删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

Tail wavelets in merger of binary compact objects

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

Kai Lin 1,2,
, Wei-Liang Qian 2,3,4,
, Xilong Fan 5,
, Hongsheng Zhang 6,7,,
,
Corresponding author: Hongsheng Zhang, sps_zhanghs@ujn.edu.cn, Corresponding author
1.Institute of Geophysics and Geoinformatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
2.Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de S?o Paulo, 12602-810, Lorena, SP, Brazil
3.Faculdade de Engenharia de Guaratinguetá, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 12516-410, Guaratinguetá, SP, Brazil
4.School of Physical Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, China
5.School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
6.School of Physics and Technology, University of Jinan, 336 West Road of Nan Xinzhuang, Jinan 250022, China
7.State Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Received Date:2020-01-17
Available Online:2020-07-01
Abstract:We present a model for tail wavelets, a phenomenon known as “echo” in the literature. The tail wavelet may appear in signal reconnaissances in the merger of binary compact objects, including black holes and neutron stars. We show that the dark matter surrounding the compact objects lead to a speculated tail wavelet following the main gravitational wave (GW). We demonstrate that the radiation pressure of the main wave is fully capable of pushing away the surrounding matter to some altitude, and splashing down of the matter excites the tail wavelet after ringing down of the main wave. We illustrate this concept in a simplified model, where numerical estimations are conducted on the specific distribution of dark matter outside the black hole horizon and the threshold values in accordance with observations. We study the full back reaction of the surrounding dark matter to the metric and find that the effect on to the tail wavelets is insignificant. We reveal the fine difference between the tail wavelets of a dressed and a bare black hole. We demonstrate that the tail wavelet can appear as a natural phenomenon in the frame of general relativity, without invoking modified gravities or quantum effects.

HTML

--> --> -->
1.Introduction
The observation of gravitational waves (GWs) from binary compact objects symbolizes the beginning of an era of GW astronomy as a branch of observational astronomy with considerable precision. In terms of fundamental physics, we finally have the experimental observables at our disposal for testing whether a quantum theory of gravity is plausible. The GW is an incisive tool for the study of the structure of the black holes and other compact objects. In particular, it may unwrap the enigma about the quantum structure of the spacetime beyond the horizon. With regard to the quantum effects, it is believed that the spacetime is no longer a smooth manifold; it may possess a specific non-trivial structure when the quantum fluctuations become significant [1]. In fact, a structure of the black hole horizon was suggested to solve the black hole information problem, for example, in terms of the fuzzball model [2] and the firewall model [3, 4]. Such a speculated structure may be detected by the GWs emitted from binary black holes [5].
In these models, the horizon is not a smooth sphere, but a shell with a finite thickness. Consequently, tail wavelets referred to as "echoes" may appear after emission of the main GWs [6-9]. The waveform of the echo model suggested in [6] may be ruled out by analysis in [10, 11]. However, the tail wavelet may assume a different form compared with Ref. [6]. This problem can be dealt with from an opposite direction, that is, to find what happens if there is absolutely no signal in the data after the main wave [10, 11]. A detailed analysis in Ref. [12] demonstrates that signals appear for several GW events with a p-value of order 1% or occasionally significantly less. Further approaches for the signal reconnaissance of tail wavelets are presented in Ref. [13]. In this context, observation of the tail wavelets in GW events of the binary neutron stars, besides those of binary black holes, is surprising. While explanations are given in terms of the resulting black hole remnant [14], the observed events also imply the possibility that the tail wavelet may be related to specific generic properties of the binary system rather than the near-horizon quantum structure [15]. In fact, it is quite challenging to interpret the appearance of tail wavelets in terms of the properties of the horizon if the latter does not exist in the first place.
Following this train of thought, we proceed by discussing some of the generic properties of compact objects, which might potentially give rise to tail wavelets. Generally, a black hole/neutron star is surrounded by dark matter, whose density is significantly higher than that of the average value in the universe. We show later that dark matter distributed in the vicinity of the compact object can provide a mechanism for the observed tail wavelets. Further quantitative studies of the wavelets may be helpful to extract the distribution of dark matter around the compact objects. Extensive studies were conducted on the distribution of dark matter around celestial bodies. Some pioneering studies [16, 17] explored specific properties of the dark matter distribution in the halos of various mass scales. A remarkable feature of the distribution of the dark matter is its universality. Halos of different scales, namely, from the mass of the celestial body to that of a cluster of galaxies, all exhibit similar distributions [18, 19]. The density profile of supermassive black holes in elliptical galaxies and barred/ordinary spiral galaxies, such as our Milky Way, is studied quantitatively [20, 21]. For the stellar mass black holes, direct observation of the dark matter halo is still absent. The distribution of dark matter around neutron stars, whose space environment is very similar to stellar mass black holes, was studied in detail [2224]. Regarding the universal distribution of dark matter halos, it is reasonable that binary compact stars/black holes are immersed within them.
Our proposed scenario is described as follows. The passage of the main GWs from the binary system merger pushes up the dark matter to a certain altitude. After the initial waves traverse through, the matter falls back towards the black hole region and subsequently produces the tail wavelets. The relevant physical quantities include the energy density, pressure, energy flux of the GWs. For linear plane GWs with frequency $ \omega $ and amplitude $ A $, the energy density $ \rho $ is found to be [1] $ \rho = \dfrac{\omega^2}{32\pi}(A_{+}^2+A_{\times}^2) $, while the energy flux $ b $ in the direction of propagation reads $ b = \dfrac{\omega^2}{32\pi}(A_{+}^2+A_{\times}^2). $ The above expressions are the same with the Landau-Lifshitz pseudo-tensor for GWs.
In a general case, the stress-energy tensor for the GWs can be defined as a second order perturbation of the Einstein tensor. The general definition of GWs in the strong field region leads to some uncertainties, which depend on the specific choice of the background for the GWs in question. For example, the obtained waves exhibit different forms when the metric about a Minkowski spacetime is expanded as compared to about a Schwarzschild spacetime. Nonetheless, the relation between power per area $ S = b $ and the pressure $ P $ satisfies
$ P = S/c, $
(1)
for massless fluctuations (gravitons). Here, we recover the luminous velocity $ c $. Notably, Eq. (1) is valid for GWs in a general sense, independent of the background metric. The total energy radiated from a binary object can be calculated, enabling determination of the corresponding pressure. In what follows, we estimate the order of magnitude of the pressure by considering the GW150914 event as an example. The system emits an amount of energy equivalent to three solar masses in about 0.1 seconds. The GW emission is "directional". However, its directivity is significantly weaker than electromagnetic radiation, as the lowest order radiation is of the quadrupole. Thus, if the GWs’ directivity is omitted, the emission can be approximated as isotropic, and the pressure of GW at the horizon is estimated by
$ P = \frac{w}{4\pi r_h^2 c}\sim \frac{3\times 10^{49}}{4\pi (62\times 3\times 10^3)^2\times 3\times 10^8} = 2.3\times 10^{29} {\rm {Pa}}. $
(2)
With regard to the comparisons, the pressure at the center of a neutron star can reach 1033 to 1034Pa. Thus, the estimated value of the GW pressure is found to be comparable to those of the interior of stellar systems.
At the region near the horizon, the Newton gravity fails. We only make an assumption to determine which force, i.e., pressure or attraction, dominates for an object around the black hole. Considering an object whose mass is 1 kg and area is 1 $ {\rm m}^2 $, for GW150914, it is attracted by the black hole with force at the horizon $ F = G\dfrac{m_1m_2}{r^2} = 2\times 10^{11}N $. At same time, the pressure it senses is $ F' = 2.3\times 10^{29}N $ when the main wave passes. The repulsive force is clearly significantly larger than the attractive force for this object. Both the repulsive and attractive force decrease with $ r^{-2} $. Thus, at large distances, the ratio between the repulsive and attractive force is exactly $ F'/F $, if the wave is completely absorbed by the object.
Furthermore, we assume that the surrounding matter can only absorb a tiny fraction of GW. A rigorous treatment of the scattering between the graviton and matter demands a full-fledged theory of quantum gravity, which remains unknown. Tree level calculations may also be affected by loop corrections. Nevertheless, some preliminary studies on the scattering of gravitons have been carried out, for example in studies of Refs. [25, 26]. By very generic arguments, similar to those for earlier approaches of quantum physics, one can estimate the lower bound of total cross-section of a graviton scattered by a matter particle $ \sigma\sim 10^{-68} {\rm m}^2 $ [27]. According to known GW events, a typical event emits energy of several solar masses, and the characteristic frequency of the GW is about 100 Hz. Thus, for a typical GW event, the number of gravitons is approximately $ N\; \sim\dfrac{3\times M_{\bigodot}c^2}{h \nu} = $ $10^{79} $. We estimate the number of collisions of a graviton. The graviton-dark matter system is significantly different from an ordinary molecular system in thermal equilibrium. The graviton does not walk randomly, but almost in a straight line, as it only losses a tiny portion of its momentum with every collision. Thus, the number of collisions is simplified to the number of dark matter particles in such a cylinder, whose bottom is a disk with a radius of the half-wavelength of the graviton, and the height is the thickness of the dark matter in consideration. An unavoidable problem of further calculations is that the mass of the dark matter particles is unknown. It may be from several TeV to even 10?20eV. We take 100 GeV as an example. Further, we assume the mass of the surrounded dark matter is $ 0.3M_{\odot} $. As we point out in the following section, this is sufficient to excite the tail wavelet. For more detailed numerical calculations, we assume that the thickness of the dark matter is 105 km, and that it distributes homogeneously. With these assumptions, we obtain an upper bound for the number of collisions of a single graviton is $ 7\times 10^{53} $, in which we assume that the graviton interacts with every particle in the travelling cylinder. The lower bound is $ 10^{17} $, where we assume that the graviton collides with only one particle in one step. The total scattering cross-section between gravitational radiations and dark matter is therefore, 1028 to 1064 m2. In comparison, the total scattering section of the radiation emitted by the sun in 0.1 seconds is 1016 m2. The radiation pressure in the interior of the Sun is about 10?3 of the total pressure. The momentum per solar photon is $ 5\times 10^{12} $ times the momentum per graviton. This is equivalent to stating that we need a cross-section of gravitons of 1031 m2 to support the mass of the sun. We estimated the total cross section to be about 1028 to 1064 m2. An accurate value requires details of the interaction between graviton and dark matter particles, which remains unknown. Nevertheless, it is highly possible that the gravitons can push away dark matter around one solar mass for GW150914. Furthermore, the sunken region of the gravitational potential may concentrate a large number of dark matter particles, as studied in numerous previous studies. Therefore, the total energy transferred from GW to the surrounding dark matter can be considerable.
Because a rigorous approach is not yet feasible, in the remainder of the present study, we carry out a phenomenological approach to investigate this interaction between GWs and dark matter.
2.Characteristic waveform of tail wavelets
The surrounding dark matter may lead to modifications of geometry (backreaction). Various modifications were studied in detail in a fairly sophisticated study [28]. The result indicates that environmental effects do not spoil main waves from binary compact objects. In this study, we take two typical modifications to study possible corrections to the tail wavelet QNMs. The first one is Schwarzschild-de Sitter, which describes a black hole with a small amount dark matter (compared to the black hole mass) as a fine approximation,
$ {\rm d}s^2 = -f{\rm d}t^2+f^{-1}{\rm d}r^2+r^2{\rm d}\Omega^2,\; $
(3)
where $ f = 1-2M/r-\Lambda_{\rm {eff}} r^2/3 $. The effective cosmological constant is related to the density of dark matter, $ \rho_{DM} = \dfrac{\Lambda_{\rm {eff}}}{8\pi} $. We call it the SdS case.
The second one is a short-hair black hole, which describes non-homogeneous fluids [29], where
$ f = 1-2M/r+Q_m^{2k}/r^{2k}. $
(4)
Here $ k $ is the equation of state of the dark matter parameter. The density and pressure of dark matter are $ \rho_m = (2k-1)Q_m^{2k}/(8\pi r^{2k+2}) $ and $ P_m = k\rho_m $, respectively. The softest matter with $ k = -1 $ is a cosmological constant, and the stiffest matter with $ k = 1 $ mimics electromagnetic fields.
We estimate the amplitude of the GW around the horizon. The energy density is proportional to the inverse square of the distance from the source $ L $. Thus, around the horizon, we obtain $ \dfrac{\rho_{r_h}}{\rho_{L}} = \dfrac{L_0^2}{r_h^2} $, where $ L_0 $ denotes the distance from the Earth to the source of GW150914. If the energy loss of the GWs is insignificant, the energy density is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the center, namely, $ \dfrac{A_{r_h}}{A_{L_0}} = \dfrac{L_0}{r_h} $. For the event GW150914, we have $ r_h = 1.8\times 10^5 $ m, $ L_0 = 1.2\times 10^{25} $ m, and $ A_{L_0} = 10^{-21} $. Here, $ A_{L_0} $ is the amplitude measured on the Earth. Then, one obtains $ A_{r_h} = \dfrac{1}{15} $. Hence, it is reasonable to consider that the amplitude of the initial main GWs is $ A_{r_h}\sim 0.1 $.
From previous studies on tail wavelets (echoes), we estate that the amplitude of the wavelet is one tenth of the main wave or smaller. Thus, the energy carried by the wavelet is about $ 0.03M_{\bigodot} $ or smaller. The energy conversion from the rest mass energy to the gravitational wave energy can be very efficient in the process of splashing down, i.e., up to 42% [30]. As a conservative estimate, we assume that 10% of the total rest mass of the dark matter is transferred to the gravitational energy of the wavelet. Thus, the mass of dark matter involved to excite the wavelet is approximately $ 0.3M_{\bigodot} $. Using this parameter, we obtain the exact form of backreactions of dark matter to a Schwarzschild black hole and present the waveform of tail wavelets in the cases of SdS and a short-haired black hole, respectively. We find the fine distinction between the cases of a dressed black hole and a bare one, although it is insignificant.
Before presenting the waveform of the wavelet, we explore the time scale between the emission of the main GWs and tail wavelets. This can be estimated by simply investigating the equation of motion of a free-falling particle from a given height. For simplicity, we consider motions along radial geodesics. The results are presented in Fig. 1. There, we consider a particle splashing down from an initial altitude of $ R $ towards the horizon $ r_h $. The epoch is observed to be slightly advanced in the modified geometries. The dark matter halo strengthens gravity.
Figure1. (color online) Estimation of epochs of tail wavelets after the main GWs. Left panel: case without backreaction, i.e., Schwarzschild. Middle panel: Black hole with DM halos, i.e., case of SdS. Right panel: Black hole with short-hair. Location of event horizon is depicted by horizontal dashed purple line.

The waveform of the tail wavelet generated by the infalling of the matter is similar to that of the ordinary quasinormal modes [3133]. Therefore, in our model, the observed tail wavelets are also a manifestation of the black hole quasinormal modes. However, there is a subtlety. Because the infalling process is continuous, the initial disturbance period carries the information not only on the black hole itself, but also on the matter distribution surrounding it. It is therefore expected that the waveform in the initial disturbance period will be characteristically different from the ordinary quasinormal modes. The Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile is the mostly studied distribution of dark matter around galaxies and clusters [18, 19]. As a more realistic study, we consider an NFW distribution of dark matter around the hole. The NFW distribution can be described by,
$ \rho(r) = \frac{\rho_0}{\dfrac{r}{R_s}\left(1+\dfrac{r}{R_s}\right)^2}. $
(5)
Setting $ x = r/r_h,\; K = r_h/R_s $, we obtain,
$ \rho(x) = \frac{\rho_0}{Kx(1+Kx)^2}. $
(6)
We assume that dark matter suffuses between $ r_h $ and $ 100r_h $. Thus, the total mass of dark matter (including the mass gravitational field) reads [34],
$\begin{split} M_d = 4\pi\int_{r_h}^{100r_h} {\rm d}r r^2 \rho(r) = 4r_h^3\pi\int_{1}^{100}{\rm d}x x^2 \rho(x) = 4\pi r_h^3 \rho_0\int_{1}^{100}{\rm d}x \frac{x^2}{Kx(1+Kx)^2} = 4\pi r_h^3 \rho_0 \frac{1}{K^3}\left(\frac{1}{1+100K}-\frac{1}{1+K}+\ln \frac{1+100K}{1+K}\right). \end{split}$
(7)
We require that the total amount of the dark matter is equivalent to the previous homogeneous case, where the total mass is
$ M_{dh} = \rho_{0h}4\pi\int_{r_h}^{100r_h} {\rm d}r r^2 = \rho_{0h}\frac{4\pi}{3}10^6 r_h^3.$
(8)
Given a relation between $ \rho_0 $ and $ \rho_{0h} $, we obtain a corresponding $ K $. For example, we assume $ \rho_0 = 10\rho_{0h} $, and thus we obtain $ r_h = 0.0254R_s $.
In this section, we present numerical calculations of the waveform associated with the gravitational perturbation of the metric owing to the infalling of matter.
The radial master equation of the gravitational fluctuation around the black hole reads [35, 36]
$ f(r)\frac{\partial}{\partial r} \left(f(r)\frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial r}\right)-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\Phi}{\partial t^2}-V(r)\Phi = 0. $
(9)
Here, $ V $ denotes the potential of the black hole. $ V $ is rather complicated; for even and odd modes, the exact form of $ V $ is provided in Refs. [31-33]. $ f(r) $ takes different forms in the cases of Schwarzschild, SdS, and short-hair black holes, as shown above.
Based on the analysis in the previous sections, we assume the following initial conditions. For convenience, we choose $ \eta = ct/r_h $ and consider the following different cases:
Case I, $ \Phi = 0.01 $ as $ \eta \in (0,5) $.
Case II, $ \Phi = 0.01 $ as $ \eta = 0. $
The first case denotes dark matter that is initially in a homogeneous distribution. For comparison, we plot the second case, which displays a pulse excitation that is the ordinary QNM of the black hole. Figs. 2 and 3 demonstrate the waveforms of the odd and even fluctuations for all geometries, including the Schwarzschild, the geometry with backreaction of dark matter halos (SdS), and the geometry of a short-hair black hole. According to the present estimations, the magnitude of the tail wavelets is at most ~10% of the main GWs [12, 13]. Thus, we take the initial perturbation to be $ \Phi = 0.01 $ for our calculations. We observe that the waveforms generated by some distribution of dark matter are different from those triggered by a pulse, where the latter corresponds to the ordinary quasinormal mode, which only carries information on the black hole itself. Furthermore, the effects of geometry modifications are not significant compared to the case of a Schwarzschild black hole. In particular, the two modifications present almost the same wavelet, which is slightly different from a "bare" Schwarzschild wavelet.
Figure2. (color online) Waveform of odd gravitational fluctuations, including cases of a bare Schwarzschild black hole and dressed black holes, i.e., SdS and short-haired black hole.

Figure3. (color online) Waveform of even gravitational fluctuations, including cases of a bare Schwarzschild black hole and dressed black holes, i.e., SdS and short-haired black hole.

We expect that forthcoming data with a better resolution for the waveform, especially those from the third generation GW detectors like the Einstein Telescope [37, 38] and Cosmic Explorer [39], may shed light on the feasibility of the present model.
Generally, the astrophysical black hole is a Kerr black hole. We study the Schwarzschild black hole as an approximation of the realistic case. Hence, we present a preliminary investigation of rotating black holes. We plot the corresponding wavelets for the Kerr holes in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5.
Figure4. (color online) Even modes of wavelets for rotating black hole. Left panel depicts wavelets corresponding to shell initial distribution, and right panel depicts wavelets corresponding to homogeneous distribution. The even mode is sensitive to the rotating parameter.

Figure5. (color online) Odd modes of wavelets for rotating black hole. Left panel depicts wavelets corresponding to shell initial distribution, and right panel depicts wavelets corresponding to homogeneous distribution. The odd mode is not sensitive to the rotating parameter.

3.Concluding remarks
The data analysis implies that there might be tail wavelets occurring after the main GWs from the merger of binary systems. These tail wavelets exist not only for the GW events of binary black holes, but also for those of binary neutron stars. Therefore, it is speculated that the physical mechanism behind the phenomenon might not be related to the quantum structure of the black hole horizon, but is rather associated with certain generic properties of the collapsing binary system. The main characteristic of our approach is that the explanation is given within the framework of Einstein’s general relativity, rather than originated from a modified theory of gravity or quantum effect.
Following this line of thought, in this work, we present a more natural and straightforward scenario for the generation of tail wavelets. In our model, the cause of the phenomenon is attributed to the matter or dark matter surrounding the binary system. In particular, the dark matter distribution around a compact object has been studied at different scales for many years. We carefully investigate the pressure of the GWs and demonstrate that they can perturb and even push away the matter distributed around a compact star. After the main wave traverses through, the matter falls back towards the black hole horizon, which in turn excites the tail wavelets. Based on our analysis, we assume four different initial conditions for the related gravitational perturbations and evaluate the corresponding waveforms. Furthermore, we make a preliminary exploration of the wavelet for Kerr black holes.
In this study, we concentrate on the physics after inspirals. We explore the effects of energy emission in the merge process and particularly the splashing down of dark matter to the black hole. This is not closely related to the physics before merging. According to the previous studies of intermediate-mass-ratio inspirals (IMRI) without dark matter [40], and especially an upcoming study [41], there is almost no wavelet in IMRI. However, we show that dark matter in such a system can produce significant tail wavelets in the merger of binary compact objects. The effect of dark matter in the inspiraling stage of the IMRI system was investigated in Ref. [42], which demonstrates that dark matter significantly enhances the merging process. We show that dark matter has a significant effect after the merging process.
We look forward to testing the proposed model against forthcoming data from the GW detectors of the third generation. Further studies concerning specific dark matter distributions are in progress. Furthermore, in the frame of this model, we investigate the distribution of dark matter surrounding the black holes by analyzing the waveform of the tail wavelet from the forthcoming data at better resolution, especially those from the third generation GW detectors.
Our heartfelt thanks to Professor Anzhong Wang, Zhoujian Cao, and Wenbiao Han for helpful discussions.
婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄С閸楁娊寮婚悢铏圭<闁靛繒濮甸悘鍫㈢磼閻愵剙鍔ゆい顓犲厴瀵鎮㈤悡搴n槶閻熸粌绻掗弫顔尖槈閵忥紕鍘介梺瑙勫劤椤曨參鍩ユ径瀣ㄤ簻妞ゆ挾鍋為崑銉╂煙閾忣偆鐭婃い鏇樺劚铻栧┑鐘辩窔閸嬫姊虹拠鈥虫灍闁挎洏鍨介獮鍐煛閸愵亞锛滃┑鈽嗗灣閸樠呮暜妤e啯鈷掑ù锝嚽归ˉ蹇涙煕鐎n亝鍣介柟骞垮灲瀹曠喖顢涘顓熜氶梻浣瑰缁诲倿藝娴煎瓨鍋傛繛鍡樺灍閸嬫挾鎲撮崟顒傤槬濠电偛鐪伴崐婵嬪春閵忋倕閱囬柍鍨涙櫅娴滈箖鎮峰▎蹇擃仾缂佲偓閸愵亞纾兼い鏃囧亹鏁堝Δ鐘靛仜缁绘ê鐣烽妸鈺佺骇闁瑰鍋涚粊鑸典繆閻愵亜鈧牠骞愭ィ鍐ㄧ獥闁逛即鍋婇弫濠囩叓閸ャ劎鈯曢柍閿嬪浮閺屾稓浠﹂幑鎰棟闂侀€炲苯澧柛銏$叀濠€渚€姊洪幖鐐插姶闁诲繑绋戦埥澶愬閻樻妲规俊鐐€栭崝鎴﹀磹閺嵮€鏋旈柟顖嗗本瀵岄梺闈涚墕濡宕告繝鍥ㄧ厱閻庯綆鍋呯亸浼存煏閸パ冾伃妞ゃ垺娲熼弫鎰板炊閳哄啯婢栨繝鐢靛Х椤d粙宕滃┑瀣畺闁稿瞼鍋涢弰銉╂煃閳轰礁鏆炲┑顖涙尦閺屟嗙疀閺囩喎娈屽Δ鐘靛亹閸嬫挸鈹戦悩娈挎殰缂佽鲸娲熷畷鎴﹀箣閿曗偓绾惧綊鏌″搴″箺闁稿顑嗘穱濠囧Χ閸涱喖娅ら梺绋款儜缁绘繈寮婚弴銏犻唶婵犻潧娲ㄩ埞娑欑節濞堝灝鏋熷┑鐐诧躬瀵鍩勯崘銊х獮婵犵數濮寸€氼參鎯冮幋婵冩斀闁斥晛鍟徊濠氭煟濡や焦宕岀€殿喖顭烽弫鎾绘偐閼碱剦妲伴梻浣瑰缁诲倿骞婂鍡欑彾闁哄洨鍠撶弧鈧梺姹囧灲濞佳嗏叿闂備焦鎮堕崝宥咁渻娴犲鏋侀柛鎰靛枛椤懘鏌eΟ铏逛粵婵炲牓绠栧娲川婵犲嫮鐣甸柣搴㈠嚬閸o絽顕i幎钘夊耿婵炴垶鐟ч崢閬嶆⒑閸濆嫭鍌ㄩ柛鏂挎湰閺呭爼顢欓悾宀€顔曢梺鍓插亝缁诲嫰鎮為崨濠冨弿濠电姴鍟妵婵堚偓瑙勬磸閸斿秶鎹㈠┑瀣<婵絾瀵уú妯兼崲濞戞埃鍋撳☉娆嬬細闁活厼鐭傞弻娑氣偓锝冨妼閳ь剚娲熼幃鎯х暋閹冲﹥妞介、鏃堝礋椤撴繄绀堥梻鍌欑閹碱偊宕愰崼鏇炵?闁哄被鍎荤紞鏍偓骞垮劚椤︿即鍩涢幋锔藉仭婵炲棗绻愰鈺呮煕閺傝鈧繈寮婚敐鍡楃疇闂佸憡鏌ㄧ€涒晝绮嬪澶婄濞撴艾娲﹂弲婵嬫⒑闂堟稓澧曟繛灞傚姂閺佸秴饪伴崘锝嗘杸闁圭儤濞婂畷鎰板即閵忕姷鏌堝銈嗗姧缁犳垿宕欓悩缁樼厸闁告劑鍔庢晶娑㈡煟閹惧鎳冩い顏勫暟閳ь剨缍嗘禍顏堫敁濡ゅ懏鐓冮悹鍥皺婢ф稒銇勯妸锝呭姦闁诡喗鐟╁鍫曞箣閻樿京绀夊┑掳鍊楁慨鐑藉磻濞戞◤娲敇閳ь兘鍋撴担绯曟瀻闁规儳鍘栫槐鍫曟⒑閸涘﹥澶勫ù婊愮秮瀹曟椽宕ㄧ€涙ǚ鎷婚梺绋挎湰閼归箖鍩€椤掑嫷妫戠紒顔肩墛缁楃喖鍩€椤掑嫮宓侀柡宥庡弾閺佸啴鏌ㄩ弴妤€浜剧紒鐐劤濠€閬嶅箟閹间焦鍋嬮柛顐g箘閻熸煡姊虹粙娆惧劀缂佺粯绻傞锝夊醇閺囩偤鍞跺┑顔斤供閸樹粙鎮甸弴鐑嗘富闁靛牆楠告禍婵囩箾閼碱剙鏋涚€殿喖顭锋俊鎼佸煛閸屾矮绨介梻浣呵归張顒傜矙閹达富鏁傞柨鐕傛嫹
2婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄У婢瑰棛妲愰幒鏂哄亾閿濆骸浜剧紒鎵佹櫆缁绘稑顔忛鑽ょ泿闁诡垳鍠栧娲礃閸欏鍎撳銈嗗灥濞层劎鍒掑▎鎺旂杸婵炴垶鐟㈤幏娲⒑闂堚晛鐦滈柛妯恒偢瀹曟繄鈧綆鍋佹禍婊堟煏婵炲灝鍔滄い銉e灮閳ь剝顫夊ú婊堝极婵犳艾鏄ラ柍褜鍓氶妵鍕箳閹存繍浠鹃梺鎶芥敱閸ㄥ潡寮诲☉妯锋婵鐗嗘导鎰節濞堝灝娅欑紒鐘冲灴濠€浣糕攽閻樿宸ラ柟鍐插缁傛帗娼忛埞鎯т壕閻熸瑥瀚粈鍐╀繆閻愭壆鐭欑€殿噮鍋婇獮妯肩磼濡桨姹楅柣搴ゎ潐濞叉牕煤閵堝宓佹俊銈呮噺閳锋帒銆掑锝呬壕濠电偘鍖犻崨顔煎簥闂佸壊鍋侀崕杈╁瑜版帗鐓涚€规搩鍠掗崑鎾翠繆閹绘帞澧㈤柟鍙夋倐瀵噣宕煎┑濠冩啺闂備焦瀵х换鍌炈囬鐐村€挎繛宸簼閻撴洟鏌熼弶鍨倎缂併劌銈搁弻娑㈡晲鎼粹€崇缂備浇椴搁幐濠氬箯閸涙潙绀堥柟缁樺笒婢瑰牓姊绘担鐟邦嚋婵炶闄勭粋宥夘敂閸曢潧娈ㄥ銈嗗姧缁犳垹澹曟總鍛婄厽闁归偊鍘界紞鎴炵箾閸喎濮嶆慨濠冩そ瀹曟﹢宕f径瀣壍闂備礁鎽滄慨鐢告嚌閹冪カ闂備礁鎲¢〃鍫ュ磻閹版澘缁╁ù鐘差儐閻撳啴鏌﹀Ο渚Ч妞ゃ儲绮岄湁婵犲﹤鎳庢禒婊勩亜椤撯€冲姷妞わ箒娅曢妵鍕Ω閵夘垵鍚悗娈垮櫘閸嬪棝鍩€椤掑﹦绉甸柛鎾寸〒婢规洟鎸婃竟婵嗙秺閺佹劖寰勭€n偊鏁┑鐘愁問閸犳牠宕愰幖浣圭畳婵犵數濮撮敃銈呂涘Δ鍛亗闁归偊鍎惔銊ョ倞鐟滄繈宕濋悢鍏肩厓鐟滄粓宕滃杈╃煓闁圭儤娲橀幊灞解攽閻樻剚鍟忛柛銊ゅ嵆椤㈡岸顢橀悩鎰佹綗闂佸湱鍎ら崹鐔肺i崼鐔稿弿婵°倐鍋撴俊顐n殜瀹曟粍娼忛埡鍐紳闂佺ǹ鏈銊ョ摥闂備焦瀵уú蹇涘磿閼碱剛鐭氶弶鍫涘妿缁♀偓闂佹悶鍎撮崺鏍疾濠靛鈷戦梻鍫熺〒婢ф洟鏌熷畡閭﹀剶鐎殿喗濞婇、姗€濮€閳锯偓閹锋椽姊洪崨濠冨磩閻忓繑鐟╁畷銏犫槈閵忥紕鍘遍梺闈浨归崕鎶藉春閿濆洠鍋撶憴鍕婵$偘绮欏畷娲焵椤掍降浜滈柟鍝勭Ч濡惧嘲霉濠婂嫮鐭掗柡宀€鍠愬ḿ蹇涘礈瑜忚摫缂備胶铏庨崣鈧柛鈺傜墵婵$敻宕熼娑欐珕闂佸吋绁撮弲婵嬪汲閵堝鈷戦柛婵嗗濠€鎵磼鐎n偄鐏撮柛鈹垮灪閹棃濡堕崶鈺傛緫闂備礁鎼ú銊﹀垔椤撱垹鑸归柛锔诲幘绾句粙鏌涚仦鍓ф噮缂佹劖姊荤槐鎾诲磼濞戞粌顥濋柧鑽ゅ仱閺屾盯寮撮妸銉︾亾婵炲瓨绮嶉悷鈺侇潖缂佹ɑ濯撮柛娑橈工閺嗗牆鈹戦悙棰濆殝缂佺姵鎸搁悾鐑藉閿濆啩姹楅梺鍦劋閸ㄥ綊鏁嶅☉銏♀拺闁革富鍘奸崝瀣亜閵娿儲顥㈤柛鈺傜洴楠炲鏁傞悾灞藉箞婵犵數濞€濞佳兾涘Δ鍜佹晜闁冲搫鎳忛悡鍐喐濠婂牆绀堟繛鍡樺灩缁€濠傗攽閻樺弶鎼愮紒鐘崇墵濮婃椽宕归鍛壉缂傚倸绉村ú顓㈠蓟瀹ュ浼犻柛鏇ㄥ亗缁ㄨ棄鈹戦悙璺轰汗闁哥姴閰i崺鐐哄箣閿旂粯鏅╅柣鐔哥懄鐢偤骞婇幘璇茬厺闁哄倸绨卞Σ鍫ユ煏韫囧ň鍋撻崘鎻掝棗濠电姴鐥夐弶搴撳亾閹版澘纾婚柟鍓х帛閻撳啴鎮峰▎蹇擃仼闁诲繑鎸抽弻鐔碱敊鐟欏嫭鐝氬Δ鐘靛仦閹瑰洭鐛幒妤€骞㈡俊鐐村劤椤ユ岸姊绘担鍝ョШ婵☆偉娉曠划鍫熺瑹閳ь剟寮婚妸鈺佄ч柛娑变簼閺傗偓闂備胶绮摫鐟滄澘鍟村鎼佸Χ閸℃瑧顔曢梺鍓插亝缁酣鎯屽▎鎾寸厸鐎光偓鐎n剛袦濡ょ姷鍋涘ú顓€€佸Δ浣瑰闁告瑥顦辨禍鐐烘⒒閸屾瑧鍔嶉柟顔肩埣瀹曟劕螖閸涱厾鐛ラ梺褰掑亰閸犳鐣烽崣澶岀瘈闂傚牊渚楅崕蹇涙煟閹烘垹浠涢柕鍥у楠炴帡骞嬪┑鎰偅闂備胶绮敮妤€顪冩禒瀣摕婵炴垯鍨圭粻娑欍亜閺嶃劎銆掗柕鍡楋躬濮婂搫煤鐠囨彃绠哄銈冨妼閹虫﹢宕洪悙鍝勭闁挎梻绮弲鈺冪磽娴e湱鈽夋い鎴濇閹箖宕奸弴鐔叉嫼缂傚倷鐒﹂敃鈺佲枔閺冨倻纾肩紓浣姑粭褔鏌涢幒鎾虫诞鐎规洖銈搁幃銏☆槹鎼达絿宓侀梻浣筋嚙閸戠晫绱為崱娑樼婵炴垯鍩勯弫濠囨煛閸ャ儱鐏柍閿嬪灴閺岋綁鎮㈤悡搴濆枈闂佹悶鍊楅崰搴ㄥ煘閹达富鏁婇柣鎰靛墯濮e牓鎮楀▓鍨灍濠电偛锕畷娲晸閻樿尙锛滃┑鐘诧工閹峰宕惔銊︹拺闁煎鍊曞瓭濠电偛锛忛崶褏顦板銈嗗姦閸嬪倻妲愰敓锟�547闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗霉閿濆浜ら柤鏉挎健濮婃椽顢楅埀顒傜矓閺屻儱鐒垫い鎺嗗亾闁稿﹤婀辩划瀣箳閺傚搫浜鹃柨婵嗙凹缁ㄤ粙鏌ㄥ☉娆戞创婵﹥妞介幃鐑藉级鎼存挻瀵栫紓鍌欑贰閸n噣宕归崼鏇炴槬婵炴垯鍨圭粻铏繆閵堝嫯鍏岄柛姗€浜跺娲传閸曨剙顦╁銈冨妼濡鍩㈠澶婂窛閻庢稒岣块崢浠嬫椤愩垺绁紒鎻掋偢閺屽洭顢涢悙瀵稿幐閻庡厜鍋撻悗锝庡墮閸╁矂鏌х紒妯煎⒌闁诡喗顨婇弫鎰償閳ヨ尙鐩庢俊鐐€曟蹇涘箯閿燂拷4婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柟闂寸绾惧鏌i幇顒佹儓闁搞劌鍊块弻娑㈩敃閿濆棛顦ョ紓浣哄У婢瑰棛妲愰幒鏂哄亾閿濆骸浜剧紒鎵佹櫆缁绘稑顔忛鑽ゅ嚬闂佸搫鎳忛悡锟犲蓟濞戙垹唯闁靛繆鍓濋悵鏍ь渻閵堝繐鐦滈柛銊ㄦ硾椤繐煤椤忓懎浠梻渚囧弿缁犳垵鈻撻崼鏇熲拺缂佸顑欓崕鎴︽煕閻樺磭澧电€规洘妞芥慨鈧柕鍫濇噽閻嫰姊洪柅鐐茶嫰婢ф潙鈹戦敍鍕毈鐎规洜鍠栭、娆撳礈瑜庡鎴︽⒒娴g瓔娼愰柛搴㈠▕椤㈡岸顢橀埗鍝勬喘閺屽棗顓奸崱蹇斿缂傚倷绀侀鍡涱敄濞嗘挸纾块柟鎵閻撴瑩鏌i悢鍝勵暭闁瑰吋鍔欓弻锝夋晲閸涱厽些濡炪値鍋呯划鎾诲春閳ь剚銇勯幒鎴濐仴闁逞屽厸缁舵艾顕i鈧畷鐓庘攽閸℃埃鍋撻崹顔规斀閹烘娊宕愰弴銏犵柈妞ゆ劧濡囧畵渚€鏌熼幍顔碱暭闁抽攱甯¢弻娑氫沪閸撗勫櫘濡炪倧璁g粻鎾诲蓟濞戞﹩娼╂い鎺戭槸閸撴澘顪冮妶搴″箹闁诲繑绻堥敐鐐测堪閸繄鍔﹀銈嗗坊閸嬫捇鏌i敐鍥у幋妞ゃ垺鐩幃婊堝幢濡粯鐝栭梻鍌欑窔濞佳呮崲閸儱鍨傞柛婵嗗閺嬫柨螖閿濆懎鏆為柍閿嬪灴濮婂宕奸悢鍓佺箒濠碉紕瀚忛崘锝嗘杸闂佺偨鍎村▍鏇㈠窗濮椻偓閺屾盯鍩為崹顔句紙閻庢鍣崳锝呯暦婵傚憡鍋勯柛婵嗗缁犮儵姊婚崒娆掑厡妞ゃ垹锕敐鐐村緞閹邦剛顦梺鍝勬储閸ㄦ椽宕曞鍡欑鐎瑰壊鍠曠花濂告煟閹捐泛鏋涢柡宀嬬秮瀵噣宕奸悢鍛婃闂佽崵濮甸崝褏妲愰弴鐘愁潟闁圭儤鎸荤紞鍥煏婵炲灝鍔ら柣鐔哥叀閹宕归锝囧嚒闁诲孩鍑归崳锝夊春閳ь剚銇勯幒鎴姛缂佸娼ч湁婵犲﹤鎳庢禒锔剧磼閸屾稑娴柟顔瑰墲閹柨螣缂佹ɑ婢戦梻鍌欒兌缁垶宕濆Ο琛℃灃婵炴垶纰嶉~鏇㈡煥閺囩偛鈧綊鎮¢弴鐔剁箚闁靛牆鎳庨顏堟煟濠垫劒绨婚懣鎰版煕閵夋垵绉存慨娑㈡⒑闁偛鑻晶顖滅磼鐎n偄绗╅柟绛嬪亝缁绘繂鈻撻崹顔句画闂佺懓鎲℃繛濠囩嵁閸愩劎鏆嬮柟浣冩珪閻庤鈹戦悙鍙夘棡闁搞劎鏁诲畷铏逛沪閸撗咁啎闁诲孩绋掑玻鍧楁儗閹烘梻纾奸柣妯虹-婢х數鈧鍠涢褔鍩ユ径鎰潊闁绘ḿ鏁搁弶鎼佹⒒娴e懙鍦崲閹版澘绠烘繝濠傜墕閺嬩線鏌″搴″箺闁抽攱鍨圭槐鎺楊敍濞戞瑧顦ㄥ┑鐐叉噺濮婅崵妲愰幒鏃傜<婵☆垵鍋愰悿鍕倵濞堝灝鏋︽い鏇嗗洤鐓″璺号堥崼顏堟煕濞戝崬鐏℃繝銏″灴濮婄粯鎷呴悷閭﹀殝缂備浇顕ч崐鍧楃嵁婵犲啯鍎熸い顓熷笧缁嬪繘姊洪崘鍙夋儓闁瑰啿绻橀崺娑㈠箣閿旂晫鍘卞┑鐐村灦閿曨偊宕濋悢鍏肩厵闁惧浚鍋呯粈鍫㈢磼鏉堛劌绗氭繛鐓庣箻婵℃悂鏁傜紒銏⌒у┑掳鍊楁慨鐑藉磻濞戞碍宕叉慨妞诲亾妤犵偛鍟撮崺锟犲礃閳轰胶褰撮梻浣藉亹閳峰牓宕滈敃鍌氱柈閻庯綆鍠楅埛鎺懨归敐鍛暈闁哥喓鍋涢妴鎺戭潩椤撗勭杹閻庤娲栫紞濠囩嵁鎼淬劌绀堥柛顭戝枟閸犳﹢鏌涢埡瀣瘈鐎规洏鍔戦、娆戞喆閸曨偒浼栭梻鍌欐祰瀹曠敻宕戦悙鐢电煓闁割偁鍎遍悞鍨亜閹哄棗浜鹃梺鍛娚戦悧妤冪博閻旂厧鍗抽柕蹇婃閹风粯绻涙潏鍓у埌闁硅绱曢幏褰掓晸閻樻彃鍤戝銈呯箰濡稓澹曟總鍛婄厪濠电偛鐏濇俊鐓幟瑰⿰鍐╄础缂佽鲸甯¢、姘跺川椤撶偟顔戦柣搴$仛濠㈡ḿ鈧矮鍗抽悰顕€宕堕澶嬫櫍闂佺粯蓱瑜板啰绮绘繝姘拻闁稿本鐟чˇ锕傛煙绾板崬浜為柍褜鍓氶崙褰掑礈濞戙垹绠查柕蹇嬪€曠粻鎶芥煛閸愩劍鎼愮亸蹇涙⒒娴e憡璐¢弸顏嗙磼閵娧冨妺缂佸倸绉撮オ浼村醇閻斿搫骞愰梻浣规偠閸庢椽鎮℃笟鈧、鏃堝醇閻斿皝鍋撻崼鏇熺厾缁炬澘宕崢鎾煕鐎n偅灏柍缁樻崌瀹曞綊顢欓悾灞借拫闂傚倷鑳舵灙妞ゆ垵鎳橀弫鍐Χ婢舵ɑ鏅梺鎸庣箓濞诧箑鐣锋径鎰仩婵炴垶甯掓晶鏌ユ煟鎼粹槅鐓兼慨濠呮閹风娀鍨惧畷鍥e亾婵犳碍鐓曢煫鍥ч鐎氬酣鏌涙繝鍐畵妞ゎ偄绻掔槐鎺懳熺拠宸偓鎾绘⒑閼姐倕鏋涢柛瀣躬瀹曠數鈧綆鍓涚壕钘壝归敐鍛棌闁稿孩鍔欓弻娑㈠Ω閵娿儱濮峰┑鈽嗗亞閸犲酣鈥旈崘顔嘉ч柛鈩兠拕濂告⒑閹肩偛濡肩紓宥咃躬楠炲啴鎮欓崫鍕€銈嗗姉婵磭鑺辨繝姘拺闁革富鍘奸崝瀣煕閳轰緤韬€殿喓鍔嶇换婵嗩潩椤撶偐鍋撻崹顐e弿婵☆垳鍘ф禍楣冩倵濮樼偓瀚�40缂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾剧懓顪冪€n亝鎹i柣顓炴閵嗘帒顫濋敐鍛闂佽姤蓱缁诲啴濡甸崟顖氬唨闁靛ě鍛帓闂備焦妞块崢浠嬪箰妤e啫鐒垫い鎺戝枤濞兼劖绻涢崣澶屽ⅹ閻撱倝鏌曟繛褍鎳嶇粭澶愭⒑閸濆嫬鏆欓柣妤€锕幃鈥斥枎閹惧鍘靛銈嗙墪濡鎳熼姘f灁闁割偅娲橀埛鎴犫偓瑙勬礀濞层劎鏁☉娆愬弿濠电姴鍊荤粔鐑橆殽閻愯尙澧﹀┑鈩冩倐婵$兘顢欓挊澶岀处闂傚倷绶氶埀顒傚仜閼活垱鏅堕悧鍫㈢闁瑰濮甸弳顒侇殽閻愬澧柟宄版嚇瀹曘劍绻濋崟銊ヤ壕妞ゆ帒瀚悡鐔煎箹閹碱厼鐏g紒澶愭涧闇夋繝濠傚暟閸╋綁鏌熼鍝勭伈鐎规洖宕埥澶娾枎韫囧骸瀵查梻鍌欑劍閹爼宕曢懡銈呯筏婵炲樊浜滅壕濠氭煙閹规劦鍤欑紒鈧崒鐐寸厱婵炴垵宕鐐繆椤愶絿鐭岀紒杈ㄦ崌瀹曟帒顫濋钘変壕鐎瑰嫭鍣磋ぐ鎺戠倞闁靛⿵绲肩划鎾绘⒑瑜版帗锛熼柣鎺炵畵瀹曟垿鏁撻悩宕囧帗闂佸憡绻傜€氼參宕宠ぐ鎺撶參闁告劦浜滈弸鏃堟煃瑜滈崜娆撳储濠婂牆纾婚柟鍓х帛閻撴洟鏌¢崶銉ュ濞存粎鍋為妵鍕箻鐎涙ǜ浠㈠┑顔硷攻濡炰粙鐛幇顓熷劅闁挎繂娲ㄩ弳銈嗙節閻㈤潧浠╅悘蹇旂懄缁绘盯鍩€椤掑倵鍋撶憴鍕闁搞劌娼¢悰顔嘉熼懖鈺冿紲濠碘槅鍨甸褔宕濋幒妤佲拺闁煎鍊曢弸鎴︽煟閻旀潙鍔ら柍褜鍓氶崙褰掑礈閻旈鏆﹂柕蹇ョ祷娴滃綊鏌熼悜妯诲皑闁归攱妞藉娲川婵犲嫮鐣甸柣搴㈠嚬閸樺ジ顢欒箛鎾斀閻庯綆鍋嗛崢閬嶆煙閸忚偐鏆橀柛銊ョ秺閹﹢鍩¢崒娆戠畾闂佸憡鐟ラˇ顖涙叏閸ヮ煈娈版い蹇撳暙瀹撳棛鈧娲栭妶鎼佸箖閵忋倕浼犻柛鏇ㄥ亜椤╊剟姊婚崒姘偓鐑芥嚄閸撲焦鍏滈柛顐f礀缁€鍫熺節闂堟稒鐏╂繛宸簻閸愨偓濡炪倖鍔戦崕鍗炵毈缂傚倸鍊风欢锟犲磻閸曨厸鍋撳▓鍨⒋婵﹤顭峰畷鎺戭潩椤戣棄浜惧瀣椤愯姤鎱ㄥ鍡楀幊缂傚倹姘ㄩ幉绋款吋閸澀缃曢梻鍌欑閹碱偊宕锕€纾瑰┑鐘崇閸庢鏌涢埄鍐炬▍鐟滅増甯楅弲鏌ユ煕椤愵偄浜滄繛鍫熺懇濮婃椽鎳¢妶鍛€鹃柣搴㈣壘閻楁挸顕i鈧畷鐓庘攽閸℃瑧宕哄┑锛勫亼閸婃牕螞娓氣偓閿濈偞寰勭仦绋夸壕闁割煈鍋嗘晶鍨叏婵犲嫮甯涢柟宄版嚇瀹曘劍绻濋崒娑欑暭婵犵數鍋為幐鑽ゅ枈瀹ュ鈧啯绻濋崒婊勬闂侀潧绻堥崐鏍偓鐢靛Т椤法鎹勯悜姗嗘!闂佽瀛╁浠嬪箖濡ゅ懎绀傚璺猴梗婢规洟姊绘担鍛婂暈婵炶绠撳畷婊冣槈閵忕姴鍋嶉梻渚囧墮缁夌敻鍩涢幋锔界厱婵犻潧妫楅鈺呮煛閸℃瑥浠遍柡宀€鍠撶划娆撳垂椤旇瀵栧┑鐘灱椤煤閻旇偐宓侀柟閭﹀幗閸庣喐绻涢幋鐑嗘畼闁烩晛閰e缁樼瑹閳ь剙岣胯椤ㄣ儴绠涢弴鐕佹綗闂佸搫娲犻崑鎾诲焵椤掆偓閸婂潡骞婇悩娲绘晢闁稿本绮g槐鏌ユ⒒娴e憡鎯堥柛鐕佸亰瀹曟劙骞栨担绋垮殤濠电偞鍨堕悷锝嗙濠婂牊鐓忛煫鍥э工婢ц尙绱掗埀顒傗偓锝庡枟閻撴瑦銇勯弮鍥舵綈婵炲懎锕ラ妵鍕閳╁啰顦伴梺鎸庣箘閸嬨倝銆佸鈧幃婊堝幢濮楀棙锛呭┑鐘垫暩婵兘寮幖浣哥;闁绘ǹ顕х粻鍨亜韫囨挻顥犵紒鈧繝鍥ㄧ厓鐟滄粓宕滃璺何﹂柛鏇ㄥ灱閺佸啴鏌曡箛濠冩珕闁宠鐗撳铏规嫚閳ヨ櫕鐝紓浣虹帛缁诲牆鐣峰ú顏勭劦妞ゆ帊闄嶆禍婊堟煙閻戞ê鐏ユい蹇d邯閺屽秹鏌ㄧ€n亝璇為梺鍝勬湰缁嬫挻绂掗敃鍌氱闁归偊鍓﹀Λ鐔兼⒒娓氣偓閳ь剛鍋涢懟顖炲储閸濄儳纾兼い鏃傛櫕閹冲洭鏌曢崱鏇狀槮闁宠閰i獮鍥敊閸撗勵潓闂傚倷绀侀幉鈥趁洪敃鍌氱闁挎洍鍋撳畝锝呮健閹垽宕楃亸鏍ㄥ闂備礁鎲¢幐鏄忋亹閸愨晝顩叉繝闈涙川缁犻箖鏌涘▎蹇fШ濠⒀嗕含缁辨帡顢欓崹顔兼優缂備浇椴哥敮鎺曠亽闂傚倵鍋撻柟閭﹀枤濞夊潡姊婚崒娆愮グ妞ゎ偄顦悾宄拔熺悰鈩冪亙濠电偞鍨崺鍕极娴h 鍋撻崗澶婁壕闂佸憡娲﹂崜娑㈠储閸涘﹦绠鹃弶鍫濆⒔閸掓澘顭块悷甯含鐎规洘娲濈粻娑㈠棘鐠佸磭鐩庢俊鐐€栭幐鎾礈濠靛牊鍏滈柛顐f礃閻撴瑥顪冪€n亪顎楅柍璇茬墦閺屾盯濡搁埡鍐毇閻庤娲橀〃濠傜暦閵娾晩鏁嶆繛鎴炨缚濡棝姊婚崒姘偓鎼佸磹妞嬪孩顐芥慨妯挎硾閻掑灚銇勯幒鎴濃偓鍛婄濠婂牊鐓犳繛鑼额嚙閻忥妇鈧娲忛崹浠嬬嵁閺嶃劍濯撮柛锔诲幖楠炴﹢姊绘担鍛婂暈闁告梹岣挎禍绋库枎閹捐櫕妲梺鎸庣箓閹冲寮ㄦ禒瀣叆婵炴垶锚椤忣亪鏌¢崱鈺佸⒋闁哄瞼鍠栭、娆撴偩鐏炴儳娅氶柣搴㈩問閸犳牠鎮ユ總鍝ュ祦閻庯綆鍣弫鍥煟閹邦厽鍎楅柛鐔锋湰缁绘繈鎮介棃娴讹絾銇勯弮鈧悧鐘茬暦閺夎鏃堝川椤旇姤鐝栭梻浣稿暱閹碱偊骞婃惔锝囩焼闁稿本绋撶粻楣冩煙鐎电ǹ浠фい锝呭级閵囧嫰顢曢敐鍡欘槹闂佸搫琚崝宀勫煘閹达箑骞㈡俊顖濇〃閻ヮ亪鏌i悢鍝ョ煂濠⒀勵殘閺侇喖螖閸涱厾鏌ч梺鍝勮閸庢煡鎮¢弴銏$厓闁宠桨绀侀弳鐔兼煙閸愬弶鍤囬柡宀嬬秮楠炴﹢宕樺ù瀣壕闁归棿璁查埀顒佹瀹曟﹢顢欓崲澹洦鐓曢柟鎵虫櫅婵″灝霉閻樻彃鈷旂紒杈ㄥ浮閹瑩顢楁担鍝勫殥缂傚倷绀侀ˇ顖涙櫠鎼淬劌绀嗛柟鐑橆殔閻撴盯鏌涘☉鍗炴灈濞存粍绮庣槐鎺楁倷椤掆偓椤庢粌顪冪€涙ɑ鍊愮€殿喗褰冮埞鎴犫偓锝庡亐閹锋椽姊婚崒姘卞缂佸鎸婚弲鍫曞即閻旇櫣顔曢柣鐘叉厂閸涱垱娈兼俊銈囧Х閸嬫稑螞濠靛鏋侀柟閭﹀幖缁剁偤鎮楅敍鍗炲椤忓綊姊婚崒娆戭槮婵犫偓鏉堛劎浠氭繝鐢靛仜椤曨參宕楀鈧畷娲Ψ閿曗偓缁剁偤鎮楅敐鍐ㄥ缂併劌顭峰娲箰鎼淬埄姊垮銈嗘肠閸愭儳娈ㄥ銈嗘磵閸嬫捇鏌$仦鍓ф创闁糕晝鍋ら獮鍡氼槺濠㈣娲栭埞鎴︽晬閸曨偂鏉梺绋匡攻閻楁粓寮鈧獮鎺懳旀担瑙勭彇闂備線娼ч敍蹇涘焵椤掑嫬纾婚柟鐐墯濞尖晠鏌i幇闈涘妞ゅ骏鎷�28缂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾剧懓顪冪€n亜顒㈡い鎰矙閺屻劑鎮㈤崫鍕戙垻鐥幑鎰靛殭妞ゎ厼娼¢幊婊堟濞戞鏇㈡⒑鏉炴壆顦︽い鎴濇喘楠炲骞栨担鍝ョ潉闂佸壊鍋侀崹鍦矈閿曞倹鈷戦柛娑橈工婵箓鏌涢悩宕囧⒈缂侇喚绮换婵嗩潩椤撶姴骞堥梻浣筋潐瀹曟ḿ浜稿▎鎴犵幓闁哄啫鐗婇悡鍐煟閻旂ǹ顥嬬紒鐘哄皺缁辨帞绱掑Ο鑲╃杽婵犳鍠掗崑鎾绘⒑閹稿海绠撴俊顐g洴婵℃挳骞囬鈺傛煥铻栧┑鐘辫兌閸戝綊姊洪崷顓€褰掑疮閸ф鍋╃€瑰嫭澹嬮弨浠嬫倵閿濆簼绨荤紒鎰洴閺岋絾鎯旈姀鈶╁鐎光偓閿濆懏鍋ョ€规洏鍨介弻鍡楊吋閸″繑瀚奸梻浣告啞缁诲倻鈧凹鍓熷铏節閸ャ劎鍘遍柣搴秵閸嬪懐浜搁悽鐢电<閺夊牄鍔岀粭褔鏌嶈閸撱劎绱為崱娑樼;闁告侗鍘鹃弳锔锯偓鍏夊亾闁逞屽墴閸┾偓妞ゆ帊绶¢崯蹇涙煕閿濆骸娅嶇€规洘鍨剁换婵嬪炊瑜忛悾鐑樼箾鐎电ǹ孝妞ゆ垵鎳樺畷褰掑磼濞戞牔绨婚梺瑙勫閺呮盯鎮橀埡鍌ゆ闁绘劖娼欓悘瀛樻叏婵犲嫮甯涢柟宄版嚇瀹曘劍绻濋崘銊ュ濠电姷鏁搁崑鐘活敋濠婂懐涓嶉柟杈捐缂嶆牗绻濋棃娑卞剰閹喖姊洪崘鍙夋儓闁稿﹤鎲$粋鎺楊敇閵忊檧鎷洪柣搴℃贡婵敻濡撮崘顔藉仯濞达絿鎳撶徊濠氬础闁秵鐓曟い鎰Т閸旀粓鏌i幘瀵告噰闁哄矉缍侀獮鍥濞戞﹩娼界紓鍌氬€哥粔鐢稿垂閸ф钃熼柣鏃傚帶缁€鍌炴煕韫囨洖甯堕柍褜鍓氶崝娆撳蓟閿涘嫪娌柣锝呯潡閵夛负浜滅憸宀€娆㈠璺鸿摕婵炴垯鍨圭粻濠氭煕濡ゅ啫浠滄い顐㈡搐铻栭柣姗€娼ф禒婊呯磼缂佹﹫鑰跨€殿噮鍋婇獮妯肩磼濡粯顏熼梻浣芥硶閸o箓骞忛敓锟�1130缂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾剧懓顪冪€n亝鎹i柣顓炴閵嗘帒顫濋敐鍛闂佽姤蓱缁诲啴濡甸崟顖氬唨闁靛ě鍛帓闂備焦妞块崢浠嬪箲閸ヮ剙钃熸繛鎴欏灩缁犲鏌ょ喊鍗炲⒒婵″樊鍣e娲箹閻愭彃顬夌紓浣筋嚙閻楁挸顕f繝姘╅柍鍝勫€告禍婊堟⒑閸涘﹦绠撻悗姘嚇婵偓闁靛繈鍨婚敍婊堟⒑闁偛鑻晶瀵糕偓瑙勬礃鐢繝骞冨▎鎴斿亾閻㈢櫥褰掔嵁閸喓绡€闁汇垽娼ф禒锕傛煕閵娿儳鍩i柡浣稿暣椤㈡洟鏁冮埀顒傜磼閳哄啰纾藉ù锝堢柈缂傛氨绱掗悩鑽ょ暫闁哄本鐩、鏇㈡晲閸モ晝鏆梻浣虹帛鐢骞冮崒鐐茶摕闁挎稑瀚▽顏嗙磼鐎n亞浠㈤柍宄邦樀閹宕归锝囧嚒闁诲孩鍑归崳锝夊春閳ь剚銇勯幒鎴姛缂佸娼ч湁婵犲﹤瀚惌鎺楁煥濠靛牆浠辩€规洖鐖奸、妤佹媴閸欏顏归梻鍌氬€风欢锟犲磻閸℃稑纾绘繛鎴欏灪閸ゆ劖銇勯弽銊р姇婵炲懐濮磋灃闁挎繂鎳庨弳鐐烘煟閹惧鎳囬柡灞剧洴楠炲鈻庤箛濠備壕闁哄稁鍋€閸嬫挸顫濋悙顒€顏�
相关话题/wavelets merger binary