删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

Slowly rotating Einstein-bumblebee black hole solution and its greybody factor in a Lorentz violatio

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

闂傚倸鍊峰ù鍥敋瑜忛埀顒佺▓閺呯娀銆佸▎鎾冲唨妞ゆ挾鍋熼悰銉╂⒑閸︻厼鍔嬫い銊ユ噽婢规洘绻濆顓犲幍闂佸憡鎸嗛崨顓狀偧闂備焦濞婇弨閬嶅垂閸洖桅闁告洦鍨扮粻娑㈡煕閹捐尙鍔嶉柛瀣斿喚娓婚柕鍫濈箳閸掓壆鈧鍠栨晶搴ㄥ箲閵忕姭鏀介悗锝庝簽閸旓箑顪冮妶鍡楃瑨閻庢凹鍓涚划濠氬Ψ閿旇桨绨婚梺鍝勫暊閸嬫捇鏌涙惔鈥虫毐闁伙絿鍏樻俊鐑藉Ψ閵忊剝鏉告俊鐐€栧濠氭偤閺傚簱鏋旀俊顖涚湽娴滄粓鏌ㄩ弬鍨挃闁靛棙顨婂濠氬磼濮橆兘鍋撻悜鑺ュ€块柨鏃堟暜閸嬫挾绮☉妯诲櫧闁活厽鐟╅弻鐔兼倻濮楀棙鐣烽梺绋垮椤ㄥ棝濡甸崟顖氭闁割煈鍠掗幐鍐⒑閸涘⿴娈曠€光偓閹间礁绠栨俊銈傚亾闁宠棄顦埢搴b偓锝庡墰缁愭姊绘担鍝ワ紞缂侇噮鍨拌灋闁告劦鍠栭拑鐔哥箾閹存瑥鐏╅崬顖炴⒑闂堟稓绠氶柛鎾寸箞閹敻鏁冮埀顒勫煘閹达附鍊烽柟缁樺笚閸婎垶鎮楅崗澶婁壕闂佸綊妫跨粈渚€鎷戦悢鍏肩厪闁割偅绻嶅Σ鍝ョ磼閻欐瑥娲﹂悡鏇熴亜椤撶喎鐏ラ柡瀣枑缁绘盯宕煎┑鍫濈厽濠殿喖锕ㄥ▍锝囨閹烘嚦鐔兼偂鎼存ɑ瀚涢梻鍌欒兌鏋紒銊︽そ瀹曟劕螖閸愩劌鐏婂┑鐐叉閸旀洜娆㈤悙鐑樼厵闂侇叏绠戞晶鐗堛亜閺冣偓鐢€愁潖濞差亝鍤冮柍鍦亾鐎氭盯姊洪崨濠冨鞍闁烩晩鍨堕悰顔界節閸屾鏂€闁诲函缍嗛崑鍡涘储娴犲鈷戠紓浣光棨椤忓嫷鍤曢柤鎼佹涧缁剁偤鏌涢弴銊ュ箰闁稿鎸鹃幉鎾礋椤掑偆妲伴梻浣瑰濞插繘宕规禒瀣瀬闁规壆澧楅崐椋庣棯閻楀煫顏呯妤e啯鐓ユ繝闈涙椤庢霉濠婂啫鈷旂紒杈ㄥ浮楠炲鈧綆鍓涜ⅵ闂備礁鎼惉濂稿窗閹邦兗缂氶煫鍥ㄦ煟閸嬪懘鏌涢幇銊︽珦闁逞屽墮缁夋挳鈥旈崘顔嘉ч柛鈩兠弳妤呮⒑绾懏鐝柟鐟版处娣囧﹪骞橀鑲╊唺闂佽鎯岄崢浠嬪磽閻㈠憡鈷戦柟顖嗗嫮顩伴梺绋款儏濡繃淇婄€涙ḿ绡€闁稿本顨嗛弬鈧梻浣虹帛閿曗晠宕戦崟顒傤洸濡わ絽鍟埛鎴︽煕濞戞﹫鍔熼柍钘夘樀閺岋絾骞婇柛鏃€鍨甸锝夊蓟閵夘喗鏅㈤梺鍛婃处閸撴瑩鍩€椤掆偓閻栧ジ寮婚敐澶婄疀妞ゆ挾鍋熺粊鐑芥⒑閹惰姤鏁辨慨濠咁潐缁岃鲸绻濋崟顏呭媰闂佺ǹ鏈懝楣冿綖閸ヮ剚鈷戦柛婵嗗閻掕法绱掔紒妯肩畵闁伙綁鏀辩缓浠嬪礈閸欏娅囬梻渚€娼х换鎺撴叏鐎靛摜涓嶉柟娈垮枤绾句粙鏌涚仦鍓ф噮闁告柨绉甸妵鍕Ω閵夛箑娈楅柦妯荤箞濮婂宕奸悢鎭掆偓鎺楁煛閸☆參妾柟渚垮妼椤粓宕卞Δ鈧导搴g磽娴g懓鏁剧紒韫矙濠€渚€姊洪幐搴g畵閻庢凹鍨堕、妤呮偄鐠佸灝缍婇幃鈩冩償閵忕姵鐏庢繝娈垮枛閿曘儱顪冮挊澶屾殾闁靛⿵濡囩弧鈧梺绋挎湰缁酣骞婇崱妯肩瘈缁剧増蓱椤﹪鏌涚€n亝鍣介柟骞垮灲瀹曞ジ濡疯缁侊箓姊洪崷顓烆暭婵犮垺锕㈤弻瀣炊椤掍胶鍘搁梺鎼炲劗閺呮盯寮搁幋鐐电闁告侗鍠氭晶顒傜磼缂佹ḿ鈯曟繛鐓庣箻瀹曟粏顦寸悮锝嗙節閻㈤潧浠滈柟閿嬪灩缁辩偞鎷呴崫銉︽闂佺偨鍎查弸濂稿醇椤忓牊鐓曟い鎰╁€曢弸搴ㄦ煃瑜滈崜娑㈠极婵犳艾钃熼柨婵嗩槸椤懘鏌eΟ鍝勬倎缂侇喚鏁诲娲箹閻愭祴鍋撻幇鏉跨;闁瑰墽绮埛鎺懨归敐鍫綈闁稿濞€閺屾盯寮捄銊愩倝鏌熼獮鍨伈鐎规洜鍠栭、姗€鎮欓懠顑垮枈闂備浇宕垫慨鏉懨洪妶鍜佸殨妞ゆ帒瀚猾宥夋煕鐏炵虎娈斿ù婊堢畺閺屻劌鈹戦崱娑扁偓妤€顭胯閸楁娊寮婚妸銉㈡闁惧浚鍋勯锟�
547闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹妞嬪海鐭嗗ù锝夋交閼板潡姊洪鈧粔鏌ュ焵椤掆偓閸婂湱绮嬮幒鏂哄亾閿濆簼绨介柨娑欑洴濮婃椽鎮烽弶搴撴寖缂備緡鍣崹鍫曞春濞戙垹绠虫俊銈勮兌閸橀亶姊洪崫鍕妞ゃ劌妫楅埢宥夊川鐎涙ḿ鍘介棅顐㈡祫缁插ジ鏌囬鐐寸厸鐎光偓鐎n剙鍩岄柧缁樼墵閺屽秷顧侀柛鎾跺枛瀵粯绻濋崶銊︽珳婵犮垼娉涢敃锕傛偪閸ヮ剚鈷戦悷娆忓缁€鍐┿亜閺囧棗鎳愰惌鍡涙煕閹般劍鏉哄ù婊勭矒閻擃偊宕堕妸锕€闉嶅銈冨劜缁捇寮婚敐澶婄閻庨潧鎲¢崚娑樷攽椤旂》鏀绘俊鐐舵閻e嘲螖閸涱厾顦ч梺鍏肩ゴ閺呮盯宕甸幒妤佲拻濞达絽鎲¢幉鎼佹煕閿濆啫鍔︾€规洘鍨垮畷鐔碱敍濞戞ü鎮i梻浣虹帛閸ㄥ吋鎱ㄩ妶澶婄柧闁归棿鐒﹂悡銉╂煟閺囩偛鈧湱鈧熬鎷�1130缂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗銆掑锝呬壕闁芥ɑ绻冮妵鍕冀閵娧呯厒闂佹椿鍘介幑鍥蓟閿濆顫呴柕蹇婃櫆濮e矂姊虹粙娆惧剱闁圭懓娲ら悾鐤亹閹烘繃鏅濋梺鎸庣箓濞诧箓顢樻繝姘拻濞撴埃鍋撻柍褜鍓涢崑娑㈡嚐椤栨稒娅犻柛娆忣槶娴滄粍銇勯幇鈺佺労婵″弶妞介弻娑㈡偐鐠囇冧紣濡炪倖鎸搁崥瀣嚗閸曨剛绡€闁告劦鍘鹃崣鎴︽⒒閸屾瑧绐旈柍褜鍓涢崑娑㈡嚐椤栨稒娅犻柟缁㈠枟閻撴盯鎮橀悙鐧昏鏅堕懠顑藉亾閸偅绶查悗姘煎櫍閸┾偓妞ゆ帒锕︾粔闈浢瑰⿰鍕煉闁挎繄鍋為幆鏃堝煢閳ь剟寮ㄦ禒瀣厽闁归偊鍨伴惃鍝勵熆瑜庨惄顖炲蓟濞戙垹惟闁靛/鍌濇闂備椒绱徊鍧楀礂濮椻偓瀵偊骞樼紒妯轰汗闂佽偐鈷堥崜锕€危娴煎瓨鐓熼柣鏂挎憸閻﹦绱掔紒妯虹闁告帗甯掗埢搴ㄥ箻瀹曞洤鈧偤姊洪崘鍙夋儓闁哥喍鍗抽弫宥呪堪閸曨厾鐦堥梺闈涢獜缁插墽娑垫ィ鍐╃叆闁哄浂浜顕€鏌¢崨顐㈠姦婵﹦绮幏鍛村川婵犲倹娈橀梺鐓庣仌閸ャ劎鍘辨繝鐢靛Т閸熺増鏅舵潏鈺冪=闁稿本绋掑畷宀勬煙缁嬪尅鏀荤紒鏃傚枛閸╋繝宕掑☉杈棃闁诲氦顫夊ú锔界濠靛绠柛娑卞灡閸犲棝鏌涢弴銊ュ箺鐞氭瑩姊婚崒姘偓椋庣矆娴i潻鑰块梺顒€绉撮崒銊ф喐閺冨牆绠栨繛宸簻鎯熼梺瀹犳〃閼冲爼顢欓崶顒佲拺闁告挻褰冩禍婵囩箾閸欏澧甸柟顔惧仱瀹曞綊顢曢悩杈╃泿闂備胶鎳撻顓㈠磻濞戙埄鏁嬫繝濠傛噽绾剧厧霉閿濆懏鎯堟い锝呫偢閺屾洟宕惰椤忣厽銇勯姀鈩冪濠殿喒鍋撻梺瀹犳〃缁€浣圭珶婢舵劖鈷掑ù锝囨嚀椤曟粎绱掔€n偄娴€规洘绻傞埢搴ㄥ箻鐠鸿櫣銈﹂梺璇插嚱缂嶅棝宕抽鈧顐㈩吋閸℃瑧鐦堟繝鐢靛Т閸婅鍒婇崗闂寸箚闁哄被鍎查弫杈╃磼缂佹ḿ绠為柟顔荤矙濡啫鈽夊Δ浣稿闂傚倷鐒﹂幃鍫曞礉瀹€鈧槐鐐寸節閸屻倕娈ㄥ銈嗗姂閸婃鎯屽▎鎰箚妞ゆ劑鍊栭弳鈺呮煕鎼存稑鈧骞戦姀鐘斀閻庯綆浜為崐鐐烘⒑闂堟胆褰掑磿閺屻儺鏁囨繛宸簼閳锋垿鏌涘┑鍡楊伌婵″弶鎮傞弻锝呂旀担铏圭厜閻庤娲橀崹鍧楃嵁閹烘嚦鏃堝焵椤掑嫬瑙︾憸鐗堝笚閻撴盯鏌涢幇鈺佸濠⒀勭洴閺岋綁骞樺畷鍥╊啋闂佸搫鏈惄顖炲春閸曨垰绀冮柍鍝勫枤濡茬兘姊绘担鍛靛湱鎹㈤幇鐗堝剶闁兼祴鏅滈~鏇㈡煙閻戞﹩娈㈤柡浣革躬閺屾稖绠涢幙鍐┬︽繛瀛樼矒缁犳牠骞冨ú顏勭鐎广儱妫涢妶鏉款渻閵堝骸浜滄い锔炬暬閻涱噣宕卞☉妯活棟闁圭厧鐡ㄩ幐濠氾綖瀹ュ鈷戦柛锔诲幖閸斿鏌涢妸銊︾彧缂佹梻鍠栧鎾偄閾忚鍟庨梺鍝勵槸閻楀棙鏅舵禒瀣畺濠靛倸鎲¢悡娑㈡煕濠娾偓缁€浣圭濠婂牆纭€闂侇剙绉甸悡鏇熴亜閹邦喖孝闁告梹绮撻弻锝夊箻鐎涙ḿ顦伴梺鍝勭灱閸犳牠骞冨⿰鍏剧喓鎷犻弻銉р偓娲⒒娴e懙褰掝敄閸ャ劎绠鹃柍褜鍓熼弻锛勪沪閻e睗銉︺亜瑜岀欢姘跺蓟濞戞粎鐤€闁哄啫鍊堕埀顒佸笚缁绘盯宕遍幇顒備患濡炪値鍋呯换鍕箲閸曨個娲敂閸滃啰鑸瑰┑鐘茬棄閺夊簱鍋撹瀵板﹥绂掔€n亞鏌堝銈嗙墱閸嬫稓绮婚悩铏弿婵☆垵顕ч。鎶芥煕鐎n偅宕岄柣娑卞櫍瀹曞綊顢欓悡搴經闂傚倷绀侀幗婊堝窗閹惧绠鹃柍褜鍓涢埀顒冾潐濞叉﹢宕归崸妤冨祦婵☆垰鐨烽崑鎾斥槈濞咁収浜、鎾诲箻缂佹ǚ鎷虹紓鍌欑劍閿氶柣蹇ョ畵閺屻劌顫濋懜鐢靛帗閻熸粍绮撳畷婊冣槈閵忕姷锛涢梺缁樻⒒閸樠囨倿閸偁浜滈柟鐑樺灥閺嬨倖绻涢崗鐓庡闁哄瞼鍠栭、娆撴嚃閳轰胶鍘介柣搴ゎ潐濞叉ê煤閻旂鈧礁鈽夐姀鈥斥偓鐑芥煠绾板崬澧┑顕嗛檮娣囧﹪鎮欓鍕ㄥ亾閺嶎厼鍨傚┑鍌溓圭壕鍨攽閻樺疇澹樼紒鈧崒鐐村€堕柣鎰緲鐎氬骸霉濠婂嫮鐭掗柡宀€鍠栭獮鍡氼槾闁圭晫濞€閺屾稒绻濋崘銊ヮ潚闂佸搫鐬奸崰鏍€佸▎鎾村殐闁宠桨鑳堕崢浠嬫煟鎼淬値娼愭繛鑼枑缁傚秹宕奸弴鐘茬ウ闂佹悶鍎洪崜娆愬劔闂備線娼чˇ顓㈠磹閺団懞澶婎潩椤戣姤鏂€闂佺粯鍔橀崺鏍亹瑜忕槐鎺楁嚑椤掆偓娴滃墽绱掗崒姘毙ч柟宕囧仱婵$柉顧佹繛鏉戝濮婃椽骞愭惔銏紩闂佺ǹ顑嗛幑鍥涙担鐟扮窞闁归偊鍘鹃崢閬嶆椤愩垺澶勬繛鍙夌墱閺侇噣宕奸弴鐔哄幍闂佺ǹ绻愰崥瀣磹閹扮増鐓涢悘鐐垫櫕鍟稿銇卞倻绐旈柡灞剧缁犳盯寮崒妤侇潔闂傚倸娲らˇ鐢稿蓟濞戙垹唯妞ゆ梻鍘ч~鈺冪磼閻愵剙鍔ら柕鍫熸倐瀵寮撮悢铏圭槇闂婎偄娲﹀ú婊堝汲閻樺樊娓婚柕鍫濇缁€澶婎渻鐎涙ɑ鍊愭鐐茬墦婵℃悂濡锋惔锝呮灁缂侇喗鐟╁畷褰掝敊绾拌鲸缍嶉梻鍌氬€烽懗鑸电仚濡炪倖鍨靛Λ婵嬬嵁閹邦厾绡€婵﹩鍓涢鍡涙⒑閸涘﹣绶遍柛銊╀憾瀹曚即宕卞☉娆戝幈闂佸搫娲㈤崝灞炬櫠娴煎瓨鐓涢柛鈩兠崫鐑樻叏婵犲嫮甯涢柟宄版嚇瀹曨偊宕熼锛勫笡闂佽瀛╅鏍窗濡ゅ懎纾垮┑鍌溓规闂佸湱澧楀妯肩矆閸愨斂浜滈煫鍥ㄦ尰椤ョ姴顭跨捄鍝勵仾濞e洤锕俊鎯扮疀閺囩偛鐓傞梻浣告憸閸c儵宕圭捄铏规殾闁硅揪闄勯崑鎰磽娴h疮缂氶柛姗€浜跺娲棘閵夛附鐝旈梺鍝ュ櫏閸嬪懘骞堥妸鈺佺劦妞ゆ帒瀚埛鎴犵磼鐎n偒鍎ラ柛搴㈠姍閺岀喓绮欏▎鍓у悑濡ょ姷鍋涚换妯虹暦閵娧€鍋撳☉娅亝绂掗幆褜娓婚柕鍫濇婢ь剟鏌ら悷鏉库挃缂侇喖顭烽獮瀣晜鐟欙絾瀚藉┑鐐舵彧缁蹭粙骞夐敓鐘茬畾闁割偁鍎查悡鏇炩攽閻樻彃顎愰柛锔诲幖瀵煡姊绘笟鈧ḿ褏鎹㈤崼銉ョ9闁哄洢鍨洪崐鍧楁煕椤垵浜栧ù婊勭矒閺岀喓鈧數枪娴犳粍銇勯弴鐔虹煂缂佽鲸甯楅幏鍛喆閸曨厼鍤掓俊鐐€ら崣鈧繛澶嬫礋楠炲骞橀鑲╊槹濡炪倖宸婚崑鎾剁棯閻愵剙鈻曢柟顔筋殔閳绘捇宕归鐣屼壕闂備浇妗ㄧ粈渚€鈥﹂悜钘壩ュù锝囩《濡插牊淇婇娑氱煂闁哥姴閰i幃楣冨焺閸愯法鐭楁繛杈剧到婢瑰﹤螞濠婂嫮绡€闁汇垽娼ф禒鈺呮煙濞茶绨界紒杈╁仱閸┾偓妞ゆ帊闄嶆禍婊勩亜閹扳晛鐒烘俊顖楀亾闂備浇顕栭崳顖滄崲濠靛鏄ラ柍褜鍓氶妵鍕箳閹存繍浠鹃梺鎶芥敱鐢繝寮诲☉姘勃闁硅鍔曢ˉ婵嬫⒑闁偛鑻崢鍝ョ磼椤旂晫鎳囬柕鍡曠閳诲酣骞囬鍓ф闂備礁鎲″ú锕傚礈閿曗偓宀e潡鎮㈤崗灏栨嫼闂佸憡鎸昏ぐ鍐╃濠靛洨绠鹃柛娆忣槺婢ц京绱掗鍨惞缂佽鲸甯掕灒闂傗偓閹邦喚娉块梻鍌欑濠€閬嶅磻閹剧繀缂氭繛鍡樻嫴婢跺⿴娼╅柤鍝ユ暩閸橀亶鏌f惔顖滅У闁稿鎳愭禍鍛婂鐎涙ḿ鍘甸悗鐟板婢ф宕甸崶鈹惧亾鐟欏嫭绀堥柛蹇旓耿閵嗕礁螣鐞涒剝鏁犻梺璇″瀻閸屾凹妫滄繝鐢靛Х閺佸憡鎱ㄩ弶鎳ㄦ椽鏁冮崒姘憋紮闂佸壊鐓堥崑鍡欑不妤e啯鐓欓悗娑欋缚缁犳﹢鏌$€n亜鏆熺紒杈ㄥ浮閸┾偓妞ゆ帒鍊甸崑鎾绘晲鎼粹剝鐏嶉梺缁樻尭閸熶即骞夌粙搴撳牚闁割偅绻勯ˇ褍鈹戦悙鏉戠仸婵ǜ鍔戦幆宀勫幢濡炴洖缍婇弫鎰板醇閻旂补鍋撻崘顔界厽闁圭儤鍩婇煬顒勬煛瀹€鈧崰搴ㄥ煝閹捐鍨傛い鏃傛櫕娴滄劙姊绘担鍛靛綊顢栭崱娑樼闁归棿绀侀悡鈥愁熆鐠哄搫顦柛瀣崌瀹曠兘顢橀悙鎰╁劜閵囧嫰鏁傞崹顔肩ギ濠殿喖锕ュ浠嬪蓟閸涘瓨鍊烽柤鑹版硾椤忣參姊洪崨濞掝亪骞夐敍鍕床婵炴垯鍨圭痪褔鏌熺€电ǹ浠滈柡瀣Т椤啴濡堕崘銊т痪闂佹寧娲忛崹褰掓偩閻戠瓔鏁冮柨鏇楀亾閸烆垶鎮峰⿰鍐伇缂侇噮鍘藉鍕箾閻愵剚鏉搁梺鍦劋婵炲﹤鐣烽幇鏉跨缂備焦锚閳ь剙娼¢弻銊╁籍閳ь剙鐣峰Ο缁樺弿闁惧浚鍋呴崣蹇斾繆椤栨氨浠㈤柣鎾村姍閺岋綁骞樺畷鍥╊啋闂佸搫鏈惄顖炲春閸曨垰绀冮柍鍝勫枤濡茶埖淇婇悙顏勨偓褏鎷嬮敐鍡曠箚闁搞儺鍓欓悞鍨亜閹哄棗浜惧┑鐘亾閺夊牄鍔庢禒姘繆閻愵亜鈧倝宕㈡總绋垮簥闁哄被鍎查崑鈺呮煟閹达絽袚闁哄懏鐓¢弻娑㈠Ψ椤栫偞顎嶉梺鍛婃礀閸熸潙顫忛搹鍦煓闁圭ǹ瀛╅幏鍗烆渻閵堝啫濡奸柟鍐茬箳缁顓兼径濠勭暰濡炪値鍏橀埀顒€纾粔娲煛娴g懓濮嶇€规洏鍔戦、娆撳礂閸忚偐鏆梻鍌氬€风粈渚€骞夐垾瓒佹椽鎮㈤搹閫涚瑝闂佸搫绋侀崢濂告嫅閻斿吋鐓ユ繝闈涙-濡插綊鏌涙繝鍕幋闁哄本绋戦埢搴ょ疀閿濆棌鏋旀繝纰樻閸嬪懘宕归崹顕呮綎婵炲樊浜濋悞濠氭煟閹邦垰钄奸悗姘嵆閺屾稑螣缂佹ê鈧劙鏌″畝瀣М妤犵偞甯¢幃娆撴偨閸偅顔撻梺璇插椤旀牠宕抽鈧畷婊堟偄妞嬪孩娈鹃梺鍦劋閸╁牆岣块埡鍛叆婵犻潧妫欓ˉ鐘绘煕濞嗗繐鏆炵紒缁樼箓閳绘捇宕归鐣屼壕闂備胶顢婂▍鏇㈠箰閸濄儱寮查梻浣虹帛鏋い鏇嗗懎顥氬┑鐘崇閻撴瑩鏌熼鍡楁噺閹插吋绻濆▓鍨仭闁瑰憡濞婂璇测槈濡攱顫嶅┑顔筋殔閻楀﹪寮ィ鍐┾拺闂傚牃鏅濈粙濠氭煙椤旂厧鈧灝顕f繝姘櫜闁糕剝锚閸斿懘姊洪棃娑氱濠殿喗鎸冲绋库枎閹惧鍘介梺缁樏崯鎸庢叏婢舵劖鐓曢柣妯虹-婢х數鈧娲樺浠嬪春閳ь剚銇勯幒宥夋濞存粍绮撻弻鐔衡偓鐢登规禒婊勩亜閺囩喓鐭嬮柕鍥у閺佸啴宕掗妶鍡╂缂傚倷娴囨ご鎼佸箰閹间緡鏁囧┑鍌溓瑰钘壝归敐鍤借绔熸惔銊︹拻濞达絼璀﹂弨鐗堢箾閸涱喗绀嬮柟顔ㄥ洦鍋愰悹鍥皺閻ゅ洭姊虹紒妯曟垵顪冮崸妤€鏋侀柛鈩冪⊕閻撴洟鏌熼柇锕€鏋涘ù婊堢畺閺岋箓骞嬪┑鎰ㄧ紓浣介哺閹瑰洤鐣烽幒鎴旀瀻闁瑰瓨绻傞‖澶愭⒒娴e憡鍟為柛鏃€娲熼垾锕傛倻閻e苯绁﹂棅顐㈡处缁嬫帡寮查幖浣圭叆闁绘洖鍊圭€氾拷28缂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣椤愪粙鏌ㄩ悢鍝勑㈢痪鎹愵嚙椤潡鎳滈棃娑樞曢梺杞扮椤戝洭骞夐幖浣哥睄闁割偅绋堥崑鎾存媴閼叉繃妫冨畷銊╊敊闂傚鐩庨梻鍌欑劍閸庡磭鎹㈤幇顒婅€块梺顒€绉甸崑鍌炴倵閿濆骸鏋熼柍閿嬪灴閹嘲鈻庤箛鎿冧痪闂佺ǹ瀛╅〃濠囧蓟濞戙垹惟闁靛/宥囩濠电姰鍨奸~澶娒洪悢鐓庢瀬闁瑰墽绮弲鎼佹煥閻曞倹瀚�
Chikun Ding 1,2,3,,
, Xiongwen Chen 1,3,,
,
Corresponding author: Chikun Ding, dingchikun@163.com;Chikun_Ding@huhst.edu.cn
Corresponding author: Xiongwen Chen, chenxiongwen@hhtc.edu.cn
1.Department of Physics, Huaihua University, Hunan, Huaihua 418008, China
2.Department of Physics, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology, Hunan, Loudi 417000, China
3.Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, and Synergetic Innovation Center for Quantum Effects and Applications, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Received Date:2020-09-22
Available Online:2021-02-15
Abstract:We obtain an exact slowly rotating Einstein-bumblebee black hole solution by solving the corresponding $rr$ and $t\phi$ components of the gravitational field equations for both cases: A) $b_\mu=(0,b(r),0,0)$ and B) $b_\mu= (0,b(r), \mathfrak{b}(\theta),0)$. Then, we check the other gravitational field equations and the bumblebee field motion equations using this solution. We find that for case A, there indeed exists a slowly rotating black hole solution for an arbitrary LV (Lorentz violation) coupling constant $\ell$; however, for case B, this slowly rotating solution exists if and only if coupling constant $\ell$ is as small as or smaller than angular momentum a. Thus far, no full rotating black hole solution has been published; hence, the Newman-Janis algorithm cannot be used to generate a rotating solution in the Einstein-bumblebee theory. This is similar to the Einstein-aether theory, wherein only some slowly rotating black hole solutions exist. To study the effects of this broken Lorentz symmetry, we consider the black hole greybody factor and find that, for angular index $l=0$, LV constant $\ell$ decreases the effective potential and enhances the absorption probability, which is similar to the results for the non-minimal derivative coupling theory.

HTML

--> --> -->
I.INTRODUCTION
Lorentz invariance (LI) is the most fundamental principle of general relativity (GR) and the standard model (SM) in particle physics. It is, therefore, not surprising that most theories of gravity encompass this symmetry, and little attention has been paid to understanding the implications of the breaking of LI. However, LI should not be an exact principle for all energy scales [1]. For example, when one considers the unification of quantum mechanics and GR, it should not be applicable. Both GR and the SM are based on LI and the spacetime background, but they address problems in profoundly different ways. GR is a classical field theory in curved spacetime that ignores all the quantum features of particles, whereas the SM is a quantum field theory in flat spacetime that disregards the gravitational effects of particles. For collisions of particles with energies on the order of $ 10^{30} $ eV (above the Planck scale), the gravitational interactions estimated by GR are very powerful, and gravity should not be ignored [2]. Thus, on this scale of very high energies, one has to reconsider combining the SM with GR in a unified theory, i.e., "quantum gravity". Therefore, studying the Lorentz violation (LV) is a useful approach toward investigating the foundations of modern physics. This involves studying the LV in the neutrino range [3], the standard-model extension (SME) [4], the LV in the non-gravity range [5], and the LV effects on the creation of atmospheric showers [6].
Experimental confirmation of this idea of quantum gravity is challenging because direct experiments on the Planck scale are impractical. However, suppressed effects, emerging from the underlying unified quantum gravity theory, might be observable on our low energy scale. Thus, the search for reminiscent quantum gravity effects in the low energy regime has attracted significant attention over the last decades. The combination of GR and the SM provides a remarkably successful description of nature. The SME is an effective field theory that studies gravity and the SM on low energy scales. It couples the SM to GR, enabling dynamical curvature modes, and involves extra items embracing information about the LV happening on the Planck scale [7]. The LV items in the SME have the form of Lorentz-violating operators coupled to coefficients with Lorentz indices. The appearance of the LV in a local Lorentz frame is manifested by a nonzero vacuum value for one or more quantities taking along local Lorentz indices. A specific theory is the "bumblebee" pattern, where the LV arises owing to the dynamics of a single vector or axial-vector field $ B_\mu $, known as the bumblebee field. This model is a simple effective theory of gravity with the LV in the SME and a subset of the Einstein-aether theory [8-10]. It is controlled by a potential revealing a minimum scrolls to its vacuum expectation value, showing that the vacuum of the theory obtains a preferential direction in the spacetime. The bumblebee gravitational model was first studied by Kostelecky and Samuel in 1989 [11, 12] as a specific pattern for an unprompted LV.
Deriving black hole solutions is a very requisite task in any theory of gravity, because these solutions yield a large amount of information about quantum gravity. In 2018, R. Casana et al. gave an exact Schwarzschild-like solution in this bumblebee gravity model and considered some classical tests for it [13]. Then, Rong-Jia Yang et al. considered the accretion onto this black hole [14] and discovered that LV parameter $ \ell $ decreases the mass accretion rate. The rotating black hole solutions are the most relational subsets for astrophysics. In 2020, C. Ding et al. found an exact Kerr-like solution by solving Einstein-bumblebee gravitational field equations and studied its black hole shadow [15]. However, this solution does not seem to meet the bumblebee field motion equation requirements. Thus, in the present paper, we seek a slowly rotating black hole solution for both of the following cases: $ b_\mu = (0,b(r), 0,0) $ and $ b_\mu = (0,b(r),\mathfrak{b}(\theta),0) $.
Then, we study the black hole greybody factor and obtain some deviations from GR and some LV gravity theories. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we provide the necessary background on the Einstein-bumblebee theory. In Sec. III, we derive the slowly rotating black hole solution by solving the gravitational field equations. In Sec. IV, we study the black hole greybody factor and report some effects of Lorentz breaking constant $ \ell $. Sec. V contains the summary of our work.
II.EINSTEIN-BUMBLEBEE THEORY
In the bumblebee gravity theory, bumblebee vector field $ B_{\mu} $ attains a nonzero vacuum expectation value via a given potential, leading to a spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking in the gravitational sector. Its action [16] is
$ \begin{aligned}[b]{\cal{S}} =& \int {\rm d}^4x\sqrt{-g}\Biggr[\frac{1}{16\pi G_N}({\cal{R}}-2\Lambda+\varrho B^{\mu}B^{\nu}{\cal{R}}_{\mu\nu}\\&+\sigma B_\mu B^\mu {\cal{R}})-\frac{\tau_1}{4}B^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu}+\frac{\tau_2}{2}D_\mu B_\nu D^\mu B^\nu \\&+\frac{\tau_3}{2}D_\mu B^\mu D_\nu B^\nu-V(B_\mu B^{\mu}\mp b^2)+{\cal{L}}_M\Biggr], \end{aligned} $
(1)
where $ b^2 $ is a real positive constant. The Lorentz and/or $ {\rm CPT} $ (charge conjugation, parity, and time reversal) violation is opened by potential $ V(B_\mu B^{\,\mu}\mp b^2) $. It yields a nonzero vacuum expectation value (VEV) for bumblebee field $ B_{\,\mu} $ , implying that the vacuum in this theory gets a preferential direction in the spacetime. This potential is assumed to have a minimum at $ B^{\,\mu}B_{\mu}\pm b^2 = 0 $ and $ V'(b_{\mu}b^{\mu}) = 0 $ to assure the breaking of the $ U(1) $ symmetry, where field $ B_{\mu} $ obtains a nonzero VEV, $ \langle B^{\,\mu}\rangle = b^{\mu} $. Vector $ b^{\mu} $ is a function of the spacetime coordinates and has a constant value of $ b_{\mu}b^{\mu} = \mp b^2 $, where the $ \pm $ signs imply that $ b^{\mu} $ is timelike or spacelike, respectively. The bumblebee field strength is
$ B_{\mu\nu} = \partial_{\mu}B_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}B_{\mu}. $
(2)
Real constants $ \varrho,\;\sigma,\;\tau_1,\;\tau_2,\;\tau_3 $ determine the form of the kinetic terms for the bumblebee field. Term $ {\cal{L}}_M $ represents possible interactions with matter or external currents. Note that if $ \varrho = \sigma = 0 $ and with a linear Lagrange-multiplier potential
$ V = \lambda (B_\mu B^{\mu}\mp b^2), $
(3)
this bumblebee model becomes a special case of the Einstein-aether theory [16]. In the Einstein-aether theory [9, 10], the Lorentz symmetry is broken by an introduced tensor field, $ u^a $, with the constraint $ u_au^a = -1 $, termed aether, which is timelike everywhere and at all times. Then, a preferred time direction exists at every point of the spacetime, i.e., a preferred frame of reference. The introduction of the aether vector allows for some novel effects, e.g., matter fields can travel faster than the speed of light, which has been dubbed superluminal particles. In Ref. [9], we derived a series of charged Einstein-aether black hole solutions in 4 dimensional spacetime and studied their Smarr formula. In Ref. [10], we obtained a series of neutral and charged black hole solutions in 3 dimensional spacetime.
In this study, constant $ \tau_1 = 1 $, $ \Lambda = \sigma = \tau_2 = \tau_3 = 0 $, and there is no $ {\cal{L}}_M $; hence,
$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\cal{S}} =& \int {\rm d}^4x\sqrt{-g}\Biggr[\frac{1}{16\pi G_N}({\cal{R}}+\varrho B^{\mu}B^{\nu}{\cal{R}}_{\mu\nu})\\&-\frac{1}{4}B^{\mu\nu}B_{\mu\nu} -V(B_\mu B^{\mu}\mp b^2)\Biggr], \end{aligned}$
(4)
where $ \varrho $ dominates the non-minimal gravity interaction with bumblebee field $ B_\mu $. Action (4) yields the gravitational field equation in vacuum,
$ {\cal{R}}_{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}{\cal{R}} = \kappa T_{\mu\nu}^B, $
(5)
where $ \kappa = 8\pi G_N $, and the bumblebee energy momentum tensor, $ T_{\mu\nu}^B $, is
$ \begin{aligned}[b]T_{\mu\nu}^B =& B_{\mu\alpha}B^{\alpha}_{\;\nu}-\frac{1}{4}g_{\mu\nu} B^{\alpha\beta}B_{\alpha\beta}- g_{\mu\nu}V+ 2B_{\mu}B_{\nu}V'\\ &+\frac{\varrho}{\kappa}\Biggr[\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}B^{\alpha}B^{\beta}R_{\alpha\beta} -B_{\mu}B^{\alpha}R_{\alpha\nu}-B_{\nu}B^{\alpha}R_{\alpha\mu}\\ &+\frac{1}{2}\nabla_{\alpha}\nabla_{\mu}(B^{\alpha}B_{\nu}) +\frac{1}{2}\nabla_{\alpha}\nabla_{\nu}(B^{\alpha}B_{\mu}) \\&-\frac{1}{2}\nabla^2(B^{\mu}B_{\nu})-\frac{1}{2} g_{\mu\nu}\nabla_{\alpha}\nabla_{\beta}(B^{\alpha}B^{\beta})\Biggr]. \end{aligned} $
(6)
The prime denotes differentiation with respect to the argument,
$ V' = \frac{\partial V(x)}{\partial x}\Big|_{x = B^{\mu}B_{\mu}\pm b^2}. $
(7)
Using the trace of Eq. (5), we obtain the trace-reversed version
$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\cal{R}}_{\mu\nu} =& \kappa T_{\mu\nu}^B+2\kappa g_{\mu\nu}V -\kappa g_{\mu\nu} B^{\alpha}B_{\alpha}V'+\frac{\varrho}{4}g_{\mu\nu}\nabla^2(B^{\alpha}B_{\alpha}) \\&+\frac{\varrho}{2}g_{\mu\nu}\nabla_{\alpha}\nabla_{\beta}(B^{\alpha}B^{\beta}). \end{aligned} $
(8)
The equation of motion for the bumblebee field is
$ \nabla ^{\mu}B_{\mu\nu} = 2V'B_\nu-\frac{\varrho}{\kappa}B^{\mu}R_{\mu\nu}. $
(9)
In the following, we suppose that the bumblebee field is frosted at its VEV, i.e., it is
$ B_\mu = b_\mu, $
(10)
then, the specific form of the potential controlling its dynamics is irrelevant. As a result, we have $ V = 0,\; V' = 0 $. Then, the first two terms in Eq. (6) are like those of the electromagnetic field; the only distinctions are the coupling terms to the Ricci tensor. Under this condition, Eq. (8) leads to the following gravitational field equations:
$ \bar R_{\mu\nu} = 0, $
(11)
with
$ \begin{aligned}[b]\bar R_{\mu\nu} =& {\cal{R}}_{\mu\nu}-\kappa b_{\mu\alpha}b^{\alpha}_{\;\nu}+\frac{\kappa}{4}g_{\mu\nu} b^{\alpha\beta}b_{\alpha\beta}+\varrho b_{\mu}b^{\alpha}{\cal{R}}_{\alpha\nu} \\&+\varrho b_{\nu}b^{\alpha}{\cal{R}}_{\alpha\mu} -\frac{\varrho}{2}g_{\mu\nu}b^{\alpha}b^{\beta}{\cal{R}}_{\alpha\beta}+\bar B_{\mu\nu},\\ \bar B_{\mu\nu} =& -\frac{\varrho}{2}\Big[ \nabla_{\alpha}\nabla_{\mu}(b^{\alpha}b_{\nu}) +\nabla_{\alpha}\nabla_{\nu}(b^{\alpha}b_{\mu}) -\nabla^2(b_{\mu}b_{\nu})\Big]. \end{aligned}$
(12)
In the next section, we derive the slowly rotating black hole solution by solving the gravitational equations in this Einstein-bumblebee model.
III.SLOWLY ROTATING SOLUTION IN THEEINSTEIN-BUMBLEBEE MODEL
In this section, we derive the slowly rotating black hole solution by solving the Einstein-bumblebee gravitational equations. Rotating black hole solutions are of extreme importance in astrophysics. However, deriving an exact rotating solution is very troublesome. For example, the Schwarzschild black hole solution was obtained in 1916, soon after GR was presented [17]. However,only 47 years later, in 1963, its rotating counterpart was obtained [18]. Many scholars have used the Newman-Janis algorithm [19] to obtain a full rotating black hole solution, but they have not checked the gravitational field equations with this obtained solution. Some authors have demonstrated that this method does not work for nonlinear sources [20].
In Ref. [15], we have found an exact Kerr-like solution for bumblebee field $ b_\mu = (0,b(r,\theta),0,0) $ by solving the gravitational field equations. However, this full rotating solution does not seem to meet the requirements of the bumblebee field equation. Considering only the case of $ b_\mu = (0,b(r),\mathfrak{b}(\theta),0) $ is very difficult, and it seems impractical to use the same method. Thus, here, we derive the slowly rotating black hole solution. The slowly rotating stationary axially symmetric black hole metric has the general form
$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\rm d}s^2 =& -U(r){\rm d}t^2+\frac{1+\ell}{U(r)}{\rm d}r^2+2F(r)H(\theta)a{\rm d}t{\rm d}\phi\\&+r^2{\rm d}\theta^2 +r^2\sin^2\theta {\rm d}\phi^2+{\cal{O}}(a^2), \end{aligned} $
(13)
where a is a small constant denoting the rotating angular momentum, and $ {\cal{O}}(a^2) $ denotes a small quantity, as small as or smaller than the second order of a, which can be ignored here. We will use this metric ansatz to set up the gravitational field equations.
In this study, we assume that the bumblebee field acquires a radial vacuum energy expectation, since the spacetime curvature has a strong radial variation compared with very slow temporal changes. Thus, the bumblebee field is spacelike ($ b_\mu b^\mu = $ positive constant) and is assumed to be
$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\rm{Case \;A:}}\;b_\mu =& \big(0,b(r),0,0\big);\\{\rm{Case \;B:}}\;b_\mu =& \big(0,b(r),\mathfrak{b}(\theta),0\big). \end{aligned} $
(14)
Case A was considered by Casana and Ding et al. in Ref. [13, 15] for the bumblebee field coupled to the gravitational field. Case B was considered by Chen et al. in Ref. [21] for the bumblebee field coupled to the electromagnetic field. Then, the bumblebee field strength is
$ b_{\mu\nu} = \partial_{\mu}b_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}b_{\mu}, $
(15)
whose components are all zero for cases A and B. Their divergences are all zero as well, i.e.,
$ \nabla^{\mu}b_{\mu\nu} = 0. $
(16)
From the equation of motion (9), we have
$ b^{\mu}{\cal{R}}_{\mu\nu} = 0 . $
(17)
Gravitational field equation (11) becomes
$ {\cal{R}}_{\mu\nu}+\bar B_{\mu\nu} = 0. $
(18)
The explicit form of $ b_\mu $ is
$ \begin{aligned}[b]{\rm{Case \;A:}}\;b_\mu =& \left(0,b_0\sqrt{\frac{1+\ell}{U(r)}},0,0\right);\\{\rm{Case \;B:}}\;b_\mu =& \left(0,b_0\sqrt{\frac{1+\ell}{U(r)}}\;,ab_0\cos\theta,0\right), \end{aligned}$
(19)
where $ b_0 $ is a real constant. The amplitude of this bumblebee field is
$ b_\mu b^{\mu} = g^{\mu\nu}b_\mu b_{\nu} = b_0^2, $
(20)
for case A; for case B, it is
$ b_\mu b^{\mu} = g^{\mu\nu}b_\mu b_{\nu} = b_0^2+{\cal{O}}(a^2), $
(21)
which are both consistent with the condition of $ b_\mu b^\mu = $ positive constant.
For metric (13), the nonzero components of the Ricci tensor are $ {\cal{R}}_{tt},\;{\cal{R}}_{t\phi},\;{\cal{R}}_{rr}, \;{\cal{R}}_{r\theta},\;{\cal{R}}_{\theta\theta},\;{\cal{R}}_{\phi\phi} $, shown in the appendix. We consider the following gravitational field equations (for both cases A and B):
$ {\cal{R}}_{rr}+\bar B_{rr} = -\frac{1}{2rU}(rU''+2U')+{\cal{O}}(a^2) = 0, $
(22)
$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\cal{R}}_{t\phi}+\bar B_{t\phi} =& -\frac{a}{2}\Biggr(HUF''+2FH\frac{U'}{r}\\&+\frac{F}{r^2}H'' -\frac{F\cos\theta}{r^2\sin\theta}H'\Biggr)+{\cal{O}}(a^2) = 0, \end{aligned} $
(23)
where the prime $ ' $ is the derivative with respect to the corresponding argument. From Eq. (22), we obtain function $ U(r) $; then,
$ U = -\frac{C_1}{r}+C_2, $
(24)
where $ C_1,\;C_2 $ are constants. Using the asymptotic flatness condition, we set $ C_2 = 1 $ and $ C_1 = 2M $, where M is the mass of the black hole; then,
$ U = 1-\frac{2M}{r}. $
(25)
From Eq. (23), we obtain functions $ F(r) $ and $ H(\theta) $; then,
$ F = \frac{2M}{r}, \;\;\;\;H = \sin^2\theta. $
(26)
Lastly, substituting these quantities into Eqns. (13) and (19), we obtain bumblebee field $b_\mu = (0, \;b_0 $ $ \sqrt{(1+\ell)r/(r-2M)},\;0,\;0) $ for case A and $ b_\mu = (0,\;b_0 $ $\sqrt{(1+\ell)r/(r-2M)},\;ab_0\cos\theta,\;0)$ for case B. The slowly rotating metric in the bumblebee gravity in both cases is
$ \begin{aligned}[b] {\rm d}s^2 =& - \left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right){\rm d}t^2-\frac{4Ma\sin^2\theta}{r} {\rm d}t{\rm d}\varphi\\&+\frac{(1+\ell)r}{r-2M}{\rm d}r^2+r^2{\rm d}\theta^2 +r^2\sin^2\theta {\rm d}\phi^2. \end{aligned}$
(27)
If $ \ell\rightarrow0 $, it recovers the usual slowly rotating Kerr metric. When $ a\rightarrow0 $, it becomes
$ {\rm d}s^2 = - \left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right){\rm d}t^2+\frac{1+\ell}{1-2M/r}{\rm d}r^2+r^2{\rm d}\theta^2 +r^2\sin^2\theta {\rm d}\varphi^2, $
(28)
which is the same as that in Ref. [13]. Metric (27) represents a Lorentz-violating black hole solution with slowly rotating angular momentum a. It is easy to see that the horizon is located at $ r_+ = 2M $.
Next, we consider the bumblebee motion equation and check for other gravitational equations. From bumblebee field motion equation (17), we obtain the following equation:
$ b^r{\cal{R}}_{rr}+b^\theta{\cal{R}}_{\theta r} = 0,\;\;\;\; b^r{\cal{R}}_{r\theta}+b^\theta{\cal{R}}_{\theta \theta} = 0. $
(29)
From the appendix, we have ${\cal{R}}_{rr} = -(rU''+2U')/2rU+ $ ${\cal{O}}(a^2) = 0+{\cal{O}}(a^2)$, $ {\cal{R}}_{r\theta} = 0+{\cal{O}}(a^2) $, and ${\cal{R}}_{\theta \theta} = -(rU'+U)/ (1+\ell)+1+{\cal{O}}(a^2) = \ell/(1+\ell)+{\cal{O}}(a^2)$. We can observe that the first equation is fulfilled for both cases; the second one can be fulfilled for case A (because $ b^\theta = 0 $). However, the second equation for case B is
$ b^\theta{\cal{R}}_{\theta \theta} = \frac{b_0\cos\theta}{1+\ell}\cdot\frac{a\ell}{r^2}+{\cal{O}}(a^2). $
(30)
If and only if coupling constant $ \ell $ is also sufficiently smaller than angular momentum a, the second motion equation can be fulfilled for case B. As for the other gravitational equations, for case A, they are,
$ {\cal{R}}_{tt}+\bar B_{tt} = 0 +{\cal{O}}(a^2), $
(31)
$ {\cal{R}}_{r\theta}+\bar B_{r\theta} = 0+{\cal{O}}(a^2), $
(32)
$ {\cal{R}}_{\theta\theta}+\bar B_{\theta\theta} = 0+{\cal{O}}(a^2), $
(33)
$ {\cal{R}}_{\phi\phi}+\bar B_{\phi\phi} = 0+{\cal{O}}(a^2), $
(34)
which are all fulfilled. However, for case B, there are similar limits for these equations to be fulfilled, i.e.,
$ {\cal{R}}_{tt}+\bar B_{tt} = \frac{\cos2\theta}{2\sqrt{1+\ell}\sin\theta}\cdot\frac{a\ell\sqrt{U}}{r^2} +{\cal{O}}(a^2), $
(35)
$ {\cal{R}}_{r\theta}+\bar B_{r\theta} = \frac{\cos\theta}{\sqrt{1+\ell}}\cdot\frac{a\ell}{r^2\sqrt{U}}+{\cal{O}}(a^2), $
(36)
$ \begin{aligned}[b]{\cal{R}}_{\theta\theta}+\bar B_{\theta\theta} = &\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\ell}\sin\theta}\cdot\frac{a\ell}{r\sqrt{U}} (r\sin^2\theta U'\\&-\cos2\theta U)+{\cal{O}}(a^2), \end{aligned} $
(37)
$ \begin{aligned}[b]{\cal{R}}_{\phi\phi}+\bar B_{\phi\phi} =& \frac{\sin\theta}{2\sqrt{1+\ell}}\cdot\frac{a\ell}{r\sqrt{U}} (r\cos^2\theta U'\\&+2\cos2\theta U)+{\cal{O}}(a^2).\end{aligned} $
(38)
In conclusion, there exists a slowly rotating black hole solution for case A, for an arbitrary coupling constant $ \ell $; however, for case B, there exists a slowly rotating black hole solution if and only if the coupling constant is sufficiently smaller than rotating angular momentum a. It is interesting that in both cases, the forms of the solutions are the same. Up to date, a full rotating black hole solution has not been derived. Thus, for case A, when the slow rotation restrictions on a are relaxed, we have $ b_\mu = (0,b(r,\theta),0,0) $, and the obtained full rotating solution [15] does not seem to meet the bumblebee field equation requirements; for case B, it remains an open issue whether there exists a full rotating solution when coupling constant $ \ell $ is sufficiently small. Therefore, one cannot use the Newman-Janis algorithm to obtain a full rotating black hole solution. This is similar to the Einstein-aether theory, where only a slowly rotating black hole solution exists [22], with a spherically symmetric (hypersurface-orthogonal) aether field configuration for $ c_{14} = 0, c_{123}\neq0 $ [23].
IV.GREYBODY FACTOR
The above slowly rotating solution contains the effects of the bumblebee field and can be used to study the effects of the bumblebee field on the black hole greybody factor. In this section, we study some observational signatures on the Lorentz-violating parameter, $ \ell $, by analyzing the black hole greybody factor (Hawking radiation) with metric (27) and try to find some deviations from GR and some similarities to other LV black holes.
In Ref. [24], we obtained analytical expressions for the greybody factor and dynamic evolution for the scalar field in the Ho$ \mathop {\rm{r}} \limits^ \smallsmile$ava-Lifshitz black hole. In Ref. [25], we studied the greybody factor of the slowly rotating Kerr-Newman black hole in the non-minimal derivative coupling theory. In this model, the kinetic term of scalar field $ \psi $ is only coupled with the Einstein tensor, $ G^{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu\psi\partial_\nu\psi $. The coupling was confirmed to be breaking the Lorentz symmetry [26].
The Klein-Gordon equation in the Einstein-bumblebee black hole spacetime (the scalar field coupling to the bumblebee field is ignored here) is
$ \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}\partial_{\mu}\left(\sqrt{-g}g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\nu}\psi\right) = 0. $
(39)
Using spherical harmonics
$ \psi(t,r,\theta,\varphi) = {\rm e}^{-{\rm i}\omega t}\,{\rm e}^{{\rm i} m \varphi}\,R_{\omega lm}(r) \,T^{m}_{l}(\theta, a \omega)\,, $
(40)
and substituting metric (27) into Eq. (39), we obtain the following radial equation:
$ \frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}r}\Bigg[(r^2-2Mr)\,\frac{{\rm d} R_{\omega l m}}{{\rm d}r}\Bigg]+ (1+\ell)\Bigg[\frac{r^2\omega(r^2\omega-2am)}{r^2-2Mr}-l(l+1)+2am\omega \Bigg]R_{\omega l m} = 0\,. $
(41)
Before attempting to solve it analytically, we first analyze the profile of the effective potential that characterizes the emission process. Defining a new radial function,
$ R_{\omega l m}(r) = \frac{\tilde{R}_{\omega l m}(r)}{r}, $
(42)
and using tortoise coordinate x as follows:
$ \frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}x} = \left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)\frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}r}, $
(43)
Eq. (41) can be rewritten in the standard Schr?dinger equation form as
$ \left(\frac{{\rm d}^2}{{\rm d}x^2}-V_{\rm eff}\right)\tilde{R}_{\omega l m}(x) = 0, $
(44)
where the effective potential is
$\begin{aligned}[b] V_{\rm eff} =& (1+\ell)\left(-\omega^2+\frac{4M}{r^3}ma\omega\right)\\&+\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right) \left[\frac{4M}{r^3}+(1+\ell)\frac{l(l+1)}{r^2}\right]. \end{aligned} $
(45)
For graphical analysis, we display the dependence of the effective potential on different parameters in Fig. 1. It is found that the gravitational barrier decreases gradually with the increase in LV coupling constant $ \ell $ when $ l = 0 $ (left plot of Fig. 1), similar to the Einstein-aether theory [23] and non-minimal coupling theory [25]. However, the barrier increases with $ \ell $ when $ l = 1 $ (right plot of Fig. 1). Increasing the effective potential means reducing the emission of scalar fields; hence, LV coupling constant $ \ell $ affects the black hole greybody factor.
Figure1. (color online) Variation of the potential, $V_{\rm eff}$, for different values of coupling constant $ \ell $ of a scalar field in the slowly rotating Einstein-bumblebee black hole, for fixed quantity $ \omega = 0.3 $.

Now, we derive the analytical solution of Eq. (41). We change radial variable r [24, 25] to function $ f(r) $ as follows:
$ r \rightarrow f(r) = 1-\frac{2M}{r} \,\,\Longrightarrow\, \frac{\rm d }{{\rm d}r} = \frac{1-f}{r}\frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}f}\,, $
(46)
following which Eq. (41) becomes
$ f(1-f)\frac{{\rm d}^2R(f)}{{\rm d} f^2}+(1-f)\frac{{\rm d} R(f)}{{\rm d} f} +\bigg[\frac{K^2_*}{(1-f)f} -\frac{\Lambda^m_l}{(1-f)}\bigg]R(f) = 0, $
(47)
where
$\begin{aligned}[b] K_* =& \left(\omega r_+-a_*m\right)\sqrt{1+\ell},\;\\a_* =& a/r_+,\; \Lambda^m_l = \sqrt{1+\ell}\big[l(l+1)-2ma\omega\big]. \end{aligned} $
(48)
After using the redefinition, $ R(f) = f^{\alpha}(1-f)^{\beta}F(f) $, and constraints
$ \alpha^2+K^2_* = 0,\;\;\;\;\beta^2-\beta+\big[K^2_* -\Lambda^m_l\big] = 0, $
(49)
we observe that Eq. (47) is a hypergeometric equation,
$ f(1-f)\frac{{\rm d}^2F(f)}{{\rm d} f^2}+[c-(1+\tilde{a}+\tilde{b})f]\frac{{\rm {\rm d}} F(f)}{{\rm d} f}-\tilde{a}\tilde{b} F(f) = 0, $
(50)
with
$ \tilde{a} = \alpha+\beta,\quad \tilde{b} = \alpha+\beta,\quad c = 1+2\alpha. $
(51)
The above two constrains (49) show that parameters $ \alpha $ and $ \beta $ are
$ \alpha_{\pm} = \pm {\rm i}K_*, $
(52)
$ \beta_{\pm} = \frac{1}{2}\bigg[1\pm\sqrt{1-4\big(K^2_* -\Lambda^m_l\big)} \;\bigg]. $
(53)
Then, the exact analytical solution of Eq. (50) is
$\begin{aligned}[b] R(f) =& A_-f^{\alpha}(1-f)^{\beta}F(\tilde{a}, \tilde{b}, c; f)\\&+A_+ f^{-\alpha}(1-f)^{\beta}F(\tilde{a}-c+1, \tilde{b}-c+1, 2-c; f), \end{aligned} $
(54)
where $ A_+,\; A_- $ are arbitrary constants.
Near the horizon, $ r\rightarrow r_+ $ and $ f\rightarrow0 $; the solution is
$ R_{\rm NH}(f) = A_-f^{\alpha_\mp}+A_+f^{\alpha_\pm}. $
(55)
The boundary condition near the horizon is that no outgoing mode exists; hence, we consider either $ A_- = 0 $ or $ A_+ = 0 $, corresponding to the choice for $ \alpha_\pm $. Here, we set $ \alpha = \alpha_- $ and $ A_+ = 0 $. The convergence of the hypergeometric function $ F(\tilde{a}, \tilde{b}, c; f) $ will determine the sign of $ \beta $, i.e., here, Re$ (c-\tilde{a}-\tilde{b})>0 $; then, we set $ \beta = \beta_- $ [24, 25]. Therefore, the asymptotic solution near the horizon $ (r\sim r_+) $ is
$ R_{\rm NH}(f) = A_-f^{\alpha}(1-f)^{\beta}F(\tilde{a}, b, c; f). $
(56)
Now, we can smoothly extend the near horizon solution (56) to the intermediate zone. We consider the property of the hypergeometric function [27] and alter its argument in the near horizon solution, from f to $ 1-f $
$ \begin{aligned}[b]R_{\rm NH}(f) =& A_-f^{\alpha}(1-f)^{\beta}\Biggr[\frac{\Gamma(c)\Gamma(c-\tilde{a}-\tilde{b})} {\Gamma(c-\tilde{a})\Gamma(c-\tilde{b})} F(\tilde{a}, \tilde{b}, \tilde{a}+\tilde{b}-c+1; 1-f)+(1-f)^{c-\tilde{a}-\tilde{b}}\frac{\Gamma(c)\Gamma(\tilde{a}+\tilde{b}-c)}{\Gamma(\tilde{a})\Gamma(\tilde{b})}\\&\times F(c-\tilde{a}, c-\tilde{b}, c-\tilde{a}-\tilde{b}+1; 1-f)\Biggr]. \end{aligned} $
(57)
When $ r\gg r_+ $, function $ (1-f) $ is
$ 1-f = \frac{2M}{r}, $
(58)
and then, the near horizon solution (57) can be reduced to
$ R_{\rm NH}(r)\simeq C_1r^{-\beta}+C_2r^{\beta-1} , $
(59)
with
$ C_1 = A_-(2M)^{\beta} \frac{\Gamma(c)\Gamma(c-\tilde{a}-\tilde{b})}{\Gamma(c-\tilde{a})\Gamma(c-\tilde{b})}, $
(60)
$ C_2 = A_-(2M)^{1-\beta}\frac{\Gamma(c)\Gamma(\tilde{a}+\tilde{b}-c)}{\Gamma(\tilde{a})\Gamma(\tilde{b})}. $
(61)
In the far field region, we expand the wave equation (41) as a power series in $ 1/r $ and maintain only the leading terms
$ \frac{{\rm d}^2R_{\rm FF}(r)}{{\rm d}r^2}+\frac{2}{r}\frac{{\rm d}R_{\rm FF}(r)}{{\rm d} r}+(1+\ell)\bigg[\omega^2-\frac{l(l+1)}{r^2}\bigg]R_{\rm FF}(r) = 0. $
(62)
It is easy to see that this is the usual Bessel equation. Therefore, the solution of the radial master equation (41) in the far-field limit is
$ R_{\rm FF}(r) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{r}}\bigg[B_1J_{\nu}(\sqrt{1+\ell}\omega r)+B_2Y_{\nu} (\sqrt{1+\ell}\omega r)\bigg], $
(63)
where $ J_{\nu}(\omega\;r) $ and $ Y_{\nu}(\omega\;r) $ are the first and second kind Bessel functions, respectively; $ \nu = \sqrt{(1+\ell)l(1+l)+1/4} $. $ B_1 $ and $ B_2 $ are the integration constants. Now, we take limit $ r\rightarrow 0 $ and extend the far-field solution (63) to the small values of the radial coordinate. Then, Eq. (63) becomes
$ R_{\rm FF}(r)\simeq\frac{B_1\left(\dfrac{\sqrt{1+\ell}\omega r}{2}\right)^{\nu}}{\sqrt{r}\;\Gamma(\nu+1)} -\frac{B_2\Gamma(\nu)}{\pi \sqrt{r}\;\left(\dfrac{\sqrt{1+\ell}\omega r}{2}\right)^{\nu}}. $
(64)
After applying the conditions of low-energy and low-angular momentum limits $ (\omega r_+)^2\ll1 $ and $ (a/r_+)^2\ll1 $, both power coefficients in Eq. (59) become, approximately,
$ -\beta \simeq -\frac{1}{2}+\nu + {\cal O}(\omega^2,a^2,a\omega), $
(65)
$ (\beta-1)\simeq -\frac{1}{2}-\nu+ {\cal O}(\omega^2,a^2,a\omega). $
(66)
Up to this point, it is easy to see that both extensions (59) and (64) of the near horizon and the far field solutions can be simplified to power-law representations with the same power coefficients, $ r^{-1/2+\nu} $ and $ r^{-1/2-\nu} $. By comparing the corresponding coefficients between Eqns. (59) and (64), we obtain two connections between $ C_1,\;C_2 $ and $ B_1,\;B_2 $. Eliminating $ A_- $, we gain the ratio between coefficients $ B_1,\; B_2 $
$ \begin{aligned}[b]B\equiv\frac{B_1}{B_2} = &-\frac{1}{\pi}\bigg[\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\ell}\omega M}\bigg]^{2\nu} \nu\Gamma^2(\nu) \\ &\times\;\frac{ \Gamma(c-\tilde{a}-\tilde{b})\Gamma(\tilde{a})\Gamma(\tilde{b})}{\Gamma(\tilde{a}+\tilde{b}-c)\Gamma(c-\tilde{a})\Gamma(c-\tilde{b})}. \end{aligned} $
(67)
In asymptotic regime $ r\rightarrow \infty $, the far-field solution can be rewritten as
$ \begin{aligned}[b] R_{\rm FF}(r)\simeq & \frac{B_1+{\rm i}B_2}{\sqrt{2\pi\;\sqrt{1+\ell}\;\omega} r}{\rm e}^{-{\rm i}\sqrt{1+\ell}\;\omega r}\\&+ \frac{B_1-{\rm i}B_2}{\sqrt{2\pi\;\sqrt{1+\ell}\;\omega} r}{\rm e}^{{\rm i}\sqrt{1+\ell}\;\omega r} \end{aligned}$
(68)
$ \;\;\;\qquad = A^{(\infty)}_{\rm in}\dfrac{{\rm e}^{-{\rm i}\sqrt{1+\ell}\;\omega r}}{r} +A^{(\infty)}_{\rm out}\dfrac{{\rm e}^{{\rm i}\sqrt{1+\ell}\;\omega r}}{r}. $
(69)
The absorption probability can be obtained from
$ |{\cal{A}}_{l m}|^2 = 1-\left|\frac{A^{(\infty)}_{\rm out}}{A^{(\infty)}_{\rm in}}\right|^2 = 1-\left|\frac{B-i}{B+i}\right|^2 = \frac{2{\rm i}(B^*-B)}{BB^*+{\rm i} (B^*-B)+1}. $
(70)
Substituting the expression for B from Eq. (67) into Eq. (70), we acquire some features of the absorption probability for the bumblebee field coupled with the Ricci tensor in the slowly rotating black hole spacetime in the low-energy limit.
In Fig. 2, we set the angular momentum to $ a = 0.1 $, and plot the absorption probability of a scalar particle for the first ($ l = 0 $) and second ($ l = 1 $) partial waves in the slowly rotating Einstein-bumblebee black hole spacetime. Evidently, the absorption probability, $ A_{l = 0} $, rises with the increase in LV coupling constant $ \ell $, which is analogous to the situation in the non-minimal coupling theory [25]. However, $ A_{l = 1} $ decreases with the increase in LV coupling constant $ \ell $.
Figure2. (color online) Variation of the absorption probability, $ |A_{l m}|^2 $, of a scalar field in the slowly rotating Einstein-bumblebee black hole, for a fixed angular momentum with $ a = 0.1 $ and $ m = 0 $.

In the case of $ l\geqslant 1 $, there is a superradiation region, where $ m = 1, 2, \cdots, l $, which is analogous to [25]. In Fig. 3, we show the dependence of the absorption probability on angular indices l and m, for different $ \ell $ and a. From the above two graphics in Fig. 3, for the super-radiation case, angular momentum a improves the usual radiation ($ m = -1 $) and the super-radiation ($ m = 1 $) for weak coupling. We note the attenuation of $ |A_{\ell m}|^2 $ for $ l\geqslant 1 $. This means that the first partial wave, $ l = 0 $, leads the other ones with respect to the absorption probability. This is similar to the situation for a scalar field without any couplings.
Figure3. (color online) Dependence of absorption probability $ |A_{l m}|^2 $ of a scalar field on angular momentum a in the slowly rotating Einstein-bumblebee black hole, for fixed $ \ell = 0.1,-0.1;l = 1 $; and $ m = 1,0,-1 $.

V.SUMMARY
In this paper, we have studied the slowly rotating, asymptotically flat black hole solutions of the Einstein-bumblebee theory, for both cases of the bumblebee field: $ b_\mu = (0,b(r),0,0) $ and $ b_\mu = (0,b(r),\mathfrak{b}(\theta),0) $. In the case of the radial Lorentz symmetry breaking, we have obtained an exact slowly rotating black hole solution for the $ rr $ and $ t\phi $ components of the gravitational field equations. In the $ a\rightarrow0 $ limit of the angular momentum, the solution reduces to a Schwarzschild like solution [13]; in the $ \ell\rightarrow0 $ limit of the LV constant, we obtain a slowly rotating Kerr black hole solution. We also reported the horizon positions.
With this solution, we then check the other gravitational equations and the bumblebee motion equations. In the case of bumblebee field $ b_\mu = (0,b(r),0,0) $, all of these equations can be fulfilled for an arbitrary coupling constant $ \ell $. In the case of bumblebee field $ b_\mu = (0,b(r),\mathfrak{b}(\theta),0) $, all of these equations can be fulfilled if and only if coupling constant $ \ell $ is as small as or smaller than slowly rotating angular momentum a. If LV coupling constant $ \ell $ is not small, the slowly rotating solution cannot exist. Thus far, no full rotating black hole solutions have been published; hence, the Newman-Janis algorithm cannot be used to obtain a rotating solution, because it may not satisfy the entire set of field equations. This is similar to the Einstein-aether theory, where there can only exist a slowly rotating black hole solution. The existence of a full rotating black hole solution for case B for very small values of the coupling constant remains an open issue.
With this obtained black hole solution, we studied some LV effects on future astronomical events. In particular, we studied the black hole greybody factor for some observational effects of LV constant $ \ell $. We reported the deviation effects of the LV from GR (a slowly rotating Kerr black hole); for the angular momentum index of $ l = 0 $, the effective potential, $ V_{\rm eff} $, decreased with the increase in LV coupling constant $ \ell $. These decreases were similar to those for the Einstein-aether black hole [23] and non-minimal derivative coupling theory [25], which are also LV black holes. The LV affected the greybody factor by increasing the absorption probability, similar to the non-minimal derivative coupling theory [25]. These differences can be detected by new generation gravitational antennas.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank Prof. Songbai Chen for useful suggestions.
APPENDIX A: SOME QUANTITIES
In this appendix, we show the nonzero components of the Ricci tensor for metric (13). They are as follows:
$\tag{A1} {\cal{R}}_{tt} = \dfrac{U}{1+\ell}\left[\dfrac{U''}{2}+\dfrac{r\sin^2\theta UU'}{\Sigma}\right]+\dfrac{a^2}{2\Sigma}\left[\frac{F^2U}{r^2}H'^2 +\dfrac{H^2U^2}{1+\ell}U'^2+\dfrac{F^2H^2U}{(1+\ell)r}U'-\dfrac{FH^2U}{1+\ell}F'U'\right] , $
$ \tag{A2} {\cal{R}}_{t\phi} = -\frac{a}{2}\left[\frac{HUF''}{1+\ell}+\frac{FH''}{r^2} +\frac{rFHU\sin^2\theta}{(1+\ell)\Sigma}U'-\frac{FU\cos\theta\sin\theta}{\Sigma}H' \right]-\frac{a^3F^2H^3}{2\Sigma(1+\ell)}\left(\frac{1}{2}F'U' +\frac{U}{r}F'\right), $
$\tag{A3}\begin{aligned}[b] {\cal{R}}_{rr} =& -\frac{r^2\sin^2\theta}{\Sigma}\left(\frac{U''}{2} +\frac{r\sin^2\theta}{\Sigma}UU'\right)-\frac{a^2F^2H^2}{\Sigma}F''+\frac{a^2H^2}{\Sigma^2}\left[-\frac{1}{2}\bar\Sigma F'^2-\frac{F^2r^2\sin\theta}{4U}U'^2\right.\\ &\left.+\frac{F\bar\Sigma}{2U}F'U'+2rU\sin^2\theta FF'-\frac{F^2(5r^2U\sin^2\theta+a^2F^2H^2)}{2rU}U'-F^2U\sin^2\theta \right], \end{aligned}$
$ \tag{A4}\begin{aligned}[b] {\cal{R}}_{r\theta} =& \frac{a^2FH}{\Sigma^2} \Biggr[-\frac{1}{2}(a^2F^2H^2+3r^2U\sin^2\theta)F'H'+\frac{1}{2}Fr^2\sin\theta U'H'\\ &+\frac{F}{r}(a^2F^2H^2+2r^2U\sin^2\theta)H'+\frac{1}{2}HUr^2\sin2\theta F'-FHr\sin\theta\cos\theta (\frac{1}{2}rU'+U) \Biggr], \end{aligned} $
$\tag{A5}\begin{aligned}[b] {\cal{R}}_{\theta\theta} =& -\frac{r}{1+\ell}\left(U' +\frac{r^3U^3\sin^4\theta}{\Sigma^2}\right)+\frac{r^4U^2\sin^4\theta}{\Sigma^2}- \frac{a^2FH}{\Sigma}\Biggr[FH''-\frac{rFHU'}{2(1+\ell)} +\frac{HrU}{1+\ell}F'\Biggr]\\ &-\frac{a^2F^2}{\Sigma^2}\Biggr[\frac{1}{2}\bar\Sigma H'^2-HrU\sin2\theta H'+r^2H^2U\cos2\theta+\frac{r^2\sin^2\theta}{1+\ell}H^2U^2\Biggr],\end{aligned} $
$\tag{A6}\begin{aligned}[b] {\cal{R}}_{\phi\phi} =& -\frac{r^2U\sin^4\theta}{\Sigma}\left( \frac{rU'+U}{1+\ell}-1\right)+ \frac{a^2}{\Sigma}\Biggr[-\frac{1}{2}F^2\sin^2\theta H'^2+\frac{1}{2}F^2H\sin2\theta H'\\ &+ \frac{H^2\sin^2\theta}{1+\ell}\Biggr(-\frac{1}{2}Ur^2F'^2 +\frac{1}{2}F^2rU'+FUrF'-2F^2U\Biggr)-F^2H^2\cos2\theta\Biggr], \end{aligned} $
where $ \Sigma $ and $ \bar\Sigma $ are
$ \begin{aligned}[b] & \Sigma = r^2U\sin^2\theta+a^2F^2H^2,\\& \bar\Sigma = r^2U\sin^2\theta-a^2F^2H^2. \end{aligned}$
The nonzero components of quantity $ \bar B_{\mu\nu} $ are
$\tag{A7} \bar B_{tt} = \frac{\ell U}{1+\ell}\left(\frac{U''}{2} +\frac{U'}{r}\right)+{\cal{O}}(a^2), $
$\tag{A8} \bar B_{t\phi} = -\frac{a\ell HUF''}{2(1+\ell)}- \frac{a\ell FHU'}{r(1+\ell)}+{\cal{O}}(a^3), $
$ \tag{A9} \bar B_{rr} = 0, $
$ \tag{A10} \bar B_{r\theta} = 0, $
$ \tag{A11} \bar B_{\theta\theta} = -\frac{\ell}{1+\ell}\left(rU'+U\right) +{\cal{O}}(a^2), $
$\tag{A12}\begin{aligned}[b]\bar B_{\phi\phi} = -\frac{\ell \sin^2\theta }{1+\ell}\left( rU'+U\right)+{\cal{O}}(a^2), \end{aligned} $
for case A; and
$\tag{A13} \bar B_{tt} = \frac{\ell U}{1+\ell}\left(\frac{U''}{2} +\frac{U'}{r}\right)+\frac{a\ell \cos2\theta\sqrt{U}}{2\sqrt{1+\ell}r^2\sin\theta}+{\cal{O}}(a^2), $
$\tag{A14} \bar B_{t\phi} = -\frac{a\ell HUF''}{2(1+\ell)}- \frac{a\ell FHU'}{r(1+\ell)}+{\cal{O}}(a^2), $
$ \tag{A15} \bar B_{rr} = 0+{\cal{O}}(a^2), $
$ \tag{A16} \bar B_{r\theta} = \frac{a\ell\cos\theta}{r^2\sqrt{(1+\ell)U}} (rU'+U)+{\cal{O}}(a^2), $
$ \tag{A17}\begin{aligned}[b] \bar B_{\theta\theta} =& -\frac{\ell}{1+\ell}\left(rU'+U\right) +\frac{a\ell}{r\sin\theta\sqrt{(1+\ell)U}}(r\sin^2\theta U'\\&-\cos2\theta U)+{\cal{O}}(a^2), \end{aligned} $
$\tag{A18} \begin{aligned}[b] \bar B_{\phi\phi} =& -\frac{\ell \sin^2\theta }{1+\ell}\left( rU'+U\right)\\&+ \frac{a\ell\sin\theta}{r\sqrt{(1+\ell)U}}\Biggr(\frac{1}{2}rU'\cos^2\theta+\cos2\theta U\Biggr)+{\cal{O}}(a^2), \end{aligned}$
for case B.
相关话题/Slowly rotating Einsteinbumblebee