删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

加拿大一枝黄花和小飞蓬叶浸提液对大豆幼苗生长的复合化感效应

本站小编 Free考研考试/2021-12-30

刘君,
周嘉伟,
肖鸿光,
王从彦,
江苏大学环境生态研究所, 环境与安全工程学院, 镇江 212013
作者简介: 刘君(1991-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为环境生态学,E-mail:578082448@qq.com.
通讯作者: 王从彦,liuyuexue623@163.com
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(31300343);江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20130500);江苏省高校自然科学研究项目(13KJB610002);江苏大学高级专业人才科研启动基金(12JDG086)


中图分类号: X171.5


Synergistic Allelopathic Effects of Solidago canadensis and Conyza canadensis on Seedling Growth of Glycine max

Liu Jun,
Zhou Jiawei,
Xiao Hongguang,
Wang Congyan,
Institute of Environment and Ecology, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
Corresponding author: Wang Congyan,liuyuexue623@163.com

CLC number: X171.5

-->

摘要
HTML全文
(0)(0)
参考文献(0)
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件(0)
访问统计

摘要:加拿大一枝黄花(Solidago canadensis)和小飞蓬(Conyza canadensis)常共同入侵至同一农田生态系统。探究了两者对大豆幼苗生长的复合化感作用。加拿大一枝黄花叶浸提液显著抑制大豆幼苗地上生物量。而小飞蓬叶浸提液也明显抑制大豆幼苗地上生物量(未达到显著水平)。与对照处理相比,两者复合叶浸提液处理未显著影响大豆幼苗地上生物量。两者复合叶浸提液处理下大豆幼苗地上生物量显著大于加拿大一枝黄花叶浸提液单一处理,同时也大于小飞蓬叶浸提液单一处理(未达到显著水平)。两者叶浸提液单一处理均明显降低大豆幼苗株高(未达到显著水平)。与对照处理相比,两者复合叶浸提液处理未显著影响大豆幼苗株高。两者复合叶浸提液处理下大豆幼苗株高明显大于两者叶浸提液单一处理(未达到显著水平)。因此,两者叶浸提液对大豆幼苗的生长均具有一定程度的抑制效应,且加拿大一枝黄花叶浸提液对大豆幼苗产生的化感作用(尤其是地上生物量)明显大于小飞蓬。两者复合化感作用明显低于两者单一化感作用,尤其是两者对大豆幼苗地上生物量的复合化感作用显著低于加拿大一枝黄花的单一化感作用。所以,化感效应可能在两者共同入侵(即两者复合作用)入侵进程中所起的贡献低于在两者单一进程中所起的作用。
关键词: 加拿大一枝黄花/
小飞蓬/
大豆/
化感作用/
幼苗生长

Abstract:The co-invasion of Solidago canadensis and Conyza canadensis may occur in the same agricultural ecosystem usually. This study aims to determine the synergistic allelopathic effects of the two species on seedling growth of Glycine max. Results showed that single leaf extracts of S. canadensis significantly reduced the aboveground biomass of G. max seedling. Single leaf extracts of C. canadensis also reduced the aboveground biomass of G. max seedling obviously but did not reach the significant level. The mixed leaf extracts of the two species did not affect the aboveground biomass of G. max seedling significantly compared with the control. The aboveground biomass of G. max seedling under the mixed leaf extracts of the two species was significantly higher than that under single leaf extracts of S. canadensis but close to that under single leaf extracts of C. canadensis. Single leaf extracts of the two species all reduced the height of G. max seedling but the change was not significant. The mixed leaf extracts of the two species did not affect the height of G. max seedling significantly compared with the control. The height of G. max seedling under the mixed leaf extracts of the two species was higher than that under single leaf extracts of the two species although not at significant level. Thus, the leaf extracts of the two species exhibit allelopathic effects on seedling growth of Glycine max, and S. canadensis triggered more allelopathic effects on seedling growth of Glycine max than C. canadensis. Meanwhile, the allelopathic effect of the mixed leaf extracts of the two species was lower than that of single leaf extracts of the two species. Especially, the effect of the mixed leaf extracts of the two species on the aboveground biomass of G. max seedling was significantly lower than that of single leaf extracts of S. canadensis. Thus, the allelopathic effects of S. canadensis and C. canadensis on the growth of native seedling might play a more important role in their single invasion process than in their co-invasion process.
Key words:Solidago canadensis/
Conyza canadensis/
Glycine max/
allelopathic effects/
seedling growth.

加载中

相关话题/环境 江苏大学 幼苗 科研 基金