高珂^1,,
朱荣¹,
邹华^1,2,
程子波¹
1.江南大学环境与土木工程学院，无锡 214122
2.江苏省水处理技术与材料协同创新中心，苏州 215009
基金项目: 江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目（SJCX18_0639）
国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFE0123600）

Remediation of Pb, Cd, Cu contaminated soil by ultrasonic-enhanced leaching

GAO Ke^1,,
ZHU Rong¹,
ZOU Hua^1,2,
CHENG Zibo¹
1.School of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
2.Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Technology and Material of Water Treatment, Suzhou 215009, China

-->

摘要
HTML全文
图(0)表(0)
参考文献(36)
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件(0)
访问统计

摘要:针对传统淋洗法修复土壤中重金属效率较低的问题，研究了超声强化淋洗技术以提高重金属去除率。以铅（Pb）、镉（Cd）、铜（Cu）为目标污染物，在0.05 mol·L-1柠檬酸、0.05 mol·L-1EDTA和0.05 mol·L-1皂角苷作为淋洗剂条件下，使用传统振荡、超声强化以及超声波加振荡3种不同的作用方式，对Pb、Cd、Cu的去除率进行比较，并对3种不同淋洗方式后Pb、Cd、Cu的形态变化进行了探讨。结果表明，当使用柠檬酸和皂角苷作为淋洗剂进行振荡淋洗时，重金属洗脱效果不理想。超声对于强化柠檬酸洗脱效果并不明显，而对于强化皂角苷洗脱重金属效果明显，平均去除率提高了120.47%。当淋洗剂为EDTA时，土壤样品在传统振荡2 h作用下，对Pb、Cd、Cu的去除率依次为50.33%、76.65%和47.35%，而在超声波30 min条件下对Pb、Cd、Cu的去除率依次为82.19%、83.31%和53.89%，平均去除率高出28.60%，可显著提高重金属去除率，缩短淋洗时间。但超声波30 min加传统振荡2 h相较于单纯超声强化效果提升不明显。通过对比3种淋洗方式后土壤中的Pb、Cd、Cu形态发现，酸可提取态的重金属在超声强化作用后有明显降低，同时超声强化对于铁锰氧化物结合态、有机物结合态和残渣态也具有较好的去除能力。因此，超声强化在化学淋洗中的应用具有一定的可行性，是一种简单、极快速去除污染场地中重金属Pb、Cd、Cu的增效手段。
关键词: 超声强化化学淋洗/
传统化学淋洗/
土壤修复/
Pb、Cd、Cu复合污染/
重金属形态分析

Abstract:This study was undertaken to investigate an efficient soil remediation. A conventional vibrating experiment and an ultrasound-enhanced experiment were conducted to study the ultrasound enhancement of removal and morphological changes of heavy metals during the leaching process. Heavy mental leaching experiments were conducted by using deionized water, 0.05 mol·L-1citric acid, 0.05 mol·L-1 ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid(EDTA) and 0.05 mol·L-1saponin under three different conditions(conventional vibrating, ultrasound and ultrasound- vibrating). The removal efficiency of Pb, Cd and Cu was compared and the variation of Pb, Cd and Cu speciation was further explored． The results showed that by means of leaching with citric acid and saponin is not effective. There is weak influence of ultrasound on citric acid, while the effect of saponin was obvious, by which the average removal rate was increased by 120.47%. When leaching with 0.05 mol·L-1 EDTA, the removal rate of Pb, Cd and Cu were 50.33%, 76.65% and 47.35%, respectively under the condition of conventional vibrating for 2 h while the removal efficiency of Pb, Cd and Cu were 82.19%, 83.31% and 53.89%, respectively under 30 min ultrasound-enhanced condition, with the average efficiency higher by 28.60%. Ultrasound-enhanced chemical leaching can improve the removal efficiency and reduce leaching time significantly. However, the removal of 30 min ultrasound compound 2 h conventional vibrating is not obviously increased when compared with the simple 30 min ultrasound leaching. By comparing the speciation distribution of the three washing methods, it was found that the acid extractable content decreased a lot after 30 min ultrasound. Ultrasound leaching also showed a more efficient reduction effect of the Fe-Mn reducible form, organic bounded form and the residual form. Hence, it is feasible to improve the washing efficiency of heavy metal contained in soil by conducting the cleaning process with the help of ultrasonic wave, which is a simple and fast method to remove Pb, Cd and Cu from contaminated soil.
Key words:ultrasound-enhanced chemical leaching/
conventional chemical leaching/
soil remediation/
Pb, Cd, Cu combined pollution/
heavy metal speciation analysis.

[1]	崔锐, 吕伟明, 刘广明, 等. 重金属污染土壤的螯合诱导植物修复技术研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报,2009,26(2):69-73
[2]	环境保护部.全国污染状况调查公报[R]. 北京:国土资源部,2014
[3]	HAN N, AGUSA T, RAMU K, et al.Contamination by trace elements at e-waste recycling sites in Bangalore, India[J].Chemosphere,2009,76(1):9-15 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.05
[4]	BISSCHOP L, WALLE G V.Environmental Victimisation and Conflict Resolution: A Case Study Of E-Waste[M].Palgrave Macmillan UK: Emerging Issues in Green Criminology， 2013:34-54 10.1057/9781137273994_3
[5]	于敏. 电子废物拆解区土壤生态风险研究[D]. 广州:华南理工大学,2010
[6]	王向健, 郑玉峰, 赫冬青. 重金属污染土壤修复技术现状与展望[J]. 环境保护科学,2004,30(2):48-49
[7]	崔德杰, 张玉龙. 土壤重金属污染现状与修复技术研究进展[J]. 土壤通报,2004,35(3):366-370
[8]	BOLAN N, KUNHIKRISHNAN A, THANGARAJAN R, et al.Remediation of heavy metal(loid)s contaminated soils：To mobilize or to immobilize?[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014,266(4):141-166 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.018
[9]	NALINIP P, CHANDRA P S.Effect of heavy metals Co2+ , Ni2+ and Cd2+ on growth and metabolism of cabbage[J].Plant Science,2002,163(4):753-758 10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00210-8
[10]	吕晓男, 孟赐福, 麻万诸. 重金属与土壤环境质量及食物安全问题研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2007,15(2):197-200
[11]	GITIPOUR S, AHMADI S, MADADIAN E, et al.Soil washing of chromium and cadmium-contaminated sludge using acids and ethylenediaminetetra acetic acid chelating agent[J].Environmental Technology,2016,37(1):145-151 1080/09593330.2011.597784
[12]	PICHTEL J, VINE B, KUULA-VAISANEN P, et al.Lead extraction from soils as affected by lead chemical and mineral forms[J].Environmental Engineering Science,2001,18(2):91-98 10.1089/10928750151132276
[13]	高国龙, 张望, 周连碧, 等. 重金属污染土壤化学淋洗技术进展[J]. 有色金属工程,2013,3(1):49-52
[14]	吴烈善, 吕宏虹, 苏翠翠,等. 环境友好型淋洗剂对重金属污染土壤的修复效果[J]. 环境工程学报,2014,8(10):4486-4491
[15]	MAO X, RUI J, WEI X, et al.Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: A review[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2015,285:419 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.009
[16]	KAZI T G, JAMALI M K, SIDDIQUI A, et al.An ultrasonic assisted extraction method to release heavy metals from untreated sewage sludge samples[J].Chemosphere,2006,63(3):411-420 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.08.056
[17]	AL-MEREY R, Al-MASRI M S, BOZOU R.Cold ultrasonic acid extraction of copper, lead and zinc from soil samples[J].Analytica Chimica Acta,2002,452(1):143-148 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01431-3
[18]	JI J B, LU X H, XU Z C.Effect of ultrasound on adsorption of geniposide on polymeric resin[J].Ultrasonics Sonochemistry,2006,13(5):463-470 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2005.08.004
[19]	吕青松, 蒋煜峰, 杨帆, 等. 重金属污染土壤淋洗技术研究进展[J]. 甘肃农业科技,2010(3):33-37
[20]	HAMDAOUI O, NAFFRECHOUX E.Adsorption kinetics of 4-chlorophenol onto granular activated carbon in the presence of high frequency ultrasound[J].Ultrasonics Sonochemistry,2009,16(1):15-22 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.05.100
[21]	ELIK A.Ultrasonic-assisted leaching of trace metals from sediments as a function of pH[J].Talanta,2007,71(2):790-794 10.1080/03067310290024085
[22]	ARAIN M B, KAZI T G, JAMALI M K, et al.Speciation of heavy metals in sediment by conventional, ultrasound and microwave assisted single extraction methods: a comparison with modified sequential extraction procedure[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,154(1/2/3):998-1006 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.004
[23]	EMMA FERNANDEZ C, MARIA LUISA A, FLORA ALONSO V.Simultaneous adsorption of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn by different soils[J].International Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment,2004,2(3):244-250 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.108
[24]	高彦鑫, 冯金国, 唐磊, 等. 密云水库上游金属矿区土壤中重金属形态分布及风险评价[J]. 环境科学,2012,33(5):1707-1717
[25]	朱光旭, 郭庆军, 杨俊兴, 等. 淋洗剂对多金属污染尾矿土壤的修复效应及技术研究[J]. 环境科学,2013,34(9):3690-3696
[26]	YOUNGGYU S, JIHOON C, MYUNGEHEE L, et al.Comparison of ultrasonic and conventional mechanical soil-washing processes for diesel-contaminated sand[J].Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,2011,50(4):60-64 10.1021/ie1016688
[27]	TIMOTHY J M.Sonochemistry and the environment?providing a “green” link between chemistry, physics and engineering[J].Ultrasonics Sonochemistry,2007,14(4):476-483 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2006.10.008
[28]	ZHAO Y, MAO G, HU H, et al.Effects of EDTA and EDDS on heavy metal activation and accumulation of metals by soybean in alkaline soil[J].Journal of Soil Contamination,2015,24(4):353-367 10.1080/15320383.2015.962125
[29]	NEILSON J W, ARTIOLA J F, MAIER R.M.Characterization of lead removal from contaminated soils by nontoxic soil-washing agents[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2003,32(3):899-908
[30]	刘霞, 王建涛, 张萌, 等. 螯合剂和生物表面活性剂对Cu、Pb污染塿土的淋洗修复[J]. 环境科学,2013,34(4):1590-1597
[31]	NEMAN A P, LORIMER J P, MASON T J, et al.An investigation into the ultrasonic treatment of polluted solids[J].Ultrasonics Sonochemistry,1997,4(2):153-156 10.1016/S1350-4177(97)00020-5
[32]	BISONE S, FRANCOIS J B, DROGUI P, et al.Toxic metal removal from polluted soil by acid extraction[J].Water，Air & Soil Pollution,2012,223(7):3739-3755 10.1007/s11270-012-1145-1
[33]	LI L, ZHAI L, ZHANG X, et al.Recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries by ultrasonic-assisted leaching process[J].Journal of Power Sources,2014,262:380-385 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.013
[34]	杨元根, PATERSOLN E, CAMPBLL C. 城市土壤中重金属元素的积累及其微生物效应 [J]. 环境科学,2001,22(3):44-48
[35]	吴新民, 潘根兴. 影响城市土壤重金属污染因子的关联度分析[J]. 土壤学报,2003,40(6):921-928
[36]	LI X D, SHEN Z G, WAI W H, et al.Chemical forms of Pb, Zn and Cu in the sediment profiles of the Pearl River Estuary[J].Marine Pollution Bulletin,2001,42(3):215-223 10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00145-4

PDF下载( 7891 KB)XML下载导出引用Turn off MathJax -->
点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:875
HTML全文浏览数:605
PDF下载数:156
施引文献:0

出版历程

刊出日期:2018-08-17

---

-->

超声强化淋洗修复Pb、Cd、Cu复合污染土壤

高珂^1,,
朱荣¹,
邹华^1,2,
程子波¹
1.江南大学环境与土木工程学院，无锡 214122
2.江苏省水处理技术与材料协同创新中心，苏州 215009
基金项目: 江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目（SJCX18_0639） 国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFE0123600）
关键词: 超声强化化学淋洗/
传统化学淋洗/
土壤修复/
Pb、Cd、Cu复合污染/
重金属形态分析
摘要:针对传统淋洗法修复土壤中重金属效率较低的问题，研究了超声强化淋洗技术以提高重金属去除率。以铅（Pb）、镉（Cd）、铜（Cu）为目标污染物，在0.05 mol·L-1柠檬酸、0.05 mol·L-1EDTA和0.05 mol·L-1皂角苷作为淋洗剂条件下，使用传统振荡、超声强化以及超声波加振荡3种不同的作用方式，对Pb、Cd、Cu的去除率进行比较，并对3种不同淋洗方式后Pb、Cd、Cu的形态变化进行了探讨。结果表明，当使用柠檬酸和皂角苷作为淋洗剂进行振荡淋洗时，重金属洗脱效果不理想。超声对于强化柠檬酸洗脱效果并不明显，而对于强化皂角苷洗脱重金属效果明显，平均去除率提高了120.47%。当淋洗剂为EDTA时，土壤样品在传统振荡2 h作用下，对Pb、Cd、Cu的去除率依次为50.33%、76.65%和47.35%，而在超声波30 min条件下对Pb、Cd、Cu的去除率依次为82.19%、83.31%和53.89%，平均去除率高出28.60%，可显著提高重金属去除率，缩短淋洗时间。但超声波30 min加传统振荡2 h相较于单纯超声强化效果提升不明显。通过对比3种淋洗方式后土壤中的Pb、Cd、Cu形态发现，酸可提取态的重金属在超声强化作用后有明显降低，同时超声强化对于铁锰氧化物结合态、有机物结合态和残渣态也具有较好的去除能力。因此，超声强化在化学淋洗中的应用具有一定的可行性，是一种简单、极快速去除污染场地中重金属Pb、Cd、Cu的增效手段。

English Abstract

全文HTML

--> --> --> 参考文献 (36)