加州大学伯克利分校古希腊与罗马研究系导师教师师资介绍简介-Todd Hickey

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-09-10

Title
Associate Professor of Classics

Department
Dept of Ancient Greek & Roman Studies


Faculty URL
http://tebtunis.berkeley.edu/hickey/hickey.html

Email
tmhickey@berkeley.edu

Phone
(510) 642-4556


Search UC Berkeley Directory





Research Expertise and Interest
classics, papyrology, Greek, Egyptian, social and economic history, late antiquity

Research Description
I am an historian whose research is focused on those segments of ancient society that are poorly represented in the elite literature that is the foundation of the discipline of Classical Studies. I am able to pursue this interest because of my training in papyrology, a subspecialty that is devoted to the decipherment and interpretation of papyrus manuscripts, the “everyday” writing of the inhabitants of Egypt (and other regions, though Egypt’s preservative sands have yielded the lion’s share of our texts). Only a handful of scholars have this training (perhaps 200 worldwide), and few of them have positions in the Western Hemisphere.
My research to date has centered on two issues. The first is the question of economic decision making. I have been interested in elucidating the choices that ancient people of various statuses made and the factors (for example, risk tolerance, the environment, access to information, custom) that contributed to an individual’s calculus. My first book addressed this topic in some detail for a large agricultural estate, arguing strongly against recent readings of the evidence in which such entities were claimed to have been rationally managed with the aim of maximizing profit. (The works in question give insufficient emphasis to the sociocultural context of economic transactions.) More lately, my attention has been devoted to the impact of “régime change” on Egyptian society; that is, I have been wondering how the coming of the Romans affected certain groups, in particular the Egyptian priesthood. Again, my research bucks the communis opinio: Rather than suggesting resistance (in the traditional sense of that word), that the priests were the principal opponents of external power and served as guardians of indigenous tradition, I demonstrate that their engagement with the dominant culture was quite significant, and call for a nuanced interpretation informed by theoretical literature on the modern colonial experience.