知识产权区域穷尽原则及其适用条件
严桂珍; 1: 同济大学法政学院 摘要(Abstract)：

知识产权区域穷尽原则的适用是有条件的。欧洲法院(ECJ)通过对《欧洲经济共同体条约》第28条和30条进行解释而确定了区域穷尽原则的适用条件是,欧共体的权利人或经权利人同意的第三人将知识产权产品投放在欧共体市场内。当然,一个知识产权产品是否投放在欧共体市场内,则应依不同情形而定。

关键词(KeyWords)： 权利穷尽;;区域穷尽原则;;权利人;;欧共体

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 严桂珍;

Email:


参考文献(References)： [1]Case78/70Deutsche Grammophon v Metro SB[1971]ECR487.[2]See Christopher Stothers:Parallel Trade in Europe-Intellectual Property,Competition and Rrgulatory Law.Oxford and Portland,Oregon2007/43.[3]Case15/74,Centrafarm BV and Another v Sterling Drug,Inc.[1]董桂文:《贸易自由化下的平行进口法律规制研究》,http://lsg.cnki.net/grid20/detail.aspx QueryID=18&CurRec=1最后上网日期:2007年9月28日。[2]Kipling v.GB Unic,Benelux Court of Justice,6Dec.1999.[3]Glaxo Group v.Kohlpharma,Oberlandesgericht,Hamburg,20Mar.2003.[4]Glaxo Group v.Dowelhurst[2003]EWHC2015(Ch);[2004]EWCACiv290.[1]See Christopher Stothers:Parallel Trade in Europe-Intellectual Property,Competition and Rrgulatory Law.Oxford and Portland,Oregon2007/46.[2]Case C-16/03Peak Holding v Axolin-Elinor[2004]ECR I-11313.[1]See Christopher Stothers:Parallel Trade in Europe-Intellectual Property,Competition and Rrgulatory Law.Oxford and Portland,Oregon2007/47.[2]See Christopher Stothers:Parallel Trade in Europe-Intellectual Property,Competition and Rrgulatory Law.Oxford and Portland,Oregon2007/61.[1]Case192/73Van Zuylen Freres v Hag(Hag1)[1974]ECR731.[2]Case C-10/89CNL-SUCAL v Hag(HagII)[1990]ECR1-3711.[3]Case C9/93IHTInternationale Heiztechnik v Ideal Standard[1994]ECR1-2789.[1]See Christopher Heath.Legal Concepts of Exhaustion and Parallel Imports.Parallel Imports in Asia.Editor Christopher Heath2004Kluw-er Law International/14.[2]See Christopher Stothers:Parallel Trade in Europe-Intellectual Property,Competition and Rrgulatory Law.Oxford and Portland,Oregon2007/70.[1]尹新天:《专利权的保护》,知识产权出版社2005年版。