Publication in refereed journal
香港中文大学研究人员 ( 现职)
| 黄锦就教授 (经济学系) |
全文
| 数位物件识别号 (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00199-007-0271-2 |
引用次数
Web of Sciencehttp://aims.cuhk.edu.hk/converis/portal/Publication/3WOS source URL
其它资讯
摘要We discuss a ranking method that allows social pairwise rankings of alternatives to depend on more than just individuals' pairwise rankings. This violates Arrow's Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives, but allows Borda's rank-order counting, which provides a limited accounting for individual preference intensities. We capture Arrow's rules (i.e., with IIA) and Borda's method as two polar cases, and allow cases in between. Our main result provides the critical line dividing those degrees of intensity, or preference density, that yield positive results from those that yield negative results.
着者Richter MK, Wong KC
期刊名称ECONOMIC THEORY
出版年份2008
月份8
日期1
卷号http://aims.cuhk.edu.hk/converis/portal/Publication/36
期次2
出版社Springer Verlag (Germany)
页次225 - 2http://aims.cuhk.edu.hk/converis/portal/Publication/38
国际标準期刊号09http://aims.cuhk.edu.hk/converis/portal/Publication/38-2259
语言英式英语
关键词Arrow's impossibility theorem; Borda counting; degrees of preference intensity; independence of irrelevant alternatives; preference density
Web of Science 学科类别Business & Economics; Economics; ECONOMICS
