删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

解释性项目反应理论模型:理论与应用

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

陈冠宇, 陈平()
北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心, 北京 100875
收稿日期:2018-06-07出版日期:2019-05-15发布日期:2019-03-20
通讯作者:陈平E-mail:pchen@bnu.edu.cn

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(31300862);东北师范大学应用统计教育部重点实验室开放课题(KLAS130028732);中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心研究生自主课题资助(BJSM-2016A1-16004)

Explanatory item response theory models: Theory and application

CHEN Guanyu, CHEN Ping()
Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Received:2018-06-07Online:2019-05-15Published:2019-03-20
Contact:CHEN Ping E-mail:pchen@bnu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 解释性项目反应理论模型(Explanatory Item Response Theory Models, EIRTM)是指基于广义线性混合模型和非线性混合模型构建的项目反应理论(Item Response Theory, IRT)模型。EIRTM能在IRT模型的基础上直接加入预测变量, 从而解决各类测量问题。首先介绍EIRTM的相关概念和参数估计方法, 然后展示如何使用EIRTM处理题目位置效应、测验模式效应、题目功能差异、局部被试依赖和局部题目依赖, 接着提供实例对EIRTM的使用进行说明, 最后对EIRTM的不足之处和应用前景进行讨论。



图1题目、被试和群体的层级关系图 注:图片翻译自Jiao, Kamata和Xie (2015, p. 145) 图5.3
图1题目、被试和群体的层级关系图 注:图片翻译自Jiao, Kamata和Xie (2015, p. 145) 图5.3


表124道言语攻击题目
题目 行为模式 情境类型 行为类型
一辆公交车没有进站停靠, 我想诅咒。 想 他人责任 诅咒
一辆公交车没有进站停靠, 我想责备。 想 他人责任 责备
一辆公交车没有进站停靠, 我想怒骂。 想 他人责任 怒骂
因为工作人员给我错误的信息, 我错过了火车, 我想诅咒。 想 他人责任 诅咒
因为工作人员给我错误的信息, 我错过了火车, 我想责备。 想 他人责任 责备
因为工作人员给我错误的信息, 我错过了火车, 我想怒骂。 想 他人责任 怒骂
当我刚进入商店, 商店就关门了, 我想诅咒。 想 自己责任 诅咒
当我刚进入商店, 商店就关门了, 我想责备。 想 自己责任 责备
当我刚进入商店, 商店就关门了, 我想怒骂。 想 自己责任 怒骂
我与对方的通话断了, 因为我用完了话费, 我想诅咒。 想 自己责任 诅咒
我与对方的通话断了, 因为我用完了话费, 我想责备。 想 自己责任 责备
我与对方的通话断了, 因为我用完了话费, 我想怒骂。 想 自己责任 怒骂
一辆公交车没有进站停靠, 我会诅咒。 做 他人责任 诅咒
一辆公交车没有进站停靠, 我会责备。 做 他人责任 责备
一辆公交车没有进站停靠, 我会怒骂。 做 他人责任 怒骂
因为工作人员给我错误的信息, 我错过了火车, 我会诅咒。 做 他人责任 诅咒
因为工作人员给我错误的信息, 我错过了火车, 我会责备。 做 他人责任 责备
因为工作人员给我错误的信息, 我错过了火车, 我会怒骂。 做 他人责任 怒骂
当我刚进入商店, 商店就关门了, 我会诅咒。 做 自己责任 诅咒
当我刚进入商店, 商店就关门了, 我会责备。 做 自己责任 责备
当我刚进入商店, 商店就关门了, 我会怒骂。 做 自己责任 怒骂
我与对方的通话断了, 因为我用完了话费, 我会诅咒。 做 自己责任 诅咒
我与对方的通话断了, 因为我用完了话费, 我会责备。 做 自己责任 责备
我与对方的通话断了, 因为我用完了话费, 我会怒骂。 做 自己责任 怒骂

表124道言语攻击题目
题目 行为模式 情境类型 行为类型
一辆公交车没有进站停靠, 我想诅咒。 想 他人责任 诅咒
一辆公交车没有进站停靠, 我想责备。 想 他人责任 责备
一辆公交车没有进站停靠, 我想怒骂。 想 他人责任 怒骂
因为工作人员给我错误的信息, 我错过了火车, 我想诅咒。 想 他人责任 诅咒
因为工作人员给我错误的信息, 我错过了火车, 我想责备。 想 他人责任 责备
因为工作人员给我错误的信息, 我错过了火车, 我想怒骂。 想 他人责任 怒骂
当我刚进入商店, 商店就关门了, 我想诅咒。 想 自己责任 诅咒
当我刚进入商店, 商店就关门了, 我想责备。 想 自己责任 责备
当我刚进入商店, 商店就关门了, 我想怒骂。 想 自己责任 怒骂
我与对方的通话断了, 因为我用完了话费, 我想诅咒。 想 自己责任 诅咒
我与对方的通话断了, 因为我用完了话费, 我想责备。 想 自己责任 责备
我与对方的通话断了, 因为我用完了话费, 我想怒骂。 想 自己责任 怒骂
一辆公交车没有进站停靠, 我会诅咒。 做 他人责任 诅咒
一辆公交车没有进站停靠, 我会责备。 做 他人责任 责备
一辆公交车没有进站停靠, 我会怒骂。 做 他人责任 怒骂
因为工作人员给我错误的信息, 我错过了火车, 我会诅咒。 做 他人责任 诅咒
因为工作人员给我错误的信息, 我错过了火车, 我会责备。 做 他人责任 责备
因为工作人员给我错误的信息, 我错过了火车, 我会怒骂。 做 他人责任 怒骂
当我刚进入商店, 商店就关门了, 我会诅咒。 做 自己责任 诅咒
当我刚进入商店, 商店就关门了, 我会责备。 做 自己责任 责备
当我刚进入商店, 商店就关门了, 我会怒骂。 做 自己责任 怒骂
我与对方的通话断了, 因为我用完了话费, 我会诅咒。 做 自己责任 诅咒
我与对方的通话断了, 因为我用完了话费, 我会责备。 做 自己责任 责备
我与对方的通话断了, 因为我用完了话费, 我会怒骂。 做 自己责任 怒骂


表224道言语攻击题目的固定效应
题目 模型1 模型2 模型3 模型4
βq βq 行为模式 βq DIF 95%置信区间 βq
1 -1.162 -1.148 -1.196 -0.101 (-0.723, 0.549) -1.248
2 -0.546 -0.531 -0.574 -0.104 (-0.717, 0.505) -0.584
3 -0.091 -0.074 -0.134 -0.171 (-0.777, 0.431) -0.101
4 -1.657 -1.641 -1.727 -0.261 (-0.934, 0.449) -1.800
5 -0.681 -0.667 -0.729 -0.182 (-0.800, 0.433) -0.746
6 -0.026 -0.011 -0.184 -0.684 (-1.293, -0.070) -0.031
7 -0.512 -0.496 -0.495 0.103 (-0.507, 0.721) -0.617
8 0.630 0.643 0.751 0.535 (-0.067, 1.151) 0.689
9 1.430 1.451 1.338 -0.455 (-1.153, 0.240) 1.610
10 -1.014 -0.998 -1.071 -0.221 (-0.853, 0.415) -1.221
11 0.312 0.329 0.362 0.231 (-0.376, 0.826) 0.354
12 0.963 0.982 0.866 -0.454 (-1.104, 0.185) 1.132
13 -1.145 -1.580 -0.465 -1.066 0.426 (-0.251, 1.108) -1.225
14 -0.383 -0.820 -0.465 -0.215 0.792 (0.156, 1.420) -0.412
15 0.820 0.381 -0.465 0.786 -0.133 (-0.767, 0.487) 0.885
16 -0.822 -1.260 -0.465 -0.618 1.006 (0.352, 1.706) -0.895
17 0.035 -0.404 -0.465 0.263 1.019 (0.409, 1.648) 0.042
18 1.372 0.933 -0.465 1.422 0.222 (-0.417, 0.879) 1.498
19 0.200 -0.240 -0.465 0.393 0.864 (0.280, 1.481) 0.199
20 1.390 0.956 -0.465 1.579 0.750 (0.093, 1.390) 1.563
21 2.711 2.277 -0.465 2.775 0.244 (-0.615, 1.062) 3.034
22 -0.660 -1.106 -0.465 -0.548 0.568 (-0.068, 1.205) -0.801
23 0.363 -0.080 -0.465 0.488 0.546 (-0.059, 1.146) 0.416
24 1.867 1.427 -0.465 1.799 -0.359 (-1.138, 0.375) 2.202

表224道言语攻击题目的固定效应
题目 模型1 模型2 模型3 模型4
βq βq 行为模式 βq DIF 95%置信区间 βq
1 -1.162 -1.148 -1.196 -0.101 (-0.723, 0.549) -1.248
2 -0.546 -0.531 -0.574 -0.104 (-0.717, 0.505) -0.584
3 -0.091 -0.074 -0.134 -0.171 (-0.777, 0.431) -0.101
4 -1.657 -1.641 -1.727 -0.261 (-0.934, 0.449) -1.800
5 -0.681 -0.667 -0.729 -0.182 (-0.800, 0.433) -0.746
6 -0.026 -0.011 -0.184 -0.684 (-1.293, -0.070) -0.031
7 -0.512 -0.496 -0.495 0.103 (-0.507, 0.721) -0.617
8 0.630 0.643 0.751 0.535 (-0.067, 1.151) 0.689
9 1.430 1.451 1.338 -0.455 (-1.153, 0.240) 1.610
10 -1.014 -0.998 -1.071 -0.221 (-0.853, 0.415) -1.221
11 0.312 0.329 0.362 0.231 (-0.376, 0.826) 0.354
12 0.963 0.982 0.866 -0.454 (-1.104, 0.185) 1.132
13 -1.145 -1.580 -0.465 -1.066 0.426 (-0.251, 1.108) -1.225
14 -0.383 -0.820 -0.465 -0.215 0.792 (0.156, 1.420) -0.412
15 0.820 0.381 -0.465 0.786 -0.133 (-0.767, 0.487) 0.885
16 -0.822 -1.260 -0.465 -0.618 1.006 (0.352, 1.706) -0.895
17 0.035 -0.404 -0.465 0.263 1.019 (0.409, 1.648) 0.042
18 1.372 0.933 -0.465 1.422 0.222 (-0.417, 0.879) 1.498
19 0.200 -0.240 -0.465 0.393 0.864 (0.280, 1.481) 0.199
20 1.390 0.956 -0.465 1.579 0.750 (0.093, 1.390) 1.563
21 2.711 2.277 -0.465 2.775 0.244 (-0.615, 1.062) 3.034
22 -0.660 -1.106 -0.465 -0.548 0.568 (-0.068, 1.205) -0.801
23 0.363 -0.080 -0.465 0.488 0.546 (-0.059, 1.146) 0.416
24 1.867 1.427 -0.465 1.799 -0.359 (-1.138, 0.375) 2.202







[1] 刘红云, 骆方 . ( 2008). 多水平项目反应理论模型在测验发展中的应用. 心理学报, 40( 1), 92-100.
[2] 聂旭刚, 陈平, 张缨斌, 何引红 . ( 2018). 题目位置效应的概念及检测. 心理科学进展, 26( 2), 368-380.
[3] 詹沛达, 王文中, 王立君 . ( 2013). 项目反应理论新进展之题组反应理论. 心理科学进展, 21( 12), 2265-2280.
[4] Adams R. J., Wu M. L., & Wilson M. R . ( 1988). ACER ConQuest: Generalised item response modelling software [Computer software]. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
[5] Baghaei P., Ravand H., . ( 2016). Modeling local item dependence in cloze and reading comprehension test items using testlet response theory. Psicologica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 37( 1), 85-104.
[6] Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B. M., & Walker S. C ( 2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using LME4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67( 1), 1-48.
[7] Bechger T. M Maris G ., ( 2015). A statistical test for differential item pair functioning. Psychometrika, 80( 2), 317-340.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-014-9408-yURL
[8] Binet A., & Simon T. , ( 1904). Méthodes nouvelles pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectuel des anormaux. L'année Psychologique, 11( 1), 191-244.
[9] Birnbaum A., , ( 1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores( pp. 392-479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[10] Bock R. D., & Aitkin M. , ( 1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46( 4), 443-459.
[11] Bock R. D., & Lieberman M. , ( 1970). Fitting a response model for n dichotomously scored items. Psychometrika, 35(2), 179-197.
[12] Bolker B. M., Brooks M. E., Clark C. J., Geange S. W., Poulsen J. R., Stevens M. H. H & White J. S. S ., ( 2009). Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24( 3), 127-135.
[13] Bolt D. M . ( 2002). A Monte Carlo comparison of parametric and nonparametric polytomous DIF detection methods. Applied Measurement in Education, 15( 2), 113-141.
doi: 10.1207/S15324818AME1502_01URL
[14] Cosgrove J., & Cartwright F. , ( 2014). Changes in achievement on PISA: The case of Ireland and implications for international assessment practice. Large Scale Assessments in Education, 2( 2), 1-17.
[15] Debeer D. & Janssen R. , ( 2013). Modeling item-position effects within an IRT framework. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50( 2), 164-185.
doi: 10.1111/jedm.2013.50.issue-2URL
[16] Debeer D., Buchholz J., Hartig J., & Janssen R . ( 2014). Student, school, and country differences in sustained test-taking effort in the 2009 PISA reading assessment. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39( 6), 502-523.
doi: 10.3102/1076998614558485URL
[17] De Boeck P., Bakker M., Zwitser R., Nivard M., Hofman A., Tuerlinckx F., & Partchev I . ( 2011). The estimation of item response models with the lmer function from the lme4 package in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 39( 12), 1-28.
[18] De Boeck P., & Wilson M. , ( 2004). Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach. New York, NY: Springer.
[19] De Boeck P., Wilson M. R . ( 2016). Explanatory response models. In W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of Item Response Theory, Volume One: Models( pp. 565-580). New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
[20] Eyre J., Berg M., Mazengarb J., & Lawes E . ( 2017). Mode equivalency in PAT: Reading comprehension. Wellington: NZCER.
[21] Fujimoto K. A . ( 2018). A general Bayesian multilevel multidimensional IRT model for locally dependent data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 71( 3), 536-560.
doi: 10.1111/bmsp.2018.71.issue-3URL
[22] Fukuhara H. & Kamata A. , ( 2011). A bifactor multidimensional item response theory model for differential item functioning analysis on testlet-based items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35( 8), 604-622.
doi: 10.1177/0146621611428447URL
[23] Gamerman D., Gonçalves F. B., Soares T. M . ( 2018). Differential item functioning. In W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of Item Response Theory, Volume Three: Applications( pp. 67-86). New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
[24] Gill J . ( 2000). Generalized linear models: A unified approach (Vol. 134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[25] Hartig J., & Buchholz J. , ( 2012). A multilevel item response model for item position effects and individual persistence. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 54( 4), 418-431.
[26] Hohensinn C., Kubinger K. D., Reif M., Schleicher E., & Khorramdel L . ( 2011). Analyzing item position effects due to test booklet design within large-scale assessment. Educational Research and Evaluation, 17( 6), 497-509.
doi: 10.1080/13803611.2011.632668URL
[27] , , Hoskens M., & De Boeck P. , ( 1997). A parametric model for local dependence among test items. Psychological Methods, 2( 3), 261-277.
[28] Ip E. H . ( 2000). Adjusting for information inflation due to local dependency in moderately large item clusters. Psychometrika, 65( 1), 73-91.
doi: 10.1007/BF02294187URL
[29] Janssen R .( 2016). Linear Logistic Models. In W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of Item Response Theory, Volume One: Models ( pp. 211-224). New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
[30] Jeon M., Rijmen F., & Rabe-Hesketh S . ( 2013). Modeling differential item functioning using a generalization of the multiple-group bifactor model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38( 1), 32-60.
doi: 10.3102/1076998611432173URL
[31] Jeon M., Rijmen F., & Rabe-Hesketh S . ( 2014). Flexible item response theory modeling with FLIRT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38( 5), 404-405.
[32] Jerrim J .( 2016). PISA 2012: How do results for the paper and computer tests compare? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23( 4), 495-518.
[33] Jerrim J., Micklewright J., Heine J. H., Salzer C., & McKeown C . ( 2018). PISA 2015: How big is the ‘mode effect’ and what has been done about it? Oxford Review of Education, 44( 4), 476-493.
[34] Jiao H., Kamata A., Wang S., & Jin Y . ( 2012). A multilevel testlet model for dual local dependence. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49( 1), 82-100.
doi: 10.1111/jedm.2012.49.issue-1URL
[35] Jiao H., Kamata A. & Xie C. , ( 2015). Multilevel cross-classified testlet model for complex item and person clustering in item response data analysis. In J. R. Harring, L. M. Stapleton & S. N. Beretvas (Eds.), Advances in multilevel modeling for educational research: Addressing practical issues found in real-world applications (pp. 139-161). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
[36] Jiao H., Wang S. D., & Kamata A . ( 2005). Modeling local item dependence with the hierarchical generalized linear model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6( 3), 311-321.
[37] Jiao H.,Zhang Y , ( 2015). Polytomous multilevel testlet models for testlet-based assessments with complex sampling designs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 68( 1), 65-83.
doi: 10.1111/bmsp.2015.68.issue-1URL
[38] Jin Y.,Kang M , ( 2016). Comparing DIF methods for data with dual dependency. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 4( 1), 18.
doi: 10.1186/s40536-016-0033-3URL
[39] Kamata A. , ( 2001). Item analysis by the hierarchical generalized linear model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38( 1), 79-93.
doi: 10.1111/jedm.2001.38.issue-1URL
[40] Kang C. , ( 2014). Linear and nonlinear modeling of item position effects (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
[41] Klein Entink R. H., Kuhn J. T., Hornke L. F., & Fox J. P . ( 2009). Evaluating cognitive theory: A joint modeling approach using responses and response times. Psychological methods, 14( 1), 54-75.
[42] Koziol N. A . ( 2016). Parameter recovery and classification accuracy under conditions of testlet dependency: A comparison of the traditional 2PL, testlet, and bi-factor models. Applied Measurement in Education, 29( 3), 184-195.
doi: 10.1080/08957347.2016.1171767URL
[43] Lee Y .( 2004). Examining passage-related local item dependence (LID) and measurement construct using Q3 statistics in an EFL reading comprehension test. Language Testing, 21( 1), 74-100.
doi: 10.1191/0265532204lt260oaURL
[44] Logan T . ( 2015). The influence of test mode and visuospatial ability on mathematics assessment performance. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(4), 423-441.
doi: 10.1007/s13394-015-0143-1URL
[45] Mislevy R. J . ( 2016). How developments in psychology and technology challenge validity argumentation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 53( 3), 265-292.
[46] OECD. ( 2017a). PISA 2015 technical report. Pairs: OECD Publishing.
[47] OECD. ( 2017b). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving, Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doiorg/10.1787/9789264281820-en.
[48] Osterlind S. J., & Everson H. T . ( 2009). Differential item functioning (Vol. 161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[49] Paek I., Fukuhara H . ( 2015). Estimating a DIF decomposition model using a random-weights linear logistic test model approach. Behavior Research Methods, 47( 3), 890-901.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0512-9URL
[50] Plummer M . ( 2017). JAGS version 4. 3.0 user manual [Software manual]. Retrieved from
[51] Rabe-Hesketh S., Skrondal A . ( 2016). Generalized linear latent and mixed modeling. In W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of Item Response Theory, Volume One: Models( pp. 503-526). New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
[52] Rabe-Hesketh S., Skrondal A.Pickles, & Pickles A., , ( 2004). GLLAMM manual [Software manual]. (U. C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series, 160)
[53] Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S., Cheong Y. F., Congdon Jr R. T., & Toit M. D . ( 2011). HLM7 hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling manual [Software manual]. Lincolnwood, IL: SSI Scientific Software International Inc.
[54] Ravand H . ( 2015). Assessing testlet effect, impact, differential testlet, and item functioning using cross-classified multilevel measurement modeling. SAGE Open, 5( 2).
[55] Rijmen F . ( 2006). BNL: A Matlab toolbox for Bayesian networks with logistic regression( Tech. Rep.). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: VU University Medical Center.
[56] Rijmen F., Tuerlinckx F., De Boeck P., & Kuppens P . ( 2003). A nonlinear mixed model framework for item response theory. Psychological Methods, 8( 2), 185-205.
doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.185URL
[57] SAS Institute . ( 2015). SAS/STAT 14.1: user's guide [Software manual]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
[58] Spiegelhalter D., Thomas A., Best N., & Lunn D. ( 2014). OpenBUGS (Version 3.2.3) [Software manual]. Retrieved from, .
[59] Stroup W. W . ( 2012). Generalized linear mixed models: Modern concepts, methods and applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.
[60] Su Y, Yajima M ( 2015). R2jags: A Package for Running JAGS from R [Computer software]. Retrieved from
[61] Teker G. T Dogan N ., ( 2015). The Effects of testlets on reliability and differential item functioning. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15( 4), 969-980.
[62] Thissen D ., ( 1991). MULTILOG [Software manual]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software.
[63] Trendtel M., Robitzsch A ., ( 2018). Modeling item position effects with a Bayesian item response model applied to PISA 2009-2015 data. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 60( 2), 241-263.
[64] Tutz G., Berger M ., ( 2016). Item-focussed trees for the identification of items in differential item functioning. Psychometrika, 81( 3), 727-750.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9488-3URL
[65] Tutz G., Schauberger G ., ( 2015). A penalty approach to differential item functioning in Rasch models. Psychometrika, 80( 1), 21-43.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9377-6URL
[66] van der Linden W.J, . ( 2016). Handbook of Item Response Theory, Volume One. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/ CRC.
[67] van der Linden W.J, . ( 2018). Handbook of Item Response Theory, Volume Three: Applications. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
[68] Vansteelandt K, .( 2000). Formal models for contextualized personality psychology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). K.U. Leuven, Belgium.
[69] Wainer H., & Lukhele R. , ( 1997). How reliable are TOEFL scores? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57( 5), 741-758.
doi: 10.1177/0013164497057005002URL
[70] Wainer H., Sireci S. G., & Thissen D . ( 1991). Differential testlet functioning definitions and detection (Research Rep. 91-21). Princeton NJ: ETS.
[71] Wang W. C., & Wilson M. ,( 2005). Assessment of differential item functioning in testlet-based items using the Rasch testlet model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65( 4), 549-576.
[72] Weirich S., Hecht M., Böhme K . ( 2014). Modeling item position effects using generalized linear mixed models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38( 7), 535-548.
doi: 10.1177/0146621614534955URL
[73] Weirich S., Hecht M., Penk C., Roppelt A., Böhme K . ( 2017). Item position effects are moderated by changes in test-taking effort. Applied psychological measurement, 41( 2), 115-129.
doi: 10.1177/0146621616676791URL
[74] Wilson M., Zheng X. H., & McGuire L . ( 2012). Formulating latent growth using an explanatory item response model approach. Journal of Applied Measurement, 13( 1), 1-22.
[75] Xie C . ( 2014). Cross-classified modeling of dual local item dependence (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
[76] Xie C., & Jiao H. , ( 2014, April). Cross-classified modeling of dual local item dependence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Phliadelphia, PA.




[1]王阳, 温忠麟, 付媛姝. 等效性检验——结构方程模型评价和测量不变性分析的新视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1961-1969.
[2]聂旭刚, 陈平, 张缨斌, 何引红. 题目位置效应的概念及检测[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(2): 368-380.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4688
相关话题/信息 心理 科学 翻译 图片