系、所：英语系职称：讲师
办公室：外语中心703
邮箱：wesleyxmj@njtech.edu.cn

教育背景
文学博士（浙江大学，2018）
文学硕士（安徽师范大学，2008）
大学本科（安徽师范大学，2005）

研究专长
认知语言学；语篇分析

主要科研项目

在研南京工业大学“青年社科基金”项目(2018-2020) :“《庄于》与柏拉图《对话录》中哲学对话的比较认知修辞学研究”，入选2019年江苏省“双创计划”双创博士(世界名校类，高校创新)




代表性成果
[1] Xiang, M. (2015). Review of Esther Pascual: Fictive interaction: The conversation frame in thought, language, and discourse. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(4), 709-716. (SSCI, A&HCI)
[2] Xiang, M., & Pascual, E. (2016). Debate with Zhuangzi: Expository questions as fictive interaction blends in an old Chinese text. Pragmatics, 26(1), 137-162. (SSCI, A&HCI)
[3] Xiang, M. (2016). Real, imaginary, or fictive? Philosophical dialogues in an early Daoist text and its pictorial version. In Esther Pascual & Sergeiy Sandler (Eds.), The Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction (pp. 63-86). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[4] Xu, J., & Xiang, M. (2019). Review of Blending technologies in second language classrooms, Palgrave Macmillan, Don Hinkelman. London, England (2018), Pp. Xxxii + 407. System, 81, 216-218. (SSCI)
[5] Xiang, M., & Ma, B. (2020). How can I persuade you without making self-assertions? A cognitive rhetorical analysis of the use of fictive questions in an early Daoist text. In Vera da Silva Sinha, Ana Moreno-Nú?ez, & Zhen Tian (Eds.), Language, Thought and Identity - Signs of Life (pp. 249–273). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[6] 林美珍、项名健、马博森.(2020).《自闭症谱系障碍语言创新性研究》述介.当代语言学(2),303-307. (CSSCI)
[7] Xiang, M., Pascual, E., & Ma, B. (2021). Who’s speaking for whom? Rhetorical questions as intersubjective mixed viewpoint constructions in an early Daoist text. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 22(2). (SSCI, A&HCI)


国际会议论文
[1] Real, imaginary, or fictive? Philosophical dialogues in an early Daoist text and its pictorial version presented at The Conversation Frame Expert Workshop, 5-6 June 2014, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
[2] Who’s reading? Rhetorical questions as intersubjective mixed viewpoint constructions in an old Chinese text presented at the 5th UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 29-31 July 2014, Lancaster University, UK and the 2nd Fictive Interaction Symposium, 2-3 April 2015, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA.
[3] Translating the invisible: Fictive questions in an Old Chinese text and its English translations presented at the 13th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 20-25 July 2015, Northumbria University, UK.
[4] Xiang, M. How can I persuade you? A cognitive rhetorical analysis of the use of fictive questions in an old Chinese text presented at the 7th International Conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association (DGKL/GCLA), 5-7 October 2016, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany.
[5] Xiang, M. & E. Pascual. Can rhetorical questions have matched polarity? Evidence from classical Chinese presented at the 15th International Pragmatics Conference, 16-21 July 2017, Belfast, UK.
[6] Xiang, M. Who’s speaking? Rhetorical questions as intersubjective mixed viewpoint constructions in an early Daoist text presented at the 4th International Conference on Figurative Thought and Language, 23-26 October 2018, Braga, Portugal.
[7] Xiang, M. & A. Bonifazi. The form is the message: A comparative cognitive rhetorical study of the philosophical dialogues by Zhuangzi and Plato presented at the Polish Cognitive Linguistics Association Conference 2019, 26-28 September 2019, Bialystok, Poland.


获奖情况
[1]浙江大学第四届学生人文社会科学研究优秀成果奖 研究生优秀成果特等奖
[2]南京工业大学2020届本科毕业论文优秀指导教师





关闭 打印




联系我们


Copyright?2016 高校模板 博达软件 版权所有