1.Key Laboratory of Middle Atmosphere and Global Environment Observation, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China 2.School of the Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Science University, Beijing 100049, China 3.Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China Manuscript received: 2017-02-17 Manuscript revised: 2017-07-06 Manuscript accepted: 2017-07-11 Abstract:The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor onboard NASA's Aqua satellite has been collecting valuable data about the Earth system for more than 14 years, and one of the benefits of this is that it has made it possible to detect the long-term variation in aerosol loading across the globe. However, the long-term aerosol optical depth (AOD) trends derived from MODIS need careful validation and assessment, especially over land. Using AOD products with at least 70 months' worth of measurements collected during 2002-15 at 53 Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) sites over land, Mann-Kendall (MK) trends in AOD were derived and taken as the ground truth data for evaluating the corresponding results from MODIS onboard Aqua. The results showed that the AERONET AOD trends over all sites in Europe and North America, as well as most sites in Africa and Asia, can be reproduced by MODIS/Aqua. However, disagreement in AOD trends between MODIS and AERONET was found at a few sites in Australia and South America. The AOD trends calculated from AERONET instantaneous data at the MODIS overpass times were consistent with those from AERONET daily data, which suggests that the AOD trends derived from satellite measurements of 1-2 overpasses may be representative of those from daily measurements. Keywords: MODIS, AERONET, Aerosol Optical Depth, Mann-Kendall trend test 摘要:MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging)气溶胶光学厚度(Aerosol Optical Depth, AOD)产品为研究全球范围的AOD变化趋势提供了很好的数据平台. 然而, 由于陆地下垫面的复杂和陆地上空气溶胶时空分布的多变, MODIS陆地气溶胶产品获得的AOD变化趋势亟需广泛的验证和评估. 本文选取了全球53个(准连续观测70个月以上)AERONET(Aerosol Robotic Network)测站, 用Mann–Kendall(MK)非参数检验方法验证评估了MODIS/Aqua陆地气溶胶光学厚度2002~2015年的变化趋势. 以AERONET日平均AOD计算得到的月中值AODRE趋势作为参考, 将其与MODIS/Terra, MODIS/Aqua过境前后半小时的AERONET瞬时资料计算得到的AODAM, AODPM月中值MK趋势进行比较, AODAM, AODPM与AODRE的变化趋势一致. 这说明, 上, 下午卫星过境前后半小时的AERONET AOD观测可以代表日平均AOD的变化趋势. 此外, 将地基AERONET AODRE MK趋势和MODIS/Aqua气溶胶产品得到的AODMOD变化趋势做了比较, 结果显示: 欧洲和北美的所有测站, 亚洲和非洲的大多数测站, MODIS气溶胶产品得到的AODMOD变化趋势与AERONET AODRE变化趋势相同. 但是, 澳大利亚和南美的测站, 由于MODIS气溶胶产品反演精度低, MODIS AODMOD变化趋势与地基AODRE的变化趋势不一致. 关键词:MODIS, AERONET, 气溶胶光学厚度, Mann–Kendall趋势检验
HTML
--> --> --> -->
2.1. Multi-sensor Aerosol Products Sampling System AOD
The Multi-sensor Aerosol Products Sampling System (MAPSS) is a framework that provides statistics on spatial and temporal subsets of level 2.0 aerosol scientific datasets from spaceborne sensors as MODIS and MISR. The data system is described in detail in (Petrenko et al., 2012). The AERONET sites were identified as focal points for spatial statistics. The process of generating the statistics for each spatial spaceborne aerosol product involved extracting values of the pixels that fell within a diameter of approximately 50 km centered on the chosen AERONET site. Statistics for ground-based temporal observations collected at a particular station were derived from measurements taken within 30 min of each satellite overpass of this location. The MODIS dataset obtained from MAPSS used in this paper is a merged dataset comprising the dark target (DT) and deep blue (DB) AOD products filtered by quality assurance (QA) processes. Unless otherwise specified, all the analyses in this paper are based on AOD at 550 nm. The highest quality (QA = 3) AODs retrieved by the DB algorithm have been shown to have an absolute uncertainty of approximately 0.03+0.20τ M for a typical Atmosphere Mass Factor of 2.8 (Sayer et al., 2013), where τ M is MODIS retrieved AOD. The uncertainty of MODIS DT AOD has been estimated to be 0.05+0.15τ A over land (Levy et al., 2010, 2013), where τ A is collocated AERONET AOD. Data at 53 AERONET stations were chosen for this analysis because their measurements are available for a relatively longer period compared with other stations. Figure 1 shows the spatial distribution of these stations, with their data lengths represented by the colors. Figure1. Spatial distribution of stations with at least 70 months of monthly median AOD during 2002-15. The data length is represented by the colors.
2 2.2. Data analysis -->
2.2. Data analysis
We used quality-assured and cloud-screened level 2.0 AERONET AOD data, with a low uncertainty of 0.01-0.02 (Holben et al., 1998). Three daily series were calculated from instantaneous AOD products as follows: AERONET daily mean AOD was calculated from all instantaneous AOD measurements each day; AERONET morning and afternoon mean AOD was calculated from instantaneous AOD measurements within 30 min of the Terra and Aqua overpass times; and monthly median AOD was calculated from the daily mean AERONET AOD if there were more than five daily measurements each month [AOD reference value (AOD RE)], which was taken as a benchmark for comparison with other estimates. The monthly median AOD in the morning (AOD AM) and in the afternoon (AOD PM) were also calculated if at least five daily measurements were available each month. The monthly median was used in the trend test instead of the monthly mean because AOD does not follow a normal distribution. The AOD trends derived from AOD RE, AOD AM and AOD PM were compared to determine whether the trends derived from AERONET AOD measured at the Terra and Aqua overpass times were representative of those derived from daily mean AERONET AOD. The monthly medians of AOD MOD were calculated from all collocated AOD from MODIS/Aqua provided by the MAPSS system if there were more than five daily measurements each month. The AOD trends from AOD MOD were compared with those of AOD RE to determine whether AERONET AOD trends could be reproduced by MODIS. The trends from AERONET and MODIS/Aqua AOD at each site were calculated based on the measurements during the same measurement period. Although the comparison of the AOD RE and AOD MOD trends mentioned above was based on measurements during the same study period, AOD measurements were not necessarily available simultaneously from AERONET and MODIS each day. Therefore, the monthly median AOD from AERONET and MODIS were probably calculated from different daily measurements. In other words, it was possible that daily AOD was available from AERONET, but MODIS/Aqua had no AOD product, or vice versa. This situation arose because of insufficient temporal coverage by MODIS or insufficient spatial coverage by AERONET. Since the difference in temporal sampling was not considered in calculating the monthly median AOD values, the trends in the MODIS and AERONET data may not have been consistent. The AOD measurements from AERONET and MODIS/Aqua were matched day-by-day, and the monthly medians were then recalculated for all the sites to assess the potential effects of sampling issues on the comparison of AOD trends.
2 2.3. Trend detection -->
2.3. Trend detection
The MK test was used to detect monotonic trends. The MK test is a rank-based non-parametric test for assessing the significance of a trend, which requires that the data be independent. The null hypothesis (H0) is that a sample of data, {X1,X2…,Xn}, is independent and identically distributed. The alternative hypothesis (H1) is that a monotonic trend exists in X. The slope b of the trend is computed using the method proposed by (Sen, 1968) as follows: \begin{equation} b={\rm Median}\left(\dfrac{X_i-X_j}{i-j}\right),\quad \forall i>j , \ \ (1)\end{equation} where b is the slope of the trend, Xi and Xj are the ith and the jth observations respectively. The slope is robust for estimating the magnitude of a trend (Yue and Wang, 2002) and much less sensitive to outliers compared with linear regression coefficient (Li et al., 2014). The non-parametric test is more suitable for non-normally distributed, censored, and missing data (Yue and Wang, 2002), such as the AERONET AOD data (Li et al., 2014). However, the AOD time series, which have distinct seasonal variability, frequently display statistically significant serial correlation. The existence of positive serial correlation in a time series increases the probability of the MK test detecting a significant trend (Hirsch and Slack, 1984; Yue and Wang, 2002). Therefore, a pre-whitening scheme proposed by (Yue et al., 2002) was used to eliminate the influence of serial correlation on the MK trend detections. First, the slope (b) of the trend in an AOD time series was estimated using Eq. (1). If b was almost equal to zero, then it was not necessary to continue performing the trend analysis. If it differed from zero, the AOD time series were detrended using \begin{equation} X'_t=X_t-T_t=X_t-bt ,\ \ (2) \end{equation} where X't is the `trend-removed' residual series, Xt denotes the raw AOD time series, and Tt is the identified trend with the slope b of the trend at time t. Second, the lag-1 autocorrelation component was removed from the detrended time series (X't) using \begin{equation} Y'_t=X'_t-r_1X'_{t-1} , \ \ (3)\end{equation} where r1 is the lag-1 autocorrelation coefficient, X't-1 is the detrended series at time t-1. Third, the identified trend was added back to the residual Y't according to the following equation: \begin{equation} Y_t=Y'_t+T_t . \ \ (4)\end{equation} It was evident that the blended time series (Yt) preserved the true trend and was no longer influenced by the effects of autocorrelation. The MK test and Sen's slope estimator were applied to the blended series to estimate the trend in AOD time series. (Hirsch and Slack, 1984) developed a seasonal MK test and estimated the annual trend as the median of the seasonal trends——an approach that is resistant to data seasonality and serial dependence. Thus, the pre-whitening scheme described by (Yue et al., 2002) was adopted first. Then, the seasonal MK test of (Hirsch and Slack, 1984) and Sen's slope estimator were applied to the pre-whitened time series of AOD.