1.School of Science, Huzhou University, Zhejiang 313000, China 2.Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 3.State Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 4.Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100084, China Received Date:2019-04-10 Accepted Date:2019-06-09 Available Online:2019-09-01 Abstract:We investigate current-current correlation functions, or the so-called response functions of a two-flavor Nambu-Jona-Lasino model at finite temperature and density. The linear response is investigated introducing the conjugated gauge fields as external sources within the functional path integral approach. The response functions can be obtained by expanding the generational functional in powers of the external sources. We derive the response functions parallel to two well-established approximations for equilibrium thermodynamics, namely mean-field theory and a beyond-mean-field theory, taking into account mesonic contributions. Response functions based on the mean-field theory recover the so-called quasiparticle random phase approximation. We calculate the dynamical structure factors for the density responses in various channels within the random phase approximation, showing that the dynamical structure factors in the baryon axial vector and isospin axial vector channels can be used to reveal the quark mass gap and the Mott dissociation of mesons, respectively. Noting that the mesonic contributions are not taken into account in the random phase approximation, we also derive the response functions parallel to the beyond-mean-field theory. We show that the mesonic fluctuations naturally give rise to three kinds of famous diagrammatic contributions: the Aslamazov-Lakin contribution, the self-energy or density-of-state contribution, and the Maki-Thompson contribution. Unlike the equilibrium case, in evaluating the fluctuation contributions, we need to carefully treat the linear terms in external sources and the induced perturbations. In the chiral symmetry breaking phase, we find an additional chiral order parameter induced contribution, which ensures that the temporal component of the response functions in the static and long-wavelength limit recovers the correct charge susceptibility defined using the equilibrium thermodynamic quantities. These contributions from mesonic fluctuations are expected to have significant effects on the transport properties of hot and dense matter around the chiral phase transition or crossover, where the mesonic degrees of freedom are still important.
HTML
--> --> -->
2.Nambu-Jona-Lasino modelFor a general $ N_f $-flavor Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model, the Lagrangian density is given by [39]
where $ \lambda_\alpha $$ (\alpha = 0,1,\cdots,N_f^2-1) $ is the $ N_f $-flavor Gell-Mann matrix with $ \lambda_0 = \sqrt{2/N_f} $, and $ \hat{m}_{c} = {\rm diag}(m_{u},m_{d},m_{s},\cdots) $ is the current quark mass matrix. In the special case $ m_{u} = m_{d} = m_{s} = \cdots = 0 $ and $ K = 0 $, $ {\cal L}_{\rm{ NJL}} $ is invariant under the group transformation ${SU_C}(N_c)\otimes {SU_V}(N_f)\otimes{SU_A}(N_f)\otimes $$ {U}_B(1)\otimes {U}_A(1) $. $ {\cal L}_{\rm{KMT}} $ is the so-called Kobayashi-Maskawa-t'Hooft term with $ K<0 $, designed to break the $ {U}_{A}(1) $ symmetry. For the three-flavor case ($ N_f = 3 $), $ {\cal L}_{\rm{KMT}} $ contains six-fermion interactions and can efficiently describe the mass splitting between $ \eta $ and $ \eta^\prime $. In this work, we consider the two-flavor case, where $ {\cal L}_{\rm{KMT}} $ contains only four-fermion interactions, like the mesonic interaction term $ {\cal L}_{S} $. The Lagrangian density of the general two-flavor NJL model is given by
where $ G = G_{s}-K, G^\prime = G_{s}+K $, and we assume $ m_{u} = $$ m_{d} = m_0 $. Since the masses of scalar-isovector and pseudoscalcar-isoscalar mesons in the two-flavor case are much larger than the sigma meson and pions, we consider the maximal axial symmetry breaking case $ |K| = G_{s} $, which leads to the minimal NJL model
In this work, we study this minimum NJL model for the sake of simplicity. In the functional path integral formalism, the partition function of the NJL model can be written as
The partition function cannot be evaluated precisely. We assume that the sigma field acquires a non-vanishing expectation value $ \langle\sigma(x)\rangle = \upsilon $ and set $ \langle{{ }}(x)\rangle = 0 $, which characterizes the dynamical chiral symmetry breaking (DCSB). Then, the auxiliary fields can be expanded around their expectation values. After performing the field shifts, $ \sigma(x)\rightarrow\upsilon+\sigma(x) $ and $ {{ \pi }}(x)\rightarrow0+{{ \pi }}(x) $, we expand the effective action $ {\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}[\sigma,{{ \pi }}] $ in powers of the fluctuations $ \sigma(x) $ and $ {{ \pi }}(x) $. We have
where $ E_{ k} = \sqrt{{ k}^2+M^2} $ with the effective quark mass $ M = m_0+\upsilon $. Since the NJL model is not renormalizable, we employ a hard cutoff $ \Lambda $ to regularize the integral over the quark momentum $ { k} $ ($ |{ k}|<\Lambda $). The condensate $ \upsilon $ should be determined by minimizing $ {\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}^{(0)} $, i.e., $ \partial {\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}^{(0)}/\partial\upsilon = 0 $, which gives rise to the gap equation
In the chiral limit $ m_0 = 0 $, we find that if $ G>\pi^2/(N_cN_f\Lambda^2) $ [39,40], the sigma field acquires a nonvanishing expectation value $ \upsilon\neq0 $, and hence the DCSB occurs. The gap Eq. (10) ensures that the linear term $ {\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}^{(1)}[\sigma,{{ \pi }}] $ vanishes. The mesons in the NJL model are regarded as collective excitations, which are characterized by the Gaussian fluctuation term $ {\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}^{(2)}[\sigma,{{ \pi }}] $. Using the derivative expansion
with $ {\cal G} = (\gamma^\mu K_\mu-M)^{-1} $ being the mean-field quark propagator and $ \Sigma = \sigma+i\gamma_5{{ \tau}}\cdot{{ \pi }} $, we obtain
with $ \varepsilon_\sigma = 2M $ and $ \varepsilon_\pi = 0 $. The masses of the mesons are determined by the pole of their propagators, i.e., $ {\cal D}^{-1}_{\sigma,\pi}(Q^2 = m_{\sigma,\pi}^2) = 0 $. We obtain
The function $ I(Q^2) $ changes very slowly with $ Q^2 $. Therefore, we can approximate $ I(m_{\sigma,\pi}^2)\approx I(0) $. The meson masses are given by
To determine the model parameters, i.e., the current quark mass $ m_0 $, the coupling constant G, and the cutoff $ \Lambda $, we need to derive the pion decay constant $ f_\pi $ in the NJL model. This can be obtained by calculating the matrix element of the vacuum to one-pion axial-vector current transition. We have
The model parameters can be fixed by matching the pion mass $ m_\pi $, the pion decay constant $ f_\pi $, and the chiral condensate $ \langle\bar{\psi}\psi\rangle_0 $. For the physical case, we choose $ m_0 = 5 $ MeV, $ G = 4.93\;{\rm GeV}^{-2} $, and $ \Lambda = 653\;{\rm MeV} $, which yields $ m_\pi = 134\;{\rm MeV} $, $ f_\pi = 93\;{\rm MeV} $, and $\langle\bar{u}u\rangle_0 = $$ -(250\;{\rm MeV})^3 $. In the chiral limit, $ m_0 = 0 $, we use $ G = 5.01\;{\rm GeV}^{-2} $, and $ \Lambda = 650\;{\rm MeV} $.
3.Phase diagram and thermodynamics of the NJL modelThe partition function of the NJL model at finite temperature T can be given by the imaginary time formalism,
Here and in the following, $ x = (\tau,{ r}) $ with $ \tau $ being the imaginary time. We use the notation $ \int {\rm d}x\equiv \int_0^\beta {\rm d}\tau\int {\rm d}^3{ r} $ with $ \beta = 1/T $. The chemical potential matrix $ \hat{\mu} $ is diagonal in flavor space, $ \hat{\mu} = {\rm diag}(\mu_{u},\mu_{d}) $. A useful parameterization of the chemical potentials is given by
corresponding to introducing two conserved charges, the baryon number and the third component of the isospin. In this work, we consider the case $ \mu_{I} = 0 $ for the sake of simplicity. We therefore set $ \mu_{u} = \mu_{d}\equiv\mu $. Our theory can be easily generalized to nonzero isospin chemical potential, $ \mu_{I}\neq0 $. A large isospin chemical potential leads to the Bose-Einstein condensation of charged pions and the BEC-BCS crossover [86-96]. Introducing two auxiliary fields $ \sigma $ and $ {{ \pi }} $, which satisfy equations of motion $ \sigma = -2G\bar{\psi}\psi,{{ \pi }} = -2G\bar{\psi} i\gamma_5{{ \tau }}\psi $, and applying the Hubbard-Strotonovich transformation, we obtain
At low temperature, we expect that the DCSB persists and we set $ \langle\sigma(x)\rangle = \upsilon $ and $ \langle{{ \pi }}(x)\rangle = 0 $. Applying again the field shifts $ \sigma(x)\rightarrow\upsilon+\sigma(x) $ and $ {{ \pi }}(x)\rightarrow0+{{ \pi }}(x) $, we expand the effective action $ {\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}[\sigma,{{ \pi }}] $ in powers of the fluctuations $ \sigma(x) $ and $ {{ \pi}}(x) $ and obtain
In this work, we neglect mesonic fluctuations of order higher than the Gaussian. The linear term $ {\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}^{(1)}[\sigma,{{ \pi }}] $ can be shown to vanish. The partition function in this Gaussian approximation is given by
Evidently, the advantage of this Gaussian approximation is that we can complete the path integral over the fluctuation fields $ \sigma(x) $ and $ {{ \pi }}(x) $. The thermodynamic potential $ \Omega = -\ln {\cal Z}_{\rm NJL}/(\beta V) $ is given by
is the inverse of the mean-field quark Green's function in momentum space, with $ k_n = (2n+1)\pi T $ ($ n\in\mathbb{Z} $) being the fermion Matsubara frequency and $ M = m_0+\upsilon $ as the effective quark mass. The mean-field thermodynamic potential can be evaluated as
where $ E_{ k} = \sqrt{{ k}^2+M^2} $. As in the zero temperature case, we also regularize the integral over the quark momentum $ { k} $ via a hard cutoff $ \Lambda $ ($ |{ k}|<\Lambda $). The chiral condensate $ \upsilon $ is determined by minimizing $ {\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}^{(0)} $, i.e., $ \partial {\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}^{(0)}/\partial\upsilon = 0 $, leading to the gap equation
Here, $ f(E) = 1/(1+e^{\beta E}) $ is the Fermi-Dirac distribution. If the phase transition is of first order, the gap equation has multiple solutions. In this case, we compare their grand potentials and find the physical solution of $ \upsilon $. Figure 1 shows the effective quark mass M as a function of T for various values of the chemical potential $ \mu $ in the chiral limit ($ m_0 = 0 $). Figure 2 shows the well-known phase diagram of the NJL model in the T-$ \mu $ plane. At small chemical potential, the chiral phase transition is of second order. It becomes of first order at large $ \mu $. Hence, a tricritical point appears. For physical current quark mass, the second-order phase transition turns into a crossover, and the tricritical point becomes a critical endpoint. Figure1. (color online) Effective quark mass M as a function of T for various values of chemical potential $ \mu $ in chiral limit ($ m_0 = 0 $).
Figure2. Phase diagram of NJL model in T-$ \mu $ plane for chiral limit ($ m_0 = 0 $). Chiral symmetry broken and restored phases are denoted by $ \langle\bar{\psi}\psi\rangle\neq0 $ and $ \langle\bar{\psi}\psi\rangle = 0 $, respectively. The dashed and solid lines represent second-order and first-order phase transitions, respectively.
23.2.Thermodynamics including mesonic contributions -->
3.2.Thermodynamics including mesonic contributions
Here, we include the mesonic degrees of freedom. To this end, we consider the excitations corresponding to the fluctuation fields $ \sigma(x) $ and $ {{ \pi }}(x) $. It is convenient to work in the momentum space by defining the Fourier transformation
where $ \phi_0 = \sigma $ and $ \phi_{i} = \pi_{i} $ ($ {i} = 1,2,3 $). Here $ Q\equiv(iq_l, { q}) $ with $ q_l = 2l\pi T $ ($ l\in\mathbb{Z} $) as the boson Matsubara frequency. The notation $ \displaystyle\sum_Q = \displaystyle\sum_l\int\displaystyle\frac{{\rm d}^3{ q}}{(2\pi)^3} $ is used throughout. In the momentum space, the inverse of the quark Green's function $ { G}^{-1} $ reads
The notation $ \sum_K = \displaystyle\sum_n\int\frac{{\rm d}^3{ k}}{(2\pi)^3} $ will be used throughout. Since we consider the case $ \mu_{I} = 0 $, the off-diagonal components vanishes, i.e., $ \Pi_{mn}(Q) = \delta_{mn}\Pi_{m}(Q) $. It is also evident that $ \Pi_{m}(-Q) = \Pi_{m}(Q) $. The meson polarization functions $ \Pi_{m}(Q) $ can be evaluated as
for $ {m} = 1,2,3 $. Here, we defined $ E_{ k}^\pm = E_{ k}\pm\mu $ for convenience. In the chiral limit, we can show that from the gap equation, $ 1/(2G)+\Pi_{m}(0,0) = 0 $ ($ {m} = 1,2,3 $) in the chiral symmetry broken phase $ M\neq0 $, which manifests the fact that the pions are Goldstone bosons in this phase. In the chiral symmetry restored phase, $ M = 0 $, we obtain $ \Pi_{\rm 0}(Q) = \Pi_{\rm 1}(Q) = \Pi_{\rm 2}(Q) = \Pi_{\rm 3}(Q) $, which indicates that the sigma meson and the pions become degenerate. In the Gaussian approximation, the path integral over $ \phi_{m} $ can be completed. The mesonic contribution to the thermodynamic potential can be evaluated as
This result could be related to the Bethe-Uhlenbeck expression, i.e., the second virial contribution in terms of the two-body scattering phase shift [74]. We note that $ 1+2G\Pi_{m}(\omega+i0^+,{ q}) $ is proportional to the T-matrix for the quark-antiquark scattering in the $ {m} $-channel, with total energy $ \omega $ and momentum $ { q} $. The scattering matrix element can be written in the Jost representation as
The S-matrix element may has poles corresponding to mesonic bound states. Above the threshold for elastic scattering, it can be represented by a scattering phase shift as
where the mesonic pole energy can be given by $ \varepsilon_{m}({ q}) = \sqrt{{ q}^2+m_{m}^2} $, with the in-medium meson mass $ m_{m} $. At low temperature, the above expression explicitly recovers the fact that thermodynamic quantities are dominated by the lightest mesonic excitations, i.e., the pions [75]. In the chiral limit, the pressure of the system at low temperature can be well given by the pressure of a gas of noninteracting massless pions, $ p = \pi^2T^4/30 $.
4.Linear response theory in path integralWe now start to study the linear response of the hot and dense matter in the NJL model, based on the description of the equilibrium thermodynamics in the last section. In this section, we introduce a generic theoretical framework to compute the following imaginary-time-ordered current-current correlation function
where $ {J}^\mu(\tau,{ r}) $ can be any current operator. The notation $ \langle \cdots\rangle_{c} $ denotes the connected piece of the correlation function. For a pure fermionic field theory with a Lagrangian density
where $ \Gamma^\mu = \gamma^\mu\hat{X} $ with $ \hat{X} $ depicting any Hermitian matrix in the spin, flavor, and color spaces. For instance, the electromagnetic current is defined by $ \hat{X} = {\rm diag}(2e/3,-e/3) $ in the flavor space with e being the elementary electric charge and $ \hat{X} = \gamma_5 $ in the spin space gives the axial vector current. Parallel to the path integral approach to the equilibrium thermodynamics, we introduce a path integral formalism for the linear response. In this formalism, we introduce an external source term to compute the correlation function $ \Pi^{\mu\nu}(\tau,{ r}) $. The external source physically represents an external perturbation applied to the system. The external source here is actually an external gauge field $ A_\mu(\tau,{ r}) $ which couples to the current $ {J}^\mu(\tau,{ r}) $. We still use $ x = (\tau, { r}) $ for convenience. The partition function with the external source is given by
In practice, we need to evaluate the generating functional in some approximations. It is convenient to work in the momentum space by making the Fourier transform
To evaluate the correlation function, we expand the generating functional $ {\cal W}[A] $ in powers of $ A_\mu(Q) $. The expansion can be formally given by
where $ {\cal W}^{(n)} $ is the nth-order expansion in $ A_\mu(Q) $. The zeroth-order contribution $ {\cal W}^{(0)} $ recovers the equilibrium grand potential $ \Omega $ with a vanishing external source,
The first-order contribution $ {\cal W}^{(1)}[A] $ provides nothing but the thermodynamic relation for the charge density $ n_{X} = \langle {\rm J}^0\rangle $. We have $ n_{X} = -\partial\Omega/\partial\mu_{X} $, where the chemical potential is defined as $ \mu_{X} = A_0(Q = 0) $. Hence, we have
Here $ \Pi^{\mu\nu}(Q) $ is just the correlation function in the momentum space. The static and long-wavelength limit of its $ 00 $-component, $ \Pi^{00}(Q = 0) $, is related to to the number susceptibility, i.e.,
For instance, for the vector current with $ \hat{X} = 1 $, $ \Pi^{00}(Q = 0) $ is proportional to the baryon number susceptibility. The above discussions are precise if the generating functional $ {\cal W}[A] $ or its second-order expansion $ {\cal W}^{(2)}[A] $ can be computed exactly. Followingly, we turn to the NJL model. The partition function of the NJL model with the external source is given by
The treatment of the the expectation values of the meson fields $ \sigma(x) $ and $ {{ \pi }}(x) $, or their classical fields $ \sigma_{cl}(x) $ and $ {{ \pi }}_{cl}(x) $, becomes nontrivial. In the absence of the external source, we choose $ \sigma_{cl}(x) = \upsilon $ and $ {{\pi }}_{cl}(x) = 0 $, which are static and homogeneous. However, in the absence of the external source, they are generally no longer static and homogeneous. Again, we apply the field shifts, $\sigma(x)\rightarrow $$ \sigma_{cl}(x)+\sigma(x) $ and $ {{ \pi }}(x)\rightarrow{{ \pi }}_{cl}(x)+{{ \pi }}(x) $, and expand the effective action $ {\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}[\sigma,{{ \pi }}] $ in powers of the fluctuations $ \sigma(x) $ and $ {{ \pi }}(x) $. We obtain
Parallel to the case without external source, we neglect the mesonic fluctuations of order higher than the Gaussian. The linear term $ {\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}^{(1)}[\sigma,{{ \pi }};A] $ can be shown to vanish once the classical fields $ \sigma_{cl}(x) $ and $ {{ \pi }}_{cl}(x) $ are determined by minimizing $ {\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}^{(0)}[A] $. The partition function in the Gaussian approximation is given by
Therefore, in this Gaussian approximation, the generating functional $ {\cal W}_{\rm NJL}[A] $ includes both the mean-field (MF) and the meson-fluctuation (FL) contributions. We have
In the path integral, we can treat the equilibrium thermodynamics and the linear response at the same footing. The mean-field and the meson-fluctuation contributions to the generating functional can be expanded in powers of the external source as
The zeroth-order contributions recover the equilibrium thermodynamic potentials, i.e., $ {\cal W}_{\rm MF}^{(0)} = \beta V \Omega_{\rm MF} $ and $ {\cal W}_{\rm FL}^{(0)} = \beta V \Omega_{\rm FL} $. So far, the dependence on the classical fields $ \sigma_{cl}(x) $ and $ {{ \pi }}_{cl}(x) $ is not explicitly shown. They are not independent quantities and should be determined as functionals of the external source via some gap equations. We write
Parallel to the theory of the equilibrium thermodynamics, we require that the classical fields are determined by minimizing the mean-field part of the generating functional, i.e.,
Once this extreme condition is imposed, we can show that the linear term $ {\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}^{(1)}[\sigma,{{ \pi }};A] $ vanishes exactly. Moreover, it is also necessary to maintain the Goldstone's theorem. Solving the extreme condition formally, we have
Substituting these solutions into the generating functional, we finally eliminate the dependence on the classical fields. In the following sections, we will study the response functions in the mean-field approximation (${\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}\simeq{\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}^{(0)}, $$ {\cal W}_{\rm NJL}\simeq{\cal W}_{\rm MF} $) and in the Gaussian-fluctuation approximation ($ {\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}\simeq{\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}^{(0)}+{\cal S}_{\rm{eff}}^{(2)},{\cal W}_{\rm NJL}\simeq{\cal W}_{\rm MF}+{\cal W}_{\rm FL} $). Here, we have truncated the mesonic fluctuations up to the quadratic order, since higher-order contributions cannot be analytically treated. The mean-field truncation, corresponding to the random phase approximation of the linear response, is obviously self-consistent, as has been verified in numerous studies of the many-body theory. The Gaussian-fluctuation truncation takes into account the contribution from the collective modes (mesons). The contributions higher than the Gaussian may correspond to the interaction between mesons, which are assumed to be weak and therefore can be neglected. However, one can show that the Gaussian-fluctuation approximation also preserves the Ward-Takahashi identity and hence the conservation laws [97-99]. In the context of the electromagnetic response of superconductors, such a Gaussian-fluctuation approximation leads to a gauge invariant linear response theory [97-99].
5.Linear response in mean-field theory: random phase approximationWe first present the linear response in the mean-field approximation, i.e., $ {\cal W}_{\rm NJL}[A] \simeq {\cal W}_{\rm MF}[A] $. We will see that the response functions in this approximation recovers the famous random phase approximation (RPA) developed in early condensed matter theory. Since we are interested in the response to an infinitesimal external source, we expect that the induced perturbations to the classical fields are also infinitesimal. Therefore, we have
where the static and uniform part $ \upsilon $ is the chiral condensate with vanishing external source. The generating functional in the mean-field approximation is given by
Here $ M = m_0+\upsilon $ is the effective quark mass as we have defined in the absence of the external source. Now we turn to the momentum space via the Fourier transform
Using the derivative expansion, we can expand the generating functional in powers of the external source as well as the induced perturbations $ \eta_{m} $. We have
where it is obvious that $ {\cal W}_{\rm MF}^{(0)} = \beta V\Omega_{\rm MF} $. Note that the induced perturbation should be finally eliminated via the gap equation (74). The linear term $ {\cal W}_{\rm MF}^{(1)}[A;\eta] $ can be evaluated as
It is related only to the $ Q = 0 $ component of the external source and the induced perturbations. The explicit form of $ {\cal G}(K) $ can be evaluated as
It is evident that $ (n_{X})_{\rm MF} = -\partial\Omega_{\rm MF}/\partial\mu_{X} $ with the chemical potential $ \mu_{X} = A_0(0) $. The linear response is characterized by the quadratic term $ {\cal W}_{\rm MF}^{(2)}[A;\eta] $. By making use of the derivative expansion and completing the trace in the momentum space, we obtain
The meson polarization functions $ \Pi_{m}(Q) $ are given in Sec. 3. The final task is to eliminate the induced perturbations. For the purpose of linear response, the induced perturbations $ \eta_{m}(Q) $ can be determined by
This result recovers nothing but the quasi-particle random phase approximation widely used in condensed matter theory [81]. We note that in addition to the pure quasi-particle contribution $ \Pi_{b}^{\mu\nu}(Q) $, the linear response can couple to the collective mesonic modes once $ C^\mu_{m}(Q)\neq0 $. Hence, the response function reveals meson properties and also possibly phase transitions. In the chiral limit ($ m_0 = 0 $), we can show that $ C^\mu_{m}(Q) = 0 $ in the chiral symmetry restored phase ($ T>T_c $). In this case, the quasi-particle random phase approximation just describes the linear response of a hot and dense gas of non-interacting quarks. This is obviously inadequate. We will discuss the linear response theory beyond the quasi-particle random phase approximation in Sec. 7.
6.Dynamical density responses in random phase approximationAs an application of the mean-field theory or the random phase approximation, we study the linear responses to some density perturbations. To be specific, we consider the following $ \hat{X} $ operators: (1) $ \hat{X} = 1 $, corresponding to the vector current; (2) $ \hat{X} = \tau_3 $, corresponding to the isospin vector current; (3) $ \hat{X} = \gamma_5 $, corresponding to the axial vector current; (4) $ \hat{X} = \tau_3\gamma_5 $, corresponding to the isospin axial vector current. The $ 0 $-component of the current $ {J}^\mu $ is related to the baryon density, isospin density, axial baryon density, and axial isospin density, respectively. The density response function $ \chi(iq_l,{ q}) $ is given by the $ 00 $-component of the response function $ \Pi^{\mu\nu}(Q) $. In the mean-field theory, it is given by
In practice, we define the dynamic structure factor $ S(\omega,{ q}) $, which is related to the density response function $ \chi(iq_l,{ q}) $ via the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. It is defined as
At $ { q} = 0 $, we can show that $ C^0_{m}(iq_l, { q} = 0) $ vanish for all $ {m} = 0,1,2,3 $. Therefore, for the baryon density response, the dynamic structure factor vanishes at $ { q} = 0 $, i.e.,
At $ { q} = 0 $, we can show that $ C^0_{m}(iq_l, { q} = 0) $ vanish for all $ {\rm m} = 0,1,2,3 $. Therefore, for the isospin density response, the dynamic structure factor also vanishes at $ { q} = 0 $, i.e.,
At $ { q} = 0 $, we can show that $ C^0_{m}(iq_l, { q} = 0) $ vanish for all $ {\rm m} = 0,1,2,3 $. Therefore, the axial baryon density response has a nonzero dynamical structure factor at $ { q} = 0 $. It does not couple to the mesonic modes and is given by $ \chi(iq_l,{ q} = 0) = \Pi_{\rm b}^{00}(iq_l,{ q} = 0) $. The dynamical structure factor reads
We note that a similar result was also obtained in Ref. [100]. It is evident that the dynamical structure factor for the axial baryon density response is a direct reflection of the quark mass gap. $ S(\omega,{ q} = 0) $ is nonzero only for $ |\omega| $ larger than two times the quark mass gap. Figure 3 shows the dynamical structure factor $ S(\omega,{ q} = 0) $ for various values of the temperature. With increasing temperature, the threshold $ \omega_{\rm th} = 2M $ becomes smaller, and finally $ \omega_{\rm th}\rightarrow 0 $ in the high T limit. Figure3. (color online) Dynamical structure factor $ S(\omega,{ q}) $ at $ { q} = 0 $ for axial baryon density response ($ \hat{X} = \gamma_5 $) at various values of T and at $ \mu = 0 $. We consider the physical current quark mass $ m_0 = 5 $ MeV.
26.4.Isospin axial vector current -->
6.4.Isospin axial vector current
For the isospin axial vector current $ \hat{X} = \tau_3\gamma^5 $, the bare response function is given by
At $ { q} = 0 $, we can show that $ C^0_{m}(iq_l, { q} = 0) $ vanish for $ {m} = 0,1,2 $. The nonzero coupling $ C^0_{\rm 3}(iq_l, { q} = 0) $ is given by
Here, we have suppressed the condition $ { q} = 0 $ for convenience. Therefore, we expect that at low temperature, the dynamical structure factor for the axial isospin density response reveals a pole plus continuum structure. For $ |\omega|>2M $, $ {\rm Im}\Pi_{\rm 3}(\omega+i\epsilon) $ is nonzero, and hence the dynamical structure factor shows a continuum. For $ |\omega|<2M $, $ {\rm Im}\Pi_{\rm 3}(\omega+i\epsilon) $ vanishes and thus the dynamical structure factor is simply proportional to a delta function. We have
It is evident that the pole is located at the pion mass. In the chiral limit, this pole is located exactly at $ \omega = 0 $ for $ T<T_c $, and it disappears for $ T>T_c $. For physical current quark mass, there is a Mott transition temperature $ T = T_{m} $ determined by the equation $ m_\pi (T) = 2M(T) $. Figure 4 shows the dynamical structure factor $ S(\omega,{ q} = 0) $ for temperatures below and above $ T_{m} $. For $ T<T_{m} $, the pion is a bound state and hence $ S(\omega,{ q} = 0) $ shows a pole plus continuum structure. Above the Mott transition temperature, the pole disappears and $ S(\omega,{ q} = 0) $ shows only a continuum. The threshold of the continuum is also located at $ \omega_{\rm th} = 2M $. Figure4. Dynamical structure factor $ S(\omega,{ q}) $ at $ { q} = 0 $ for axial isospin density response ($ \hat{X} = \tau_3\gamma_5 $) below and above pion Mott transition temperature $ T_{\rm M} $. We consider physical current quark mass $ m_0 = 5 $ MeV and $ \mu = 0 $. The pion Mott transition temperature in this case is $ T_{\rm M} = 193 $ MeV.
7.Linear response beyond random phase approximation: meson-fluctuation contributionIn the chiral limit ($ m_0 = 0 $), the quarks become massless ($ M = 0 $) above the chiral phase transition temperature. In this case, we can show that $ C^\mu_{m}(Q) = 0 $ in the chiral symmetry restored phase. Therefore, the quasi-particle random phase approximation simply describes the linear response of a system of non-interacting massless quarks. However, it is generally expected that mesonic fluctuations play an important role above and near the chiral phase transition, indicating that the random phase approximation is inadequate for such a strongly interacting system. In this part, we consider a linear response theory beyond the random phase approximation. To this end, we recall that the generating functional in the Gaussian approximation can be expressed as
In the previous random phase approximation, the meson-fluctuation contribution $ {\cal W}_{\rm FL}[A] $ is neglected. We expect that this part becomes rather important near and above the chiral phase transition, where the quarks become massless and the mesonic degrees of freedom are still important. This is a general feature of a strongly interacting fermionic system. In strong-coupling superconductors, the pair fluctuation has an important contribution to the transport properties above and near the superconducting transition temperature [84,85]. We consider the contribution from mesonic fluctuations. To derive the generating functional $ {\cal W}_{\rm FL}[A] $, we first note that
The trace here is also taken in the momentum space. The next step is to expand $ {\cal W}_{\rm FL}[A] $ in powers of the external source and induced perturbations. To this end, we first expand the inverse meson propagator $ { D}_{A}^{-1}(Q,Q^\prime) $ in powers of $ A_\mu $ and $ \eta_{m} $. The expansion takes the form
Here, $ { D}(Q) $ is the meson propagator evaluated in Sec. 3, and $ \Sigma^{(n)} $ denotes the nth-order expansion in $ A_\mu $ and $ \eta_{m} $. In practice, we only need to evaluate the expansion up to the second order, since the higher order contributions are irrelevant to the linear response. Like $ { D}^{-1} $, $ \Sigma^{(1)} $ and $ \Sigma^{(2)} $ are $ 4\times4 $ matrices in the space spanned by $ {m} = 0,1,2,3 $. To obtain $ \Sigma^{(1)} $ and $ \Sigma^{(2)} $, we note that in the momentum space, the inverse of the mean-field quark Green's function with external source, $ {\cal G}_{A}^{-1} $, is given by
where $ \tilde{\Gamma} $ is a compact notation of $ (\Gamma_{m},\Gamma^\mu) $ and $ \Phi $ is a compact form of $ (\eta_{m},A_\mu) $. Here $ {i} = 0,1,2,3 $ still stands for $ \eta_{m} $ with $ {m} = 0,1,2,3 $, and $ {i} = 4,5,6,7 $ stands for $ A_\mu $ with $ \mu = 0,1,2,3 $. Applying the Taylor expansion for matrix functions, we obtain
According to the fact that $ {\cal G}(K,K^\prime) = {\cal G}(K)\delta_{K,K^\prime} $ and $ \Sigma_{A}(K,K^\prime) = \Sigma_{A}(K-K^\prime) $, this can be simplified to
The explicit form of $ \Sigma^{(1)} $ and $ \Sigma^{(2)} $ can be derived by using the above expansion for $ {\cal G}_{A} $. $ \Sigma^{(1)} $ is composed of one zeroth-order and one first-order contributions of $ {\cal G}_{A} $. It is explicitly given by
Here we start to demonstrate the explicit dependence on induced perturbations. Applying the trick of derivative expansion, we can expand $ {\cal W}_{\rm FL} $ in powers of the external source as well as the induced perturbations. We have
It is evident that $ {\cal W}_{\rm FL}^{(0)} = \beta V\Omega_{\rm FL} $ and hence the present linear response theory including the meson-fluctuation contribution is parallel to the meson-fluctuation theory of the equilibrium thermodynamics. The first-order expansion is given by
Here, the trace $ {\rm Tr}_{4\rm D} $ is now taken only in the four-dimensional space spanned by $ {m},{n} = 0,1,2,3 $. The second-order expansion can be expressed as
which correspond diagrammatically to the Aslamazov-Lakin (AL), self-energy (SE) or density-of-state, and Maki-Thompson (MT) contributions. To obtain the response functions, we need to eliminate the induced perturbations $ \eta_{m}(Q) $. Noting that the present theory of linear response is a natural generalization of the meson-fluctuation theory of the equilibrium thermodynamics, where the order parameter is determined at the mean-field level, we determine the induced perturbations $ \eta_{m}(Q) $ still by minimizing the mean-field generation functional, i.e.,
Later, we will show that the use of the above relations is also crucial to recover the correct number susceptibility in the static and long-wavelength limit. 37.1.1.Order parameter induced contribution -->
7.1.1.Order parameter induced contribution
Unlike the mean-field theory or random phase approximation, the first-order contribution, Eq. (143), becomes highly nontrivial. It can be expressed as
Since we consider only nonzero baryon chemical potential, here the effective chemical potential $ \mu_{X} = A_0(0) $ is nonvanishing only for the vector current case $ (\hat{X} = 1) $. Thus, $ {\cal C}_4 $ is nonvanishing only for the case $ \hat{X} = 1 $, where $ \mu_{X} $ corresponds to the quark chemical potential $ \mu $. The fact that $ {\cal C}_0\neq0 $ indicates that the first-order contribution $ {\cal W}_{\rm FL}^{(1)}[A;\eta] $ cannot be simply neglected, since it does contribute to the linear response. To understand this, we note that when eliminating the induced perturbation $ \eta_0(0) $, Eq. (147) is not adequate. Actually, the contributions of the order $ O(A^2) $ in Eq. (147) become important. To obtain these contributions, we should expand the mean-field generating functional $ {\cal W}_{\rm MF}[A;\eta] $ up to the third order in A and $ \eta $. We have
Here the the static and long-wavelength limit of an arbitrary function $ {\cal A}(Q) $ should be understood as $\lim_{Q\rightarrow0} $$ {\cal A}(Q) = \lim_{{ q}\rightarrow0}{\cal A}(iq_l = 0,{ q}) $. For the purpose of linear response, we apply Eq. (147) and obtain
It is evident that this contribution is due to the non-vanishing chiral condensate. In the chiral limit, this contribution vanishes above the phase transition temperature, where $ {\cal C}_0 = 0 $. Therefore, we denote it as the order parameter induced (OP) contribution, which can be expressed as
where $ \Pi_{\rm MT}^{\mu\nu}(Q) $ is the MT contribution to the response function. Combining all contributions, the meson-fluctuation contribution to the linear response is given by
Now, we verify the static and long-wavelength limit of the above linear response theory. In this limit, it is obvious that the density response function $ \Pi^{00}(Q\rightarrow0) $ should recover the charge susceptibility $ \kappa_{X} $ associated with the channel X, i.e.,
In condensed matter theory, this is the so-called compressibility sum rule [75]. Here, we emphasize that the correct static and long-wavelength limit of an arbitrary function $ {\cal A}(Q) $ should be understood as
In the mean-field theory, the thermodynamic potential is given by $ \Omega_{\rm MF}(\mu_{X},M) $, where the dependence on the temperature is not explicitly shown. Note that the effective quark mass M is also an implicit function of $ \mu_{X} $, $ M = M(\mu_{X}) $, which should be determined by the mean-field gap equation
We note that the effective quark mass $ M(\mu_{X}) $ is still determined by the mean-field gap equation. On the other hand, the meson-fluctuation contribution to the density response function can be decomposed as
We can show that the first three terms in $ (\kappa_{X})_{\rm FL} $ are related to the sum of AL, SE, and MT contributions in the $ Q\rightarrow0 $ limit,
we find that the the last term in $ (\kappa_{X})_{\rm FL} $ is exactly given by the OP contribution. We can further understand this result by working out the explicit form
In summary, we have shown that the compressibility sum rule is exactly satisfied in the linear response theory including the meson fluctuations. The order parameter induced contribution is rather crucial to recover the correct static and long-wavelength limit. 27.3.Chiral symmetry restored phase -->
7.3.Chiral symmetry restored phase
One special case we are interested in is the chiral symmetry restored phase ($ T>T_c $) in the chiral limit ($ m_0 = 0 $). In this case, we have $ {\cal C}_0 = 0 $, and hence the order parameter induced contribution vanishes. Also, we have $ C_{m}^\mu(Q) = 0 $, indicating that we do not need to consider the induced perturbations $ \eta_{m}(Q) $. In this case, the formalism becomes rather simple and we can identify various contributions diagrammatically. In the chiral symmetry restored phase, the sigma meson and pions become degenerate. We have
Here $ E_{ k} = |{ k}| $ for $ T>T_c $. Due to the degeneracy of the sigma meson and pions, various contributions to the linear response above $ T_c $ become simple. 37.3.1.Aslamazov-Lakin contribution -->
7.3.1.Aslamazov-Lakin contribution
Above $ T_c $, the Aslamazov-Lakin contribution is given by
Here, the quark propagator $ {\cal G}(K) $ is given in Eq. (85) with $ M = 0 $. The AL contribution can be diagrammatically demonstrated in Fig. 5. Figure5. Diagrammatic representation of Aslamazov-Lakin contribution. Note that there are two kinds of AL-type diagrams. The solid lines with arrows denote the quark propagator, the dashed lines depict the meson propagator, and wavy lines represent the external source.
37.3.2.Self-energy contribution -->
7.3.2.Self-energy contribution
Above $ T_c $, the self-energy or density-of-state contribution is given by
The SE contribution is diagrammatically illustrated in Fig. 6. Figure6. Diagrammatic representation of the self-energy contribution. Notations are the same as in Fig. 5.
37.3.3.Maki-Thompson contribution -->
7.3.3.Maki-Thompson contribution
Above $ T_c $, the Maki-Thompson contribution is given by
The MT contribution is diagrammatically illustrated in Fig. 7. Figure7. Diagrammatic representation of the Maki-Thompson contribution. Notations are the same as in Fig. 5.
In summary, the AL, SE, and MT contributions can be diagrammatically identified in the chiral symmetry restored phase. These contributions include the propagator of the degenerate mesonic modes, $ {\cal {D}}(Q) $. Near the chiral phase transition temperature, these mesonic modes are soft modes and are nearly massless. Therefore, we expect that these mesonic modes have a significant effect on the transport properties near the transition.