Exact solutions of the nonlocal Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation
本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-02
Miao Li, Yi Zhang,*, Rusuo Ye, Yu LouDepartment of Mathematics, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
First author contact:*Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed. Received:2021-02-19Revised:2021-04-16Accepted:2021-07-1Online:2021-08-31
Abstract The nonlocal nonlinear Gerdjikov-Ivanov (GI) equation is one of the most important integrable equations, which can be reduced from the third generic deformation of the derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation. The Darboux transformation is a successful method in solving many nonlocal equations with the help of symbolic computation. As applications, we obtain the bright-dark soliton, breather, rogue wave, kink, W-shaped soliton and periodic solutions of the nonlocal GI equation by constructing its 2n-fold Darboux transformation. These solutions show rich wave structures for selections of different parameters. In all these instances we practically show that these solutions have different properties than the ones for local case. Keywords:nonlocal Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation;Darboux transformation;rogue wave;mixed soliton solutions
PDF (1307KB)MetadataMetricsRelated articlesExportEndNote|Ris|BibtexFavorite Cite this article Miao Li, Yi Zhang, Rusuo Ye, Yu Lou. Exact solutions of the nonlocal Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2021, 73(10): 105005- doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ac1065
1. Introduction
As one of the most famous integrable equations in physics, the nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation can be reduced from the AKNS system [1]. It is natural to propose several generic deformations of the NLS equation under higher-order perturbations. Among them, there are three kinds of the derivative nonlinear Schrödinger (DNLS) equations. They are regarded as having important roles in various fields of mathematical physics such as nonlinear water waves, plasma astrophysics, and nonlinear optics fibers [2, 3]. One version of the celebrated DNLS equation is presented in the form$\begin{eqnarray}{\rm{i}}{q}_{t}+{q}_{{xx}}+{\rm{i}}\varepsilon {q}^{2}{q}_{x}^{* }+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{q}^{3}{q}^{* 2}=0,\end{eqnarray}$where the sign * denotes the complex conjugation and ϵ=±1. It is also known as the DNLS-III or GI equation which is reduced from the coupled GI equation [4] by a reduction.
As a generalization of an integrable system of NLS type, the GI equation has been studied from various points of views in [5–12]. A bi-Hamiltonian structure and Liouville integrability for GI hierarchy were proposed in [13]. The Lax pair and exact solutions of equation (1) were obtained in [14–16] via the Darboux transformation (DT). [17] provided the determinant expression of higher-order solutions including higher-order rational solutions and higher-order rogue wave solutions. We note that the GI equation (1) was investigated by bifurcation theory and the existence of travelling wave solutions was verified [18]. In [19], the authors sought the exact solutions with trigonometric and rational functions with the aid of exp-expansion method. The sine-Gordon equation approach and Riemann-Hilbert method were carried out to the GI equation [20, 21].
Recently, many researchers have focused on the ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric phenomena, and the theory of ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetry is applied to nonlinear integrable systems in mathematical physics [22–24]. Some nonlocal equations have been presented successively soon after Ablowitz and Musslimani initially introduced the nonlocal NLS equation and derived its solutions by the inverse scattering transformation [25]. Particular examples are the nonlocal KP equation, the nonlocal mKdV equation, the nonlocal DS equations, the nonlocal Boussinesq equation, and so on. These nonlocal cases are obviously different from local integrable equations, which arouse renewed interest in nonlinear integrable systems. The DT has been attested to be an efficient algorithm in many circumstances to obtain soliton, breather, and rogue wave solutions of nonlinear integrable equations [26–29]. Several nonlocal systems have been proposed and studied by using DT [30–34].
In this work, we investigate the integrable nonlinear coupled GI equation$\begin{eqnarray}{\rm{i}}{q}_{t}+{q}_{{xx}}+{\rm{i}}{q}^{2}{r}_{x}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{q}^{3}{r}^{2}=0,\end{eqnarray}$$\begin{eqnarray}{\rm{i}}{r}_{t}-{r}_{{xx}}+{\rm{i}}{r}^{2}{q}_{x}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{q}^{2}{r}^{3}=0,\end{eqnarray}$which can be derived through a zero-curvature equation. It leads to the nonlocal GI equation$\begin{eqnarray}{\rm{i}}{q}_{t}+{q}_{{xx}}+{\rm{i}}\varepsilon {q}^{2}{q}_{x}(-x,-t)+\frac{1}{2}{q}^{3}{q}^{2}(-x,-t)=0,\end{eqnarray}$by the reduction q(x, t)=ϵ r(−x, −t), then take the case ϵ=−1.
This paper is organized as follows. In section 2, the DT of equation (3) is discussed based on the presented Lax pair. In section 3, we obtain different kinds of solutions including bright-dark soliton, periodic, rogue wave, W-shaped soliton and kink solutions from zero and nonzero seed solutions. The conclusions are given in section 4.
2. The Lax pair and Darboux transformation
In this section, we consider the Lax pair of a coupled GI equation (2)$\begin{eqnarray}{{\rm{\Phi }}}_{x}=U(x,t,\lambda ){\rm{\Phi }},\end{eqnarray}$$\begin{eqnarray}{{\rm{\Phi }}}_{t}=V(x,t,\lambda ){\rm{\Phi }},\end{eqnarray}$where$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}U & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}-{\rm{i}}{\lambda }^{2}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{\rm{i}}{qr} & \lambda q\\ \lambda r & {\rm{i}}{\lambda }^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{\rm{i}}{qr}\end{array}\right),\\ V & = & \left(\begin{array}{cc}A & B\\ C & -A\end{array}\right),\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$with$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}A & = & -2{\rm{i}}{\lambda }^{4}-{\rm{i}}{qr}{\lambda }^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({{rq}}_{x}-{{qr}}_{x})+\displaystyle \frac{1}{4}{\rm{i}}{q}^{2}{r}^{2},\\ B & = & 2q{\lambda }^{3}+{\rm{i}}{q}_{x}\lambda ,\quad C=2r{\lambda }^{3}-{\rm{i}}{r}_{x}\lambda .\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Firstly, we introduce the following gauge transformation$\begin{eqnarray}{{\rm{\Phi }}}^{[1]}={{\rm{T}}}^{[1]}{\rm{\Phi }},\end{eqnarray}$and it is easy to see that the spectral problem (4) is transformed into$\begin{eqnarray}{{\rm{\Phi }}}_{x}^{[1]}={({{\rm{T}}}_{x}^{[1]}+{{\rm{T}}}^{[1]}U)({{\rm{T}}}^{[1]})}^{-1}{{\rm{\Phi }}}_{1}\triangleq {U}^{[1]}{{\rm{\Phi }}}_{1},\end{eqnarray}$$\begin{eqnarray}{{\rm{\Phi }}}_{t}^{[1]}={({{\rm{T}}}_{t}^{[1]}+{{\rm{T}}}^{[1]}V)({{\rm{T}}}^{[1]})}^{-1}{{\rm{\Phi }}}_{1}\triangleq {V}^{[1]}{{\rm{\Phi }}}_{1}.\end{eqnarray}$Based on DT in [15], the Darboux matrix T can be established as$\begin{eqnarray}{\rm{T}}(\lambda )=\left(\begin{array}{cc}\lambda & {b}_{1}\\ {c}_{1} & \lambda \end{array}\right),\end{eqnarray}$where b1, c1 are all functions of x and t. Then on comparing the identical power of λ and using the fact of T[1]Φ1=0, 1-fold DT is obtained, where Φ1 is a nonzero solution of (4) at λ=λ1. Similarly, considering the eigenfunctions ${{\rm{\Phi }}}_{i}\,={({\phi }_{i},{\varphi }_{i})}^{T},(i=1,2,\cdots ,n)$, the N-fold DT can be expressed by the same process and the transformations between $\left({q}^{[n]},{r}^{[n]}\right)$ and $\left({q}^{[0]},{r}^{[0]}\right)$ are$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}{q}^{[n]} & = & {q}^{[0]}+2{\rm{i}}{b}_{n}={q}^{[0]}+2{\rm{i}}\displaystyle \frac{{\delta }_{11}}{{\delta }_{12}},\\ {r}^{[n]} & = & {r}^{[0]}-2{\rm{i}}{c}_{n}={r}^{[0]}-2{\rm{i}}\displaystyle \frac{{\delta }_{21}}{{\delta }_{22}},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$where, for N=2n,$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{rcl}{\delta }_{11} & = & \left|\begin{array}{ccccc}{\phi }_{1} & {\lambda }_{1}{\varphi }_{1} & \cdots & {\lambda }_{1}^{n-2}{\phi }_{1} & -{\lambda }_{1}^{n}{\phi }_{1}\\ {\phi }_{2} & {\lambda }_{2}{\varphi }_{2} & \cdots & {\lambda }_{2}^{n-2}{\phi }_{2} & -{\lambda }_{2}^{n}{\phi }_{2}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots \\ {\phi }_{n} & {\lambda }_{n}{\varphi }_{n} & \cdots & {\lambda }_{n}^{n-2}{\phi }_{n} & -{\lambda }_{n}^{n}{\phi }_{n}\end{array}\right|,\\ {\delta }_{12} & = & \left|\begin{array}{ccccc}{\phi }_{1} & {\lambda }_{1}{\varphi }_{1} & \cdots & {\lambda }_{1}^{n-2}{\phi }_{1} & {\lambda }_{1}^{n-1}{\varphi }_{1}\\ {\phi }_{2} & {\lambda }_{2}{\varphi }_{2} & \cdots & {\lambda }_{2}^{n-2}{\phi }_{2} & {\lambda }_{2}^{n-1}{\varphi }_{2}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots \\ {\phi }_{n} & {\lambda }_{n}{\varphi }_{n} & \cdots & {\lambda }_{n}^{n-2}{\phi }_{n} & {\lambda }_{n}^{n-1}{\varphi }_{n}\end{array}\right|,\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{rcl}{\delta }_{21} & = & \left|\begin{array}{ccccc}{\varphi }_{1} & {\lambda }_{1}{\phi }_{1} & \cdots & {\lambda }_{1}^{n-2}{\varphi }_{1} & -{\lambda }_{1}^{n}{\varphi }_{1}\\ {\varphi }_{2} & {\lambda }_{2}{\phi }_{2} & \cdots & {\lambda }_{2}^{n-2}{\varphi }_{2} & -{\lambda }_{2}^{n}{\varphi }_{2}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots \\ {\varphi }_{n} & {\lambda }_{n}{\phi }_{n} & \cdots & {\lambda }_{n}^{n-2}{\varphi }_{n} & -{\lambda }_{n}^{n}{\varphi }_{n}\end{array}\right|,\\ {\delta }_{22} & = & \left|\begin{array}{ccccc}{\varphi }_{1} & {\lambda }_{1}{\phi }_{1} & \cdots & {\lambda }_{1}^{n-2}{\varphi }_{1} & {\lambda }_{1}^{n-1}{\phi }_{1}\\ {\varphi }_{2} & {\lambda }_{2}{\phi }_{2} & \cdots & {\lambda }_{2}^{n-2}{\varphi }_{2} & {\lambda }_{2}^{n-1}{\phi }_{2}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots \\ {\varphi }_{n} & {\lambda }_{n}{\phi }_{n} & \cdots & {\lambda }_{n}^{n-2}{\varphi }_{n} & {\lambda }_{n}^{n-1}{\phi }_{n}\end{array}\right|.\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
Under the nonlocal reduction condition q(x, t)=−r(−x, −t), we have to choose the eigenfunction Φk as$\begin{eqnarray}{\phi }_{k}(x,t)={\varphi }_{k}(-x,-t).\end{eqnarray}$In a word, we should pay more attention to the effects of different reductions when considering the nonlocal equations.
3. Exact solutions of equation (3)
In the following contents, we select several zero and nonzero seed solutions to solve the nonlocal GI equation (3). With the substitution of seed solutions, we can obtain the solutions of the Lax pair for different cases.
3.1. Soliton solutions from the zero seed solution
First of all, we select trivial solution q[0](x, t)=−r[0](−x, −t)=0, the corresponding eigenfunctions for equation (3) are given by$\begin{eqnarray}{{\rm{\Phi }}}_{k}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{\phi }_{k}\\ {\varphi }_{k}\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{{\rm{e}}}^{-{\rm{i}}{\theta }_{k}}\\ {{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}{\theta }_{k}}\end{array}\right),\end{eqnarray}$where ${\theta }_{k}={\lambda }_{k}^{2}x+2{\lambda }_{k}^{4}t$.
3.1.1. Soliton solutions from the zero seed solution by two-fold DT
It is easy to describe different solutions by adjusting the appropriate parameters λk (k=1, 2). Then we get the following solution$\begin{eqnarray}{q}^{[2]}=2{\rm{i}}\displaystyle \frac{{\phi }_{1}{\phi }_{2}({\lambda }_{1}^{2}-{\lambda }_{2}^{2})}{{\lambda }_{2}{\phi }_{1}{\varphi }_{2}-{\lambda }_{1}{\varphi }_{1}{\phi }_{2}}.\end{eqnarray}$
Case 1: Bright soliton solution
Let ${\lambda }_{1}={\lambda }_{2}^{* }$, we can gain the typical bright soliton solution$\begin{eqnarray}{q}^{[2]}=2{\rm{i}}\displaystyle \frac{({\lambda }_{1}^{2}-{\lambda }_{1}^{* 2}){{\rm{e}}}^{-{\rm{i}}({\theta }_{1}+{\theta }_{2})}}{{\lambda }_{1}^{* }{{\rm{e}}}^{-{\rm{i}}({\theta }_{1}-{\theta }_{2})}-{\lambda }_{1}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}({\theta }_{1}-{\theta }_{2})}},\end{eqnarray}$with appropriate parameters.
Case 2: Kink solution
Additionally, to get another solution which is different from the one of classical GI equation, setting Re(λ2)=0, the kink solution is derived. It follows from this solution that if Re(λ1)>0, the form of the solution is expressed as the kink solution, and the solution given by the Re(λ1)<0 is expressed as the anti-kink solution.
Case 3: Periodic solution
Without loss of any generality, setting Im(λ1)= Im(λ2)=0, and the solution turns to a periodic solution,$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{q}^{[2]}=2{\rm{i}}\left({\lambda }_{1{\rm{R}}}^{2}-{\lambda }_{2{\rm{R}}}^{2}\right)\\ \ \times \ \displaystyle \frac{\cos ({H}_{1})-\mathrm{isin}({H}_{1})}{({\lambda }_{2{\rm{R}}}-{\lambda }_{1{\rm{R}}})\cos ({H}_{2})-{\rm{i}}({\lambda }_{2{\rm{R}}}+{\lambda }_{1{\rm{R}}})\sin ({H}_{2})},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$where$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{rcl}{H}_{1} & = & \left({\lambda }_{1{\rm{R}}}^{2}+{\lambda }_{2{\rm{R}}}^{2}\right)x+2\left({\lambda }_{1{\rm{R}}}^{4}+{\lambda }_{2{\rm{R}}}^{4}\right)t,\\ {H}_{2} & = & \left({\lambda }_{1{\rm{R}}}^{2}-{\lambda }_{2{\rm{R}}}^{2}\right)x+2\left({\lambda }_{1{\rm{R}}}^{4}-{\lambda }_{2{\rm{R}}}^{4}\right)t.\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$Thus, the period of this solution can be obtained by direct calculation. The periodicity of the solution appears concurrently in x and t.
3.1.2. Soliton solutions from zero seed solution by four-fold DT
Meanwhile, we can construct four-fold DT to get different kinds of interactional solutions with the distinct choices of parameters. Taking the same procedure as above, one can find soliton solutions of the nonlocal GI equation$\begin{eqnarray}{q}^{[4]}=2{\rm{i}}\displaystyle \frac{{Q}_{4}}{{R}_{4}}\end{eqnarray}$with$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{rcl}{Q}_{4} & = & \left|\begin{array}{cccc}{\phi }_{1} & {\lambda }_{1}{\varphi }_{1} & {\lambda }_{1}^{2}{\phi }_{1} & -{\lambda }_{1}^{4}{\phi }_{1}\\ {\phi }_{2} & {\lambda }_{2}{\varphi }_{2} & {\lambda }_{2}^{2}{\phi }_{2} & -{\lambda }_{2}^{4}{\phi }_{2}\\ {\phi }_{3} & {\lambda }_{3}{\varphi }_{3} & {\lambda }_{3}^{2}{\phi }_{3} & -{\lambda }_{3}^{4}{\phi }_{3}\\ {\phi }_{4} & {\lambda }_{4}{\varphi }_{4} & {\lambda }_{4}^{2}{\phi }_{4} & -{\lambda }_{4}^{4}{\phi }_{4}\end{array}\right|,\\ {R}_{4} & = & \left|\begin{array}{cccc}{\phi }_{1} & {\lambda }_{1}{\varphi }_{1} & {\lambda }_{1}^{2}{\phi }_{1} & {\lambda }_{1}^{3}{\varphi }_{1}\\ {\phi }_{2} & {\lambda }_{2}{\varphi }_{2} & {\lambda }_{2}^{2}{\phi }_{2} & {\lambda }_{2}^{3}{\varphi }_{2}\\ {\phi }_{3} & {\lambda }_{3}{\varphi }_{3} & {\lambda }_{3}^{2}{\phi }_{3} & {\lambda }_{3}^{3}{\varphi }_{3}\\ {\phi }_{4} & {\lambda }_{4}{\varphi }_{4} & {\lambda }_{4}^{2}{\phi }_{4} & {\lambda }_{4}^{3}{\varphi }_{4}\end{array}\right|.\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
Case 4: Two-bright soliton solution
While for ${\lambda }_{1}={\lambda }_{2}^{* }$, ${\lambda }_{3}={\lambda }_{4}^{* }$, two-bright soliton solution is easy to obtain, which is shown in figure 1.
Figure 1.
New window|Download| PPT slide Figure 1.Two-bright soliton solution with λ1= ${\lambda }_{2}^{* }=1.1+0.6{\rm{i}}$, λ3= ${\lambda }_{4}^{* }=0.8+0.4{\rm{i}}$.
Case 5: Mixed periodic solution
As shown in figure 2, to construct a mixed periodic solution, we take the parameters as ${\lambda }_{1}={\lambda }_{2}^{* }$, Im(λ3)=0, Re(λ4)=0. It is observed that this solution on the periodic wave background has the similar property as (15).
Figure 2.
New window|Download| PPT slide Figure 2.Mixed periodic solution with ${\lambda }_{1}={\lambda }_{2}^{* }=0.7+{\rm{i}}$, ${\lambda }_{3}$=−0.8, ${\lambda }_{4}=0.3{\rm{i}}$.
Case 6: Mixed kink and soliton solution
As discussed above, we can obtain different kinds of hybrid solutions with other parameter choices. In this case, for the following parameters, the mixed kink and soliton solution is shown in figure 3.
Figure 3.
New window|Download| PPT slide Figure 3.Mixed kink and soliton solution with λ1=0.2+i, λ2=−i, ${\lambda }_{3}={\lambda }_{4}^{* }=1-1.2{\rm{i}}$.
3.2. Soliton solutions from the nonzero seed solution
In order to utilize DT method for obtaining the solutions of nonlocal GI equation, we should first give the nonzero seed solution. It is easy to suppose that q[0](x, t)=−r[0](−x, −t)=aeiζ, $\zeta ={bx}+(\tfrac{1}{2}{a}^{4}-{a}^{2}b-{b}^{2})t$ is the special solution of equation (3), where a and b are two complex parameters. Substituting this seed solution into (4), the corresponding solution with λk can be elaborately deduced as$\begin{eqnarray}{{\rm{\Phi }}}_{k}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{\phi }_{k}\\ {\varphi }_{k}\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}\left({C}_{2,k}{{\rm{e}}}^{-{\eta }_{k}}-{C}_{1,k}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\eta }_{k}}\right){{\rm{e}}}^{\tfrac{{\rm{i}}}{2}\zeta }\\ \left({C}_{2,k}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\eta }_{k}}-{C}_{1,k}{{\rm{e}}}^{-{\eta }_{k}}\right){{\rm{e}}}^{-\tfrac{{\rm{i}}}{2}\zeta }\end{array}\right),\end{eqnarray}$where$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{C}_{1,k}\\ =\ \displaystyle \frac{4{\rm{i}}{\lambda }_{k}^{4}-2{\rm{i}}{a}^{2}{\lambda }_{k}^{2}+{\rm{i}}{a}^{2}b-{\rm{i}}{b}^{2}+\sqrt{{\rho }_{k}}+2a{\lambda }_{k}(-2{\lambda }_{k}^{2}+b)}{2a{\lambda }_{k}(-2{\lambda }_{k}^{2}+b)\sqrt{{\rho }_{k}}},\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{C}_{2,k}\\ =\ \displaystyle \frac{4{\rm{i}}{\lambda }_{k}^{4}-2{\rm{i}}{a}^{2}{\lambda }_{k}^{2}+{\rm{i}}{a}^{2}b-{\rm{i}}{b}^{2}-\sqrt{{\rho }_{k}}+2a{\lambda }_{k}(-2{\lambda }_{k}^{2}+b)}{2a{\lambda }_{k}(-2{\lambda }_{k}^{2}+b)\sqrt{{\rho }_{k}}},\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{rcl}{\eta }_{k} & = & \sqrt{{\rho }_{k}}\left(\displaystyle \frac{x}{-4{\lambda }_{k}^{2}+2b}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}t\right),\\ {\rho }_{k} & = & -{\left(-2{\lambda }_{k}^{2}+b\right)}^{2}\left(4{\lambda }_{k}^{4}+4b{\lambda }_{k}^{2}+{\left({a}^{2}-b\right)}^{2}\right).\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
Comparing the formulas of φk and φk by direct computation, we can find the eigenfunction Φk satisfies φk(x, t)=φk(−x, −t), and consequently gain the solutions of equation (3). Similarly, the concrete expressions of the solutions are derived in determinant forms via DT. Here we consider several special solutions of the nonlocal GI equation.
3.2.1. Soliton solutions from nonzero seed solution by two-fold DT
Case 7: Dark and anti-dark soliton solutions
In order to further generate dark and anti-dark solitons, we first set Re(λ1)=Re(λ2)=0, then let Im(λ2) →−Im(λ1) with proper parameters, see figure 4.
Figure 4.
New window|Download| PPT slide Figure 4.Dark and anti-dark soltion solutions with (a) λ1=2i, λ2=−2.01i, a=1, b=12.99; (b) λ1=i, λ2=−1.01i, a=−3, b=5.01.
Case 8: Breather and rogue wave solutions
Let ${\lambda }_{1}=\pm {\lambda }_{2}^{* }$, we can gain the typical breather solution of equation (3), which is displayed in figure 5. Next, the rogue wave solution is derived from its breather solution through a limit process. Take one pair of negative complex-conjugate eigenvalues ${\lambda }_{1}=-{\lambda }_{2}^{* }$ and set $b=-2{\lambda }_{{\rm{R}}}^{2}+2{\lambda }_{{\rm{I}}}^{2}$, we can obtain the rogue wave solution by letting a→2λI.
Figure 5.
New window|Download| PPT slide Figure 5.Breather and rogue wave solutions with (a) ${\lambda }_{1}={\lambda }_{2}^{* }=1+{\rm{i}},a=1,b=1$; (b) λ1=−1+i, λ2=1+i.
Case 9: Double periodic solution
To describe the double periodic solution, we take Re(λ1)=Re(λ2)=0, see figure 6. Interestingly, if we choose Im(λ2) to approach Im(λ1), the period of this solution will decrease. Set Im(λ2) → Im(λ1), the solution consisting of periodic waves and a breather is derived when a>b . Then the case a<b gives the shape of the solution as the anti-dark solution in figure 7.
Figure 6.
New window|Download| PPT slide Figure 6.Double periodic solution with λ1=1.1i, λ2=i, a=2, b=1.
Figure 7.
New window|Download| PPT slide Figure 7.Mixed soliton solution with λ1=1.1i, λ2=0.8i, a=1, b=1.5.
Case 10: Mixed kink and periodic solution
To derive the hybrid solution composing of a kink solution and a periodic solution, we choose the parameters as Re(λ1)=0. We can obtain the interaction of periodic and kink solution which is shown in figure 8. This kind of solution can be regarded as a periodic solution with changed background height.
Figure 8.
New window|Download| PPT slide Figure 8.Mixed kink and periodic solution with λ1=i, λ2=0.4−i, a=1.5, b=0.5.
3.2.2. Soliton solutions from nonzero seed solution by four-fold DT
Substituting eigenfunction (17) into (10) with N=4, we can construct two-soliton solution from nonzero seed solution with the help of four-fold DT. Under these circumstances, [17] has obtained higher order rogue wave solutions by a certain limit. In our work, we provide some mixed soliton solutions in this subsection.
Case 11: Mixed rogue wave and periodic solution
For convenience, let b=0, a=1 and we take the limit of (17) at ${\lambda }_{1}=\tfrac{a}{2}+\tfrac{a}{2}{\rm{i}}$ and ${\lambda }_{2}=-\tfrac{a}{2}+\tfrac{a}{2}{\rm{i}}$, respectively. Then choose the appropriate parameters λ3 and λ4, the mixed rogue wave and periodic solution is derived in figure 9.
Figure 9.
New window|Download| PPT slide Figure 9.Mixed rogue wave and periodic solution with a=1, b=0, λ1=0.5+0.5i, λ2=−0.5+0.5i, λ3=1.61i, λ4=−1.6i.
Case 12: Mixed W-shaped soliton and periodic solution
Let Re(λi)=0(i=1, ⋯, 4), the mixed periodic solution is obtained through 4-fold DT. Next, we select the appropriate eigenvalues to construct new solutions of the nonlocal GI equation. In the case of Re(λ2)→−Re(λ1) and Re(λ3)→−Re(λ4), q[4] provides the mixed W(M)-shaped soliton and periodic solution. The soliton solution show special contours in that it is look like an English letter W(M). It is noteworthy that q[4] gives the M-shaped soliton while Im(λ1)<0. Moreover it generates the W-shaped soliton while Im(λ1)>0, which can see in figures 10 and 11.
Figure 10.
New window|Download| PPT slide Figure 10.Mixed W-shaped soliton and periodic solution with λ1=i, λ2=−1.01i, λ3=2i, λ4=−2.01i, a=1, b=2.
Figure 11.
New window|Download| PPT slide Figure 11.Mixed M-shaped soliton and periodic solution with λ1=−i, λ2=1.01i, λ3=−2i, λ4=2.01i, a=1, b=2.
Case 13: Mixed dark soliton and periodic solution
Similar to case 12, when Re(λi)=0(i=1, ⋯,4), the mixed dark soliton and periodic solution is derived from 4-fold DT by choosing appropriate parameters. Figure 12 displays the profiles of the special solution, which is like an unfolded book.
Figure 12.
New window|Download| PPT slide Figure 12.Mixed dark soliton and periodic solution with λ1=−i, λ2=1.01i, λ3=2i, λ4=−2.01i, a=1, b=12.99.
Comparing the eigenfunctions of the local and nonlocal equations, the differences between the exact solutions of two equations in nonzero seed case are listed in table 1. We find the latter has fewer restrictive conditions, which has more parameter choices. It is necessary to find that the eigenfunctions in nonlocal equation are more general. What's more, the parameters a, b from nonzero seed solutions are complex constants in nonlocal GI equation. It is easy to find that the exact solutions of equation (3) possesses new characteristics in nonlocal case.
Table 1. Table 1.Differences between the solutions of two equations in nonzero seed case.
Equation
GI equation
Nonlocal GI equation
Parameters a, b
Real
Complex
Discrepancies of solutions
Breather, rogue wave, dark soliton, periodic solutions
In this paper, the exact solutions in terms of the determinant have been represented based on 2n-fold DT. Through the distinct choices of parameters, we present several types of hybrid soliton solutions including bright-dark soliton, breather, rogue wave, periodic, W-shaped soliton and kink solutions. We devote to find the differences between local and nonlocal case. It is noteworthy that the solutions of the nonlocal GI equation are different from those of classic GI equation. We expect to find more types of explicit solutions which can then be presented in new features in the future.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11371326 and Grant No. 11975145).
TianS FZhangT T2018 Long-time asymptotic behavior for the Gerdjikov-Ivanov type of derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation with time-periodic boundary condition 146 17131729 DOI:10.1090/proc/13917 [Cited within: 1]
GerdzhikovV SIvanovM I1983 A quadratic pencil of general type and nonlinear evolution equations: II. Hierarchies of Hamiltonian structures 10 130143 [Cited within: 1]
ZhangJ BGongyeY YMaW X2020 Conservation laws and τ-symmetry algebra of the Gerdjikov-Ivanov soliton hierarchy 43 111123 DOI:10.1007/s40840-018-0666-1
TrikiHAlqahtaniR TZhouQBiswasA2017 New envelope solitons for Gerdjikov-Ivanov model in nonlinear fiber optics 111 326334 DOI:10.1016/j.spmi.2017.06.046
DingC CGaoY TLiL Q2019 Breathers and rogue waves on the periodic background for the Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation for the Alfvén waves in an astrophysical plasma 120 259265 DOI:10.1016/j.chaos.2019.01.007
ShiYShenS FZhaoS L2019 Solutions and connections of nonlocal derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equations 95 12571267 DOI:10.1007/s11071-018-4627-x
LüXMaW XLiuF HKhaliqueC M2015 Envelope bright- and dark-soliton solutions for the Gerdjikov-Ivanov model 82 12111220 DOI:10.1007/s11071-015-2227-6
ZhangZ CFanE G2020 Inverse scattering transform for the Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation with nonzero boundary conditions 71 128 DOI:10.1007/s00033-020-01371-z
JiTZhaiY Y2020 Soliton, breather and rogue wave solutions of the coupled Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation via Darboux transformation 101 619631 DOI:10.1007/s11071-020-05790-5 [Cited within: 1]
FanE G2000 Integrable evolution systems based on Gerdjikov-Ivanov equations, bi-Hamiltonian structure, finite-dimensional integrable systems and N-fold Darboux transformation 41 77697782 DOI:10.1063/1.1314895 [Cited within: 1]
ChenJ CYanQ XZhangH2020 Multiple bright soliton solutions of a reverse-space nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equation 106 106375 DOI:10.1016/j.aml.2020.106375
RaoJ GHeJ SDumitruMChengY2020 PT-symmetric nonlocal Davey-Stewartson I equation: General lump-soliton solutions on a background of periodic line waves 104 106246 DOI:10.1016/j.aml.2020.106246 [Cited within: 1]
YeR SZhangYZhangQ YChenX T2020 Vector rational and semi-rational rogue wave solutions in the coupled complex modified Korteweg-de Vries equations 92 102425 DOI:10.1016/j.wavemoti.2019.102425
ZhangYYangJ WChowK WWuC F2017 Solitons, breathers and rogue waves for the coupled Fokas-Lenells system via Darboux transformation 33 237252 DOI:10.1016/j.nonrwa.2016.06.006
LiMXuT2015 Dark and antidark soliton interactions in the nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equation with the self-induced parity-time-symmetric potential 91 033202 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.91.033202
ShiX JLvPQiC2020 Explicit solutions to a nonlocal 2-component complex modified Korteweg-de Vries equation 100 106043 DOI:10.1016/j.aml.2019.106043