doi:10.12202/j.0476-0301.2019204马晓婧^{1, 2,},
刘强^{2, 3,,},
潘继花¹,
张军龙⁴,
孙荧杉^{2, 5},
袁晓敏^{2, 3}
1.曲阜师范大学地理与旅游学院，276826，山东日照
2.北京师范大学环境学院，水环境模拟国家重点实验室，100875，北京
3.北京师范大学环境学院，教育部水沙科学重点实验室，100875，北京
4.山东师范大学地理与环境学院，250358，山东济南
5.济南大学水利与环境学院，250002，山东济南
基金项目:水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项资助项目（2018ZX07110001）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（51579008）；北京市科技计划课题资助项目（217300011）

详细信息

通讯作者:刘强（1978—），男，副教授，博士. 研究方向：生态水文学. e-mail：qiang.liu@bnu.edu.cn

中图分类号:P333

计量

文章访问数:158
HTML全文浏览量:85
PDF下载量:10
被引次数:0

出版历程

收稿日期:2019-07-18
网络出版日期:2020-11-03
刊出日期:2020-10-31

Baseflow separation and temporal changes in the Juma River, China

Xiaojing MA^{1, 2,},
Qiang LIU^{2, 3,,},
Jihua PAN¹,
Junlong ZHANG⁴,
Yingshan SUN^{2, 5},
Xiaomin YUAN^{2, 3}
1. School of Geography and Tourism, Qufu Normal University, 276826, Rizhao, Shandong, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, 100875, Beijing, China
3. Key Laboratory for Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, 100875, Beijing, China
4. School of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, 250358, Jinan, Shandong, China
5. School of Water Resources and Environment, University of Jinan, 250002, Jinan, Shandong, China



摘要
HTML全文
图(4)表(0)
参考文献(19)
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件(0)
访问统计

摘要
摘要:以大清河流域拒马河为研究对象，基于紫荆关水文站1950—2016年的日径流数据，采用改进退水常数后数字滤波法中的Chapman-Maxwell法，对拒马河径流过程进行基流分割，并对拒马河丰、平、枯年基流变化特征进行分析. 结果表明：1)使用改进后退水常数（α=0.993）比以往经验所得退水常数（α=0.925）计算的基流量变化特征更稳定；2)基流与径流均呈减小突变，基流突变时间略早于径流突变时间，突变前后基流变化幅度小于径流变化幅度；3)丰、平、枯不同水平年基流对径流的贡献率分别达到35.80%、42.51%、52.20%，丰水年基流贡献率最小，枯水年基流是径流的主要补给源. 研究结果可为保障河道生态基流及应对气候变化对河道生态系统的影响提供理论和技术支撑.
关键词:基流/
退水常数/
自动化基流识别法/
Chapman-Maxwell法/
拒马河
Abstract:Digital filtering method with improved regression constant, the Chapman-Maxwell method, was used to separate baseflow from daily runoff in Zijinguan hydrological station in Juma River, China, with temporal trends of baseflow investigated. Modified receding water constant (α = 0.993) calculated from Chapman-Maxwell method were found suitable to separate baseflow compared with experienced receding water constant (α = 0.925). Annual runoff and baseflow presented decreasing trends with abrupt changes around 1967. Abrupt changes for annual baseflow were found to be earlier than for annual runoff. Changes in baseflow were found to make up to 35.8%, 42.51%, and 52.20% of changes in runoff in flood, normal, and drought years. It is concluded that baseflow presents steady characteristics than changes in runoff, this plays a vital role in maintaining integrity of river ecosystem.
Key words:baseflow??????? separation/
regression constant/
automatic baseflow identification technique/
Chapman-Maxwell method/
Juma River