Publication in refereed journal
香港中文大学研究人员 ( 现职)
| Professor Tony GIN (麻醉及深切治疗学系) |
全文
| 没有全文档案提供 |
引用次数
Scopushttp://aims.cuhk.edu.hk/converis/portal/Publication/26Scopus source URL
其它资讯
摘要Propofol has been used for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia during pregnancy although this is not an indication approved by Zeneca Pharmaceuticals. Compared with thiopentone, propofol reduces the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Maternal recovery from anesthesia may be marginally quicker. Neonatal outcome is satisfactory although one group of researchers has consistently preferred thiopentone to propofol. Compared with inhalational agents, infusions of propofol do not offer any significant advantages for the maintenance of anesthesia and the risk of neonatal depression is potentially greater. Although propofol has no major advantages to justify it replacing thiopentone for the induction of anesthesia in pregnancy, propofol does give satisfactory results and should be available as an alternative.
着者Gin T.
期刊名称Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica
出版年份1994
月份6
日期1
卷号32
期次2
出版社Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists
出版地Taiwan
页次127 - 132
国际标準期刊号0529-5769
语言英式英语
