摘要:近年来生态系统服务研究已经成为了生态学、地理学及环境科学领域的热点和核心议题。基于SCI-E和CNKI数据库，运用文献计量和文本分析法对比了中美两国生态系统服务研究现状和热点。结果表明：（1）近30年来中美两国生态系统服务领域的发文量分别是9327篇和9468篇，均呈现快速增长趋势。（2）就中美两国发文篇均被引频次和总被引频次而言，中国科学院生态环境研究中心和斯坦福大学分别位列第1。美国刊发生态系统服务研究文稿最多的期刊是Ecological Economics，PNAS刊发的文章引用率最高；生态学报刊发的中文文章最多且被引用率最高。研究成果影响力最大的中美两国****分别是欧阳志云、傅伯杰、Kremen C和Polasky S等。（3）不同时期中美两国所关注的研究热点不同。美国作为生态系统服务研究的主要发源地，在理论研究和方法上都相对领先于中国。（4）美国的研究侧重于理论与模型构建，中国的基础应用研究成果丰富。近年来两国越来越关注人类福祉、生态安全等全球性问题，生态系统服务与人类福祉及科学决策正成为新的热点。在全球可持续发展的背景下，两国在生态系统服务研究方面具有良好的交流与合作前景。



Abstract:Research on ecosystem services has become one of the hotspots and key issues of ecology, geography and environmental science. Based on SCI-E and CNKI databases, this paper comparative reviewed the research status and hotspots of ecosystem services in China and USA via bibliometric method and text meta-analysis. The results show that: (1) the papers on ecosystem services in China and USA in the latest 30 years was 9327 and 9468, respectively, both increased with a significant growth trend. (2) As to the average quoting frequency per paper and total quoting in both China and USA, Research Center for Eco-environmental Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Stanford University ranked first in China and USA, respectively. The most published journal in the USA on ecosystem services was Ecological Economics, but the highest quoting journal was PNAS. Acta Ecologica Sinica was the Chinese journal with the most articles on ecosystem service and the highest quoting rate. The most influential scholars in USA are Kremen C and Polasky S, while in China are Ouyang Zhiyun and Fu Bojie. (3) There are different research hotspots of ecosystem service in China and USA in the different periods. As the two major research countries on ecosystem services themes, USA was relatively ahead of China in terms of theoretical research and methods. (4) American researchers focus more on theoretical research and models building, while the Chinese researchers focus more on the basic research and its application. Recently, the researchers in the two countries have paid more and more attention to global issues such as human well-being and ecological security. Ecosystem services, human well-being and scientific decision-making have become new hotspots. In the context of global sustainable development, the two countries have good prospects for communication and cooperation in ecosystem services research.





PDF全文下载地址:

https://www.ecologica.cn/stxb/article/pdf/stxb201904220811