data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddae9/ddae9b72a39e834d171a5da88fb8629100e9262b" alt=""
1 兰州大学管理学院, 兰州 730000
2 广西大学商学院, 南宁 530000
收稿日期:
2017-05-03出版日期:
2018-07-15发布日期:
2018-05-29基金资助:
* 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71502075);国家自然科学基金地区项目(71362011);国家社科基金项目(15BGL152);甘肃省社会科学规划项目资助(YB033)Touch or not touch? Prior touch facilitates consumers’ adoption of new products
LIU Wumei1(data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddae9/ddae9b72a39e834d171a5da88fb8629100e9262b" alt=""
1 School of Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
2 Business School, Guangxi University, Nanning 530000, China
Received:
2017-05-03Online:
2018-07-15Published:
2018-05-29摘要/Abstract
摘要: 已有触觉研究和已有新产品研究都不能回答是否先前触摸一个新产品会影响消费者随后对另一新产品的理解和评估。本文发现:事先让消费者触摸(vs.不触摸)一个外观极度不一致的新产品会促进消费者对另一外观极度不一致的目标新产品的评估和选择(实验1-实验2)。实验3进一步发现, 当先前触摸的产品和随后评估的产品在外观极度不一致这一点上不具相似性时(如, 当所摸新产品在外观上与常见同类产品一致), 先前触摸将不再促进目标新产品的不一致解决, 进而不再影响目标新产品评估。最后, 实验4剥离了触觉和视觉的影响, 发现实验1~实验3的发现受触觉(先前摸)而非视觉(先前看)主导。
图/表 3
表1实验1和实验3中各水平下的人数分布和目标产品评估的均值和标准差
变量 | 目标新产品外观不一致程度 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一致 | 中度不一致 | 极度不一致 | |||||||||
n | M | SD | n | M | SD | n | M | SD | |||
实验1 | 触摸 | 27 | 4.57 | 0.74 | 27 | 4.67 | 0.88 | 28 | 4.79 | 0.92 | |
不触摸 | 26 | 4.38 | 0.75 | 28 | 4.93 | 0.97 | 27 | 4.26 | 0.94 | ||
实验3 | 一致新产品 | 触摸 | 32 | 4.40 | 1.24 | 29 | 3.76 | 1.15 | |||
不触摸 | 30 | 4.20 | 0.55 | 29 | 4.10 | 0.86 | |||||
极度不一 致新产品 | 触摸 | 31 | 4.48 | 0.77 | 31 | 4.39 | 1.23 | ||||
不触摸 | 30 | 4.10 | 0.71 | 30 | 3.30 | 1.18 |
表1实验1和实验3中各水平下的人数分布和目标产品评估的均值和标准差
变量 | 目标新产品外观不一致程度 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一致 | 中度不一致 | 极度不一致 | |||||||||
n | M | SD | n | M | SD | n | M | SD | |||
实验1 | 触摸 | 27 | 4.57 | 0.74 | 27 | 4.67 | 0.88 | 28 | 4.79 | 0.92 | |
不触摸 | 26 | 4.38 | 0.75 | 28 | 4.93 | 0.97 | 27 | 4.26 | 0.94 | ||
实验3 | 一致新产品 | 触摸 | 32 | 4.40 | 1.24 | 29 | 3.76 | 1.15 | |||
不触摸 | 30 | 4.20 | 0.55 | 29 | 4.10 | 0.86 | |||||
极度不一 致新产品 | 触摸 | 31 | 4.48 | 0.77 | 31 | 4.39 | 1.23 | ||||
不触摸 | 30 | 4.10 | 0.71 | 30 | 3.30 | 1.18 |
表2实验1中目标产品不一致程度和先前触摸影响目标产品评估的中介分析结果
变量 | 不一致解决 | 唤醒水平 | 正性情绪指数 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
beta | t | p | beta | t | p | beta | t | p | |
步骤1: IV*Mo-DV | -1.222 | -2.22 | 0.028 | -1.222 | -2.22 | 0.028 | -1.222 | -2.22 | 0.028 |
步骤2 IV*Mo-Me | -1.046 | -1.94 | 0.055 | -0.271 | -0.453 | 0.652 | 0.026 | 0.04 | 0.966 |
步骤3: IV*Mo-DV | -0.846 | -1.61 | 0.111 | -1.083 | -1.81 | 0.074 | -1.394 | -2.44 | 0.017 |
步骤3: Me-DV | 0.359 | 3.84 | <0.0001 | -0.014 | -0.130 | 0.897 | 0.315 | 3.18 | 0.002 |
Bootstrap analysis (5000 bootstraps) | effect | 95%CI | effect | 95%CI | effect | 95%CI | |||
-0.24 | [-0.64, -0.02] | 0.002 | [-0.07, 0.14] | 0.01 | [-0.24, 0.29] |
表2实验1中目标产品不一致程度和先前触摸影响目标产品评估的中介分析结果
变量 | 不一致解决 | 唤醒水平 | 正性情绪指数 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
beta | t | p | beta | t | p | beta | t | p | |
步骤1: IV*Mo-DV | -1.222 | -2.22 | 0.028 | -1.222 | -2.22 | 0.028 | -1.222 | -2.22 | 0.028 |
步骤2 IV*Mo-Me | -1.046 | -1.94 | 0.055 | -0.271 | -0.453 | 0.652 | 0.026 | 0.04 | 0.966 |
步骤3: IV*Mo-DV | -0.846 | -1.61 | 0.111 | -1.083 | -1.81 | 0.074 | -1.394 | -2.44 | 0.017 |
步骤3: Me-DV | 0.359 | 3.84 | <0.0001 | -0.014 | -0.130 | 0.897 | 0.315 | 3.18 | 0.002 |
Bootstrap analysis (5000 bootstraps) | effect | 95%CI | effect | 95%CI | effect | 95%CI | |||
-0.24 | [-0.64, -0.02] | 0.002 | [-0.07, 0.14] | 0.01 | [-0.24, 0.29] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a101/6a101c39d9e5d64da55610d22bdadee72eb14008" alt=""
图1实验4中视触组别对目标饮料瓶产品评估(均值(标准差))的影响
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a101/6a101c39d9e5d64da55610d22bdadee72eb14008" alt=""
参考文献 34
[1] | Abrams R. A., Davoli C. C., Du F., Knapp W. J., &Paull D . ( 2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107( 3), 1035-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.006URLpmid: 17977524 |
[2] | Ackerman J. M., Nocera C. C., & Bargh J. A . ( 2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328 ( 5986), 1712-1715. doi: 10.1126/science.1189993URLpmid: 3005631 |
[3] | Bloch, P.H . ( 1995). Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing, 59( 3), 16-29. doi: 10.2307/1252116URL |
[4] | Campbell, M.C., &Goodstein R.C . ( 2001). The moderating effect of perceived risk on consumers’ evaluations of product incongruity: Preference for the norm. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 439-449. doi: 10.1086/323731URL |
[5] | Du F., Wang X. T., Abrams R. A., & Zhang K . ( 2017). Emotional processing is enhanced in peri-hand space. Cognition, 165, 39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.009URL |
[6] | Gick M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. ( 1987) . The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. In Transfer of learning:Contemporary research and applications (pp. 9-46). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-188950-0.50008-4URL |
[7] | Gourville, J.T . ( 2006). Eager sellers and stony buyers: Understanding the psychology of new-product adoption. Harvard Business Review, 84, 98-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2006.00034.xURLpmid: 16770897 |
[8] | Haskell R. E. ( 2001). Transfer of learning:Cognition, instruction, and reasoning. San Diego: Academic Press. |
[9] | Hayes, A.F ( 2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. |
[10] | Herzenstein M., Posavac S. S., & Brakus J. J . ( 2007). New and really new products: The effects of self-regulation systems and risk salience. Journal of Marketing Research, 44( 2), 251-260. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.44.2.251URL |
[11] | Homa D., Kahol K., Tripathis P., Bratton L., & Panchanathan S . ( 2009). Haptic concepts in the blind. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71( 4), 690-698. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.4.690URLpmid: 19429952 |
[12] | Huang M. X., Li P., & Wang Y. T . ( 2016). Is high variance of reviews necessarily a bad thing for a new product?-The role of perceived social value. Journal of Marketing Science, 12( 3), 36-50. |
[ 黄敏学, 李萍, 王艺婷 . ( 2016). 新产品评论不一致一定是坏事吗?—基于社会价值视角. 营销科学学报, 12( 3), 36-50.] | |
[13] | Huber B., Joanne T., Mariana N. A., Chelsee G., Steven J., Jordy K., & Swinburne Babylab Team . ( 2016). Young children's transfer of learning from a touchscreen device. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.010URL |
[14] | Jhang J. H., Grant S. J., & Campbell M. C . ( 2012). Get it? Got it. Good! Enhancing new product acceptance by facilitating resolution of extreme incongruity. Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 247-259. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1693188URL |
[15] | Klatzky R. L., Lederman S. J., & Metzger V. A . ( 1985). Identifying objects by touch: An “expert” system. Perception & Psychophysics, 37( 4), 299-302. doi: 10.3758/BF03211351URLpmid: 4034346 |
[16] | Liu, W.M., &Liang J.P . ( 2015). To choose red or blue? Investigating whether, when and why background colors will (will Not) affect visually new product evaluations. Nankai Business Review, 18( 5), 97-109. |
[ 柳武妹, 梁剑平 . ( 2015). 选择红色还是蓝色?背景色彩影响视觉新产品评估的现象、中介及边界体制研究. 南开管理评论, 18( 5), 97-109.] | |
[17] | Mandler, G. ( 1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste” in affect and cognition. In The 17th annual carnegie symposium on cognition. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
[18] | McCabe, D.B., &Nowlis S.N . ( 2003). The effect of examining actual products or product descriptions on consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13( 4), 431-439. doi: 10.1207/S15327663JCP1304_10URL |
[19] | Meyers-Levy, J., &Tybout ,A.M . ( 1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 39-54. doi: 10.1086/jcr.1989.16.issue-1URL |
[20] | Muller D., Judd C. M., & Yzerbyt V. Y . ( 2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852URLpmid: 16393020 |
[21] | Noseworthy T. J., Di Muro F., & Murray K. B . ( 2014). The role of arousal in congruity-based product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 41( 4), 1108-1026. doi: 10.1086/678301URL |
[22] | Noseworthy,T.J., &Trudel R., ( 2011). Looks interesting, but what does it do? Evaluation of incongruent product form depends on positioning. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 1008-1019. doi: 10.1509/jmr.10.0384URL |
[23] | Noseworthy T. J., Cotte J., & Lee S. H . ( 2011). The effects of ad context and gender on the identification of visually incongruent products. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 358-375. doi: 10.1086/658472URL |
[24] | Nuszbaum M., Voss A., Christoph K. K., & Betsch T . ( 2010). Assessing individual differences in the use of haptic information using a German translation of the need for touch scale. Social Psychology, 41( 4), 263-274. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000035URL |
[25] | Peck, J., &Childers ,T.L . ( 2003 b). Individual differences in haptic information processing: The “need for touch” scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 430-442. doi: 10.1086/378619URL |
[26] | Peck, J., &Childers ,T.L . ( 2003 a). To have and to hold: The influence of haptic information on product judgments. Journal of Marketing, 67, 35-48. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.67.2.35.18612URLpmid: 12755688 |
[27] | Peck, J., &Childers T.L . ( 2006). If I touch it I have to have it: Individual and environmental influences on impulse purchasing. Journal of Business Research, 59( 6), 765-769. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.014URL |
[28] | Peck, J., &Shu ,S.B . ( 2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 434-447. doi: 10.1086/598614URL |
[29] | Peck J., Barger V. A., & Webb A . ( 2013). In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23( 2), 189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2012.09.001URL |
[30] | Perkins D. N., &Salomon, G. ( 1992) .Transfer of learning. In International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.). Oxford, England:Pergamon Press. |
[31] | Romero, M., &Craig A.W . ( 2017). Costly curves: How human-like shapes can increase spending. Journal of Consumer Research, 44( 1), 88-98. doi: 10.1093/jcr/ucw080URL |
[32] | Russell J. A., Weiss A., & Mendelsohn G. A . ( 1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57( 3), 493-502. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.493URL |
[33] | Wang X. T., Du F., He X. S., & Zhang K . ( 2014). Enhanced spatial stimulus-response mapping near the hands: The Simon effect is modulated by hand-stimulus proximity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(6), 2252-2265. doi: 10.1037/a0038140URLpmid: 25314044 |
[34] | Zhang, M., &Li ,X.P . ( 2012). From physical weight to psychological significance: The contribution of semantic activations. Journal of Consumer Research, 38( 6), 1063-1075. doi: 10.1086/661768URL |
相关文章 2
[1] | 宋晓蕾, 李洋洋, 杨倩, 游旭群. 反应手的不同状态对联合任务中观察学习的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 975-984. |
[2] | 任洁,莫雷. 样例与运算性程序知识学习迁移关系的初步研究[J]. 心理学报, 1999, 31(4): 444-450. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4222