data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddae9/ddae9b72a39e834d171a5da88fb8629100e9262b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddae9/ddae9b72a39e834d171a5da88fb8629100e9262b" alt=""
1宁波大学心理学系暨研究所, 宁波 315211
2吉林大学哲学社会学院, 长春 130000
3中国科学技术大学人文与社会科学学院, 合肥 230022
收稿日期:
2017-09-26出版日期:
2018-10-15发布日期:
2018-08-23基金资助:
* 国家社会科学基金(12BSH055);国家自然科学基金(31540024);宁波大学研究生科研创新基金资助(G18044)The processing advantage of self-positive expression: Evidence from an ERPs study
TAN Qun1, YIN Yueyang1,2, LIU Shen1,3(data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddae9/ddae9b72a39e834d171a5da88fb8629100e9262b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddae9/ddae9b72a39e834d171a5da88fb8629100e9262b" alt=""
1 Department and Institute of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
2 School of Philosophy and Sociology, Jilin University, Changchun 130000, China
3 School of Humanities and Social Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230022, China
Received:
2017-09-26Online:
2018-10-15Published:
2018-08-23摘要/Abstract
摘要: 基于自我加工优势和内隐积极联想理论, 采用视觉搜索范式结合ERPs技术考察个体自我表情加工的特点, 并进一步探讨情绪效价和身份信息对面孔加工的直接影响。结果发现:(1)搜索自我快乐表情比自我愤怒表情及两类他人表情速度更快、正确率也更高; (2)自我快乐表情对N1、N2、LPP成分的激活显著大于自我愤怒表情及两类他人表情。自我表情加工存在积极加工偏向, 且这种加工优势在面孔加工早期视觉编码阶段就已出现。
图/表 4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58802/58802f3469b569935307eeb4d75bedd1e1fbb663" alt=""
图1自我(左一、左二)和他人(右一、右二)表情示例图
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58802/58802f3469b569935307eeb4d75bedd1e1fbb663" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ace3/7ace393abd418feae86744121ee5efa321e8e2ea" alt=""
图2实验程序的单次试验流程图
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ace3/7ace393abd418feae86744121ee5efa321e8e2ea" alt=""
表1各实验条件下表情判断的反应时(ms)和正确率(%) (M ± SD)
身份类型 | 表情类型 | 反应时 | 正确率 |
---|---|---|---|
自我 | 快乐 | 713 ± 218 | 97 ± 2 |
愤怒 | 899 ± 336 | 97 ± 5 | |
他人 | 快乐 | 765 ± 257 | 94 ± 4 |
愤怒 | 1060 ± 377 | 91 ± 9 |
表1各实验条件下表情判断的反应时(ms)和正确率(%) (M ± SD)
身份类型 | 表情类型 | 反应时 | 正确率 |
---|---|---|---|
自我 | 快乐 | 713 ± 218 | 97 ± 2 |
愤怒 | 899 ± 336 | 97 ± 5 | |
他人 | 快乐 | 765 ± 257 | 94 ± 4 |
愤怒 | 1060 ± 377 | 91 ± 9 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c5b0/4c5b04be93b83bad51cdcae0066bcd72e513f031" alt=""
图3自我表情加工与他人表情加工的ERP总平均波形图和地形图
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c5b0/4c5b04be93b83bad51cdcae0066bcd72e513f031" alt=""
参考文献 30
[1] | Bruce V., &Young A .( 1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77( 3), 305-327. doi: 10.1111/bjop.1986.77.issue-3URL |
[2] | Calvo M.G., &Beltrán D .( 2013). Recognition advantage of happy faces: Tracing the neurocognitive processes. Neuropsychologia, 51( 11), 2051-2061. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.010URLpmid: 23880097 |
[3] | Calvo M.G., &Beltrán D .( 2014). Brain lateralization of holistic versus analytic processing of emotional facial expressions. Neuroimage, 92( 10), 237-247. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.048URLpmid: 24495810 |
[4] | Chen Y., Zhong Y. P., Zhou H. B., Zhou L. P., & Wang X. Y . ( 2012). An ERP study on implicit self-positivity bias effect. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psycholog, 20( 3), 297-300. |
[ 陈芸, 钟毅平, 周海波, 周路平, 王小艳 . ( 2012). 内隐自我正面偏见效应的ERP研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20( 3), 297-300.] | |
[5] | Foti D., Hajcak G., & Dien J . ( 2009). Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: Evidence from temporal- spatial PCA. Psychophysiology, 46( 3), 521-530. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00796.xURLpmid: 19496228 |
[6] | Feldmann-Wüstefeld T., Schmidt-Daffy M., & Schubö A . ( 2011). Neural evidence for the threat detection advantage: Differential attention allocation to angry and happy faces. Psychophysiology, 48( 5), 697-707. doi: 10.1111/psyp.2011.48.issue-5URL |
[7] | Gong X., Huang Y. X., Wang Y., & Luo Y. J . ( 2011). Revision of the Chinese facial affective picture system. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 25( 1), 40-46. |
[ 龚栩, 黄宇霞, 王妍, 罗跃嘉 . ( 2011). 中国面孔表情图片系统的修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 25( 1), 40-46.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2011.01.011URL | |
[8] | Gosling A., & Eimer M .( 2011). An event-related brain potential study of explicit face recognition. Neuropsychologia, 49( 9), 2736-2745. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.025URLpmid: 21679721 |
[9] | Gratton G., Coles M. G. H., & Donchin E . ( 1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalograghy & Clinical Neurophyiology, 55( 4), 468-484. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9URLpmid: 6187540 |
[10] | Guan L. L., Qi M. M., Zhang Q. L., & Yang J . ( 2014). The neural basis of self-face recognition after self-concept threat and comparison with important others. Social Neuroscience, 9( 4), 424-435. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.920417URL |
[11] | Guan L. L., Zhang Q. L., Qi M. M., Yan H., & Yang J . ( 2012). Self-concept threat and comparison with important others weaken self-face advantage altogether. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44( 6), 789-796. |
[ 关丽丽, 张庆林, 齐铭铭, 侯燕, 杨娟 . ( 2012). 自我概念威胁以及与重要他人的比较共同削弱自我面孔优势效应. 心理学报, 44( 6), 789-796.] | |
[12] | Han S.H., &Zhang Y.F .( 2012). A cultural neuroscience approach to self-concept representation. Advances in Psychological Science, 20( 5), 633-640. |
[ 韩世辉, 张逸凡 . ( 2012). 自我概念心理表征的文化神经科学研究. 心理科学进展, 20( 5), 633-640.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.00633URL | |
[13] | Hoefler A., Athenstaedt U., Corcoran K., Ebner F., & Ischebeck A . ( 2015). Coping with self-threat and the evaluation of self-related traits: An fMRI study. PLoS ONE, 10( 9), e0136027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136027URLpmid: 4558049 |
[14] | Kim H .( 2012). A dual-subsystem model of the brain's default network: Self-referential processing, memory retrieval processes, and autobiographical memory retrieval. Neuroimage, 61( 4), 966-977. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.025URL |
[15] | Ma Y.N., &Han S.H .( 2010). Why we respond faster to the self than to others? An implicit positive association theory of self-advantage during implicit face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36( 3), 619-633. doi: 10.1037/a0015797URL |
[16] | Pavel F.A., &Iordănescu E . ( 2012). The influence of facial expressions on recognition performance in facial identity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 548-552. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.181URL |
[17] | Rellecke J., Sommer W., & Schacht A . ( 2012). Does processing of emotional facial expressions depend on intention? Time-resolved evidence from event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 90( 1), 23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.002URL |
[18] | Sui J., Zhu Y., & Han S. H . ( 2006). Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: An event-related brain potential study. Neuroreport, 17( 4), 423-427. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000203357.65190.61URL |
[19] | Tong F., & Nakayama K . ( 1999). Robust representations for faces: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 25( 4), 1016-1035. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.4.1016URLpmid: 10464943 |
[20] | Verosky S.C., & Todorov A .( 2010). Differential neural responses to faces physically similar to the self as a function of their valence. Neuroimage, 49( 2), 1690-1698. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.017URL |
[21] | Wang L. Y., Zhang M., & Sui J . ( 2011). Self-face advantage benefits from a visual self-reference frame. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43( 5), 494-499. |
[ 王凌云, 张明, 隋洁 . ( 2011). 自我参照框架决定了自我面孔优势效应的出现. 心理学报,43( 5), 494-499.] | |
[22] | Wang Y.M., &Fu X.L .( 2007). Effect of discriminability on interference between facial expression and facial identity recognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39( 2), 191-200. |
[ 汪亚珉, 傅小兰 . ( 2007). 区分度在面部表情与面孔身份识别交互中的作用. 心理学报, 39( 2), 191-200.] | |
[23] | Watson L. A., Dritschel B., Obonsawin M. C., & Jentzsch I . ( 2007). Seeing yourself in a positive light: Brain correlates of the self-positivity bias. Brain Research, 1152, 106-110. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.049URLpmid: 17462610 |
[24] | Wu B. X., Zhang Z. J., & Sun Y. S . ( 2015). Facial Familiarity Modulates the Interaction between Facial Gender and Emotional Expression. Acta Psychologica Sinica,47( 10), 1201-1212. |
[ 吴彬星, 张智君, 孙雨生 . ( 2015). 面孔熟悉度对面孔性别与表情相互作用的调节. 心理学报,47( 10), 1201-1212.] | |
[25] | Xia M., Li X. L., Ye C., & Li H . ( 2014). The ERPs for the facial expression processing. Advances in Psychological Science, 22( 10), 1556-1563. |
[ 侠牧, 李雪榴, 叶春, 李红 . ( 2014). 面部表情加工的ERP成分. 心理科学进展, 22( 10), 1556-1563.] | |
[26] | Xu X.Y., &Gao X.P . ( 2017). Self-threat Stimuli Capture Attention: Evidence from Inhibition of Return. Journal of Psychological Science, 40( 2), 296-302. |
[ 徐欣颖, 高湘萍 . ( 2017). 自我威胁刺激对返回抑制的影响. 心理科学, 40( 2), 296-302.] | |
[27] | Yun J. Y., Hur J. W., Jung W. H., Jang J. H., Youn T., Kang D.-H., … Kwon J. S . ( 2014). Dysfunctional role of parietal lobe during self-face recognition in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 152( 1), 81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.07.010URLpmid: 23916187 |
[28] | Zhong Y. P., Chen Y., Zhou L. P., & Zhou H. B . ( 2010). An ERP study on self-positivity bias. Journal of Psychological Science, 33( 3), 560-563. |
[ 钟毅平, 陈芸, 周路平, 周海波 . ( 2010). 自我正面偏见的ERP研究. 心理科学, 33( 3), 560-563.] | |
[29] | Zhong Y. P., Li J., Zhan Y. L., Fan W., & Yang Z. L . ( 2016). Rotated self-face recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48( 11), 1379-1389. |
[ 钟毅平, 李琎, 占友龙, 范伟, 杨子鹿 . ( 2016). 自我旋转面孔识别的ERPs研究. 心理学报, 48( 11), 1379-1389.] | |
[30] | Zhou Y. L., Hu S. J., Cai J. Y., Hu Z. G., & Liu H. Y . ( 2016). Modulation effect of emotional state on self-positivity bias. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24( 2), 196-199. |
[ 周一琳, 胡少军, 蔡佳烨, 胡治国, 刘宏艳 . ( 2016). 情绪状态对积极自我偏向的调节. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24( 2), 196-199.] |
相关文章 1
[1] | 关丽丽,张庆林,齐铭铭,侯燕,杨娟. 自我概念威胁以及与重要他人的比较共同削弱自我面孔优势效应[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(6): 789-796. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4279