胡 颖， 尹雪峰*， 常 和， 冯雪岩， 王泽佳， 郝雪晖， 郭志娟

内蒙古大学生态与环境学院，内蒙古自治区环境污染控制与废物资源化重点实验室，内蒙古自治区 呼和浩特 010021

收稿日期:2019-04-25修回日期:2019-09-05出版日期:2020-05-22发布日期:2020-05-18
通讯作者:尹雪峰

基金资助:国家自然科学基金;内蒙古高校科技项目

Mechanisms and suppression methods for attrition and carbon deposition of oxygen carriers in chemical looping combustion

Ying HU, Xuefeng YIN*, He CHANG, Xueyan FENG, Zejia WANG, Xuehui HAO, Zhijuan GUO

State Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Waste Recycling in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Department of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010021, China

Received:2019-04-25Revised:2019-09-05Online:2020-05-22Published:2020-05-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 磨损和积碳的产生都严重干扰化学链燃烧(CLC)的正常运行，磨损可造成载氧体的损耗，积碳可导致载氧体与燃料不能充分接触。载氧体的循环燃烧效率与CLC技术成本密切相关，是其进入商业化的关键。本工作针对载氧体的磨损和积碳抑制这两大主要问题进行了分析总结。阐述了CLC过程发生的详细反应及形成炭黑型积碳前驱物多环芳烃机制，总结了应对的可行方法，其中联合水蒸气和CO2喷射具有很好的前景。并在此基础上讨论了该领域的潜在研究需求。

引用本文

胡颖 尹雪峰 常和 冯雪岩 王泽佳 郝雪晖 郭志娟. 化学链燃烧中载氧体磨损和产生积碳的机制及抑制方法[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(5): 493-502.
Ying HU Xuefeng YIN He CHANG Xueyan FENG Zejia WANG Xuehui HAO Zhijuan GUO. Mechanisms and suppression methods for attrition and carbon deposition of oxygen carriers in chemical looping combustion[J]. Chin. J. Process Eng., 2020, 20(5): 493-502.

使用本文

0
/ / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文:http://www.jproeng.com/CN/10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.219188
http://www.jproeng.com/CN/Y2020/V20/I5/493

参考文献

[1] Omoniyi OA, Dupont V. Optimised cycling stability of sorption enhanced chemical looping steam reforming of acetic acid in a packed bed reactor [J]. Applied Catalysis B-Environmental, 2019, 242: 397-409. [2] Hong H, Jin HG. A novel solar thermal cycle with chemical looping combustion [J]. International Journal of Green Energy, 2005, 2(4): 397-407. [3] Moon JH, Jo SH, Park SJ, et al. Carbon dioxide purity and combustion characteristics of oxy firing compared to air firing in a pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed [J]. Energy, 2019, 166: 183-192. [4] Li J, Zhang H, Gao Z, et al. CO2 capture with chemical looping combustion of gaseous fuels: an overview [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(4): 3475-3524. [5] Ryu H-J. Selection of the best oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor [J]. Clean Technology, 2018, 24(1): 63-69. [6] Kimball E, Lambert A, Fossdal A, et al. Reactor choices for chemical looping combustion (CLC) - dependencies on materials characteristics [J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 567-574. [7] Patel HA, Byun J, Yavuz CT. Carbon dioxide capture adsorbents: chemistry and methods [J]. Chemsuschem, 2017, 10(7): 1303-1317. [8] Cuadrat A, Abad A, Labiano F, et al. Ilmenite as oxygen carrier in a chemical looping combustion system with coal [J]. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 362-369. [9] Mendiara T, Diego LF, Labiano F, et al. Behaviour of a bauxite waste material as oxygen carrier in a 500 Wth CLC unit with coal [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 17: 170-182. [10] Sun Z, Lu DY, Hughes RW, et al. O-2 uncoupling behaviour of ilmenite and manganese-modified ilmenite as oxygen carriers [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 169: 15-23. [11] Lee D, Bae D, Shun D, et al. Comparison of reduction reactivity of new oxygen carriers for chemical looping combustion system in a bubbling fluidized bed [J]. The Korean Hydrogen and New Energy Society, 2017, 28(5): 554-560. [12] Jing D, Mattisson T, Ryden M, et al. Innovative oxygen carrier materials for chemical-looping combustion [J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 645-653. [13] Scala F, Chirone R, Salatino P. Attrition phenomena relevant to fluidized bed combustion and gasification systems [J]. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, 2013, 30(1): 254–315. [14] Cabello A, Gayan P, Labiano F, et al. On the attrition evaluation of oxygen carriers in chemical looping combustion [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 148: 188-197. [15] Qin W, Lin C, Cheng W, et al. Enhancing the activity of iron based oxygen carrier via surface controlled preparation for lignite chemical looping combustion [J]. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities-Chinese, 2015, 36(1): 116-123. [16] Nguyen HNT, Seemann M, Thunman H. Fate of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons during tertiary tar formation in steam gasification of biomass [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(3): 3499-3509. [17] Mattisson T, Johansson M, Lyngfelt A. The use of NiO as an OC in chemical looping combustion [J]. Fuel, 2006, 85: 736?747. [18] Soo YH, Il CS, Park C, et al. Characteristics of redox of oxygen carriers with NiO/AiPO4 for chemical-looping combustion [J]. Applied Chemistry for Engineering, 2004, 15(2): 200-204. [19] 梁志永. 铁基载氧体深层氧化CO以及积碳形成机理研究 [D]. 北京：华北电力大学; 2017. [20] Li JH, Lin CF, Qin W, et al. Synergetic effect of mercury adsorption on the catalytic decomposition of CO over perfect and reduced Fe2O3 001 surface [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2016, 32(11): 2717-2723. [21] 覃吴, 林常枫, 龙东腾, 等. 高指数晶面结构氧化铁化学链燃烧反应活性及深层还原反应机理 [J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(04): 667-675. Qin W, Lin CF, Long DT, et al. Reaction activity and deep reduction reaction mechanism of a high index iron oxide surface in chemical looping combustion [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2015, 31(04): 667-675. [22] 白雪峰, 尹雪峰, 邓玉洁, 等. CaSO_4/膨润土载氧体煤直接化学链燃烧中PAHs的生成 [J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 42(07): 1854-1862. [23] 梁志永, 董长青, 覃吴, 等. 化学链燃烧中铁基载氧体性能优化研究综述 [J]. 现代化工, 2017, 37(02): 36-40. [24] Veranth JM, Fletcher TH, Pershing DW, et al. Measurement of soot and char in pulverized coal fly ash [J]. Fuel, 2000, 79(9): 1067–1075. [25] Richter H, Howard JB. Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their growth to soot-a review of chemical reaction pathways [J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2000, 26(5): 565–608. [26] Blacha T, Domenico MD, Gerlinger P, et al. Soot predictions in premixed and non-premixed laminar flames using a sectional approach for PAHs and soot [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(1): 181–193. [27] Hansen N, Schenk M, Moshammer K, et al. Investigating repetitive reaction pathways for the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in combustion processes [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2017, 180: 250-261. [28] Houben MP, Lange HC, Steenhoven AA. Tar reduction through partial combustion of fuel gas [J]. Fuel, 2005, 84: 817?824. [29] Sim CY, Brown T, Chen Q, et al. Particle characterisation in chemical looping combustion [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2012, 69(1): 211-224. [30] Jin H, Ishida M. A new type of coal gas fueled chemical looping combustion [J]. Fuel, 2004, 83: 2411?2417. [31] Hua X, Wang W. Chemical looping combustion: A new low-dioxin energy conversion technology [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2015, 32: 135-145. [32] Mantripragada HC, Rubin ES. Chemical looping for pre-combustion and post-combustion CO2 capture [J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 6403-6410. [33] Haus J, Goltzsche M, Hartge EU, et al. Gasification kinetics of lignite char in a fluidized bed of reactive oxygen carrier particles [J]. Fuel, 2019, 236: 166-178.

相关文章 15

[1]	龚庆超 王健乔 方冬东 段锋 张丽徽. 铁基载氧体与干化市政污泥二元混合物流化特性[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020, 20(8): 904-911.
[2]	孙小青 陈朋 刘永卓 郭庆杰. 烟煤化学链反应特性及机理分析[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(6): 1120-1128.
[3]	常明 高思鸿 范怡平 卢春喜. 移动床除尘器捕集颗粒喷动再生的主要操作因素[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(6): 1153-1159.
[4]	田强 车立新 丁斌 石书强 苏庆泉. 反应压力对Ni基与Cu-Fe基混合装填载氧体还原性能的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(4): 750-756.
[5]	敦启孟 陈兆辉 皇甫林 周杨 余剑 高士秋 刘鸿雁. 温度和停留时间对煤热解挥发分二次反应的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(1): 140-147.
[6]	万奇顺 刘永卓 郭庆杰 田安红. 煤焦化学链气化过程中神木煤灰对铁基载氧体反应特性及结构的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2017, 17(5): 995-1001.
[7]	张俪安钱付平胡笳夏勇军杨洪鲁进利韩云龙. 通风管路90o弯管壁面颗粒磨损的数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2016, 16(3): 394-401.
[8]	赵占一孟文俊孙晓霞蒋权张立勇. 垂直螺旋输送机中颗粒速度的分布[J]. 过程工程学报, 2015, 15(6): 909-915.
[9]	邹康艾志久胡坤钱惠杰付必伟. 基于防磨结构的旋风分离器性能优化[J]. , 2015, 15(1): 9-15.
[10]	郑晓明苏庆泉米万良史勇. 基于新型化学链燃烧工艺的Cu基载氧体循环寿命[J]. , 2014, 14(5): 867-873.
[11]	郑晓明苏庆泉米万良邵嘉兴潘璐. 颗粒粒度对Cu基载氧体反应性能的影响[J]. , 2014, 14(4): 631-636.
[12]	刘杰王莹利宋莲英车红卫张卫东苏发兵. 沉淀法制备氧化亚铜颗粒及其在(CH3)2SiCl2单体合成反应中应用[J]. , 2012, 12(1): 136-141.
[13]	胡大成高加俭贾春苗平原贾丽华王莹利许光文古芳娜苏发兵. 甲烷化催化剂及反应机理的研究进展[J]. , 2011, 11(5): 880-893.
[14]	苏玉琰李松庚宋文立林伟刚. 铁基化学链法调节合成气氢碳比及联产氢气的实验研究[J]. , 2011, 11(2): 269-275.
[15]	恽松骞伟中魏飞. 流化床与固定床耦合反应器中的颗粒磨损[J]. , 2010, 10(1): 17-22.

PDF全文下载地址:

http://www.jproeng.com/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=3435