Measurement of the differential cross sections and angle-integrated cross sections of the 6Li(n, t)4

HTML

--> --> -->

1.Introduction

The ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He reaction is one of the most important nuclear reactions for the following reasons. Firstly, this is a tritium production nuclear reaction, and tritium is a key material (T_1/2 = 12.4 a) for fusion energy production [1]. Secondly, the ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He reaction is widely used in neutron spectrometry and calibration of detectors because its Q-value is high, 4.78 MeV, and the cross-sections have been adopted as standards from 0.0253 eV to 1.0 MeV [2]. Thirdly, the only neutron-induced reactions on ⁶Li below 1 MeV are the (n, el), (n, γ), and (n, t) reactions [3]. Therefore, ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He is one of the best choices for experimental and theoretical study of nuclear reactions with light nuclei.
At thermal neutron energy, the cross-section of the ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He reaction is large (938.5 b) [4]. Below 0.01 MeV, the cross-section shows a 1/v behavior [5], and at ~0.24 MeV there is a strong resonance peak due to the 7.46 MeV level of the compound nucleus ⁷Li. At higher energies, the cross-section decreases. Because of the importance of this reaction, a number of measurements have been conducted since 1950 [6]. However, discrepancies among different measurements and evaluations are noticeable in the MeV region. The cross-sections of the latest measurement conducted by Kirsch et al. [7] in 2017 are slighty smaller than the results of most evaluations above 0.5 MeV. For example, the cross-section at 1.0 MeV measured in Ref. [7] is smaller by ~8% than the one reported in the ENDF/B-VIII.0 library [8]. Furthermore, the measured differential cross-sections, which are very helpful in the research of nuclear reaction mechanisms, are scanty except for the energy region on the right side of the resonance peak around ~0.24 MeV. In particular, there are no differential cross-section measurements below 0.1 MeV up to date [6]. In addition, the discrepancies among the existing measured differential cross-sections are significant [6].
In the present work, the LPDA (Light charged Particle Detector Array facility) [9], consisting of 15 silicon detectors mounted in a vacuum chamber, was developed to study neutron-induced charged particle emission reactions at the CSNS (China Spallation Neutron Source) Back-n white neutron source. The measurement of the ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He reaction was the first experiment of this kind. The differential cross-sections (15 detection angles ranging from 19.2° to 160.8°), as well as the angle-integrated cross-sections, were obtained from 1.0 eV to 3.0 MeV (80 neutron energy points). In addition, the present results are compared with the existing measurements and evaluations.

2.Experiment

2.1.The neutron source

-->

2.1.The neutron source

The present experiment was performed at Endstation #1 of the CSNS Back-n white neutron source [10]. The neutrons were generated using the proton beam (double-bunch, 25 Hz, 1.6 GeV, ~20 kW) to bombard a tungsten target [11]. The time width of each proton bunch was ~41 ns, and the interval between the two proton bunches was 410 ns. The diameter of the neutron beam was ~5.0 cm at Endstation #1, the neutron flight path was 57.99 m, and the neutron flux was ~3.5×10⁶ n/cm²/s.
The neutron energy spectrum [12] was measured using a multi-layer fission chamber at Endstation #2 of the CSNS Back-n white neutron source with a flight path of 75.78 m, and with the accelerator operated in the single-bunch mode [10]. In the calculations of the neutron energy spectrum from the measured fission events, the cross-sections of the ²³⁵U(n, f) reaction were taken from the ENDF/B-VIII.0 library [8] below 0.15 MeV, and from the standard library [4] above 0.15 MeV. The neutron energy resolution (mainly caused by the moderation length of the neutron source for neutron energies below 0.01 MeV) was used to smooth the evaluated cross-sections of the ²³⁵U(n, f) reaction. In the neutron energy region below 2.5 keV, deviations between the measured and actual neutron energy spectra were expected because of: a) the cross-sections of the ²³⁵U(n, f) reaction were not standard; and b) the moderation length of the neutron source was not accurately known.
In the present experiment, the samples and the detectors were placed in a vacuum chamber with an entrance window (tantalum sheet 0.10 mm in thickness), so that the neutron energy spectrum was corrected according to

${\varphi _{\rm{C}}} = {\varphi _{\rm{O}}}{{\rm e}^{ - {\sigma _{{\rm{tot}}}}Nd}},$

(1)

where φ_C is the corrected relative neutron fluence, φ_O is the relative neutron fluence, σ_tot is the cross-section of the ¹⁸¹Ta(n, tot) reaction [8] which is smoothed using the neutron energy resolution, N is the atomic density of ¹⁸¹Ta, and d is the thickness of the tantalum sheet.
The neutron energy bins and the neutron energy spectrum, with the uncertainties presented by the blue bars, is shown in Fig. 1. In the present work, 80 energy points (E-bins) were chosen from 1.0 eV to 3.0 MeV: a) 50 energy points in the neutron energy region from 1.0 eV to 0.1 MeV are distributed in equal logarithm intervals; 20 energy points in the region from 0.1 to 1.0 MeV are distributed in equal logarithm intervals to show better the resonance peak of the ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He reaction from ~0.1 to ~0.4 MeV; and 10 energy points in the region from 1.0 to 3.0 MeV are distributed with equal separation of 0.2 MeV. The centers of two adjacent E-bins are their boundaries.

Figure1. (color online) Neutron energy bins and the neutron energy spectrum with uncertainties presented by the blue bars.

It should be pointed out that the position of the experiment (Endstation #1) was ~17.8 m away from where the neutron energy spectrum was measured (Endstation #2), so that the neutron energy spectra at these two positions were expected to be slightly different.
2

2.2.The samples

-->

2.2.The samples

Two enriched (90%) ⁶LiF samples were separately evaporated on each side of a stainless steel sheet 0.10 mm thick. Their thickness was 776 and 787 μg/cm². Their diameter and non-uniformity were 50 mm and 5%, respectively. The ⁶LiF samples were installed in one of the four sample positions of the LPDA sample holder, as shown in Fig. 2. In the other sample positions, two back-to-back ²⁴¹Am α sources and a stainless steel sheet 0.10 mm thick were installed. The ²⁴¹Am α sources were used to calibrate the detection system, and the stainless steel sheet was used for background measurement. To minimize the energy loss of the charged particles in the samples, the angle between the normal lines to the samples and the neutron beam line was 60°, as shown in Fig. 3.

Figure2. Photo of the samples and the sample holder. In three of the four sample positions, the back-to-back ²⁴¹Am α sources (right), the stainless steel sheet (second from right) and the ⁶LiF samples (left) were installed.

Figure3. (color online) Configuration of the detectors: (a) photo of the detectors in the vacuum chamber; (b) sketch of the configuration of the detectors.

2

2.3.The charged particle detector

-->

2.3.The charged particle detector

The samples and the detectors were placed in a vacuum chamber 50 cm in radius and 50 cm high. Fifteen rectangular silicon detectors (2 cm × 2.5 cm, 500 μm thick), 20 cm away from the center of the ⁶LiF samples and covering angles from 19.2° to 160.8°, were used to measure the emitted charged particles, as shown in Fig. 3. To keep away from the neutron beam, the detection angle could not be smaller than 19.2° or larger than 160.8°. In addition to the 15 silicon detectors, 3 ΔE-E detectors and 1 GIC (gridded ionization chamber) were also installed and tested. To avoid shielding the ΔE-E detectors, the centers of the silicon detectors were lower than the beam line. The angle between the normal line to each silicon detector and the horizon was 16°. In this configuration, the solid angles of the silicon detectors with respect to the ⁶LiF samples were (0.0123 ? 0.0125) (±0.3%) sr, calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation. The distribution of the receiving angles of the detectors is shown in Fig. 4.

Figure4. (color online) Distribution of the receiving angles of the detectors. The numbers in the legend are the average receiving angles of the corresponding detectors.

2

2.4.The data acquisition system

-->

2.4.The data acquisition system

The DAQ (data acquisition) system [13] was designed based on a PXIe platform. The sampling rate of the DAQ system was 1 GHz, and the resolution was 12 bits. If the amplitude of the signal surpassed the trigger threshold of the DAQ system, the signal waveform of the corresponding silicon detector was recorded in the ~15 μs time window. Also, the duration between the start of each recorded waveform and the moment when the corresponding proton bunch hits the tungsten target was recorded by the DAQ system. Thus, TOF (time-of-flight) of neutrons producing the detected events could be calculated. Since the silicon detectors were also sensitive to γ rays, the generation time (T₀) of neutrons could be determined using the detected γ flash events. The width of the detected γ peak was ~8 ns, indicating that the time resolution of the detection system was smaller than 8 ns because the width of the γ flash events also contributed to their time distribution. As the time resolution of the detection system was much smaller than ~41 ns, the length of the proton bunches, the time resolution of the detection system could not noticeably degrade the total time resolution, and was ignored in the present work.
2

2.5.The experimental procedure

-->

2.5.The experimental procedure

The detection system was first calibrated using the ²⁴¹Am α sources. The ⁶LiF samples (foreground) and the stainless steel sheet (background) events were then measured in turn. The beam duration for each turn was ~24 h, and the total beam duration was ~196 h. The number of protons hitting the tungsten target was used as the normalization factor for background subtraction. The uncertainty of the normalization factor was less than 0.03%, calibrated using the Si-Li detector array installed on the neutron beam line.

-->

3.1.Extraction and statistical analysis of the events

From the recorded signal waveforms of each silicon detector, the amplitude and TOF of each event were obtained. Using TOF of each event, the corresponding neutron energy could be determined. The E_n-Amplitude two dimensional spectra at the corresponding detection angle were so obtained. An example is shown in Fig. 6. Since a 1.0 mm thick cadmium plate was placed in the neutron beam line to suppress the very low energy neutrons that could mix with neutrons generated by the next arriving proton bunch, there are no tritium events for neutron energies below 0.5 eV.

Figure6. (color online) E_n-Amplitude two dimensional spectrum at 90.3° in the laboratory system.

From the E_n-Amplitude two dimensional spectrum, the area of tritium events could be determined as shown in Fig. 6. These events were counted into the corresponding neutron energy bins shown in Fig. 1. As the width of the neutron energy bin must be taken into account, each event was weighed as

$w = \frac{{{}^{{\rm{cor}}}\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin, }}\theta }^{\rm re}}}{{{}^{{\rm{cor}}}\sigma _{E{\rm{, }}\theta }^{\rm re}}},$

(2)

where w is the weight of the event, ${}^{{\rm{cor}}}\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin, }}\theta }^{\rm re}$ and ${}^{{\rm{cor}}}\sigma _{E{\rm{,}} \theta }^{\rm re}$ are the relative differential cross-sections of the ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He reaction for the emission angle θ and neutron energies E-bin and E, respectively, where E-bin is the neutron energy bin and E is the energy of neutrons producing the event. ${}^{{\rm{cor}}}\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re}$ is the measured result, described in Sec. 3.5, and ${}^{{\rm{cor}}}\sigma _{E{\rm{,}}\theta }^{\rm re}$ is the result of linear interpolation. Starting from the initial w of 1, this iteration process was repeated until the difference between the last two iteration results was smaller than 1%, or the number of iterations reached 10.
2

3.2.Background subtraction

-->

3.2.Background subtraction

The net events in each energy bin and for each detection angle were obtained after background subtraction. An example is shown in Fig. 7. The normalization factor for the background subtraction was the ratio of the total number of protons hitting the tungsten target during the foreground measurement to that during the background measurement. Although the background from the sample (⁷Li and ¹⁹F) cannot be subtracted, the interference of the background from ⁷Li and ¹⁹F can be ignored. Among the neutron-induced charged particle emission reactions with neutron energies below 3 MeV, only the reaction channels ⁷Li(n, nt)⁴He (Q-value = ?2.5 MeV) and ¹⁹F(n, α)¹⁶N (Q-value = ?1.5 MeV) are open [14]. However, the energies of the emitted tritium and α particles are too low and are outside the tritium event area shown in Fig. 6. For the same reason, the background from ⁶Li(n, nd)⁴He (Q-value = ?1.5 MeV) was ignored.

Figure7. (color online) Measured tritium events for the detection angle of 160.8° and neutron energy of 1.20 MeV.

2

3.3.Relative differential cross-section

-->

3.3.Relative differential cross-section

With the neutron energy spectrum, the number of ⁶Li nuclei in the sample and the detection solid angles of the silicon detectors, the relative differential cross-section $\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re}$ is calculated as

$\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re} = \frac{{{w_{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }}}}{{{\varphi _{E{\rm{ - bin}}}}{\Omega _\theta }{N_{{\rm{Li}}}}}},$

(3)

where w_E_-bin,_θ is the total weight of the net events, φ_E_-bin is the relative neutron fluence, Ω_θ is the detection solid angle of the corresponding silicon detector, and N_Li is the number of ⁶Li nuclei (the two samples are not the same). The subscripts E-bin and θ represent the neutron energy bin and the detection angle. The uncertainties of w_E_-bin,_θ, φ_E_-bin, Ω_θ, and N_Li are <11.5%, 0.5% ? 21.4%, 0.3%, and 1.0%, respectively. An example is shown in Fig. 8 labeled “Measured”.

Figure8. (color online) Relative differential cross-section at E_n = 1.20 MeV in the laboratory system.

2

3.4.Unfolding of the double-bunched proton beam

-->

3.4.Unfolding of the double-bunched proton beam

The neutrons are generated using double-bunched proton beams, such that the bunches hit the tungsten target with a spacing of 410 ns. This results in an incorrect determination of the neutron energy, especially for high energies. Therefore, the influence of the double bunched proton beams was unfolded using an iterative method [15]. In the unfolding process, every event is split into two child events and each is weighed. As the interval between the two proton bunches is 410 ns centered at T₀, the TOF of one child event equals the TOF of the event plus 205 ns, while that of the other equals the TOF of the event minus 205 ns [15]. The neutron energies E_n_1 and E_n_2 of the two child events can then be calculated. Using the obtained relative differential cross-sections, and multiplying the number of neutrons in unit duration of TOF (i.e. n/ns) corresponding to the TOFs of the two child events, the relative counts C1 and C2 at E_n_1 and E_n_2 are calculated. The weights of the two child events are C1/(C1+C2) and C2/(C1+C2) [15]. With the known energies and weights, the two child events were counted in the corresponding bins, and the new relative differential cross-sections were obtained using the methods presented in Sec. 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3. This iteration process was repeated until the difference between the last two iteration results was smaller than 1%, or the number of iterations reached 10. An example of the result is shown in Fig. 8 labeled “Energy unfolding”.
Although the unfolding decreases the spread of neutron energies, it brings additional uncertainties in the obtained differential cross-sections. As the energy resolution, determined by the interval between the two proton bunches, is relatively small for low neutron energies, the full neutron energy range does not need to be corrected. In the present work, the correction was performed for neutron energies above 0.1 MeV, and the corresponding uncertainties are 0.7% ? 73.9% (97% of which are smaller than 10%).
2

3.5.Unfolding of the spread of receiving angles

-->

3.5.Unfolding of the spread of receiving angles

As the spreads of the receiving angles of the detectors are 3.8° ? 4.0°, their influence should also be corrected. For each neutron energy bin, the relative angular distribution curve was obtained by fitting the 15 measured relative differential cross-sections $\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re}$ using Legendre polynomials of the third order and the least-squares method [16] (second order Legendre polynomials cannot fit the data very well for some neutron energy points). For each detection angle θ, the fitted curve was normalized to $\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re}$. The normalized fitted curve was then convoluted with the distribution of the receiving angles of the detectors (shown in Fig. 4) to obtain a new relative differential cross-section ${}^{{\rm{fit}}}\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re}$. The corrected relative differential cross-section ${}^{{\rm{cor}}}\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re}$ is

${}^{{\rm{cor}}}\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re} = \sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re}\frac{{\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re}}}{{{}^{{\rm{fit}}}\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re}}}.$

(4)

New relative angular distribution curves were obtained by fitting the 15 ${}^{{\rm{cor}}}\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re}$ for each neutron energy bin. New ${}^{{\rm{fit}}}\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re}$ and new ${}^{{\rm{cor}}}\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re}$ were calculated using the new relative angular distribution curves. The unfolding process was iterated until the difference between the last two iteration results was smaller than 1%, or the number of the iterations reached 10. The final relative differential cross-sections are shown in Fig. 8 labeled “Angle unfolding” and “Fit”. After the correction, the uncertainties of the receiving angles were reduced to ~0.01°, resulting in uncertainties of the relative differential cross-sections of <1.1%.
It should be noted that the distribution of the receiving angles of the detectors shown in Fig. 4 deviate from the actual distribution because in the simulations the charged particles are assumed to be emitted isotropically???? while in fact they are not isotropic. Fortunately, the influence of these deviations is small since the spreads of the detection angles are small, and the change of the differential cross-sections inside the receiving angle spread is tiny.
2

3.6.The results

-->

3.6.The results

Fitting the relative differential cross-sections ${}^{{\rm{cor}}}\sigma _{E{\rm{ - bin,}}\theta }^{\rm re}$ with Legendre polynomial of the third order and integrating the fitted curves over the 4π solid angle, the relative angle-integrated cross-sections of the ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He reaction were obtained. As the cross-section of the ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He reaction is adopted as the standard below 1.0 MeV, the cross-sections from the ENDF/B-VIII.0 library [8] in the range 0.1 ? 0.4 MeV, where a strong resonance peak exists, were used for normalization. Finally, the differential cross-sections σ_E_-bin,_θ and the angle-integrated cross-sections σ of the ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He reaction after normalization are shown in Figs. 9 and 10. The measured data are presented in Appendix A, and the differential cross-sections as a function of the tritium emission angle are presented in Appendix B. The uncertainty of fitting is <0.4%, and that of normalization is 1.0% , based on experience. The uncertainties of the differential cross-sections σ_E_-bin,_θ are 1.7% ? 74.3% (1.7% ? 21.5% below 0.1 MeV; 2.1% ? 11.4% in the region 0.1 ? 1.0 MeV; 2.3% ? 74.3% in the region 1.0 ? 3.0 MeV), and of the angle-integrated cross-sections σ are 1.5% ? 21.5% (1.5% ? 21.5% below 0.1 MeV; 1.8% ? 3.1% in the region 0.1 ? 1.0 MeV; 1.8% ? 3.7% in the region 1.0 ? 3.0 MeV). The sources and magnitudes of the uncertainties are given in Table 1.

Figure10. (color online) Angle-integrated cross-sections of the ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He reaction obtained in the present experiment, compared with the existing evaluations and measurements since 1990. The evaluations are taken from the ENDF library [8]. “Chen” is the result of the R-matrix analysis performed by Prof. Zhenpeng Chen from Tsinghua University. The experimental data are taken from the EXFOR library [6].

source	magnitude (%)	source	magnitude (%)
w_E_-bin, _θ	<11.5^a; 0.1?2.2^b	UDB	0.7?73.9^a; 0.2?2.9^b
φ_E_-bin	0.5?21.4	URA	<1.1^a; <0.1^b
Ω_θ	0.3^a; 0.1^b	Fit	<0.4
N_Li	1.0	normalization	1.0
a: for differential cross-sections; b: for angle-integrated cross-sections; UDB: unfolding of the double-bunched proton beams; URA: unfolding of the spreads of receiving angles.

Table1.Sources and magnitude of the uncertainties.

Appendix A: The measured differential cross-sections

E_n /MeV	σ_E_?bin,_θ /(mb/sr)
E_n /MeV	19.2°	26.9°	36.5°	46.7°	57.3°	68.0°
1.00×10^?6±4.2×10^?9	1.29×10⁴±2.3×10²	1.30×10⁴±2.3×10²	1.28×10⁴±2.2×10²	1.29×10⁴±2.2×10²	1.30×10⁴±2.3×10²	1.30×10⁴±2.3×10²
1.26×10^?6±5.3×10^?9	1.03×10⁴±2.8×10²	1.06×10⁴±2.8×10²	1.04×10⁴±2.8×10²	1.04×10⁴±2.8×10²	1.05×10⁴±2.8×10²	1.04×10⁴±2.8×10²
1.58×10^?6±6.7×10^?9	8.19×10³±2.3×10²	8.26×10³±2.3×10²	8.23×10³±2.3×10²	8.26×10³±2.3×10²	8.38×10³±2.4×10²	8.32×10³±2.4×10²
2.00×10^?6±8.5×10^?9	7.49×10³±2.3×10²	7.58×10³±2.3×10²	7.71×10³±2.4×10²	7.75×10³±2.4×10²	7.73×10³±2.3×10²	7.68×10³±2.3×10²
2.51×10^?6±1.1×10^?8	6.83×10³±3.2×10²	6.50×10³±3.0×10²	6.58×10³±3.0×10²	6.72×10³±3.1×10²	6.59×10³±3.0×10²	6.68×10³±3.1×10²
3.16×10^?6±1.4×10^?8	7.20×10³±2.6×10²	7.19×10³±2.5×10²	7.22×10³±2.6×10²	7.47×10³±2.6×10²	7.37×10³±2.6×10²	7.31×10³±2.6×10²
3.98×10^?6±1.7×10^?8	5.33×10³±6.3×10²	5.46×10³±6.4×10²	5.32×10³±6.2×10²	5.42×10³±6.4×10²	5.51×10³±6.5×10²	5.35×10³±6.3×10²
5.01×10^?6±2.2×10^?8	5.10×10³±3.7×10²	5.27×10³±3.8×10²	5.21×10³±3.8×10²	5.19×10³±3.8×10²	5.21×10³±3.8×10²	5.30×10³±3.8×10²
6.31×10^?6±2.8×10^?8	5.28×10³±2.8×10²	5.13×10³±2.7×10²	5.34×10³±2.8×10²	5.12×10³±2.7×10²	5.24×10³±2.8×10²	5.21×10³±2.8×10²
7.94×10^?6±3.7×10^?8	4.16×10³±8.7×10²	4.33×10³±9.0×10²	4.40×10³±9.2×10²	4.30×10³±9.0×10²	4.38×10³±9.1×10²	4.28×10³±8.9×10²
1.00×10^?5±4.7×10^?8	4.39×10³±1.7×10²	4.26×10³±1.6×10²	4.18×10³±1.6×10²	4.18×10³±1.6×10²	4.22×10³±1.6×10²	4.18×10³±1.6×10²
1.26×10^?5±6.1×10^?8	3.54×10³±3.1×10²	3.60×10³±3.1×10²	3.55×10³±3.1×10²	3.55×10³±3.1×10²	3.58×10³±3.1×10²	3.58×10³±3.1×10²
1.58×10^?5±7.9×10^?8	2.92×10³±4.3×10²	2.97×10³±4.4×10²	2.97×10³±4.4×10²	2.97×10³±4.4×10²	2.99×10³±4.4×10²	2.91×10³±4.3×10²
2.00×10^?5±1.0×10^?7	2.35×10³±4.2×10²	2.38×10³±4.3×10²	2.37×10³±4.3×10²	2.35×10³±4.2×10²	2.37×10³±4.3×10²	2.26×10³±4.1×10²
2.51×10^?5±1.3×10^?7	2.66×10³±1.3×10²	2.78×10³±1.3×10²	2.68×10³±1.3×10²	2.63×10³±1.3×10²	2.61×10³±1.3×10²	2.73×10³±1.3×10²
3.16×10^?5±1.8×10^?7	1.87×10³±4.0×10²	1.80×10³±3.9×10²	1.86×10³±4.0×10²	1.89×10³±4.1×10²	1.86×10³±4.0×10²	1.90×10³±4.1×10²
3.98×10^?5±2.4×10^?7	1.85×10³±1.7×10²	1.94×10³±1.8×10²	1.95×10³±1.8×10²	2.00×10³±1.8×10²	1.91×10³±1.7×10²	1.95×10³±1.8×10²
5.01×10^?5±3.2×10^?7	1.79×10³±1.3×10²	1.83×10³±1.3×10²	1.77×10³±1.3×10²	1.76×10³±1.3×10²	1.76×10³±1.2×10²	1.81×10³±1.3×10²
6.31×10^?5±4.4×10^?7	1.38×10³±1.4×10²	1.39×10³±1.4×10²	1.39×10³±1.4×10²	1.41×10³±1.4×10²	1.37×10³±1.4×10²	1.38×10³±1.4×10²
7.94×10^?5±6.0×10^?7	1.28×10³±1.2×10²	1.37×10³±1.3×10²	1.33×10³±1.3×10²	1.34×10³±1.3×10²	1.32×10³±1.2×10²	1.34×10³±1.3×10²
1.00×10^?4±8.5×10^?7	1.15×10³±8.8×10¹	1.17×10³±8.9×10¹	1.18×10³±8.9×10¹	1.21×10³±9.2×10¹	1.19×10³±9.0×10¹	1.22×10³±9.3×10¹
1.26×10^?4±1.1×10^?6	1.08×10³±1.1×10²	1.09×10³±1.1×10²	1.08×10³±1.1×10²	1.07×10³±1.1×10²	1.10×10³±1.1×10²	1.10×10³±1.1×10²
Continued on next page

TableA1.The measured differential cross-sections of the ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He reaction in the laboratory system.

E_n /MeV	σ_E_?bin,_θ /(mb/sr)
E_n /MeV	78.8°	90.3°	101.2°	112.0°	122.7°
1.00×10^?6±4.2×10^?9	1.30×10⁴±2.2×10²	1.30×10⁴±2.3×10²	1.30×10⁴±2.3×10²	1.29×10⁴±2.2×10²	1.31×10⁴±2.3×10²
1.26×10^?6±5.3×10^?9	1.05×10⁴±2.8×10²	1.03×10⁴±2.8×10²	1.05×10⁴±2.8×10²	1.04×10⁴±2.8×10²	1.05×10⁴±2.9×10²
1.58×10^?6±6.7×10^?9	8.29×10³±2.4×10²	8.29×10³±2.4×10²	8.35×10³±2.4×10²	8.13×10³±2.3×10²	8.33×10³±2.4×10²
2.00×10^?6±8.5×10^?9	7.69×10³±2.3×10²	7.62×10³±2.3×10²	7.87×10³±2.4×10²	7.62×10³±2.3×10²	7.64×10³±2.3×10²
2.51×10^?6±1.1×10^?8	6.48×10³±3.0×10²	6.42×10³±3.0×10²	6.53×10³±3.0×10²	6.63×10³±3.1×10²	6.45×10³±3.0×10²
3.16×10^?6±1.4×10^?8	7.46×10³±2.6×10²	7.47×10³±2.7×10²	7.34×10³±2.6×10²	7.30×10³±2.6×10²	7.27×10³±2.6×10²
3.98×10^?6±1.7×10^?8	5.34×10³±6.3×10²	5.34×10³±6.3×10²	5.58×10³±6.6×10²	5.37×10³±6.3×10²	5.50×10³±6.5×10²
5.01×10^?6±2.2×10^?8	5.36×10³±3.9×10²	5.19×10³±3.8×10²	5.14×10³±3.7×10²	5.20×10³±3.8×10²	5.07×10³±3.7×10²
6.31×10^?6±2.8×10^?8	5.29×10³±2.8×10²	5.29×10³±2.8×10²	5.19×10³±2.8×10²	5.23×10³±2.8×10²	5.24×10³±2.8×10²
7.94×10^?6±3.7×10^?8	4.38×10³±9.2×10²	4.29×10³±9.0×10²	4.23×10³±8.8×10²	4.14×10³±8.6×10²	4.29×10³±9.0×10²
1.00×10^?5±4.7×10^?8	4.32×10³±1.7×10²	4.11×10³±1.6×10²	4.24×10³±1.7×10²	4.07×10³±1.6×10²	4.21×10³±1.6×10²
1.26×10^?5±6.1×10^?8	3.60×10³±3.1×10²	3.41×10³±3.0×10²	3.44×10³±3.0×10²	3.48×10³±3.0×10²	3.53×10³±3.1×10²
1.58×10^?5±7.9×10^?8	3.00×10³±4.5×10²	2.87×10³±4.3×10²	2.94×10³±4.4×10²	2.86×10³±4.3×10²	2.85×10³±4.2×10²
2.00×10^?5±1.0×10^?7	2.32×10³±4.2×10²	2.32×10³±4.2×10²	2.26×10³±4.1×10²	2.31×10³±4.2×10²	2.32×10³±4.2×10²
2.51×10^?5±1.3×10^?7	2.63×10³±1.3×10²	2.57×10³±1.3×10²	2.64×10³±1.3×10²	2.55×10³±1.2×10²	2.64×10³±1.3×10²
3.16×10^?5±1.8×10^?7	1.85×10³±4.0×10²	1.80×10³±3.9×10²	1.84×10³±4.0×10²	1.80×10³±3.9×10²	1.90×10³±4.1×10²
3.98×10^?5±2.4×10^?7	1.97×10³±1.8×10²	1.86×10³±1.7×10²	1.95×10³±1.8×10²	1.91×10³±1.7×10²	1.86×10³±1.7×10²
Continued on next page

TableA2.The measured differential cross-sections of the ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He reaction in the laboratory system.

E_n /MeV	σ_E_?bin,_θ /(mb/sr)				σ /mb
E_n /MeV	133.2°	143.5°	153.1°	160.8°	σ /mb
1.00×10^?6±4.2×10^?9	1.30×10⁴±2.3×10²	1.28×10⁴±2.2×10²	1.28×10⁴±2.2×10²	1.28×10⁴±2.3×10²	1.63×10⁵±2.5×10³
1.26×10^?6±5.3×10^?9	1.08×10⁴±2.9×10²	1.07×10⁴±2.9×10²	1.04×10⁴±2.8×10²	1.04×10⁴±2.8×10²	1.32×10⁵±3.3×10³
1.58×10^?6±6.7×10^?9	8.32×10³±2.4×10²	8.25×10³±2.4×10²	8.37×10³±2.4×10²	8.33×10³±2.4×10²	1.04×10⁵±2.7×10³
2.00×10^?6±8.5×10^?9	7.57×10³±2.3×10²	7.54×10³±2.3×10²	7.82×10³±2.4×10²	7.44×10³±2.3×10²	9.63×10⁴±2.7×10³
2.51×10^?6±1.1×10^?8	6.43×10³±3.0×10²	6.55×10³±3.0×10²	6.59×10³±3.0×10²	6.45×10³±3.0×10²	8.24×10⁴±3.6×10³
3.16×10^?6±1.4×10^?8	7.43×10³±2.6×10²	7.41×10³±2.6×10²	7.33×10³±2.6×10²	7.40×10³±2.6×10²	9.24×10⁴±3.0×10³
3.98×10^?6±1.7×10^?8	5.55×10³±6.5×10²	5.53×10³±6.5×10²	5.28×10³±6.2×10²	5.44×10³±6.4×10²	6.82×10⁴±7.9×10³
5.01×10^?6±2.2×10^?8	5.16×10³±3.7×10²	5.22×10³±3.8×10²	5.12×10³±3.7×10²	5.09×10³±3.7×10²	6.53×10⁴±4.6×10³
6.31×10^?6±2.8×10^?8	5.15×10³±2.8×10²	5.22×10³±2.8×10²	5.20×10³±2.8×10²	5.18×10³±2.8×10²	6.57×10⁴±3.4×10³
7.94×10^?6±3.7×10^?8	4.30×10³±9.0×10²	4.09×10³±8.5×10²	4.21×10³±8.8×10²	4.31×10³±9.0×10²	5.37×10⁴±1.1×10⁴
1.00×10^?5±4.7×10^?8	4.14×10³±1.6×10²	4.02×10³±1.6×10²	4.24×10³±1.7×10²	4.20×10³±1.6×10²	5.27×10⁴±1.8×10³
Continued on next page

TableA3.The measured differential cross-sections in the laboratory system and the angle-integrated cross-sections of the ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He reaction.

Appendix B: Differential cross-sections of the ⁶Li(n, t)⁴He reaction as a function of the tritium emission angle

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

Corresponding author: Guohui Zhang, guohuizhang@pku.edu.cn

HTML

2.1.The neutron source

2.2.The samples

2.3.The charged particle detector

2.4.The data acquisition system

2.5.The experimental procedure

3.1.Extraction and statistical analysis of the events

3.2.Background subtraction

3.3.Relative differential cross-section

3.4.Unfolding of the double-bunched proton beam

3.5.Unfolding of the spread of receiving angles

3.6.The results

相关话题/Measurement differential cross

领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!

Isotopic cross-sections in proton induced spallation reactions based on the Bayesian neural network

QCD analysis of CMS W + charm measurements at LHC with \begin{document}${\sqrt { s} = 7\; {\bf{T

Measurements of differential and angle-integrated cross sections for the 10B(n, α)7Li reaction in th

Giant dipole resonance parameters from photoabsorption cross-sections

Prediction of the cross-sections of isotopes produced in deuteron-induced spallation of long-lived f

Activation cross-sections of titanium isotopes at neutron energies of 13.5–14.8 MeV

Cross-section prediction for isotopes near neutron drip line in 70, 80Zn projectile fragmentation re

In-medium nucleon-nucleon elastic cross-sections determined from the nucleon induced reaction cross-

Cross sections for inelastic 2-to-2 meson-meson scattering in hadronic matter

In-medium NN→NΔ cross section and its dependence on effective Lagrange parameters in isospin-asymmet