李燕1,
熊仁2,
马嘉伟2,
肖本益2,
刘俊新2,
郭雪松2,
刘越3
1.中国矿业大学环境与测绘学院,徐州 221116
2.中国科学院生态环境研究中心,北京 100085
3.北京清流技术股份有限公司,北京100073
基金项目: 中国科学院科技服务网络计划(KFJ-STS-ZDTP-014)
Mixture ratio optimization of different organic solid waste co-composting in rural areas
YAN Jin1,2,,LI Yan1,
XIONG Ren2,
MA Jiawei2,
XIAO Benyi2,
LIU Junxin2,
GUO Xuesong2,
LIU Yue3
1.School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics,China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
2.Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
3.Beijing Qingliu Technology Limited Liability Company, Beijing 100073, China
-->
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要:为寻求3种农村有机固体废弃物(农村污泥、人粪便、生活垃圾)的最适堆肥配比组合,采用混料设计,分别进行了14组堆肥实验,以WSC/WSN(溶解性碳氮比)、WSCorg(溶解性有机碳)、T(终点C/N与初始C/N的比值)、k(有机质降解速率)作为混合堆肥腐熟程度的判别指标进行响应面分析。结果表明:将三者进行混合堆肥,可有效解决它们单独堆肥时存在的溶解性碳素过高和堆肥进程较慢的问题。堆肥效果相对较优的配比组合(干重比)为生活垃圾27%~45%、人粪便38%~70%和农村污泥0%~27%。在该区间内,堆肥产品WSCorg、WSC/WSN、T和k分别为7.57~8.78?mg·g-1、4.97~6.07、0.43~0.48、0.10~0.12?d-1,达到腐熟标准。
关键词: 农村污泥/
人粪便/
生活垃圾/
混合堆肥/
响应面分析
Abstract:There were 14 compost tests designed by mixture design and conducted to find out the optimal composting mixture ratio of rural sludge, human excrement and domestic waste. Based on the response surface analysis, the important parameters e.g. WSC/WSN(water-soluble carbon to water-soluble nitrogen), WSCorg (water-soluble organic carbon), T (the ratio of final C/N to initial C/N), and k (degradation rate of organic matter) were used to judge the co-compost maturity of the rural solid wastes. The results showed that the co-compost of the three wastes could effectively solve the problems of high dissolved carbon and slow degradation rate in the mono-compost. The composting products reached the maturity standard when raw material consisted of 27% to 45% of domestic waste, 0% to 27% of rural sludge and 38% to 70% of human waste (dry weight). The optimal ranges of the parameters (WSCorg, WSC/WSN, T and k) were 7.57 to 8.78 mg·g-1,4.97 to 6.07,0.43 to 0.48 and 0.10 to 0.12?d-1, respectively.
Key words:rural sludge/
human excrement/
domestic waste/
co-composting/
response surface analysis.
[1] | 孙永明,李国学,张夫道,等.中国农业废弃物资源化现状与发展战略[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(8):169-173 |
[2] | 赵雨阳,金志扬,林茂,等.小型二次循环农村污水处理器的设计与试验[J].机械设计与制造,2017(11):220-223 |
[3] | 郭雪松,陈梅雪,刘俊新.我国农村生活污水处理技术现状和对策[C]//全国排水委员会.全国排水委员会2012年年会论文集.南宁,2012:146-151 |
[4] | ABDULLAH N,CHIN N L.Simplex-centroid mixture formulation for optimised composting of kitchen waste[J].Bioresource Technology,2010,101(21):8205-8210 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.068 |
[5] | BERNAL M P,ALBURQUERQUE J A, MORAL R.Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment:A review[J].Bioresource Technology,2009,100(22):5444-5453 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.027 |
[6] | PAREDES C, ROIG A, BERNAL M P, et al.Evolution of organic matter and nitrogen during co-composting of olive mill wastewater with solid organic wastes[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2000,32(3):222-227 10.1007/s003740000239 |
[7] | ZHU N.Effect of low initial C/N ratio on aerobic composting of swine manure with rice straw[J].Bioresource Technology,2007,98(1):9-13 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.12.003 |
[8] | 居玉坤,赵卫兵,王鹤立,等.不同添加剂下污泥堆肥化处理氮素变化研究[J].环境工程学报,2014,8(11):4897-4901 |
[9] | 安淼,王华伟,占美丽,等.污泥用量对生活垃圾堆肥氮素转化与损失的影响[J].环境工程学报,2011,5(8):1877-1881 |
[10] | 马强,孙英杰,王华伟,等.添加腐熟污泥对生活垃圾堆肥氮素转化与损失的影响[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(7):4325-4330 10.12030/j.cjee.201605188 |
[11] | 康军,张增强,邵淼.玉米秸秆添加比例对污泥堆肥中Cu和Zn形态的影响[J].环境工程学报,2011,5(2):436-442 |
[12] | 潘寻,强志民,贲伟伟.高温堆肥对猪粪中多类抗生素的去除效果[J].生态与农村环境学报,2013,29(1):64-69 |
[13] | HUANG Y L, SUN Z Y, ZHONG X Z, et al.Aerobic composting of digested residue eluted from dry methane fermentation to develop a zero-emission process[J].Waste Management,2017,61:206-212 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.007 |
[14] | 徐向宏,何明珠.试验设计与Design-Expert、SPSS应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2010:169-176 |
[15] | CHANG J I, CHEN Y J.Effects of bulking agents on food waste composting[J].Bioresource Technology,2010,101(15):5917-5924 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.042 |
[16] | MOLDES A, CENDóN Y, BARRAL M T.Evaluation of municipal solid waste compost as a plant growing media component, by applying mixture design.[J].Bioresource Technology,2007,98(16):3069-3075 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.021 |
[17] | 赵桂红,李梓木,于艳玲,等.通风速率对烟草废料堆肥腐熟及元素变化影响[J].环境工程学报,2015,9(10):5031-5036 |
[18] | 刘卫,袁兴中,欧阳建新,等.利用污泥熟肥作为高含水率污泥堆肥调理剂[J].环境工程学报,2013,7(6):2349-2354 |
[19] | 赵秀玲,朱新萍,罗艳丽,等.温度与秸秆比例对牛粪好氧堆肥的影响[J].环境工程学报,2014,8(1):334-340 |
[20] | 李国学.固体废物堆肥化与有机复混肥生产[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2000:137-150 |
[21] | 曾光明.堆肥环境生物与控制[M].北京:科学出版社,2006:151-160 |
[22] | 卢秉林,王文丽,李娟,等.添加小麦秸秆对猪粪高温堆肥腐熟进程的影响[J].环境工程学报,2010,4(4):926-930 |
[23] | CHEN Y.Nuclear magnetic resonance, infra-red and pyrolysis: Application of spectroscopic methodologies to maturity determination of composts[J].Compost Science and Utilization,2003,11(2):152-168 10.1080/1065657X.2003.10702121 |
[24] | ONWOSI C O, IGBOKWE V C, ODIMBA J N, et al.Composting technology in waste stabilization: On the methods, challenges and future prospects[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2017,190:140-157 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.051 |
[25] | HIRAI M F, CHANYASAK V, KUBOTA H.Standardmeasurementforcompost maturity[J].Biocycle,1983,24(6):54-56 |
[26] | KULCU R.Composting of greenhouse tomato plant residues, wheat straw, and separated dairy manure, and the effect of free air space on the process[J].Polish Journal of Environmental Studies,2014,23(4):1341-1346 |
[27] | 贺琪,李国学,张亚宁,等.高温堆肥过程中的氮素损失及其变化规律[J].农业环境科学学报,2005,24(1):169-173 |
[28] | 秦莉,沈玉君,李国学,等.不同C/N比对堆肥腐熟度和含氮气体排放变化的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(12):2668-2673 |
[29] | 赵建荣,高德才,汪建飞,等.不同C/N下鸡粪麦秸高温堆肥腐熟过程研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2011,30(5):1014-1020 |
[30] | 李艳霞,王敏健.城市固体废弃物堆肥化处理的影响因素[J].生态环境学报,1999,8(1):62-65 |
[31] | WU S, SHEN Z, YANG C, et al.Effects of C/N ratio and bulking agent on speciation of Zn and Cu and enzymatic activity during pig manure composting[J].International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation,2016,119:429-436 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.016 |
[32] | GUO R, LI G, JIANG T, et al.Effect of aeration rate, C/N ratio and moisture content on the stability and maturity of compost[J].Bioresource Technology,2012,112(58):171-178 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.099 |
Turn off MathJax -->
点击查看大图
计量
文章访问数:566
HTML全文浏览数:352
PDF下载数:259
施引文献:0
出版历程
刊出日期:2018-07-26
-->
农村不同类型有机固体废弃物混合堆肥配比优化
颜瑾1,2,,李燕1,
熊仁2,
马嘉伟2,
肖本益2,
刘俊新2,
郭雪松2,
刘越3
1.中国矿业大学环境与测绘学院,徐州 221116
2.中国科学院生态环境研究中心,北京 100085
3.北京清流技术股份有限公司,北京100073
基金项目: 中国科学院科技服务网络计划(KFJ-STS-ZDTP-014)
关键词: 农村污泥/
人粪便/
生活垃圾/
混合堆肥/
响应面分析
摘要:为寻求3种农村有机固体废弃物(农村污泥、人粪便、生活垃圾)的最适堆肥配比组合,采用混料设计,分别进行了14组堆肥实验,以WSC/WSN(溶解性碳氮比)、WSCorg(溶解性有机碳)、T(终点C/N与初始C/N的比值)、k(有机质降解速率)作为混合堆肥腐熟程度的判别指标进行响应面分析。结果表明:将三者进行混合堆肥,可有效解决它们单独堆肥时存在的溶解性碳素过高和堆肥进程较慢的问题。堆肥效果相对较优的配比组合(干重比)为生活垃圾27%~45%、人粪便38%~70%和农村污泥0%~27%。在该区间内,堆肥产品WSCorg、WSC/WSN、T和k分别为7.57~8.78?mg·g-1、4.97~6.07、0.43~0.48、0.10~0.12?d-1,达到腐熟标准。
English Abstract
Mixture ratio optimization of different organic solid waste co-composting in rural areas
YAN Jin1,2,,LI Yan1,
XIONG Ren2,
MA Jiawei2,
XIAO Benyi2,
LIU Junxin2,
GUO Xuesong2,
LIU Yue3
1.School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics,China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
2.Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
3.Beijing Qingliu Technology Limited Liability Company, Beijing 100073, China
Keywords: rural sludge/
human excrement/
domestic waste/
co-composting/
response surface analysis
Abstract:There were 14 compost tests designed by mixture design and conducted to find out the optimal composting mixture ratio of rural sludge, human excrement and domestic waste. Based on the response surface analysis, the important parameters e.g. WSC/WSN(water-soluble carbon to water-soluble nitrogen), WSCorg (water-soluble organic carbon), T (the ratio of final C/N to initial C/N), and k (degradation rate of organic matter) were used to judge the co-compost maturity of the rural solid wastes. The results showed that the co-compost of the three wastes could effectively solve the problems of high dissolved carbon and slow degradation rate in the mono-compost. The composting products reached the maturity standard when raw material consisted of 27% to 45% of domestic waste, 0% to 27% of rural sludge and 38% to 70% of human waste (dry weight). The optimal ranges of the parameters (WSCorg, WSC/WSN, T and k) were 7.57 to 8.78 mg·g-1,4.97 to 6.07,0.43 to 0.48 and 0.10 to 0.12?d-1, respectively.