1.School of Physics and State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China 2.FRIB/NSCL Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA 3.China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China 4.Kitami Institute of Technology, 090-8507 Kitami, Japan 5.Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP), Osaka University, 10-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan 6.Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 7.Spallation Neutron Source Science Center, Dongguan 523803, China Received Date:2021-05-01 Available Online:2021-08-15 Abstract:A multi-nucleon transfer and cluster decay experiment, $^7$Li($^{11}$B,$^{14}$C$^*\rightarrow\alpha$+$^{10}$Be)$\alpha$, is conducted at an incident beam energy of 55 MeV. This reaction channel has a significantly large Q-value, which favors populating the high lying resonant states in $^{14}$C. The decay paths, from these resonances to various states of the final nucleus $^{10}$Be, can be selected, owing to the experimentally achieved optimal resolution of the Q-value spectrum. A number of resonant states are reconstructed from the forward emitting $^{10}$Be + $\alpha$ fragments, and their major molecular structures can be detected according to the selective decay paths and relative decay widths. A state at 22.4(2) MeV validates the previously measured and theoretically predicted band head of the positive-parity $\sigma$-bond linear-chain molecular band. Two additional resonances at 22.9(2) and 24.2(2) MeV are identified and consistent with the predicted $2^+$ and $4^+$ members of the same molecular band, thus providing novel evidences for the existence of the exotic clustering chain structure in neutron-rich carbon isotopes. A few high energy resonances, which also indicate the presence of the $\sigma$-bond molecular structure, are observed; however, further studies are still required to clarify their ascription in band systematics.
HTML
--> --> -->
III.ANALYSIS AND RESULTSAs indicated in the introduction section, reaction Q-value is particularly important in the present work, and it relies on distinguishing the decay paths. For the targeted transfer-decay process, $ ^7 $Li($ ^{11} $B,$ ^{14}{\rm{C^*}}\rightarrow $$ \alpha +^{10}{\rm{Be}} $)$ \alpha $, the $ Q $-value is defined as
To maintain the high statistics, we solely measure two decay fragments, the forward emitting $ ^{10} $Be and $ \alpha $, and deduce the energy of the remaining $ \alpha $-particles according to the momentum-energy conservation of the reaction [11, 13]. In this case, the contamination from the fluoride content in the LiF target may contribute to the Q-value and invariant mass spectra (see below). However, by applying the so-called EP-plot method [28], this contamination can mostly be removed. Figure 2 presents the excellent resolution of the Q-value spectrum, which allows us to clearly discriminate the ground state ($ Q_{\rm{ggg}} \sim 6\; {\rm{MeV}} $) and first excited state ($ E_{\rm{x}} \approx 3.4 \; {\rm{MeV}} $, $ 2^+ $) of $ ^{10} $Be. At the excitation energy of approximately 6 MeV ($ Q \sim 0\; {\rm{MeV}} $), there are four close-by states in $ ^{10} $Be, namely 5.958 MeV ($ 2^+_2 $), 5.96 MeV ($ 1^- $), 6.18 MeV ($ 0^+_2 $), and 6.26 MeV ($ 2^- $) states, which cannot be separated in the Q-value spectrum and will be labeled as $ \sim 6\; {\rm{MeV}} $ states. We note that the extremely large reaction Q-value of the reaction considered in this study, [$ ^7 $Li($ ^{11} $B,$ ^{14}{\rm{C}} $)$ \alpha $, $ Q = 18.13\; {\rm{MeV}} $], is crucial in eliminating the background from other reactions with significantly lower Q-values. Furthermore, to achieve the required Q-value resolution, it is important to have optimal energy resolutions for the incident beam and detection system, as well as a small energy loss in the target [11]. Figure2. (color?online) Q-value spectrum for the reaction $^7$Li($^{11}$B,$^{14}{\rm{C^*}}\rightarrow\alpha +^{10}{{\rm{Be}}}$)$\alpha$, calculated using the measured $^{10}$Be and $\alpha$-particle at forward angles and another $\alpha$ with deduced energy (refer to text for details). The peaks in the spectrum are associated with the ground and excited states (as marked) of the final fragment $^{10}$Be.
Using the two decay fragments measured by L0 and R0 telescopes, namely the $ ^{10} $Be and $ \alpha $-particle, the relative energy (or decay energy) of the resonances in $ ^{14} $C can be reconstructed according to the standard invariant mass (IM) method [6, 11, 13, 14]. A contamination reaction, $ ^7 $Li($ ^{11} $B,$ ^{10}{\rm{Be}} $)$ ^8{\rm{Be}}\rightarrow 2\alpha $, might emerge. This reaction possesses the same final mass combination as our targeted reaction and hence cannot be eliminated by the Q-value selection. We verified this assertion by using the two-dimensional Dalitz-plot corresponding to the reconstruction of $ ^{14} $C and $ ^{8} $Be. It was determined that the $ ^8 $Be decay does not significantly affect the $ ^{14} $C decay owing , most likely, to the angular coverage of the L0(R0) telescope that is not in favor of detecting the recoil $ ^8 $Be remnants. The excitation-energy (relative energy plus the corresponding separation energy) spectra, conditioned by the Q-value peaks as presented in Fig. 2, can be fitted by continuum backgrounds plus a number of resonance peaks. The continuum backgrounds appear similar to those presented in Fig. 2 of Ref. [11] but with significantly less relative contributions, owing to the actual selection of the reaction channel. In Fig. 3, we plot the spectra with the backgrounds subtracted, to obtain a better illustration of the resonance peaks. Each peak curve in the figure is a convolution of the Breit-Wigner (BW) function with the Gaussian-type energy-resolution function [14]. The energy resolution functions and detection efficiency (acceptance) curves, as a function of the relative energy, were simulated by considering a reasonable angular distribution of the produced $ ^{14} $C and its decay fragments, as well as the actual detection setup, energy and position resolutions of the detectors, and applied cuts in the data analysis [11, 14]. Because the efficiency curves (Fig. 3) do not significantly affect he number of counts and the width of each peak [14], we did not incorporate them into the BW resonance shape. Figure3. (color?online) Excitation-energy (relative energy plus the corresponding separation energy) spectra conditioned by the Q-value peaks in Fig. 2 and with the continuum backgrounds subtracted [11]. The peak curves (red-solid lines) are BW functions convoluted by energy resolution functions, obtained by fitting to the experimental spectra. The simulated detection efficiency curves (yellow-dashed lines) are also plotted with an arbitrary unit. The vertical blue-dashed lines are used to guide the eyes for the peak positions of the resonances.