加州大学伯克利分校法学院导师教师师资介绍简介-Tejas N. Narechania

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-08-27

Tejas N. Narechania

Publications

CV

Tejas N. Narechania is the Robert and Nanci Corson Assistant Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, where he writes about (and teaches courses on) telecommunications regulation and intellectual property, among other subjects.? He is also a Faculty Co-Director of the Berkeley Center for Law & Technology.
Before joining Berkeley Law, Professor Narechania clerked for Justice Stephen G. Breyer of the Supreme Court of the United States (2015–2016) and for Judge Diane P. Wood of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (2011–2012). He has advised the Federal Communications Commission on network neutrality matters, where he served as Special Counsel (2012–2013). He has a J.D. from Columbia Law School, where he received the Ruth Bader Ginsburg Prize and was the Executive Notes Editor of the?Columbia Law Review. He also has a B.S. (Electrical Engineering and Computer Science) and a B.A. (Political Science) from the University of California, Berkeley.
Professor Narechania’s research projects have appeared in the?Columbia Law Review,?the?Georgetown Law Journal, the?Michigan Law Review, the?Stanford Law Review Online, and the?Washington Law Review, among other outlets. His projects have been cited by the White House, in the work of the Supreme Court and the federal Courts of Appeals, as well as in the New York Times and the Washington Post, among other venues.

Education

B.S., UC Berkeley (2005)
B.A., UC Berkeley (2005)
J.D., Columbia Law School (2011)

Profiles

-->

Tejas Narechania is not teaching any Law courses in Fall 2022.
-->

Courses During Other Semesters

SemesterCourse NumCourse Title Teaching Evaluations
Summer 2022 226.4S sec. 001 Regulated Digital Industries
Spring 2022 222.13 sec. 001 Colloquium on the Court and Judicial Process View Teaching Evaluation
226.4 sec. 001 Regulated Digital Industries: Telecommunications Law & Policy for a Modern Era View Teaching Evaluation
Summer 2021 226.4S sec. 001 Regulated Digital Industries
-->

What broadband ‘nutrition labels’ could reveal about your internet provider

Professor Tejas Narechania explains a new act, passed by the FCC that will require broadband companies ?provide easy-to-read information about their services to improve transparency

Mensch On The Bench

Professor Tejas Narechania joins the Strict Scrutiny podcast for a retrospective on Justice Breyer

The Supreme Court Is About to Lose Its ‘Driving Force’ on IP Law

Professor Tejas Narechania says Justice Breyer brings a level of sophistication and engagement to the Supreme Court’s intellectual property cases that will be missed

The FCC is trying to crack down on those annoying spam texts

Professor Tejas Narechania says the FCC’s proposal to crack town on spam texts is a good start, but warns it is a hard issue to address

What Biden’s big executive order means for the internet, air travel, and more

Professor Tejas Narechania says President Biden’s recent executive order concerning technology, competition and consumer choice, includes so many different directives and requests in so many disparate areas is itself a point worth paying attention to. The article also cites and links to Prof. Narechania’s recent paper.

Internet prices kick off Washington brawl

Professor Tejas Narechania’s working paper, which finds that broadband providers offer slower service for the same price in areas where they lack competition, and proposes a model statute for rate regulation of a basic tier broadband service in areas without competition, is highlighted by The White House

Epic opens assault in court clash with Apple over app market

Professor Tejas Narechania says Apple v Epic Games is?going to tell us a lot about how we structure industries and the technology industry going forward

Op-Ed: Challenge to California net neutrality law should be dismissed

Professor Tejas Narechania and Erik Stallman, associate director of the Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic, urge the court to dismiss the lawsuit filed by internet service providers challenging California’s law requiring that ISPs follow net neutrality rules