doi:10.12202/j.0476-0301.2021007林孝松^1,,
王莹¹,
余情²,
廖青松¹,
陈小波¹,
赵思宇²
1.重庆交通大学建筑与城市规划学院，400074，重庆
2.重庆交通大学土木工程学院，400074，重庆
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(41601564)；重庆市基础研究与前沿探索项目(CSTC2018JCYJ0156)

详细信息

作者简介:林孝松（1976—），男，博士，教授. 研究方向：资源环境与地理信息系统，乡村地理与乡村发展. E-mail：lxsgis@163.com

中图分类号:K901

计量

文章访问数:111
HTML全文浏览量:45
PDF下载量:6
被引次数:0

出版历程

收稿日期:2021-01-09
刊出日期:2021-06-30

Evaluation and type identification of village development potential in Fengjie County

Xiaosong LIN^1,,
Ying WANG¹,
Qing YU²,
Qingsong LIAO¹,
Xiaobo CHEN¹,
Siyu ZHAO²
1. School of Architecture and Urban Planning，Chongqing Jiaotong University，400074，Chongqing， China
2. School of Civil Engineering，Chongqing Jiaotong University，400074，Chongqing，China



摘要
HTML全文
图(0)表(6)
参考文献(17)
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件(0)
访问统计

摘要
摘要:从地形、交通、规模和资源4个维度构建指标体系，借助TOPSIS评价、SOFM网络模型和系统聚类等方法，对重庆市奉节县332个行政村（不含社区）进行综合评价和类型识别，并对各类型村庄特征与发展路径进行分析．结果表明：1）各村庄地形本底和交通区位值总体呈现中部高、南北低分布格局，村庄规模和资源禀赋分布特征不明显，二者具有负向对应关系，各村庄维度值空间聚集不显著，以中、中低等级为主；2）各村庄接近度值呈现中部高、南北低以及沿梅溪河线状高值聚集分布格局，各等级数量呈正态分布，总体以中、中低等级为主；3）利用SOFM模型法将研究区村庄划分为24种类型，各类型村庄具有大分散、小聚集的分布特性．基于发展水平和4个维度，运用系统聚类法，将村庄类型合并为6种类型，数量上以Ⅱ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ和Ⅵ为主，占总数的78.92%；面积上以Ⅳ、Ⅴ和Ⅵ为主，占70.05%．综合来看，研究区村庄总体上在近年来得到了不同程度的发展，但今后仍需针对不同类型，采取发挥优势、补足短板、有序推进的策略促进村庄发展．研究结果可为研究区村庄分类发展、脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴战略有效衔接提供决策依据．
关键词:奉节县/
村庄发展/
潜力评价/
类型识别
Abstract:Objective evaluation of village development potential and scientific identification of village types are the prerequisite and basis for promoting rural revitalization by classification．Taking Fengjie County of Chongqing as the research area, the index system in this paper was constructed from four dimensions, including topography, traffic, Village size and resources．TOPSIS evaluation, SOFM network model and system clustering were used to comprehensively evaluate and identify the types of 332 administrative villages (excluding communities) in the research area．Meanwhile, the characteristics and development paths of each type were also analyzed in this paper．The results show that: 1) The topographic background and traffic location values of each village generally present a spatial pattern of high in the middle and low in the north and south; the distribution characteristics of village scale and resource endowment are not obvious, and the two have a negative correspondence; the spatial aggregation of the dimension values of each village is not significant, mainly in the middle and low grades．2) The proximity values of all villages showed a central high, low north-south and linear high-value cluster distribution pattern along the Meixi River．And the number of each level presents a normal distribution, mainly low-level．3) The villages in the study area are divided into 24 types by SOFM model, each of which has the characteristics of large dispersion and small aggregation distribution; and the system cluster method is used to merge these villages into 6 types from the aspects of development level and four dimensions．In terms of quantity, these villages are dominated by Ⅱ, Ⅳ, Ⅴ and Ⅵ, accounting for 78.92% of the total．While in terms of area, these villages are dominated by Ⅳ, Ⅴ and Ⅵ, accounting for 70.05%．On the whole, the villages in the study area have been developed to different degrees．In order to further promote the development of these villages, it is necessary to take gradual development strategies that give full play to the advantages and disadvantages of different types of villages．The results of this paper can provide the decision-making basis for the study of the classification of village development, poverty alleviation and rural revitalization strategies．
Key words:Fengjie County/
village development/
potential evaluation/
type identification