. Therefore, this linkage is reproducible in HadGEM3, which gives us a suggested method to improve the prediction of East Asian summer precipitation associated with ENSO when applying the model outputs.Figure12. (a) Precipitation anomalies during the decaying summer of the two strongest El Ni?o events in the N216 simulation. Reconstruction of precipitation anomalies using linear regression with (b) Ni?o3.4 index, (c) Ni?o-A index, and (d) both Ni?o3.4 and Ni?o-A indices. Units: mm d-1.