删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

Search for QCD critical point by transverse velocity dependence of anti-deuteron to deuteron ratio

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

闂傚倸鍊烽懗鍫曞箠閹剧粯鍋ら柕濞炬櫅缁€澶愭煙閻戞ɑ鈷愰悗姘煼閺岋綁寮崒姘闁诲孩纰嶅畝鎼佸蓟濞戞ǚ鏋庣€广儱鎳庢慨搴ㄦ⒑鏉炴媽顔夐柡鍛█楠炲啰鎹勭悰鈩冾潔闁哄鐗冮弲娑氭暜閵娧呯=濞达絼绮欓崫铏圭磼鐠囪尙澧曢柣锝呭槻椤繄鎹勯崫鍕偓鍧楁⒑閸濆嫭鍌ㄩ柛銊ヮ煼瀹曪綁骞囬悧鍫㈠幗闂佺粯锚瀵爼骞栭幇顒夌唵鐟滃瞼鍒掑▎鎾虫槬闁靛繈鍊栭崵鍐煃閸濆嫬鈧悂鎯冮锔解拺闁告稑锕ユ径鍕煕閹炬潙鍝洪柟顔斤耿楠炲洭鎮ч崼姘闂備礁鎲¢幐鍡涘礃瑜嶉ˉ姘舵⒑濮瑰洤鐒洪柛銊ゅ嵆椤㈡岸顢橀悢渚锤闂佸憡绋戦敃銉х礊閸ャ劊浜滈柟鎵虫櫅閻忊晜顨ラ悙宸剶婵﹥妞藉畷妤呮偂鎼粹€承戦梻浣规偠閸ㄨ偐浜搁鍫澪﹂柟鎵閺呮悂鏌ㄩ悤鍌涘40%闂傚倸鍊风粈浣革耿鏉堚晛鍨濇い鏍仜缁€澶愭煛瀹ュ骸骞栭柛銊ュ€归幈銊ノ熼崸妤€鎽甸柣蹇撶箰鐎涒晠骞堥妸銉庣喖宕归鎯у缚闂佽绻愬ù姘椤忓牆钃熼柕濞垮劗濡插牓鏌ц箛锝呬簻妞ゅ骏鎷�
闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥綖婢跺顩插ù鐘差儏缁€澶屸偓鍏夊亾闁逞屽墰閸掓帞鎷犲顔兼倯闂佹悶鍎崝宀勬儍椤愨懇鏀芥い鏃囶潡瑜版帒鏄ラ柡宥庡亗閻掑﹥銇勮箛鎾跺闁绘挻绋戦…璺ㄦ崉閻氭潙浼愰梺鍝勬閸犳劗鎹㈠☉娆忕窞婵☆垰鎼猾宥嗙節绾版ê澧查柟绋垮暱閻g兘骞掗幋鏃€鏂€闂佸綊鍋婇崜姘额敊閺囩偐鏀介柣鎰▕閸ょ喎鈹戦姘煎殶缂佽京鍋ら崺鈧い鎺戝閻撳繘鏌涢埄鍐炬當闁哄棴绲块埀顒冾潐濞测晝绱炴笟鈧妴浣糕槈閵忊€斥偓鐑芥煃鏉炵増顦峰瑙勬礀閳规垿顢欓惌顐簽婢规洟顢橀悩鍏哥瑝闂佸搫绋侀悘鎰版偡閹靛啿鐗氶梺鍛婃处閸嬪棝顢栭崟顒傜閻庣數枪瀛濋梺缁橆殔缁绘帒危閹版澘绫嶉柛顐g箘椤撴椽姊虹紒妯忣亪鎮樺璺虹畾闁挎繂顦伴埛鎺戙€掑顒佹悙濞存粍绻堥弻锛勪沪鐠囨彃顬嬪┑鐐叉閸ㄤ粙骞冨▎鎴斿亾閻㈢數銆婇柡瀣墵濮婅櫣绱掑Ο铏逛桓闁藉啴浜堕弻鐔兼偪椤栨瑥鎯堢紓浣介哺鐢€愁嚕椤曗偓閸┾偓妞ゆ帒瀚崑锟犳煥閺冨倸浜鹃柡鍡樼矌閹叉悂鎮ч崼婵堫儌閻庤鎸风欢姘跺蓟濞戔懇鈧箓骞嬪┑鍥╁蒋闂備礁鎲¢懝楣冨箠鎼淬劍绠掗梻浣稿悑缁佹挳寮插☉婧惧彺闂傚倷绶氶埀顒傚仜閼活垱鏅堕鐐粹拺闁兼亽鍎遍埛濂濆┑鐘垫暩閸嬬偛岣垮▎鎾宠Е閻庯綆鍠楅崵灞轿旈敐鍛殭缂佺姷鍠栭弻鐔煎箚閻楀牜妫勯梺璇茬箺濞呮洜鎹㈠┑瀣瀭妞ゆ劧绲介弳妤冪磽娴f彃浜炬繝銏e煐閸旀牠鎮¢悢鍏肩厓鐟滄粓宕滃▎鎰箚濞寸姴顑嗛悡鏇㈡煃閸濆嫬鈧煤閹绢喗鐓涢悘鐐跺Г閸h銇勯锝囩畵闁伙絿鍏樺畷鍫曞煛閸愨晜鐦掗梻鍌欐祰瀹曞灚鎱ㄩ弶鎳ㄦ椽濡堕崼娑楁睏闂佺粯鍔曢幖顐︽嚋鐟欏嫨浜滈柟鐑樺灥閳ь剙缍婂畷鎴濐潨閳ь剟寮婚弴鐔虹鐟滃秶鈧凹鍣e鎶芥偐缂佹ǚ鎷洪梺鍛婄☉閿曘倗绮幒鎾茬箚妞ゆ劧绲鹃ˉ鍫熶繆椤愩垺鍤囬柛鈺嬬節瀹曘劑顢欓幆褍鍙婇梻鍌欒兌缁垶宕濋敃鍌氱婵炲棙鍔曠欢鐐碘偓骞垮劚椤︿即鎮″▎鎾村€垫繛鎴炵憽缂傛艾顭胯閸撶喖寮婚悢鍏煎剬闁告縿鍎宠ⅵ婵°倗濮烽崑娑㈡煀閿濆棔绻嗛柣鎴f鎯熼梺闈涱檧婵″洦绂嶅畡鎵虫斀闁绘劖娼欓悘锔芥叏婵犲嫭鍤€妞ゎ厼鐏濋~婊堝焵椤掑嫮宓侀柛鎰╁壆閺冨牆宸濇い鏃囧Г閻濐偊鏌f惔鈥冲辅闁稿鎹囬弻娑㈠箛椤撶偛濮㈠┑鐐茬墢閸嬫挾鎹㈠☉姘e亾閻㈢櫥褰掝敁閹惧墎纾界€广儰绀佹禍楣冩⒒娓氣偓濞佳兾涘Δ鍛柈闁圭虎鍠栫粻鐘绘煏韫囨洖啸闁哄棗顑夐弻鈩冨緞鎼淬垻銆婇梺璇″櫙閹凤拷40%闂傚倸鍊风粈浣革耿鏉堚晛鍨濇い鏍仜缁€澶愭煛瀹ュ骸骞栭柛銊ュ€归幈銊ノ熼幐搴c€愰弶鈺傜箞濮婅櫣绮欓幐搴㈡嫳缂備浇顕х粔鐟扮暦閻㈠憡鏅濋柍褜鍓熷﹢渚€姊虹紒妯兼噧闁硅櫕鍔楃划鏃堫敆閸曨剛鍘梺绯曞墲椤ㄥ懘寮抽悢鍏肩厵鐎瑰嫭澹嗙粔鐑樸亜閵忊埗顏堝煘閹达箑鐐婄憸婊勫閸℃稒鈷掑ù锝呮啞閹牓鏌eΔ浣虹煉鐎规洘绮岄埥澶愬閳ュ厖鎴锋俊鐐€栭悧妤冪矙閹炬眹鈧懘鎮滈懞銉ヤ化婵炶揪绲介幗婊堟晬瀹ュ洨纾煎璺猴功娴犮垽妫佹径瀣瘈鐟滃繑鎱ㄩ幘顔肩柈妞ゆ牜鍋涚粻姘舵煕瀹€鈧崑鐐烘偂閵夛妇绠鹃柟瀵稿€戦崷顓涘亾濮樺崬顣肩紒缁樼洴閹剝鎯旈埥鍡楀Ψ缂傚倷绀侀崐鍝ョ矓瑜版帇鈧線寮撮姀鐙€娼婇梺缁樶缚閺佹瓕鈪�9闂傚倸鍊烽懗鍫曘€佹繝鍥ф槬闁哄稁鍓欑紞姗€姊绘笟鈧埀顒傚仜閼活垱鏅堕鈧弻娑欑節閸愨晛鈧劙鏌熼姘殻濠殿喒鍋撻梺闈涚墕閹虫劙藝椤愶附鈷戠紒顖涙礀婢у弶绻涢懠顒€鏋涢柟顕嗙節閸╋繝宕ㄩ瑙勫闂備礁鎲¢幐鍡涘礃瑜嶉ˉ姘舵⒑濮瑰洤鐒洪柛銊╀憾楠炴劙鎼归锛勭畾闁诲孩绋掕摫濠殿垱鎸抽幃宄扳枎韫囨搩浠奸梻鍌氬亞閸ㄨ泛顫忛搹瑙勫厹闁告侗鍨伴悧姘舵⒑缁嬪潡顎楃€规洦鍓熷﹢浣糕攽椤斿浠滈柛瀣崌閺岀喖顢欓妸銉︽悙闁绘劕锕弻宥夊传閸曨偅娈查梺璇″灲缂嶄礁顫忓ú顏勭閹艰揪绲哄Σ鍫ユ⒑閸忓吋銇熼柛銊ф暬婵$敻骞囬弶璺紲闂佺粯鍔樼亸娆撍囬锔解拺闁告繂瀚峰Σ瑙勩亜閹寸偟鎳囩€规洘绻堝畷銊р偓娑欋缚閸樻悂鎮楃憴鍕鞍闁告繂閰e畷鎰板Χ婢跺﹦鏌堥梺鍓插亖閸庢煡鎮¢弴鐘冲枑閹艰揪绲块惌娆撶叓閸ャ劎鈽夐柣鎺戠仛閵囧嫰骞嬮敐鍛Х闂佺ǹ绻愰張顒傛崲濞戙垹宸濇い鎰╁灩椤姊虹拠鈥崇仭婵☆偄鍟村顐﹀礃閳哄倸顎撶紓浣割儓濞夋洘绂掗銏♀拻濞达絽鎲¢崯鐐烘煟閵婏妇鐭嬮柟宄版嚇楠炴捇骞掑鍜佹婵犵數鍋犻幓顏嗙礊娓氣偓瀵煡鎳犻鍐ㄐ¢梺瑙勫劶婵倝鎮¢弴鐔剁箚闁靛牆瀚ˇ锕傛煙閸忓吋鍊愰柡灞界Х椤т線鏌涜箛鏃傘€掔紒顔肩墛閹峰懘宕烽褎閿ら梻浣告惈濞层劑宕伴幘璇茬厴鐎广儱顦粻鎶芥煙閹増顥夐柣鎺戠仛閵囧嫰骞嬪┑鍫滆檸闂佺ǹ锕ュΣ瀣磽閸屾艾鈧绮堟笟鈧鐢割敆閳ь剟鈥旈崘顔藉癄濠㈠厜鏅滈惄顖氱暦缁嬭鏃堝焵椤掑啰绠芥繝鐢靛仩閹活亞绱為埀顒佺箾閸滃啰绉€规洩缍侀崺鈧い鎺嶈兌缁犻箖鏌熺€电ǹ浠﹂柣鎾卞劤缁辨帡濡搁敂濮愪虎闂佺硶鏂侀崑鎾愁渻閵堝棗鐏﹂悗绗涘懐鐭堝ù鐓庣摠閻撶喐銇勮箛鎾村櫤閻忓骏绠撻弻鐔碱敊閼恒儯浠㈤梺杞扮劍閸旀瑥鐣烽崼鏇炵厸闁稿本绋戦崝姗€姊婚崒娆戭槮闁硅绻濋幊婵嬪礈瑜夐崑鎾愁潩閻撳骸鈷嬫繝纰夌磿閺佽鐣烽崼鏇ㄦ晢闁稿本姘ㄩ妶锕傛⒒娴e憡鍟為柛鏃€鐗為妵鎰板礃椤旂晫鍘愰梻渚囧墮缁夌敻鎮¤箛娑欑厱闁宠棄妫楅獮妤呮倵濮樼偓瀚�
Ning Yu 1,
, Dingwei Zhang 2,
, Xiaofeng Luo 2,,
,
Corresponding author: Xiaofeng Luo, xfluo@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
1.School of Physics & Electronic Engineering, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China
2.Key Laboratory of Quark & Lepton Physics (MOE) and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
Received Date:2019-09-26
Available Online:2020-01-01
Abstract:We propose the transverse velocity ($\beta_T$) dependence of the anti-deuteron to deuteron ratio as a new observable to search for the QCD critical point in heavy-ion collisions. The QCD critical point can attract the system evolution trajectory in the QCD phase diagram, which is known as the focusing effect. To quantify this effect, we employ the thermal and hadronic transport model to simulate the dynamical particle emission along a hypothetical focusing trajectory near the critical point. We found that the focusing effect can lead to anomalous $\beta_T$ dependence on $\bar{p}/p$, $\bar{d}/d$ and $^3\overline{\rm{He}}/^3{\rm{He}}$ ratios. We examined the $\beta_T$ dependence of $\bar{p}/p$ and $\bar{d}/d$ ratios of central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt {s_{\rm{NN}}} = $ 7.7 to 200 GeV measured by the STAR experiment at RHIC. Surprisingly, we only observe a negative slope in $\beta_T$ dependence of $\bar{d}/d$ ratio at $\sqrt {s_{\rm{NN}}} = $ 19.6 GeV, which indicates the trajectory evolution has passed through the critical region. In the future, we could constrain the location of the critical point and/or width of the critical region by conducting precise measurements on the $\beta_T$ dependence of the $\bar{d}/d$ ratio at different energies and rapidity.

HTML

--> --> -->
1.Introduction
Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) constitutes the fundamental theory of the strong interaction. One of the main goals of relativistic heavy-ion collisions is to explore the phase structure of hot and dense QCD matter, which can be displayed in the $ T-\mu_B $ plane (T: temperature, $ \mu_B $: baryon chemical potential) of QCD phase diagram. Lattice QCD calculations confirmed that the transition between hadronic gas and quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is a smooth crossover at $ \mu_B $ = 0 [1]. At the large $ \mu_B $ region, QCD-based models predicted that the phase transition is of the first order [2-6]. The QCD critical point (QCP) is the end point of the first order phase transitions boundary. Theoretically, many efforts have been made to locate the critical point in lattice QCD [7-11] and models [12], however its position and even the existence is still not confirmed yet. Therefore, from the experimental side, scientists are performing a systematical exploration of the phase structure of the QCD matter at high baryon density region. The search for the critical point is one of the main goals of the beam energy scan (BES) program at the relativistic heavy-ion collider (RHIC). It is also the main physics motivation for future accelerators, such as facility for anti-proton and ion research (FAIR) in Darmstadt and the nuclotron‐based ion collider facility (NICA) in Dubna. Experimental confirmation of the existence of the QCD critical point will be a milestone of exploring the nature of the QCD phase structure.
In the vicinity of the QCP, the correlation length of the system and density fluctuations will become large. In the first phase of beam energy scan at RHIC (BES-I, 2010-2014), the STAR experiment has made two important measurements, which are dedicated to search for the QCP: 1). The measurement of the cumulants of net-proton, net-charge, and net-kaon multiplicity distribution [1318] in Au+Au collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = $7.7-200 GeV. One of the most striking findings is the observation of non-monotonic energy dependence of the fourth order net-proton cumulant ratios ($ C_4/C_2 $) in the most central (0%–5%) Au+Au collisions. We observe a minimum dip around 19.6 GeV and large increase at 7.7 GeV. The review of these results can be found in Ref. [19]. 2). The measurement of the light nuclei (deuteron and triton) production as well as derived neutron density fluctuations at RHIC. We observe a non-monotonic energy dependence of the neutron density fluctuations in central (0%–10%) Au+Au collisions with a maximum peak around 19.6 GeV [20, 21]. These non-monotonic behaviors, the dip and peak structures observed around 19.6 GeV, are qualitatively consistent with the theoretical predictions of the signature of the critical point [22-24].
The QCD critical point was predicted to serve as an attractor of the trajectory evolution in the $ T-\mu_B $ plane, which is known as the QCP focusing effect [25, 26]. The entropy over the baryon density ratio $ s/n_b $ is constant along the isentropic trajectory. When the isentropic trajectory passes through the critical region in the $ T-\mu_B $ plane, the transverse velocity ($ \beta_T = p_T/E $) dependence of $ \bar{p}/p $ ratio will exhibit anomalous behavior [26]. A detail calculation to demonstrate how the focusing effect could lead to anomalous $ \beta_T $ dependence of $ \bar{p}/p $ ratio has been done [27]. The $ \bar{p}/p $ ratio will exhibit different $ \beta_T $ dependence trends with or without the QCP focusing effect. However, we did not observe this anomaly in $ \beta_T $ dependence of $ \bar{p}/p $ in Au+Au collisions at RHIC-BES measured by the STAR experiment [28]. There are several reasons that could lead to suppressing the focusing effect on $ \bar{p}/p $. First, the contributions of strong and weak decay to proton and anti-proton are important in heavy-ion collisions [29-31]. Second, final state hadronic interactions between particles will dilute the QCP focusing effect. In this letter, we propose the transverse velocity dependence of $ \bar{d}/d $ ratio or heavier light anti-nuclei to light nuclei ($ ^3\overline{{\rm He}}/^3{\rm He} $, $ \bar{t}/t $, ···) ratios as more robust signatures of searching for the QCP. Assuming thermal production of the light nuclei along the system evolution trajectory, the yield ratio of light nuclei $ \bar{d}/d $ is more sensitive to the $ \mu_{B} $ than $ \bar{p}/p $, because of the ratio $ r \propto \exp[-2A\times\mu_{B}/T] $, A is the mass number of the particle. This means the production of light nuclei is more sensitive to the system evolution trajectory in the vicinity of QCP, which will cause the changing of T and $ \mu_{B} $ of the system. One of the other advantages is that the decay contributions for light nuclei is negligible in heavy-ion collisions. In the following, we will formulate the QCP focusing effect on the $ \beta_T $ dependence of $ \bar{d}/d $ and $ ^3\overline{{\rm He}}/^3{\rm He} $ ratios by applying the UrQMD and THERMUS model to calculate the dependence patterns for a hypothetical focusing trajectory.
2.The QCD critical point focusing effect
To simulate the focusing effect, we assume that the critical point lies at $ (T,\mu_B) = (162,360) $ MeV [8] and the system evolution receives the focusing effect in central Au + Au collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = $19.6 GeV with a chemical freeze-out point at $ (T_{\rm ch},\mu_B) = (152,188) $ MeV [28]. Besides the starting (critical point) and ending (chemical freeze-out point) points, the hydrodynamic conjectured trajectory with focusing effect is shown in Fig. 1. Following the methods in Refs. [25, 27], the normalized relative time $ t = L/L_{{\rm tot}} $ is used to characterize the time scale of the isentropic trajectory on the QCD phase diagram. The system is evolving from the critical point along the conjectured trajectory to the chemical freeze-out point. The L represents the path length along the trajectory from the critical point to the considered point, and $ L_{{\rm tot}} $ is the total path length along the trajectory from the critical point to the chemical freeze-out point. The system is assumed to be in thermodynamical equilibrium and continues to emit particles. The number of particles A emitted at time t along the trajectory is calculated by
Figure1. (color online) Sketch of conjectured QCD phase diagram with crossover (black dashed line), $1^{st}$ order phase transition boundary (black solid lines), and QCD critical point (red solid circle, $(T,\mu_B) = (162,360)$ MeV). A hypothetical system evolution trajectory (red dashed lines) is also plotted and ends with the chemical freeze-out point (blue solid circle).

$ D_A(t) = \frac{Y_A[T(t),\mu_B(t)]}{\displaystyle\int_0^1 Y_A(t){\rm d}t}\times Y_A(t = 1), $
(1)
where A is the type of particle. $ Y_A(t) $ is the yield of particle A at a certain point on the trajectory, which is determined by a statistical thermal model THERMUS [32]. $ Y_A(t = 1) $ is the yield at the chemical freeze-out point and with the normalization condition $ \int_0^1 D_A(t){\rm d}t = Y(t = 1) $. This means that the sum of the total number of emitting particles A equals to the particle multiplicity at chemical freeze-out.
Time evolution of the particle ratios $ N_{\bar{p}}(t)/N_p(t) $, $ N_{\bar{d}}(t)/N_d(t) $, and $ N_{^3\overline{{\rm He}}}(t)/N_{^3{\rm He}}(t) $ for the focusing effect trajectory is shown in Fig. 2. Those ratios show an increasing trend as a function of time from the critical point ($ t = 0 $) to the chemical freeze-out point ($ t = 1 $) caused by the decreasing $ \mu_B/T $ ratio along the focused trajectory. Because of the QCP focusing effect, the time evolution of three particle ratios is different and should be proportional to $ \exp[-2A\times\mu_{B}/T] $. The $ N_{\bar{d}}(t)/N_d(t) $ is more gradual at the earlier stage and more abrupt at later stage than $ N_{\bar{p}}(t)/N_p(t) $.
Figure2. (color online) Time evolution of $\bar{p}/p$, $\bar{d}/d$, and $^3\overline{{\rm He}}/^3{\rm He}$ ratios along ocusing trajectory.

To obtain the $ \beta_T $ dependence of those ratios, one needs to know the relation between emission time t and transverse velocity $ \beta_T $. This relation can be obtained quantitatively by transport model, UrQMD [33]. UrQMD is based on relativistic Boltzmann dynamics involving binary hadronic reactions, which are commonly used to describe the freeze-out and breakup of the fireball produced in relativistic heavy-ion collisions into hadrons. Two dimensions of $ \beta_T - t $ distribution for p and $ \bar{p} $, $ N_p(\beta,t) $ and $ N_{\bar{p}}(\beta,t) $ are calculated by UrQMD Au+Au collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = $19.6 GeV with impact parameters $ b < $ 4 fm. The average emission time $ \langle t_{{\rm emission}}\rangle $ as a function of $ \beta_T $ of p and $ \bar{p} $ from UrQMD are shown in Fig. 3. We observe strong $ \beta_T - t $ anti-correlation for p and $ \bar{p} $ during the evolution of the system. This indicates that the particles with larger transverse velocity are freezed-out at earlier time. We also found $ \langle t_{{\rm emission}}\rangle $ for p are larger than $ \bar{p} $ for a certain $ \beta_{T} $, which suggests larger freeze-out time for protons than anti-protons.
Figure3. (color online) UrQMD calculations for $\beta_T$ dependence of average emission time of p and $\bar{p}$ at mid-rapidity $|y| < 0.3$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt {s_{\rm{NN}}} = $ 19.6.

Once obtaining the relation between emission time t and transverse velocity $ \beta_T $, we can calculate the $ \beta_T $ dependence of $ \bar{p}/p $ ratio (solid triangles) as
$ \frac{\bar{p}(\beta_T)}{p(\beta_T)} = \frac{\displaystyle\int N^{{\rm U}}_{\bar{p}}(\beta_T,t){\rm d}t}{\displaystyle\int N^{{\rm U}}_p(\beta_T,t){\rm d}t}, $
(2)
where $ N^{{\rm U}}_{\bar{p}}(\beta_T,t) $ and $ N^{{\rm U}}_p(\beta_T,t) $ are the $ \beta_T - t $ distribution for $ \bar{p} $ and p, respectively. The results are shown in Fig. 4. The $ \bar{p}/p $ ratio from UrQMD shows an increasing trend as a function of $ \beta_T $ (upto $ \beta_T $ = 0.6) in the absence of the QCP focusing effect, as the UrQMD does not include the physics of critical point. The $ \bar{d}/d $ and $ ^3\overline{{\rm He}}/^3{\rm He} $ ratios from UrQMD should show similar trends as the $ \bar{p}/p $ ratio, if the probability is similar of forming a light nuclei from nucleons and anti-nuclei from anti-nucleons.
Figure4. (color online) $\bar{p}/p$, $\bar{d}/d$, and $\bar{t}/t$ as a function of $\beta_T$ from UrQMD and UrQMD + QCP focusing effect. Shaded band represents range of $p_T / A$ from 0.5 to 2 GeV/c. A depicts the mass number of light nuclei.

To obtain the $ \beta_T $ dependence of the anti-particle to particle ratio with QCP focusing effects, we convolute the time evolution of these ratios from Fig. 2 with the $ \beta_T - t $ distribution from UrQMD. The multiplicity of certain particle with $ \beta_T $ and t is calculated by the thermal model. That means the $ \beta_T - t $ distribution of particle with QCP focusing effect can be calculated by
$ N^{{\rm FE}}_{A}(\beta_T,t) = \frac{N^{{\rm U}}_A(\beta_T,t)}{{\displaystyle\int N^{{\rm U}}_A(\beta_T,t)}{\rm d}\beta_T}\times D_{A}(t), $
(3)
where $ A = \bar{p},p,\bar{d},d,\cdots $. The normalized $ \beta_T - t $ distribution $ \dfrac{N^{{\rm U}}(\beta_T,t)}{\int N^{{\rm U}}(\beta_T,t){\rm d}\beta_T} $ for d and $ \bar{d} $ are assumed to be the same as those for p and $ \bar{p} $ in this study, as the light nuclei are coalesced by nucleons. The $ \beta_T - t $ distribution of $ ^3\overline{{\rm He}} $ and $ ^3{\rm He} $ or heavier light nuclei can also be derived from the equations above. By using $ \beta_T - t $ distribution of particles with the QCP focusing effect obtained in Eq. (3), the $ \beta_T $ dependence of anti-particle to particle ratio can be calculated by Eq. (2).
We show the $ \beta_T $ dependence of $ \bar{p}/p $, $ \bar{d}/d $, and $ ^3\overline{{\rm He}}/^3{\rm He} $ ratios with QCP focusing effect in Fig. 4. The $ \beta_T $ dependence of $ \bar{t}/t $ (triton) is similar to the results of $ ^3\overline{{\rm He}}/^3{\rm He} $ owing to the similar particle yield of the two types of particle. By comparing the $ \bar{p}/p $ results from pure UrQMD calculations with those receiving the QCP focusing effect, we find very different $ \beta_T $ dependence trends. This means the QCP focusing effect can lead to anomaly in $ \beta_T $ dependence of anti-particle to particle ratio. We observed that the slope of these ratios are almost flat at low $ \beta_T $ and become negative at higher $ \beta_T $. In our study, this shows that the heavier light nuclei are more sensitive to QCP. The heavier the particle is, the steeper slope we can observe. However, the production for anti-light nuclei is difficult to be measured at lower collision energy [34]. Thus, we propose using $ \beta_T $ dependence of anti-deuteron to deuteron ratio to search for QCD critical point in heavy-ion collisions.
Experimentally, one needs to measure the $ \beta_T $ dependence of $ \bar{p}/p $ ratios as a function of energy, centrality, and rapidity and perform linear fits to obtain slopes. Negative slopes could indicate the system trajectories have passed through the critical region, and QCP is located on the right of the chemical freeze-out point of this collision energy due to the focusing effect. Then, a finer scan by looking at rapidity and centrality dependence of the slopes can further help to locate the QCP and the width of the critical region in the QCD phase diagram. The $ p_{T} $ spectra of $ p(\bar{p}) $ and $ d(\bar{d}) $ at mid-rapidity have been measured in Au+Au collisions by the STAR experiment at RHIC BES-I [34-37] with energies $ \sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = $ 7.7-200 GeV. In Fig. 5, the $ \beta_T $ dependence of 0%–5% collision centrality for $ \bar{p}/p $ and 0%-10% for $ \bar{d}/d $ ratios are shown. The longitudinal momentum $ p_z $ is smaller than the energy of particle at mid-rapidity, and the approximation $ \beta_T = p_T/E\approx $ $p_T/ \sqrt{m_0^2+p^2_T} $ is used in our analysis, where E and $ m_0 $ are the energy and mass of particle. We performed linear fits to these data and found positive slopes for $ \beta_T $ dependence of $ \bar{p}/p $. The positive slopes for $ \beta_T $ dependence of $ \bar{d}/d $ are also observed for all energies except 19.6 GeV. The decreasing trend of $ \bar{d}/d $ at high $ \beta_T $ in central Au+Au collisions at $ \sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = $19.6 GeV is consistent with the trend in Fig. 4 with QCP focusing effect. If the anomaly in $ \beta_T $ dependence of $ \bar{d}/d $ at 19.6 GeV is indeed due to the QCP focusing effect, this indicates that the system evolution trajectories have passed through the critical region, and the $ \mu_B $ of the QCP should be larger than the chemical freeze-out $ \mu_B $ of 19.6 GeV. Currently, we observe a positive slope for the $ \beta_T $ dependence of $ \bar{d}/d $ at 14.5 GeV and 11.5 GeV. However, this could be due to the limited statistics, which makes it difficult to measure the high $ \beta_T $ region, especially for $ \bar{d} $.
Figure5. (color online) $\beta_T$ dependence of 0%–5% central $\bar{p}/p$ (left) and 0%–10% central $\bar{d}/d$ (right) are derived from the $p_{T}$ spectra in Au+Au collisions measured by the STAR experiment at RHIC-BES energies [34-36]. Dashed lines depict the linear fit. Error bars shown in the figure combine both systematic and statistical errors.

3.Summary
We studied the QCP focusing effect of $ \beta_T $ dependence on $ \bar{p}/p $, $ \bar{d}/d $, and $ ^3\overline{{\rm He}}/^3{\rm He} $ ratios. The focusing effect is modeled by convoluting the particle density along the focused trajectories and the $ \beta_T - t $ distribution from the UrQMD model. The focusing effect will lead to a decreasing anti-particle to particle ratio when increasing $ \beta_T $. We examined and performed a linear fit to the $ \beta_T $ dependence of $ \bar{p}/p $ and $ \bar{d}/d $, which are calculated from the STAR measured $ p_{T} $ spectra. We observed that only the fitting slope of the $ \bar{d}/d $ at $ \sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = $19.6 GeV is negative. The negative slope can be qualitatively explained in term of the QCP focusing effect, which might indicate that the system evolution trajectory at $ \sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = $19.6 GeV has passed through the critical region. This anomaly could be potentially connected with the dip and peak structures observed at 19.6 GeV in the measurements of net-proton fluctuations and neutron density fluctuations, respectively, by the STAR experiment. We can make more precise measurements and pose further constraint on the $ \mu_B $ value of QCP in the second phase of beam energy scan program (BES-II, 2019-2021) at RHIC [38]. Furthermore, since $ \mu_B $ depends on rapidity, we could also perform a rapidity scan for the $ p_T $ dependence of $ \bar{d}/d $ at each energy. This might allow us to map out the location of the QCP with a finer $ \mu_B $ step. Finally, we predicted that the $ \beta_T $ dependence of heavier anti-light nuclei to light nuclei ratio, such as $ ^3\overline{ \rm{He}} / ^3 \rm{He} $ and $ \bar{t}/t $, are more sensitive to the QCP focusing effect.
We thank Dr. Nu Xu for the fruitful discussions.
相关话题/Search critical point

闂傚倸鍊烽懗鍓佸垝椤栫偛绀夋俊銈呮噹缁犵娀鏌熼幑鎰靛殭闁告俺顫夐妵鍕棘閸喒鎸冮梺鍛婎殕瀹€鎼佸箖濡ゅ懏鏅查幖瀛樼箘閻╁海绱撴担椋庤窗闁革綇缍佸濠氭偄閻撳海顦ч梺鍏肩ゴ閺呮繈鎮¢崒鐐粹拺缂佸娉曢悞鍧楁煙閸戙倖瀚�2濠电姷鏁搁崑鐐哄垂閸洖绠扮紒瀣紩濞差亜惟闁冲搫顑囩粙蹇涙⒑閸︻厼鍔嬫い銊ユ瀹曠敻鍩€椤掑嫭鈷戦柛娑橈工婵箑霉濠婂懎浠辩€规洘妞介弫鎾绘偐瀹曞洤骞楅梻渚€娼х换鍫ュ磹閺嵮€妲堢憸鏃堝蓟閿濆鐒洪柛鎰典簼閸d即姊虹拠鈥虫殭闁搞儜鍥ф暪闂備焦瀵х换鍌毭洪姀銈呯;闁圭儤顨嗛埛鎴︽煕濠靛棗顏╅柍褜鍓欑紞濠囧箖闁垮缍囬柍鍝勫亞濞肩喖姊虹捄銊ユ珢闁瑰嚖鎷�
濠电姷鏁告慨浼村垂瑜版帗鍋夐柕蹇嬪€曢悙濠勬喐瀹ュ棙鍙忛柕鍫濐槹閳锋垿鏌涘☉姗堝伐缂佹甯楁穱濠囶敃閿濆洦鍒涘銈冨灪濡啯鎱ㄩ埀顒勬煏閸繃锛嶆俊顐㈠閺岋絾鎯旈婊呅i梺鍝ュУ閻楃姴鐣烽姀銈呯妞ゆ梻鏅崢鎼佹⒑閸涘﹥绀嬫繛浣冲洦鍊堕柨婵嗘娴滄粓鏌熺€涙ḿ绠栧璺哄缁辨帞鈧綆浜跺Ο鈧梺绯曟杹閸嬫挸顪冮妶鍡楀潑闁稿鎹囬弻宥囨嫚閺屻儱寮板┑锟犵畺娴滃爼寮诲鍫闂佸憡鎸婚悷鈺佺暦椤栨稑顕遍悗娑櫭禍顖氣攽閻愬弶鈻曞ù婊勭箞瀵煡顢楅崟顒€鈧爼鏌i幇顔芥毄闁硅棄鍊块弻娑㈠Χ閸ヮ灝銏ゆ婢跺绡€濠电姴鍊搁弳锝嗐亜鎼淬埄娈曢柕鍥у閸╃偤顢橀悙宸痪婵犳鍨遍幐鎶藉蓟閿熺姴鐐婇柍杞扮劍閻忎線姊洪崨濠勬喛闁稿鎹囧缁樻媴閸濄儳楔濠电偘鍖犻崱鎰睏闂佺粯鍔楅弫鍝ョ不閺冨牊鐓欓柟顖嗗苯娈堕梺宕囩帛濮婂綊骞堥妸銉庣喓鎷犻幓鎺濇浇闂備焦鎮堕崐褏绮婚幘璇茶摕闁绘棁娅i惌娆撴煙缁嬪灝顒㈤柟顔界懇濮婄儤瀵煎▎鎴犘滅紓浣哄У閻楁洟顢氶敐澶樻晝闁冲灈鏅滈悗濠氭⒑瑜版帒浜伴柛妯哄⒔缁瑩宕熼娑掓嫼闂佸湱枪濞寸兘鍩ユ径鎰厸闁割偒鍋勬晶瀵糕偓瑙勬礀缂嶅﹥淇婂宀婃Ъ婵犳鍨伴妶鎼佸蓟濞戞ǚ妲堟慨妤€鐗婇弫鍓х磽娴e搫校閻㈩垳鍋ら崺鈧い鎺嗗亾闁诲繑鑹鹃…鍨潨閳ь剟骞冭瀹曞崬霉閺夋寧鍠樼€规洜枪铻栧ù锝夋櫜閻ヮ亪姊绘担渚敯闁规椿浜浠嬪礋椤栨稒娅栭梺鍝勭▉閸樹粙鎮¤箛娑欑厱闁斥晛鍟粈鈧銈忕岛閺嗘竼e濠电姷鏁告慨浼村垂閸︻厾绀婂┑鐘叉搐閻掑灚銇勯幒宥堝厡闁愁垱娲熼弻鏇㈠幢濡も偓閺嗭綁鏌$仦鍓ф创妤犵偞甯¢獮瀣倻閸℃﹩妫у┑锛勫亼閸婃牜鏁悙鍝勭獥闁归偊鍠氶惌娆忊攽閻樺弶澶勯柛瀣姍閺岋綁濮€閵忊剝姣勯柡浣哥墦濮婄粯鎷呯粙鎸庡€┑鐘灪閿曘垹鐣烽娑橆嚤閻庢稒锚娴滎垶姊洪崨濠勭畵濠殿垵椴搁幆鏃堝閿涘嫮肖婵$偑鍊栭崝妤呭窗鎼淬垻顩插Δ锝呭暞閻撴盯鏌涢妷锝呭闁汇劍鍨块弻锝夋偄閸欏鐝旈梺瀹犳椤︾敻鐛Ο鑲╃闁绘ê宕銏′繆閻愵亜鈧牕煤濠靛棌鏋嶉柡鍥╁亶缂傛岸鐓崶銊р槈鐎瑰憡绻冮妵鍕箻濡も偓閸燁垶顢欓敓锟�20婵犲痉鏉库偓妤佹叏閻戣棄纾婚柣妯款嚙缁犲灚銇勮箛鎾搭棡妞ゎ偅娲樼换婵嬫濞戝崬鍓扮紓浣哄У閸ㄥ潡寮婚妶鍡樺弿闁归偊鍏橀崑鎾澄旈埀顒勫煝閺冨牆顫呴柣妯烘閹虫捇銈导鏉戠闁冲搫锕ラ敍鍛磽閸屾瑧顦︽い锔诲灦椤㈡岸顢橀姀鐘靛姦濡炪倖宸婚崑鎾寸節閳ь剟鏌嗗鍛紱闂佺粯姊婚崢褔寮告笟鈧弻鏇㈠醇濠垫劖效闂佺ǹ楠哥粔褰掑蓟濞戙垹鍗抽柕濞垮劚椤晠姊烘导娆戠暠缂傚秴锕獮鍐ㄎ旈崘鈺佹瀭闂佸憡娲﹂崣搴ㄥ汲閿熺姵鈷戦柛婵嗗椤ユ垿鏌涚€n偅宕屾慨濠冩そ瀹曨偊宕熼崹顐嵮囨⒑閸涘﹥鈷愰柣妤冨█楠炲啴鏁撻悩铏珫闂佸憡娲﹂崜娆撴偟娴煎瓨鈷戦梻鍫熺〒缁犳岸鏌涢幘瀵哥疄闁诡喒鈧枼鏋庨柟閭﹀枤椤旀洘绻濋姀锝嗙【妞ゆ垵妫涚划鍫ュ焵椤掑嫭鍊垫繛鍫濈仢濞呭秹鏌¢埀顒勫础閻戝棗娈梺鍛婃处閸嬫帡宕ョ€n喗鐓曢柡鍥ュ妼楠炴ɑ淇婇崣澶婄伌婵﹥妞藉畷顐﹀礋椤愮喎浜惧ù鐘差儜缂嶆牕顭跨捄鐑樻拱闁稿繑绮撻弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ㄩ梺鍝勬媼閸撶喖骞冨鈧幃娆撴濞戞顥氱紓鍌欒兌婵數鏁垾鎰佹綎濠电姵鑹鹃悙濠囨煥濠靛棙鍣稿瑙勬礋濮婃椽鎳¢妶鍛€惧┑鐐插级閸ㄥ潡骞婂Δ鍐╁磯閻炴稈鍓濋悘渚€姊虹涵鍛涧闂傚嫬瀚板畷鏇㈠箣閿旇棄鈧敻鏌ㄥ┑鍡涱€楁鐐瘁缚缁辨帡鎮╁畷鍥р拰闂佸搫澶囬崜婵嗩嚗閸曨偀妲堟繛鍡楁禋娴硷拷