其他题名Spatial distribution of heavy metals and As concentrations and assessment of their ecological risk in inshore sediments, affected by the Flow-sediment Regulation Scheme in the Yellow River estuary
田莉萍; 孙志高
; 王传远; 孙万龙; 黎静; 陈冰冰发表期刊生态学报
ISSN1000-0933
2018-04-19
卷号38期号:15页码:5529-5540
关键词重金属砷污染来源生态风险黄河口
DOI10.5846/stxb201708111445
产权排序(1)福建师范大学地理研究所湿润亚热带生态地理过程教育部重点实验室; (2)中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所海岸带环境过程与生态修复重点实验室; (3)清华大学环境学院
作者部门海岸带环境过程实验室
英文摘要To clarify the concentration distribution characteristics of heavy metal and arsenic (As) and their ecological risks in the sediments of the Yellow River estuary and the long-term effects of the Flow-sediment Regulation Scheme (FSRS), the concentrations of six heavy metals (Zn, Cr, Ni,Pb,Cu,Cd) and As in the surface sediments of 27 stations sampled in 2012 were determined by ICP-MS and their ecological risks were evaluated by determining the potential ecological risk index (RI).The results showed that the average levels of heavy metal and As in inshore sediments were in the order of As > Zn > Cr > Ni > Pb > Cu > Cd. The spatial distributions of Cr, Ni, Cu, and Pb concentrations were consistent, and higher values were generally detected in inshore and near the Yellow River estuary, whereas lower values were observed far from the estuary and coastline. Ni, Cu, Pb, and Zn concentrations showed significantly positive correlations with clay (P< 0.05),whereas no significant correlations were observed between clay and Cd (or Cr and As) (P > 0.05). The average potential ecological risk indices of six heavy metals and As in inshore sediments generally followed the order of Cd > As > Ni > Pb > Cu > Cr > Zn. According to the RI values in the study area, 18.52% of stations were slightly ecologically hazardous, 70.07% of stations were moderately ecologically hazardous, and 7.41% of stations were strongly ecologically hazardous, which was mainly caused by Cd and As. Because of the use of agricultural fertilizers, inshore oil extraction, fossil fuel combustion,and estuarine pollutant input,the sources of heavy metals and As in inshore sediments are complex and diverse. This study showed that only the concentrations of Cd and As showed an increasing trend following long-term implementation of the FSRS,indicating that their ecotoxicological risk in inshore sediments of the Yellow River estuary should be evaluated in the future.
中文摘要为了明确调水调沙工程长期影响下黄河口近岸沉积物中重金属含量的分布特征及其生态风险,基于2012年黄河口近岸27个站位的表层沉积物样品,通过ICP-MS测定重金属(Zn、Cr、Ni、Pb、Cu、Cd)和砷(As)含量,并运用潜在生态风险指数法(RI)对其进行生态风险评估。结果表明:近岸沉积物中重金属和As的平均含量表现为As>Zn>Cr>Ni>Pb>Cu>Cd。Cr、Ni、Cu和Pb四种元素的分布规律较为一致,整体呈现出近岸和近黄河口高而远离河口和岸线低的空间分异特征。Ni、Cu、Pb、Zn与粘土均呈极显著或显著正相关(P<0.01或P0.05)。近岸沉积物中6种重金属和As的平均单项潜在生态风险指数大小顺序整体表现为Cd>As>Ni>Pb>Cu>Cr>Zn。就潜在生态风险(RI)而言,研究区域18.52%的站位属轻微生态危害,70.07%的站位属中等生态危害,7.41%的站位属强生态危害,Cd和As是造成危害的两种主要元素。近岸沉积物中重金属和As的来源复杂且多样,主要是由于农业化肥使用、海上石油开采和泄漏、化石燃料燃烧以及河口污染物输入所致。对比研究发现,随着调水调沙工程的长期实施,除Cd和As外沉积物中其他重金属含量均呈下降趋势,说明二者的生态风险将会随调水调沙的长期实施呈增加趋势,而其他重金属的生态风险将呈降低趋势,故未来应重点关注近岸沉积物中Cd和As的生态毒理风险。
资助机构国家自然科学基金面上项目#41371104; 国家自然科学基金面上项目#41171424; 福建省“闽江****奖励计划”项目#
收录类别CSCD
语种中文
CSCD记录号CSCD:6291517
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.yic.ac.cnhttp://ir.yic.ac.cn/handle/133337/24708
专题中科院海岸带环境过程与生态修复重点实验室_海岸带环境过程实验室
中科院海岸带环境过程与生态修复重点实验室_滨海湿地实验室
中科院海岸带环境过程与生态修复重点实验室
作者单位1.福建师范大学地理研究所湿润亚热带生态地理过程教育部重点实验室;
2.中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所海岸带环境过程与生态修复重点实验室;
3.清华大学环境学院
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714田莉萍,孙志高,王传远,等. 调水调沙工程黄河口近岸沉积物重金属和砷含量的空间分布及其生态风险评估[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(15):5529-5540.
APA田莉萍,孙志高,王传远,孙万龙,黎静,&陈冰冰.(2018).调水调沙工程黄河口近岸沉积物重金属和砷含量的空间分布及其生态风险评估.生态学报,38(15),5529-5540.
MLA田莉萍,et al."调水调沙工程黄河口近岸沉积物重金属和砷含量的空间分布及其生态风险评估".生态学报 38.15(2018):5529-5540.
PDF全文下载地址:
点我下载PDF
