杜晓燕^{1, 2},
乔江^1,,,
卫佩佩¹
1.信息工程大学信息系统工程学院 ??郑州 ??450001
2.郑州大学信息工程学院 ??郑州 ??450001

详细信息

作者简介:杜晓燕：女，1975年生，副教授，研究方向为电磁场、微波技术与天线等
乔江：男，1995年生，硕士生，研究方向为对流层电波传播
卫佩佩：女，1990年生，博士生，研究方向为电波传播、电磁计算及反演问题等

通讯作者:乔江　qj951213@163.com

中图分类号:TN011.3

计量

文章访问数:1797
HTML全文浏览量:394
PDF下载量:30
被引次数:0

出版历程

收稿日期:2018-04-17
修回日期:2018-09-26
网络出版日期:2018-10-23
刊出日期:2019-01-01

Real-time Correction Model for Zenith Tropospheric Delay Applied to the Chinese Region

Xiaoyan DU^{1, 2},
Jiang QIAO^1,,,
Peipei WEI¹
1. Institute of Information Systems Engineering, Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2. School of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China


摘要
摘要:针对目前对流层延迟修正受限于探空数据不足导致修正效率低的问题，该文结合Saastamoinen和GPT2w模型构建形成组合模型Sa+GPT2w模型，通过利用GPT2w模型提供的高精度气象数据，实现中国地区对流层天顶延迟(ZTD)的实时修正，克服对探空数据的依赖，并用实测数据对计算结果进行验证。以IGS提供的中国地区2015至2017年ZTD时间序列为评估标准时，Sa+GPT2w模型(bias: 1.661 cm, RMS: 4.711 cm)的精度较同等条件下的Sa+EGNOS, Sa+UNB3m和Hop+GPT2w模型分别提升50.5%, 41.9%和37.1%；以GGOS Atmosphere 2017年ZTD数据为标准时，Sa+GPT2w模型(bias: 1.551 cm, RMS: 4.859 cm)的精度相对同等条件下的另3种模型分别提升49.5%, 38.5%和46.8%；最后对Sa+EGNOS, Sa+UNB3m和Sa+GPT2w模型在ZTD修正中误差结果的时空分布特征进行分析。研究结果可为在中国地区的导航定位、大气折射研究中，应用不同气象参数模型进行ZTD修正的有效性和可能达到的精度提供参考。
关键词:对流层天顶延迟/
Saastamoinen模型/
GPT2w模型/
EGNOS模型/
UNB3m模型
Abstract:In view of the correction for tropospheric delay is limited by the shortage of sounding data, which leads to the problem that the low correction efficiency, this paper proposes a model named Sa+GPT2w, combining Saastamoinen model with GPT2w model. In this paper, the real-time correction for Zenith Tropospheric Delay (ZTD) over China is realized by using the high-precision meteorological values provided by the GPT2w model, and the results are verified by the measured data. Taking the ZTD in 2015-2017 of International GNSS Service(IGS) as a reference, the accuracy of the Sa+GPT2w model (bias: 1.661 cm, RMS: 4.711 cm) rises by 50.5%, 41.9% and 37.1%, respectively, relative to the Sa+EGNOS, Sa+UNB3m and the Hop+GPT2w models. Moreover, using the ZTD from Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) in 2017 as a standard, the Sa+GPT2w model (bias: 1.551 cm, RMS: 4.859 cm) improves the accuracy by 49.5%, 38.5% and 46.8% relative to other three models, respectively. Finally, this paper analyzes the temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of the bias and RMS of the above three models. The results provide a significant reference for the effectiveness of correction for ZTD by using different meteorological models in the research of navigation and atmospheric refraction over China.
Key words:Zenith Tropospheric Delay (ZTD)/
Saastamoinen model/
GPT2w model/
EGNOS model/
UNB3m model



PDF全文下载地址:

https://jeit.ac.cn/article/exportPdf?id=b79f43fe-3487-49c1-b89f-0b7345288292