著作权扩张及其缘由透视
Insight into Copyright Expansion and Its Cause 冯晓青; 1:中国政法大学 北京100088 摘要(Abstract)：

对著作权法的历史考察表明,它代表了被保护权利的持续扩张,以及相应的在作品中作为公共领域部分的持续减少。著作权扩张表现在受保护的客体不断增加、著作权保护范围不断扩大、使用方式不断增多、著作权保护期限不断延长等方面。从技术发展方面看,技术因素对著作权扩张具有极大的影响。著作权的扩张不仅可以从著作权制度本身的角度加以考察,也可以从政治、文化视野和经济学的层面上分析。著作权扩张还可以从利益平衡原理得到解释。著作权扩张与限制的辩证关系也说明,利益平衡是著作权法永恒的主题。

关键词(KeyWords)： 著作权扩张;;公共领域;;利益平衡;;权利限制

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 冯晓青;

Email:


参考文献(References)： [2]See:Information Infrastructure Task Force,Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure:The Report of the WorkingGroup On Intellectual Property Rights(1995).[3]Jessica Litman,Reforming Information Law In Copyright's Image,22U.Dayton Law Review,587,603(1997).[4]关于第7条、第11条和第16条的议定声明指出,第7条和第11条所规定的复制权及其中通过第16条允许的例外,完全适用于数字环境,尤其是以数字形式使用表]和录音制品的情况。不言而喻,在电子媒体中以数字形式存储受保护的表]或录音制品,构成这些条款意义下的复制。[1]See:Niva Eliken-Koren,Cyberspace Lawand Social Change:ADemocratic Approach to Copyright Lawin Cyberspace,14Cardozo Arts&Entertainment Law Journal215,273-77(1996).[2]应注意,我国2001年修改后的《著作权法》取消了“录像作品”的概念,将这类作品归入“电影作品和以类似拍摄电影的方法创作的作品”。[3]L.Ray Patterson,Stanley W.Lindberg,The Nature of Copyright:ALawof Users'Right,the University of Georgia Press,1991,Sa-thens&London,at137.[4]17U.S.C.(101(2000).[1]DIRECTIVE96/9EC,MARCH1996.[1]See:In formation Infrastructure Task Force,Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure:A Preliminary Draft of theReport of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights(July1994),at44-05&n.130.[1]Act of January6,1897,Ch.4,29Stat.481.[2]Basic Books,758F.Supp.at1535;Compare Campbell,114S.Ct.at1177-78.[3]American Geophysical Union,60F.3d at922.[4]Sega Enters.,Ltd.v.Accolade,Inc.,1993U.S.App.LEXIS78,*27,*5253(9th Cir.1993).[1]Neil Weinstock Netanel,Copyright and a Democratic Civil Society,6Yale Law Journal283(1996).[1]982F.2d.693,696(2d Cir.1992).[2]See:Maureen Ryan,Cyberspace as Public Space:A Public Trust Paradigm for Copyright in a Digital World,79Oregon LawReview654(2000).[1]J.H.Reichman,Design Protection and the NewTechnologies:The United States Experience in a Transnational Perspective,19U.Balt.L.Rev.6,142-43(1989).[2]See:Maureen Ryan,Cyberspace as Public Space:A Public Trust Paradigm for Copyright in a Digital World,79Oregon LawReview654(2000).[3]See:Jessica Litman,Copyright and Information Policy,55Law&Contemporary Problems,185,205(1992).[1]Christopher Yoo,Copyright and Product Differentiation,79N.Y.U.L.Rev.212,260-61(2004).[1]See:Joan Robinson,The Economics of Imperfect Competition102-04(MacMillan,1933).[1]See:Glynn S.Lunney,Reexamine Copyright Incentive Access Paradigm,49Vanderbilt Law Review483(1996).[2]See:Glynn S.Lunney,Reexamine Copyright Incentive Access Paradigm,49Vanderbilt Law Review497-99(1996).[3]See:Nichols v.Universal Pictures Corp.,45F.2d119.[4]See:Landes and Posner,An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law,18J.Legal Stud.332-33(1987)(一个作者对其创作行为是否值得冒风险,他会在风险、不确定性、搜寻和许可成本之间进行利益衡量).[5]See:Campbell v.Acuff-Rose Music,Inc.,114S.Ct.1164,1176,127L.Ed.2d500(1994).[6]See:Wendy J.Gordon,Fair Use as Market Failure:A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and its Predecessors,82Colum.L.Rev.1600,1618,1628-30(1982).[1]See:Robert Bork,The Antitrust Paradox92-101(Free Press,1978);Walter Bowman,Jr.,Patent and Antitrust Law:ALegal and E-conomic Appraisal1-8(U.Chicago,1973).[2]Edward Samuels,The Public Domain in Copyright Law,41Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA137(1993).[3]Edward Samuels,The Public Domain Revisited,36Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review435(2002).[4]See:Landes and Posner,An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law,18J.Legal Stud.332-33(1987).[1]郑成思.版权的概念与沿革[A].中华人民共和国著作权法讲习[C].北京:中国国际广播出版社,1991.[2]袁咏.数字著作权[A].郑成思,主编.知识产权文丛(第2卷)[C].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999.[3][美]迈克尔.D.贝勒斯.法律的原则———一个规范的分析[M].张文显,等译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996.[4]李雨峰.著作权扩张:一种合法性的反思[J].现代法学,2001,(5).