删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

Joule【-逻*辑*与-】ndash;Thomson expansion of RN-AdS black hole immersed in perfect fluid dark matter

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-02

Yihe Cao,, Hanwen Feng,, Wei Hong,, Jun Tao,Center for Theoretical Physics, College of Physics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China

First author contact: Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.
Received:2021-04-15Revised:2021-06-11Accepted:2021-07-1Online:2021-08-05


Abstract
In this paper, we study the Joule–Thomson expansion for RN-AdS black holes immersed in perfect fluid dark matter. As perfect fluid dark matter is one of the dark matter candidates, we are interested in how it influences the thermodynamic properties of black holes. Firstly, the negative cosmological constant could be interpreted as thermodynamic pressure and its conjugate quantity as the thermodynamic volume, which give us more physical insights into the black hole. Moreover, we derive the thermodynamic definitions and study the critical behaviour of the black hole. Secondly, the explicit expression of Joule–Thomson coefficient is obtained from the basic formulas of the pressure, the volume, the entropy and the temperature. Then, we obtain the inversion curves in terms of charge Q and parameter λ. Furthermore, we analyse the isenthalpic curve in TP graph with the cooling–heating region determined by the inversion curve. At last, we derive the ratio of minimum inversion temperature to critical temperature and compare the result with that in the RN-AdS case.
Keywords: Joule–Thomson expansion;black hole;perfect fluid dark matter


PDF (588KB)MetadataMetricsRelated articlesExportEndNote|Ris|BibtexFavorite
Cite this article
Yihe Cao, Hanwen Feng, Wei Hong, Jun Tao. Joule–Thomson expansion of RN-AdS black hole immersed in perfect fluid dark matter. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2021, 73(9): 095403- doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ac1066

1. Introduction

Since Bekenstein and Hawking’s first study, black holes as thermodynamic systems have been an interesting research subject in the theory of gravity [15]. The thermodynamic properties of AdS black holes have been studied since the early work of Hawking–Page phase transition [5]. Another notable thing is that the dark energy which corresponds to the cosmological constant is introduced to the first law of black hole thermodynamics. Particularly, the negative cosmological constant can be interpreted as thermodynamic pressure and treated as a thermodynamic variable [6, 7]. And its conjugate quantity can be regarded as volume of black holes once the thermodynamic laws of black hole mechanics were generalised [8]. Based on this idea, the charged AdS black hole thermodynamic properties and plenty of other characteristics were successfully investigated [924].

In the extended phase space (including P and V terms in the black hole thermodynamics), the phase transition of charged AdS black holes is remarkably coincident with van der Waals liquid–gas phase transition [18, 25, 26]. An interesting aspect of van der Waals system is Joule–Thomson expansion, which indicates that the heating and cooling zones emerge through the throttling process. Since the phase structure and the critical behaviour of AdS black holes are similar to van der Waals system, the Joule–Thomson expansion of AdS black holes was firstly investigated by Ökcü and Aydıner [27]. In the extended thermodynamics, one identifies the enthalpy H with the mass of the black hole [8]. Joule–Thomson expansion is characterised by the invariance of enthalpy, so the throttling process is also an isenthalpic process. The slope of the isenthalpic curves equals the Joule–Thomson coefficient μ which determines the final change of temperature in this system. One can use the sign of the Joule–Thomson coefficient to determine the heating and cooling zone. Subsequently, there are many studies on Joule–Thomson expansion in various black holes [2849].

The standard model of cosmology suggests that our universe is compiled of dark matter, dark energy and baryonic matter. And the existence of dark matter and dark energy has been proved by several experiments and observations [50]. There exists a greater velocity scattered of stars in the galactic plane than expected which means that more mass is required and it is thought to be provided by dark matter [51, 52]. Therefore, it is meaningful to consider the black hole solutions surrounded by dark matter or dark energy. As one of the dark matter candidates, the perfect fluid dark matter (PFDM) has been considered in [53, 54]. A new class of solutions of the Einstein equations was presented by applying the perfect fluid relations, and a new logarithmic term was introduced to explain the observed asymptotic behaviour at large distance. While astrophysical observations show that there exists a supermassive black hole surrounded by dark matter halo [55, 56] and many black hole solutions within dark matter have been proposed. Particularly, spherically symmetric black hole solutions surrounded by PFDM have been obtained in [54, 5759]. Plenty of properties about this kind of black holes were discussed in [6071]. We consider the existence of dark matter in the observable universe, and the interesting perfect fluid model helps to study the influence of dark matter on various properties of black holes. Especially, we are interested in the Joule–Thomson expansion of the black hole and curious about the effect of PFDM on it.

This paper is organised as follows. In section 2, we investigate the thermodynamic properties of RN-AdS black holes immersed in PFDM. In section 3, we discuss the Joule–Thomson expansion of this kind of black holes, which includes the Joule–Thomson coefficient, the inversion curves and the isenthalpic curves. Furthermore, we compare the critical temperature with the minimum of inversion temperature, while the influence of the PFDM parameter λ and charge Q on inversion curves is also discussed. Finally, we discuss our results in section 4.

2. RN-AdS black hole immersed in PFDM

The minimum coupling of dark matter field with gravity, electromagnetic field and cosmological constant is described by the action [54, 59, 72]$\begin{eqnarray}S=\int \sqrt{-g}\left({{ \mathcal L }}_{\mathrm{DM}}+\displaystyle \frac{{F}_{\mu \nu }{F}^{\mu \nu }}{4}-\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{\Lambda }}}{8\pi G}+\displaystyle \frac{R}{16\pi G}\right){{\rm{d}}}^{4}x,\end{eqnarray}$where G is the gravitational constant, Λ is the cosmological constant, ${F}_{\mu \nu }$ is the electromagnetic tensor and ${{ \mathcal L }}_{\mathrm{DM}}$ is the Lagrangian which is related to the density of PFDM.

The spacetime metric of static and spherically symmetric RN-AdS black holes immersed in PFDM is defined as [60, 72]$\begin{eqnarray}{{\rm{d}}{s}}^{2}=-f(r){{\rm{d}}{t}}^{2}+f{\left(r\right)}^{-1}{{\rm{d}}{r}}^{2}+{r}^{2}{\rm{d}}{{\rm{\Omega }}}^{2},\end{eqnarray}$where ${\rm{d}}{{\rm{\Omega }}}^{2}={\rm{d}}{\theta }^{2}+{\sin }^{2}\theta {\rm{d}}{\phi }^{2}$ and f(r) is given by$\begin{eqnarray}f(r)=1-\displaystyle \frac{2M}{r}+\displaystyle \frac{{Q}^{2}}{{r}^{2}}-\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{\Lambda }}}{3}{r}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{\lambda }{r}\mathrm{ln}\left(\displaystyle \frac{r}{\left|\lambda \right|}\right),\end{eqnarray}$with Q being the charge of the black hole and λ is related to the dark matter density and pressure. This metric reduces to the RN-AdS black hole when $\lambda =0$. For the given spacetime metric in the case where $\lambda \ne 0$, the stress energy–momentum tensor of the dark matter whose distribution is like anisotropic perfect fluid which reads as$\begin{eqnarray}{T}_{\nu }^{\mu }={\rm{diag}}(-\rho ,{p}_{r},{p}_{\theta },{p}_{\phi }),\end{eqnarray}$where the density, the radial and the tangential pressures are given by [67]$\begin{eqnarray}\rho =-{p}_{r}=\displaystyle \frac{\lambda }{8\pi {r}^{3}},\quad {p}_{\theta }={p}_{\phi }=\displaystyle \frac{\lambda }{16\pi {r}^{3}}.\end{eqnarray}$Note that for a PFDM distribution we shall restrict ourselves to the case $\lambda \gt 0$ which gives positive energy density.

The cosmological constant Λ is often parameterised by the AdS radius l according to$\begin{eqnarray}{\rm{\Lambda }}=-\displaystyle \frac{(d-1)(d-2)}{2{l}^{2}}.\end{eqnarray}$And the negative cosmological constant is related to thermodynamic pressure P$\begin{eqnarray}P=-\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{\Lambda }}}{8\pi }.\end{eqnarray}$The entropy of the black hole at the horizon is given by$\begin{eqnarray}S=\pi {r}_{+}^{2}.\end{eqnarray}$

The event horizon ${r}_{+}$ is the solution of $f({r}_{+})=0$, which indicates the black hole mass M can be expressed in event horizon ${r}_{+}$ as$\begin{eqnarray}M=\displaystyle \frac{{r}_{+}}{2}+\displaystyle \frac{4}{3}\pi {{\Pr }}_{+}^{3}+\displaystyle \frac{{Q}^{2}}{2{r}_{+}}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\lambda \mathrm{ln}\left(\displaystyle \frac{{r}_{+}}{\lambda }\right).\end{eqnarray}$The Hawking temperature $T=f^{\prime} ({r}_{+})/4\pi $, while combining Equations (7) and (9), it can be obtained as$\begin{eqnarray}T=\displaystyle \frac{\lambda }{4\pi {r}_{+}^{2}}+2{{\Pr }}_{+}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{4\pi {r}_{+}}-\displaystyle \frac{{Q}^{2}}{4\pi {r}_{+}^{3}}.\end{eqnarray}$The first law of thermodynamics can be expressed as [72]$\begin{eqnarray}{\rm{d}}{M}={T}{\rm{d}}{S}+{\rm{\Phi }}{\rm{d}}{Q}+{V}{\rm{d}}{P}+{A}{\rm{d}}\lambda ,\end{eqnarray}$where the thermodynamic volume V of the black hole, the electrostatic potential Φ and the conjugate quantity A are given by$\begin{eqnarray}V=\displaystyle \frac{4}{3}\pi {r}_{+}^{3},{\rm{\Phi }}=\displaystyle \frac{Q}{{r}_{+}},A=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\mathrm{ln}\left(\displaystyle \frac{{r}_{+}}{\lambda }\right).\end{eqnarray}$The Hawking temperature T versus event horizon ${r}_{+}$ and entropy S are shown in figure 1 for different values of Q with $\lambda =1$ and P=0.075. The Hawking temperature is zero corresponding to the extreme black hole. When the temperature is positive and Q, P and λ are fixed, the slope the isobar numerically equals to the partial derivative $\partial T/\partial S$, and it determines the sign of specific heat capacity (${C}_{P}\,=T(\partial S/\partial T)$). And figure 1 implies the similarity between this kind of black holes with van der Waals system [14, 21, 42].

Figure 1.

New window|Download| PPT slide
Figure 1.The temperature T of RN-AdS black hole immersed in PFDM versus ${r}_{+}$ and S for different values of Q, where $\lambda =1$ and P=0.075.


Next, we will study the critical behaviour of the black hole. From equation (10), we get the expression of pressure$\begin{eqnarray}P({r}_{+},T)=\displaystyle \frac{T}{2{r}_{+}}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{8\pi {r}_{+}^{2}}+\displaystyle \frac{{Q}^{2}}{8\pi {r}_{+}^{4}}-\displaystyle \frac{\lambda }{8\pi {r}_{+}^{3}}.\end{eqnarray}$At the critical point, we have$\begin{eqnarray}{\left.\displaystyle \frac{\partial P}{\partial {r}_{+}}\right|}_{r={r}_{c}}={\left.\displaystyle \frac{{\partial }^{2}P}{\partial {r}_{+}^{2}}\right|}_{r={r}_{c}}=0,\end{eqnarray}$$\begin{eqnarray}{\left.\displaystyle \frac{\partial T}{\partial {r}_{+}}\right|}_{r={r}_{c}}={\left.\displaystyle \frac{{\partial }^{2}T}{\partial {r}_{+}^{2}}\right|}_{r={r}_{c}}=0,\end{eqnarray}$so the critical point rc is obtained as$\begin{eqnarray}{r}_{c}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{9{\lambda }^{2}+24{Q}^{2}}-\displaystyle \frac{3\lambda }{2}.\end{eqnarray}$When the PFDM parameter $\lambda =0$, the critical radius reduces to ${r}_{c}=\sqrt{6}Q$ which is the same with that of RN-AdS black holes [18]. By using the equations (10), (13) and (16), we can determine the critical temperature Tc and critical pressure Pc,$\begin{eqnarray}{T}_{c}=\displaystyle \frac{16{Q}^{2}-3\lambda \left(\sqrt{9{\lambda }^{2}+24{Q}^{2}}-3\lambda \right)}{\pi {\left(\sqrt{9{\lambda }^{2}+24{Q}^{2}}-3\lambda \right)}^{3}},\end{eqnarray}$$\begin{eqnarray}{P}_{c}=\displaystyle \frac{\lambda \left(3\lambda -\sqrt{9{\lambda }^{2}+24{Q}^{2}}\right)+6{Q}^{2}}{\pi {\left(\sqrt{9{\lambda }^{2}+24{Q}^{2}}-3\lambda \right)}^{4}}.\end{eqnarray}$The critical temperature and critical pressure of RN-AdS black hole are ${T}_{c}=\sqrt{6}/18\pi Q$, ${P}_{c}=1/96\pi {Q}^{2}$ [18], which is consistent with equations (17) and (18) when $\lambda =0$. The critical variables depend on the charge Q and the parameter λ. Here we focus on the critical temperature because it will be useful to analyse the Joule–Thomson expansion of the black hole in the next section. One can plot the critical point rc and the critical temperature Tc with varying Q and λ in figure 2. The critical temperature decreases while the charge Q increases. If the temperature is less than the critical temperature Tc, the black hole can undergo a first-order phase transition between the small black hole and the large black hole, which is similar to the van der Waals fluids. Furthermore, one can go back to the RN-AdS case as in [27] by taking the limit $\lambda \to 0$. When the charge Q is fixed, the critical radius decreases with the increase of PFDM factor λ, and the critical temperature rises with the increase of parameter λ. Thus, the influence of PFDM on the critical behaviour of RN-AdS black holes is obvious.

Figure 2.

New window|Download| PPT slide
Figure 2.Critical radius rc and critical temperature Tc versus Q of RN-AdS black hole immersed in PFDM.


We derive the thermodynamic definitions of RN-AdS black holes immersed in PFDM, and we study the critical behaviour of the black hole. In the next section, we investigate the Joule–Thomson expansion of RN-AdS black holes immersed in PFDM.

3. Joule–Thomson expansion

The instability of the black holes appears in the process of the Joule–Thomson expansion. And we introduce Joule–Thomson coefficient μ to determines the cooling and heating phases of the isenthalpic expansion.

The specific heat at constant pressure for the black holes is obtained by$\begin{eqnarray}{C}_{P}=T{\left(\displaystyle \frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)}_{P,Q,\lambda }.\end{eqnarray}$Regarding parameters $Q,P,\lambda $ as constant and substituting the equations (12) and (10) into (19), we have the isobaric heat capacity of this black hole$\begin{eqnarray}{C}_{P}=\displaystyle \frac{2\pi {r}_{+}^{2}\left[{r}_{+}\left(\lambda +8\pi {{\Pr }}_{+}^{3}+{r}_{+}\right)-{Q}^{2}\right]}{{r}_{+}\left(-2\lambda +8\pi {{\Pr }}_{+}^{3}-{r}_{+}\right)+3{Q}^{2}}.\end{eqnarray}$For the Joule–Thomson expansion of the van der Waals fluids, the fluids pass through a porous plug from one side to the other with pressure declining during the throttling process. Therefore, we apply this corresponding concept to black hole thermodynamics and the enthalpy M of the black hole keeps constant throughout this process. Besides, the partial differential of temperature versus pressure of the black hole is defined as Joule–Thomson coefficient μ,$\begin{eqnarray}\mu ={\left(\displaystyle \frac{\partial T}{\partial P}\right)}_{M}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{{C}_{P}}\left[T{\left(\displaystyle \frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\right)}_{P}-V\right].\end{eqnarray}$By substituting equations (10), (20) and (12) into (21), we obtain$\begin{eqnarray}\mu =\displaystyle \frac{2{r}_{+}\left[{r}_{+}\left(5\lambda +16\pi {{\Pr }}_{+}^{3}+4{r}_{+}\right)-6{Q}^{2}\right]}{3\left[{r}_{+}\left(\lambda +8\pi {{\Pr }}_{+}^{3}+{r}_{+}\right)-{Q}^{2}\right]}.\end{eqnarray}$

The Joule–Thomson coefficient μ versus the horizon ${r}_{+}$ is shown in figure 3 where the parameter $\lambda =0,0.5,1$ and 2, pressure P=0.075 and charges Q=0.7. There exists a divergence point and a zero point at different values of λ and the influence of PFDM on the Joule–Thomson coefficient is apparent. The divergence point here reveals the information of Hawking temperature and corresponds to the extremal black hole, and it is clear that the divergence point of the blue curve in figure 3 is consistent with the zero points of Hawking temperature in figure 1 in the case of Q=0.7.

Figure 3.

New window|Download| PPT slide
Figure 3.Joule–Thomson coefficient μ of RN-AdS black hole immersed in PDFM for Q=0.7, P=0.075 and $\lambda =0, 0.5, 1$ and 2.


Therefore, we are only interested in the right part of figure 3 where the temperature is above zero. Besides, the Joule–Thomson coefficient of RN-AdS black hole immersed in PFDM can be both positive and negative, which means that there remain both cooling and heating stages. For $\mu \gt 0$, the temperature of the black hole decreases, in other words the black hole is cooling down when the pressure goes down in the process of throttling. On the contrary, $\mu \lt 0$ means that the black hole heats up after the throttling process. So there are inversion points at which the cooling–heating transition occurs when $\mu =0$ and the temperature of the black hole at $\mu =0$ is called the inversion temperature.

One can obtain the inversion temperature ${T}_{i}=V\tfrac{\partial T}{\partial V}$ by $\mu =0$. While using the equations (12) and (10), inversion temperature Ti in terms of inversion pressure Pi is expressed as$\begin{eqnarray}{T}_{i}=V{\left(\displaystyle \frac{\partial T}{\partial V}\right)}_{P}=\displaystyle \frac{2{P}_{i}{r}_{+}}{3}+\displaystyle \frac{{Q}^{2}}{4\pi {r}_{+}^{3}}-\displaystyle \frac{\lambda }{6\pi {r}_{+}^{2}}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{12\pi {r}_{+}}.\end{eqnarray}$Bringing this equation into equation (13) at $P={P}_{i}$, we derive$\begin{eqnarray}{P}_{i}=\displaystyle \frac{3{Q}^{2}}{8\pi {r}_{+}^{4}}-\displaystyle \frac{5\lambda }{16\pi {r}_{+}^{3}}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{4\pi {r}_{+}^{2}},\end{eqnarray}$$\begin{eqnarray}{T}_{i}=\displaystyle \frac{{Q}^{2}}{2\pi {r}_{+}^{3}}-\displaystyle \frac{3\lambda }{8\pi {r}_{+}^{2}}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{12\pi {r}_{+}^{2}}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{6\pi {r}_{+}}.\end{eqnarray}$

From the above results, the inversion curves TiPi in figure 4 with different Q and λ are plotted, which are similar to the case of charged RN-AdS black holes [27]. At low pressure, the inversion temperature Ti decreases with the increase of charge Q and increases with the increase of λ. This phenomenon is just the opposite of high-pressure situation. In addition, there are some numerical effects of PFDM on the inversion temperature when other thermal quantities remain unchanged. We find the density of PFDM and the charge have the opposite effect on the inversion curves. It can be observed that the inversion temperature still increases monotonically with the growth of inversion pressure like RN-AdS black holes. Meanwhile, the inversion curves are not closed which differs from the van der Waals fluids. When the inversion pressure equals zero, the inversion temperature reaches a minimum value. And the minimun inversion temperature increases with the charge Q and decreases with the PFDM factor λ.

Figure 4.

New window|Download| PPT slide
Figure 4.Inversion curves of RN-AdS black hole immersed in PFDM.


The Joule–Thomson expansion occurs in the isenthalpic process. And for a black hole, enthalpy is mass M. The isenthalpic curves can be obtained from equations (9) and (13) in figure 5 where inversion curves and isenthalpic curves are both presented.

Figure 5.

New window|Download| PPT slide
Figure 5.The isenthalpic curves of RN-AdS black hole immersed in PFDM. From bottom to top, the isenthalpic curves correspond to increasing values of M.


The intersections of the black inversion curves and the blue isenthalpic curves coincide with the extreme points of isenthalpic curves. And the isenthalpic curves have positive slopes above the inversion curves indicating that cooling occurs. And the isenthalpic curves have negative slopes under the inversion curves indicating that the heating occurs. We can conclude that the region above this inversion curve is the cooling zone while the one below is the heating zone. The temperature rises when the pressure goes down in the heating zone. In contrast, the temperature is lower with reducing pressure in the cooling zone. Moreover, comparing the four graphs, the temperature and pressure decrease with larger charge Q or smaller λ, and PFDM statistically have an influences the isenthalpic curves.

Furthermore, one can obtain the minimum inversion temperature ${T}_{i}^{\min }$ corresponding to Pi=0 as$\begin{eqnarray}{T}_{i}^{\min }=\displaystyle \frac{4\left[\lambda \left(5\lambda -\sqrt{25{\lambda }^{2}+96{Q}^{2}}\right)+16{Q}^{2}\right]}{\pi {\left(\sqrt{25{\lambda }^{2}+96{Q}^{2}}-5\lambda \right)}^{3}}.\end{eqnarray}$The ratio of inversion temperature to critical temperature ${T}_{i}^{\min }/{T}_{c}$ is obtained according to equations (26) and (17)$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{{T}_{i}^{\min }}{{T}_{c}}\\ =\displaystyle \frac{4{\left(\sqrt{9{\lambda }^{2}+24{Q}^{2}}-3\lambda \right)}^{3}\left[\lambda \left(5\lambda -\sqrt{25{\lambda }^{2}+96{Q}^{2}}\right)+16{Q}^{2}\right]}{{\left(\sqrt{25{\lambda }^{2}+96{Q}^{2}}-5\lambda \right)}^{3}\left[16{Q}^{2}-3\lambda \left(\sqrt{9{\lambda }^{2}+24{Q}^{2}}-3\lambda \right)\right]}.\end{array}\,\end{eqnarray}$It has been shown in [27] that the ratio for the RN-AdS black holes equals 1/2, but in the case of PFDM, this value should be corrected. The ratio grows with increasing $Q/\lambda $, and the ratio versus $Q/\lambda $ is shown in figure 6. When $Q/\lambda \to 0$, in other words, $Q\to 0$ or $\lambda \to \infty $, the ratio has a leading term which is 25/54$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \frac{{T}_{i}^{\min }}{{T}_{c}}=\displaystyle \frac{25}{54}+\displaystyle \frac{4{Q}^{2}}{27{\lambda }^{2}}+O\left[{\left(Q/\lambda \right)}^{4}\right].\end{eqnarray}$For $Q/\lambda \to \infty $, the ratio approaches 1/2$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \frac{{T}_{i}^{\min }}{{T}_{c}}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}-\displaystyle \frac{{\lambda }^{2}}{128{Q}^{2}}+O\left[{(\lambda /Q)}^{3}\right].\end{eqnarray}$

Figure 6.

New window|Download| PPT slide
Figure 6.The ratio ${T}_{i}^{\min }/{T}_{c}$ of RN-AdS black hole immersed in PFDM.


Furthermore, by taking the limit $\lambda \to 0$, the ratio is approaching 1/2 corresponding to the RN-AdS case [27].

4. Conclusion

In this paper, we discuss the Joule–Thomson expansion for RN-AdS black holes immersed in PFDM. In the extended phase space, the cosmological constant is identified with the pressure and its conjugate quantity is the thermodynamic volume. Since the black hole mass is interpreted as enthalpy, an isenthalpic process can be applied to investigate the heating and cooling region of this system accoding to the Joule–Thomson expansion. By analysing the Joule–Thomson coefficient μ, we find the divergent point of μ coincides with the point where Hawking temperature is zero which corresponds to the extremal black hole case. Moreover, we plot the inversion curves and the corresponding isenthalpic curves in the TP plane with different λ and Q. From the results mentioned above, we can conclude how the PFDM parameter λ affects the thermodynamic quantities, Joule–Thomson coefficient and the inversion temperature. In addition, one can easily go back to the RN-AdS case by taking the limit $\lambda \to 0$. We also discuss the isenthalpic curves with different values of M during the throttling process.

Furthermore, we derive the ratio of minimum inversion temperature to critical temperature and the inversion curves in terms of charge Q and parameter λ. It has been shown in [27] that the ratio for the RN-AdS black holes is equal to 1/2, while in the case of PFDM, the ratio depends on both charge Q and parameter λ. In our study, the ratio of ${T}_{i}^{\min }/{T}_{c}$ is rewritten in terms of $Q/\lambda $. In figure 6, the ratio is about 25/54 for small $Q/\lambda $, and the ratio approaches 1/2 for enormous $Q/\lambda $, which is the same with that of RN-AdS black holes.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to thank Shihao Bi and Feiyu Yao for useful discussions. This work is supported by NSFC (Grant No. 11947408 and 11875196).


Reference By original order
By published year
By cited within times
By Impact factor

Hawking S W 1974 Black hole explosions
Nature 248 30 31

DOI:10.1038/248030a0 [Cited within: 1]

Bardeen J M Carter B Hawking S W 1973 The Four laws of black hole mechanics
Commun. Math. Phys. 31 161 170

DOI:10.1007/BF01645742

Hawking S W 1975 Particle creation by black holes
Commun. Math. Phys. 43 199 220

DOI:10.1007/BF02345020

Bekenstein J D 1974 Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics
Phys. Rev. D 9 3292 3300

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3292

Hawking S W Page D N 1983 Thermodynamics of black holes in anti-de Sitter space
Commun. Math. Phys. 87 577

DOI:10.1007/BF01208266 [Cited within: 2]

Caldarelli M M Cognola G Klemm D 2000 Thermodynamics of Kerr–Newman–AdS black holes and conformal field theories
Class. Quantum Grav. 17 399 420

DOI:10.1088/0264-9381/17/2/310 [Cited within: 1]

Padmanabhan T 2002 Classical and quantum thermodynamics of horizons in spherically symmetric space-times
Class. Quantum Grav. 19 5387 5408

DOI:10.1088/0264-9381/19/21/306 [Cited within: 1]

Kastor D Ray S Traschen J 2009 Enthalpy and the mechanics of ads black holes
Class. Quantum Grav. 26 195011

DOI:10.1088/0264-9381/26/19/195011 [Cited within: 2]

Kubiznak D Mann R B Teo M 2017 Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda
Class. Quantum Grav. 34 063001

DOI:10.1088/1361-6382/aa5c69 [Cited within: 1]

Cai R G 2002 Gauss–Bonnet black holes in AdS spaces
Phys. Rev. D 65 084014

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.084014

Zou D C Zhang S J Wang B 2014 Critical behavior of Born–Infeld AdS black holes in the extended phase space thermodynamics
Phys. Rev. D 89 044002

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.044002

Hendi S H Mann R B Panahiyan S Eslam Panah B 2017 Van der Waals like behavior of topological AdS black holes in massive gravity
Phys. Rev. D 95 021501

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.021501

Altamirano N Kubiznak D Mann R B Sherkatghanad Z 2014 Thermodynamics of rotating black holes and black rings: phase transitions and thermodynamic volume
Galaxies 2 89 159

DOI:10.3390/galaxies2010089

Niu C Tian Y Wu X N 2012 Critical phenomena and thermodynamic geometry of RN-AdS black holes
Phys. Rev. D 85 024017

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.024017 [Cited within: 1]

Myung Y S Kim Y W Park Y J 2008 Thermodynamics and phase transitions in the Born–Infeld–anti-de Sitter black holes
Phys. Rev. D 78 084002

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.084002

Hendi S H Eslam Panah B Panahiyan S 2015 Einstein–Born–Infeld-massive gravity: AdS-black hole solutions and their thermodynamical properties
J. High Energy Phys.JHEP11(2015)157

DOI:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)157

Saurabh K Jusufi K 2021 Eur. Phys. J. C 81 490
DOI:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09280-9

Kubiznak D Mann R B 2012 P–V criticality of charged AdS black holes
J. High Energy Phys.JHEP07(2012)033

DOI:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)033 [Cited within: 3]

Cai R G Cao L M Li L Yang R Q 2013 P–V criticality in the extended phase space of Gauss–Bonnet black holes in AdS space
J. High Energy Phys.JHEP09(2013)005

DOI:10.1007/JHEP09(2013)005

Hendi S H Vahidinia M H 2013 Extended phase space thermodynamics and P–V criticality of black holes with a nonlinear source
Phys. Rev. D 88 084045

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.084045

Wang P Wu H Yang H 2019 Thermodynamics and phase transitions of nonlinear electrodynamics black holes in an extended phase space
J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.JCAP04(2019)052

DOI:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/052 [Cited within: 1]

Toth G Z 2012 Test of the weak cosmic censorship conjecture with a charged scalar field and dyonic Kerr–Newman black holes
Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 44 2019 2035

DOI:10.1007/s10714-012-1374-z

Crisford T Santos J E 2017 Violating the weak cosmic censorship conjecture in four-dimensional anti-de sitter space
Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 181101

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.181101

Liang J Guo X Chen D Mu B 2021 Remarks on the weak cosmic censorship conjecture of RN-AdS black holes with cloud of strings and quintessence under the scalar field
Nucl. Phys. B 965 115335

DOI:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2021.115335 [Cited within: 1]

Chamblin A Emparan R Johnson C V Myers R C 1999 Charged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography
Phys. Rev. D 60 064018

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.064018 [Cited within: 1]

Chamblin A Emparan R Johnson C V Myers R C 1999 Holography, thermodynamics and fluctuations of charged AdS black holes
Phys. Rev. D 60 104026

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.064018 [Cited within: 1]

Ökcü Ö Aydıner E 2017 Joule–Thomson expansion of the charged AdS black holes
Eur. Phys. J. C 77 24

DOI:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4598-y [Cited within: 6]

Bi S Du M Tao J Yao F 2021 Joule–Thomson expansion of Born–Infeld AdS black holes
Chin. Phys. C 45 025109

DOI:10.1088/1674-1137/abcf23 [Cited within: 1]

Guo S Han Y Li G P 2020 Joule–Thomson expansion of a specific black hole in f(R) gravity coupled with Yang–Mills field
Class. Quantum Grav. 37 085016

DOI:10.1088/1361-6382/ab77ec

Huang Y L Guo SThermodynamic of the charged accelerating AdS black hole: P–V critical and Joule–Thomson expansion
arXiv:2009.09401 [hep-th]



Hegde K Kumara A N Rizwan C L A Ajith K M Ali M S 2003 Thermodynamics, phase transition and Joule Thomson expansion of novel 4-D Gauss Bonnet AdS black hole
arXiv:2003.08778 [gr-qc]



Rajani K V Rizwan C L A Kumara A N Ali M S Vaid D 2021 Joule–Thomson expansion of regular Bardeen AdS black hole surrounded by static anisotropic matter field
Phys. Dark Univ. 32 100825

DOI:10.1016/j.dark.2021.100825

Rostami M Sadeghi J Miraboutalebi S Masoudi A A Pourhassan B 2020 Charged accelerating AdS black hole of f(R) gravity and the Joule–Thomson expansion
Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 17 2050136

DOI:10.1142/S0219887820501364

Nam C H 2021 Heat engine efficiency and Joule–Thomson expansion of nonlinear charged AdS black hole in massive gravity
Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 53 30

DOI:10.1007/s10714-021-02787-2

Mahdavian Yekta D Hadikhani A Ökcü Ö 2019 Joule–Thomson expansion of charged AdS black holes in rainbow gravity
Phys. Lett. B 795 521 527

DOI:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.06.049

Lan S Q 2018 Joule–Thomson expansion of charged Gauss–Bonnet black holes in AdS space
Phys. Rev. D 98 084014

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.084014

Ghaffarnejad H Yaraie E Farsam M 2018 Quintessence Reissner Nordström Anti de Sitter black holes and Joule Thomson effect
Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 1671 1682

DOI:10.1007/s10773-018-3693-7

Pu J Guo S Jiang Q Q Zu X T 2020 Joule–Thomson expansion of the regular(Bardeen)-AdS black hole
Chin. Phys. C 44 035102

DOI:10.1088/1674-1137/44/3/035102

Mo J X Li G Q 2020 Effects of Lovelock gravity on the Joule–Thomson expansion
Class. Quantum Grav. 37 045009

DOI:10.1088/1361-6382/ab60b9

Cisterna A Hu S Q Kuang X M 2019 Joule–Thomson expansion in AdS black holes with momentum relaxation
Phys. Lett. B 797 134883

DOI:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134883

Li C He P Li P Deng J B 2020 Joule–Thomson expansion of the Bardeen-AdS black holes
Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 52 50

DOI:10.1007/s10714-020-02704-z

Rizwan C L A Kumara A N Vaid D Ajith K M 2019 Joule–Thomson expansion in AdS black hole with a global monopole
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 1850210

DOI:10.1142/S0217751X1850210X [Cited within: 1]

Chabab M El Moumni H Iraoui S Masmar K Zhizeh S 2018 Joule–Thomson expansion of RN-AdS Black Holes in f(R) gravity
Lett. High Energy Phys. 02 05

DOI:10.31526/LHEP.2.2018.02

Mo J X Li G Q Lan S Q Xu X B 2018 Joule–Thomson expansion of d-dimensional charged AdS black holes
Phys. Rev. D 98 124032

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.124032

Ökcü Ö Aydıner E 2018 Joule–Thomson expansion of Kerr–AdS black holes
Eur. Phys. J. C 78 123

DOI:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5602-x

Haldar A Biswas R 2018 Joule–Thomson expansion of five-dimensional Einstein–Maxwell–Gauss–Bonnet–AdS black holes
Europhys. Lett. 123 40005

DOI:10.1209/0295-5075/123/40005

Feng Z W Zhou X He G Zhou S Q Yang S Z 2021 Joule–Thomson expansion of higher dimensional nonlinearly AdS black hole with power Maxwell invariant source
Commun. Theor. Phys. 73 065401

DOI:10.1088/1572-9494/abecd9

Nam C H 2020 Effect of massive gravity on Joule–Thomson expansion of the charged AdS black hole
Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135 259

DOI:10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00274-2

Meng Y Pu J Jiang Q Q 2020 P–V criticality and Joule–Thomson expansion of charged AdS black holes in the Rastall gravity
Chin. Phys. C 44 065105

DOI:10.1088/1674-1137/44/6/065105 [Cited within: 1]

Ade P A R et al.(Planck) 2016 Planck 2015 results: XIII. Cosmological parameters
Astron. Astrophys. 594 A13

DOI:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 [Cited within: 1]

Das S Sarkar N Mondal M Rahaman F 2020 A new model for dark matter fluid sphere
Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35 2050280

DOI:10.1142/S0217732320502806 [Cited within: 1]

De Risi G Harko T Lobo F S N 2012 Solar system constraints on local dark matter density
J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.JCAP07(2012)047

DOI:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/047 [Cited within: 1]

Rahaman F Nandi K K Bhadra A Kalam M Chakraborty K 2011 Perfect fluid dark matter
Phys. Lett. B 694 10 15

DOI:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.09.038 [Cited within: 1]

Kiselev V VQuintessential solution of dark matter rotation curves and its simulation by extra dimensions
arXiv:gr-qc/0303031 [gr-qc]

[Cited within: 3]

Akiyama K et al.(Event Horizon Telescope) 2019 First M87 event horizon telescope results: I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole
Astrophys. J. 875 L1

DOI:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 [Cited within: 1]

Akiyama K et al.(Event Horizon Telescope) 2019 First M87 event horizon telescope results: VI. The shadow and mass of the central black hole
Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 L6

DOI:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141 [Cited within: 1]

Kiselev V V 2005 Vector field and rotational curves in dark galactic halos
Class. Quantum Grav. 22 541 558

DOI:10.1088/0264-9381/22/3/007 [Cited within: 1]

Kiselev V V 2004 Vector field as a quintessence partner
Class. Quantum Grav. 21 3323 3336

DOI:10.1088/0264-9381/21/13/014

Li M H Yang K C 2012 Galactic dark matter in the phantom field
Phys. Rev. D 86 123015

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.123015 [Cited within: 2]

Shaymatov S Ahmedov B Jamil M 2021 Testing the weak cosmic censorship conjecture for a Reissner–Nordström–de Sitter black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter
Eur. Phys. J. C 81 588

DOI:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09398-w [Cited within: 2]

Das A Saha A Gangopadhyay S 2021 Investigation of circular geodesics in a rotating charged black hole in the presence of perfect fluid dark matter
Class. Quantum Grav. 38 065015

DOI:10.1088/1361-6382/abd95b

Ma T C Zhang H X Zhang H R Chen Y Deng J B 2021 Shadow cast by a rotating and nonlinear magnetic-charged black hole in perfect fluid dark matter
Mod. Phys. Lett. A 36 2150112

DOI:10.1142/S0217732321501121

Narzilloev B Rayimbaev J Shaymatov S Abdujabbarov A Ahmedov B Bambi C 2020 Dynamics of test particles around a Bardeen black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter
Phys. Rev. D 102 104062

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.104062

Hou X Xu Z Wang J 2018 Rotating black hole shadow in perfect fluid dark matter
J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.JCAP12(2018)040

DOI:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/12/040

Sadeghi J Pourhassan B Noori Gashti S Upadhyay S Mezerji E NStudying new universal relations in the black holes thermodynamics
arXiv:2011.14366 [physics.gen-ph]



Zhang H X Chen Y Ma T C He P Z Deng J B 2021 Bardeen black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter
Chin. Phys. C 45 055103

DOI:10.1088/1674-1137/abe84c

Shaymatov S Malafarina D Ahmedov B 2004 Effect of perfect fluid dark matter on particle motion around a static black hole immersed in an external magnetic field
arXiv:2004.06811 [gr-qc]

[Cited within: 1]

Hendi S H Nemati A Lin K Jamil M 2020 Instability and phase transitions of a rotating black hole in the presence of perfect fluid dark matter
Eur. Phys. J. C 80 296

DOI:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7829-6

Rizwan M Jamil M Jusufi K 2019 Distinguishing a Kerr-like black hole and a naked singularity in perfect fluid dark matter via precession frequencies
Phys. Rev. D 99 024050

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.024050

Haroon S Jamil M Jusufi K Lin K Mann R B 2019 Shadow and deflection angle of rotating black holes in perfect fluid dark matter with a cosmological constant
Phys. Rev. D 99 044015

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.044015

Xu Z Wang J Hou X 2018 Kerr–anti-de Sitter/de Sitter black hole in perfect fluid dark matter background
Class. Quantum Grav. 35 115003

DOI:10.1088/1361-6382/aabcb6 [Cited within: 1]

Xu Z Hou X Wang J Liao Y 2019 Perfect fluid dark matter influence on thermodynamics and phase transition for a Reissner–Nordstrom–anti-de Sitter black hole
Adv. High Energy Phys. 2019 2434390

DOI:10.1155/2019/2434390 [Cited within: 3]

相关话题/JoulendashThomson expansion black