不同标准拔出引流管对腰椎融合术后疗效的影响
谭跃龙, 刘丽君, 李思维, 郝赫, 陈林林中国医科大学第八临床学院, 鞍钢集团公司总医院骨科, 辽宁 鞍山 114002
收稿日期:
2021-06-11出版日期:
2022-05-30发布日期:
2022-05-28通讯作者:
陈林林作者简介:
谭跃龙(1988-),男,主治医师,硕士.关键词: 引流管拔出时间, 腰椎融合术, 术后疗效
Abstract: Objective To compare drainage tube removal according to different standards of time and drainage volume and determine which method is better for patients after lumbar fusion. Methods A total of 200 patients who underwent lumbar posterior internal fixation in our hospital were selected and divided into groups A and B according to the different drainage standards,with 100 patients in each group. The drainage tube was removed according to the time (day 2 post-operation) in group A,and according to the drainage volume (<50 mL/d) in group B. The postoperative effects in the two groups were compared. Results The postoperative drainage volume,total blood loss,postoperative ambulation time,and hospital stay in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P< 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of surgical site infection or postoperative pain between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion In patients who underwent posterior lumbar 1-2 segment fusion and internal fixation,the recovery of group A was faster than that of group B. The postoperative drainage volume and total blood loss of group A were less than those of group B. The patients in group A were ambulatory earlier post-operation,had shorter postoperative hospital stay,and did not have increased incidence of postoperative infection or pain symptoms.
Key words: drainage tube extraction time, lumbar fusion, postoperative efficacy
PDF全文下载地址:
https://journal.cmu.edu.cn/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=2995