1.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China 2.Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control And Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China Manuscript received: 2020-12-16 Manuscript revised: 2021-04-19 Manuscript accepted: 2021-05-10 Abstract:Iron and oxalic acids are widely distributed in the atmosphere and easily form ferric oxalate complex (Fe(III)-Ox). The tropospheric aqueous-phase could provide a medium to enable the photo-Fenton reaction with Fe(III)-Ox under solar irradiation. Although the photolysis mechanisms of Fe(III)-Ox have been investigated extensively, information about the oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOC), specifically the potential for Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation in the Fe(III)-Ox system, is lacking. In this study, a ubiquitous VOC methacrolein (MACR) is chosen as a model VOC, and the oxidation of MACR with Fe(III)-Ox is investigated under typical atmospheric water conditions. The effects of oxalate concentration, Fe(III) concentration, MACR concentration, and pH on the oxidation of MACR are studied in detail. Results show that the oxidation rate of MACR greatly accelerates in the presence of oxalate when compared with only Fe(III). The oxidation rate of MACR also accelerates with increasing concentration of oxalate. The effect of Fe(III) is found to be more complicated. The oxidation rate of MACR first increases and then decreases with increasing Fe(III) concentration. The oxidation rate of MACR increases monotonically with decreasing pH in the common atmospheric water pH range or with decreasing MACR concentration. The production of ferrous and hydrogen peroxide, pH, and aqueous absorbance are monitored throughout the reaction process. The quenching experiments verify that ·OH and $\rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $ are both responsible for the oxidation of MACR. MACR is found to rapidly oxidize into small organic acids with higher boiling points and oligomers with higher molecular weight, which contributes to the yield of SOA. These results suggest that Fe(III)-Ox plays an important role in atmospheric oxidation. Keywords: Fe(III)-Ox, OH radical, atmospheric oxidation, SOA, methacrolein 摘要:大气中广泛存在着草酸和铁元素,两者极易络合形成草酸铁络合物Fe(III)-Ox。光照下的Fe(III)-Ox可以在大气对流层水相中发生光芬顿反应。尽管Fe(III)-Ox的光解机制已被广泛研究,但Fe(III)-Ox体系内挥发性有机物(VOC)的氧化机制及其生成二次气溶胶(SOA)的潜力尚不明确。本研究选用了普遍存在的VOC甲基丙烯醛(MACR)为模型VOC,在典型的大气水相条件下研究了MACR在光照Fe(III)-Ox体系中氧化过程,包括了草酸根浓度、Fe(III)浓度、MACR浓度和pH对MACR氧化速率的影响。结果显示在有草酸根存在时,MACR的氧化速率要远远快于只有Fe(III)的光照体系,且MACR的氧化速率随草酸根浓度的增加而增加。在本研究范围内,MACR的氧化速率随溶液pH的降低和MACR初始浓度的减少而单调增加。而Fe(III)的影响机制更为复杂,MACR的氧化速率随着Fe(III)浓度的增加先增加后降低。为了研究反应机制,还监测了Fe(II)浓度、H2O2浓度、溶液pH、溶液吸光度的变化和不同自由基对MACR氧化的贡献。通过对产物的质谱分析发现MACR在光照Fe(III)-Ox体系中被快速氧化为小分子有机酸和高分子量的聚合物,进而贡献了大气二次气溶胶的产量。 关键词:草酸铁, 羟基自由基, 大气氧化性, 二次气溶胶, 甲基丙烯醛
HTML
--> --> --> -->
2.1. Materials
MACR (95%) and potassium oxalate (99.98%) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co. Ltd. Ferric perchlorate, perchloric acid (70%), ferrozine (97%), 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (99%), and peroxidase (from horseradish, RZ>2.5) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Analytical grade $ {\mathrm{C}\mathrm{H}}_{3}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{O}\mathrm{O}\mathrm{H} $, $ {\mathrm{C}\mathrm{H}}_{3}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{O}\mathrm{O}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{a} $, NaOH, hydroxylamine hydrochloride, phenazine, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt (EDTA-2Na) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Deionized (DI) water was utilized in all experiments.
2 2.2. Photolysis experiments -->
2.2. Photolysis experiments
Photolysis reaction was performed in a photochemical reactor (XPA-VII, Xujiang electromechanical plant, Nanjing, China) equipped with a 500 W Xenon lamp combined with a 290 nm cut-off filter as simulated solar light. The Xenon lamp spectrum received by the reaction solution is shown in Fig. A1 in the Appendix. The temperature of the reactor was maintained at 25°C ± 2°C by cooling water. The pH was adjusted by $ \mathrm{H}{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{O}}_{4} $. A 20 mL solution was prepared under constant magnetic stirring and reacted in a 50 mL cylindrical quartz tube sealed with a rubber stopper. Before sealing, the aqueous solution, which did not contain MACR, was stirred in the dark for 10 min to achieve oxygen saturation. Then, 1 mL of the solution was taken out through the rubber stopper using a syringe and filtered through a poly tetra fluoroethylene (PTFE) 0.22 μm filter. FigureA1. The xenon lamp spectrum received by the reaction solution.
2 2.3. Analytical procedures -->
2.3. Analytical procedures
GC-FID (Agilent 7890A, USA) was used to analyze the MACR concentration. It was equipped with a semi-polar capillary column (CNW CD-5MS 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, Germany), which allowed the injection of aqueous phase samples. The GC injector and detector were heated at 250°C. Nitrogen gas was used as carrier gas at 1 mL min?1 with a 1/10 split. The oven temperature program was 40°C for 4 min, raised by 10°C min?1 up to 120°C, and 120°C for 5 min (El Haddad et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2009). An IC (DIONEX ICS-3000, Thermo Fisher, USA) assembled with AG11-HC guard column and AS11-HC analytical column was used to measure organic acid anions (Zhou et al., 2018). The pH of the aqueous solution containing iron ion was adjusted to 10. Then, the solution was passed through a 0.22 μm PTFE filter and an H-type pretreatment filter to remove the iron. The concentrations of Fe(II) and total dissolved iron were determined by using a spectrophotometry methodology with ortho-phenanthroline and hydroxylamine (Sastry and Rao, 1996). Hydrogen peroxide concentrations were determined by the fluorescence method developed by Lazrus et al. (1985) after sample mixing with EDTA-2Na. Solution pH was measured using a pH meter (METTLER TOLEDO FE20, Switzerland). UV-vis spectra of the solutions were tracked by UV-vis spectrometer (Scinco Nano MD, SCINCO, South Korea). Reaction byproducts were identified with a LC-QTOF-MS system (Agilent 6540, USA) equipped with an electrospray ionization source, and analysis was performed under negative ionization mode (Lian et al., 2017).
-->
3.1. The control experiments
As seen in Fig. 1, MACR shows little change under dark conditions. The small Henry coefficient of MACR keeps it mostly distributed in the aqueous solution, and errors caused by gas-liquid distribution are ignored in subsequent experiments. No obvious direct photolysis of MACR is found under the simulated sunlight conditions (λ > 290 nm) because MACR’s absorbance peak at 375 nm is low (Fig. 2). In the presence of Fe(III), MACR is oxidized about 7% in 90 min. $ {\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{O}\mathrm{H}\right)}^{2+} $ is the dominant Fe(III) hydroxide complex in the aqueous solution with pH of 4, and it is expected to undergo photolysis to generate ·OH according to Eqs. (1?3) and then react with MACR. Figure1. Control experiments of MACR oxidation ([MACR]0 = 500 μM, [Fe(III)]0 = 100 μM, [Oxalate]0 = 1000 μM, pH = 4.0 ± 0.1, air-saturated solution).
Figure2. (a) Effect of oxalate concentration on the photooxidation of MACR in the Fe(III)-Ox system; (b) The reaction rate constant calculated by the pseudo-first-order kinetics variation with the concentration of oxalate ([Oxalate]0 = 1000 μM, [MACR]0 = 500 μM, pH 4.0 ± 0.1, air saturated solution).
where h is Planck constant, v is frequency of light. In the presence of Fe(III)-Ox (Fig. 1), the oxidation rate of MACR rapidly increases, and 80% MACR is oxidized in 60 min. This result occurs because Fe(III)-Ox forms and the efficiency of Fenton-like reaction is accelerated. As shown in Fig. A2, Fe(III)-Ox has more obvious absorption peaks in the sunlight range compared to the Fe(III) solution. Quantum yields (at 293 K, pH = 4.0) for the photolysis of $ {\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{O}\mathrm{H}\right)}^{2+} $ at 313 nm and 360 nm are 0.14 ± 0.04 and 0.017 ± 0.003 (Faust and Hoigné, 1990), respectively. $ {\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{O}\mathrm{H}\right)}^{2+} $ has weak absorption in the solar UVA-visible region (Knight and Sylva, 1975). Quantum yields for $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\right){\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{3}\right]}^{3-} $ at 313 nm and 366 nm are 2663 ± 37 and 709 ± 10, respectively, and quantum yields for $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\right){\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{2}\right]}^{-} $ at 313 nm and 366 nm are 2055 ± 111 and 1.17 ± 1.46 (Weller et al., 2013b), respectively, which are much higher than $ {\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{O}\mathrm{H}\right)}^{2+} $, indicating that higher photoactivity produces more radicals. FigureA2. UV-vis absorption spectra of solution (pH = 4.0 ± 0.1, in dark condition).
2 3.2. Effect of oxalate concentration -->
3.2. Effect of oxalate concentration
The effect of oxalate concentration is investigated in the range from 100 μM to 2000 μM. As shown in Fig. 2a, the oxidation rate of MACR increases with increasing oxalate concentration. The pseudo-first-order oxidation rate of MACR has an increase of nearly equal proportion with increasing oxalate concentration from 100 μM to 2000 μM (Fig. 2b). Approximately 80% MACR is oxidized when oxalate concentration is 1000 μM. Oxalate at 2000 μM leads to the oxidation of all MACR, though this concentration is excessive. However, the oxidation rate corresponding to 2000 μM oxalate still increases linearly, and the inhibitory effect caused by excess oxalate is not observed in Fig. 2b. This result may be due to the low second-order reaction rate constant of oxalate and ·OH. The increasing degradation efficiency of MACR is due to the formation of Fe(III)-Ox, which is photolyzed to yield oxalate radicals (${\mathrm{C}}_{2}\rm{O}_{\small 4}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}}$) and ·OH in the presence of dissolved oxygen (Eqs. 4?10). Different ratios of oxalate and ferric form different complexes, and quantum yields for $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}{\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{2}\right]}^{-} $ are larger than $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}{\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{3}\right]}^{3-} $ under simulated sunlight (Weller et al., 2013a), which indicates that $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}{\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{2}\right]}^{-} $ has stronger photoactivity and can produce more active radicals. According to Fig. A3, the proportion of $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}{\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{2}\right]}^{-} $ increases first then decreases with increasing oxalate concentration from 100 μM to 2000 μM, while $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}{\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{3}\right]}^{3-} $ increases monotonously and becomes the main complex when the concentration of oxalate is above 500 μM. The different proportions of the complex also cause the difference in the photoactivity of the solution. However, the oxidation rate of MACR keeps increasing monotonically with increasing oxalate concentration, which may be due to the simultaneous existence of multiple complexes, resulting in insignificant differences in photoactivity. FigureA3. Change of Fe(III) species distribution with oxalate concentration, [Fe(III)]0 = 100 μM, pH = 4.0, 25°C.
2 3.3. Effect of Fe(III) concentration -->
3.3. Effect of Fe(III) concentration
To investigate the effect of Fe(III) concentration on the photooxidation of MACR, the Fe(III) concentration was varied from 20 μM to 200 μM during the reaction. As shown in Fig. 3, the photooxidation rate of MACR increases with increasing Fe(III) concentration from 20 μM to 200 μM in the first 60 min. This is because the complex species become different when the concentration ratio between ferric and oxalate is changed. The $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}{\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{2}\right]}^{-} $ with higher photoactivity is the main form when oxalate concentration is low, and more $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}{\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{3}\right]}^{3-} $ is produced with increasing oxalate concentration (Fig. A4). As the reaction time is extended, high Fe(III) concentration has a negative effect on MACR oxidation. The reason for this might be the consumption of ${\mathrm{C}}\rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}}$ under relatively high Fe(III) concentration conditions. Normally, ${{\mathrm{C}\rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}}} }$ reacts with dissolved $ {\mathrm{O}}_{2} $ and causes formation of $ {\mathrm{H}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{2} $ and ·OH at low Fe(III)-Ox concentration. However, the majority of $\rm{CO}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}}$ interacts with Fe(III)-Ox, resulting in the formation of Fe(II) and $ {\mathrm{C}\mathrm{O}}_{2} $ (Eq. 11) with a high concentration of Fe(III)-Ox. The formation of OH radicals is inhibited in this situation. Figure3. Effect of Fe(III) concentration on the photooxidation of MACR in the Fe(III)-Ox system ([Oxalate]0 = 1000 μM, [MACR]0 = 500 μM, pH 4.0 ± 0.1, air-saturated solution).
FigureA4. Change of Fe(III) species distribution with Fe(III) concentration, [Oxalate]0 = 1000 μM, pH = 4.0, 25°C.
2 3.4. Effects of solution pH -->
3.4. Effects of solution pH
Solution pH has an important effect on the speciation and reactivity of Fe(III)-Ox. The typical pH value in the atmosphere is from 2.5 to 5.5. As shown in Fig. 4, the photooxidation rates of MACR decrease with increasing pH from 2.5 to 5.5. $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\right){\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{2}\right]}^{-} $ is the major complex in pH 2.5 and then decreases with increasing pH value. Then, $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\right){\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{3}\right]}^{3-} $ becomes the dominant complex. Considering that $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\right){\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{3}\right]}^{3-} $ and $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\right){\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{2}\right]}^{-} $ have stronger photoactivity than $ [{\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\right)\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)]}^{+} $ and $ {\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}}^{3+} $ (Weller et al., 2013b), pH affects the photo-reactivity by changing the complex forms. Moreover, pH also affects the reactions between $ \rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $/$ {{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\,\cdot\,}} $ and Fe(II) (Eq. 9), and these reactions contribute most of the H2O2 in the Fe(III) oxalate system. $ {{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\,\cdot\,}} $ is the dominant species at low pH, and then it transfers to $ \rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $ with increasing pH (Eq. 8) (Zuo and Hoigne, 1992). $ \rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $ can react to the H2O2 form faster than $ {{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\,\cdot\,}} $. So, these two factors allow low pH to have a positive effect on MACR oxidation. Figure4. Effect of pH on the photooxidation of MACR in the Fe(III)-Ox system ([Fe(III)]0 = 100 μM, [Oxalate]0 = 1000 μM, [MACR]0= 500 μM, air-saturated solution).
2 3.5. Effects of MACR concentration -->
3.5. Effects of MACR concentration
The influence of initial MACR concentration (from 60 μM to 680 μM) is investigated (Fig. 5). The oxidation rates of MACR increase with decreasing MACR concentration, and 60 μM, 160 μM, and 250 μM MACR are 100% oxidized during 45 min. However, a certain amount of MACR remains when MACR concentration is high (such as 400 μM and 680 μM). This is because oxalate is depleted and is unable to produce enough ·OH to completely oxidize MACR. Figure5. Effect of MACR concentration on the photooxidation of MACR in the Fe(III)-Ox system ([Fe(III)]0 = 100 μM, [Oxalate]0 = 1000 μM, pH 4.0 ± 0.1, air-saturated solution).
2 3.6. Photooxidation mechanism of MACR in Fe(III)-Ox system -->
3.6. Photooxidation mechanism of MACR in Fe(III)-Ox system
H2O2 and Fe(II) are the major long-lived oxidized active species in the photolysis of Fe(III)-Ox (Faust et al., 1993), and this determines the production of free radicals. As shown in Fig. 6a, Fe(II) concentration rapidly increases to 80% in 10 min, and then reduces to approximately 2% from 30 min to 60 min. Finally, Fe(II) concentration is maintained at an undetectable value in the remaining time. The total dissolved iron remains stable for 30 min and then quickly drops to only 5 μM left in the next 30 min. Fe(II) is usually formed by the photoreduction of $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\right){\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{3}\right]}^{3-} $ or $ {\left[\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\right){\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{2}\right]}^{-} $ and is finally consumed with H2O2 to form Fe(III). The accumulation of Fe(II) is due to the fast photoreduction rate. The change of total dissolved iron happens because the iron precipitates as insoluble Fe(OH)n(s), which is caused by decreasing oxalate concentration (Fig. A3) and increasing pH (Figs. 4. and A5). The change of pH is caused by the generation of $ {\mathrm{O}\mathrm{H}}^{-} $ in Fenton reaction. Fenton reaction can increase pH, as confirmed in a previous study (de Lima Perini et al., 2013). The pH increase can be attributed to the consumption of oxalate, leading to the release of Fe(III). The concentration of free oxalate changes, which might establish the acid-base reaction (de Luca et al., 2014). Otherwise, some organic acids are formed by the reaction of MACR and ·OH (Liu et al., 2009), which can decrease the solution pH. Figure6. (a) The change of Fe(II), total dissolved iron, and pH (b) H2O2 formation during the photooxidation of MACR in the Fe(III)-Ox system ([Fe(III)]0 = 100 μM, [Oxalate]0 = 1000 μM, [MACR]0 = 500 μM, pH 4.0 ± 0.1, air-saturated solution).
FigureA5. Change of Fe(III) species distribution with pH, [Fe(III)]0 = 100 μM, [Oxalate]0 = 1000 μM, 25°C.
The concentration of H2O2 increase in the first 5 min, then decreases in 5?45 min, and returns to increase after 45 minutes (Fig. 6b). H2O2 is the production of reaction of Fe(II) and $ \rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $/$ {{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\,\cdot\,}} $, and $ \rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $/$ {{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\,\cdot\,}} $ is from the photolysis of oxalate (Eqs. 4?9). According to Eqs. 9 and 10, low concentration Fe(II) is suitable for H2O2 accumulation, so H2O2 concentration increase first and then decrease with the increase of Fe(II) concentration in first 30 min. After 30 min, the increase in pH and the consumption of oxalate leads to the formation of $ {\mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{O}\mathrm{H}\right)}_{{\rm{n}}} $, which reduces the available Fe(II) and inhibits the rate of generation and consumption of H2O2 (Eqs. 9 and 10) simultaneously. At this stage, non-Fenton reactions might also play a role in the generation and consumption of H2O2 (Eqs. 12 and 13). The mechanism of Fe(III)-Ox photolysis is shown in Eqs. 4?11. $ \mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\right){{\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{3}^{3-}} $ and $ \mathrm{F}\mathrm{e}\left(\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{I}\right){{\left({\mathrm{C}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}\right)}_{2}^{-}} $ are photolyzed to produce $ {{\mathrm{C}}_{2}\rm{O}_{\small 4}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} } $ (Eqs. 4?5), which forms $ {\mathrm{C}\rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} } $ through decarboxylation (Eq. 6). $ {\mathrm{C}\rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} } $ reacts with $ {\mathrm{O}}_{2} $ to produce $\rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} ($Eq. 7) and leads to the formation of $ {\mathrm{H}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{2} $ (Eq. 9). ·OH can be produced continuously by the reaction between Fe(II) and H2O2 (Fenton reaction). In this study, 1 mM p-benzoquinone (BQ) was used as the scavenger of $ \rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $ (Patel and Willson, 1973), and 200 mM isopropanol (2-Pr) was used to quench ·OH. The experimental results are shown in Fig. 7. The addition of BQ and 2-Pr suppresses the oxidation of MACR, and only 10% and 30% oxidation remains after 90 min reaction, respectively. This indicates that $ \rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $ can also react with MACR in addition to ·OH. Nitrogen (N2) is introduced in the solution to eliminate oxygen (O2). However, it is difficult for the solution containing volatile MACR to remove all O2 if MACR is prevented from leaking simultaneously. So, the system still contains a part of O2. However, the N2 bubbling experiment proves that the conversion of O2 to $\rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $ is an important speed-limiting step. A low concentration of O2 extends the time for the complete oxidation of MACR. The reaction of MACR with ${{\mathrm{C}\rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} }}$ is not considered in aerated water because of the rapid quenching reaction of ${{\mathrm{C}\rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} }}$ by O2 (Surdhar et al., 1989). Figure7. Effect of scavengers on the photooxidation of MACR in the Fe(III)-Ox system ([Fe(III)]0 = 100 μM, [Oxalate]0 = 1000 μM, [MACR]0 = 500 μM, pH 4.0 ± 0.1, air-saturated solution).
The proposed reaction pathways based on the observed products are shown in Fig. 8. Here, we present and discuss the three possible pathways oxidation of MACR in Fe(III)-Ox Fenton-like reaction can proceed: via addition on the C = C bond by ·OH (pathway A) (Liu et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2010), H-abstraction of the methyl group by ·OH and $\rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $ (pathway B), nucleophilic addition on carbonyl group by $ \rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $ (pathway C) (Hayyan et al., 2016). Figure8. Scheme for the proposed reaction pathways of the photooxidation of MACR in the Fe(III)-Ox system. The molecular formulas in the blue frames are observed products.
The external addition of ·OH leads to the formation of an alkyl radical, which may form aldehyde or react with itself to form polymer C8H14O4 (Mass-to-charge ratio m/z = 175.0940) directly (pathway A1) or rapidly add to O2 to form peroxy radical (pathway A2). The peroxy radical reacts with itself to form an unstable tetroxide, then degrades to form alkoxy radical (pathway A2.1). This alkoxy radical undergoes decomposition and forms C3H4O2 (m/z = 73.0295), C3H4O3 (m/z = 89.0241), C3H6O2, and acetic acid (pathway A2.1a, b, c, d). The radical fragments generated during the decomposition can also react with O2 to form HCHO, CHOOH, and HOOCH2OH. The C3H4O2 (m/z = 73.0296) can also result in the formation of pyruvate, glyoxylate, and oxalate. ·OH and $ \rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $ can attack MACR by hydrogen abstraction on the methyl group, leading to the formation of the alkyl radical (pathway B). Then by rapidly adding to O2 to form peroxy radical, which may form the corresponding carboxylic acid C4H6O3 (m/z = 103.0395) or react with itself to form a tetroxide C8H10O6 (m/z = 203.0549). Then C8H10O6 degrades to form alkoxy radical and results in the formation of C4H6O2 (m/z = 87.0454) and C4H4O2 (m/z = 85.0289). $ \rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $ may have a nucleophilic addition on carbonyl group (pathway C) and react with itself to form another tetroxide, and the corresponding aldehyde or carboxylic acid C4H6O2 (m/z = 87.0447) is generated through a similar approach as above. The formation of higher molecular weight compounds is observed, and the pathway of ·OH and $ \rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $ to oxidize MACR is different. The photooxidation of MACR in the Fe(III)-Ox system is an important source of SOA in the atmosphere. Small organic acids are known to be the main oxidation products of MACR (El Haddad et al., 2009). So, IC was used to analyze the 60 min photooxidation sample of MACR in Fe(III)-Ox and H2O2 systems. Photolysis of H2O2 only produces ·OH, and the product is compared with the oxidation product from the Fe(III)-Ox system. Similar MACR photooxidation rates are obtained in 200 mM H2O2 after 60 min compared with the Fe(III)-Ox system. The results of IC measurements are shown in Fig. 9. Except for the oxalate added at the beginning, acetic, formic and pyruvic acids are detected in photolysis of MACR in the Fe(III)-Ox system, although pyruvic acid is not detected in the H2O2 system. The concentrations of small organic acids in the two systems have obvious differences. More acetic acid and less formic acid are obtained from the Fe(III)-Ox system. This may be because the oxidation mechanism of MACR in the two systems differs, and the involvement of $ \rm{O}_{\small 2}^{\overline {\,\cdot\,}} $ influences the concentration of the products dramatically. Figure9. Concentration of small organic acids in the photooxidation of MACR in H2O2 and Fe(III)-Ox system at 60 min obtained by IC ([Fe(III)]0 = 100 μM, [Oxalate]0 = 1000 μM, [MACR]0 = 500 μM, pH 4.0 ± 0.1).
As shown in Fig. 10, the absorbance of the solution changes significantly with irradiation time. Two big absorbance peaks are found at around 280 nm and 310 nm at the beginning of the reaction, which from oxalate and MACR, respectively. The absorbance at 310 nm decreases in the first 30 min, and the absorbance of 280 nm relative to the nearby baseline decreases in the first 10 min, increases from 10 min to 60 min, then decreases from 60 min to 180 min. The absorbance of the region with a wavelength higher than 320 nm increases from 30 min to 150 min. The increasing absorbance at 280 nm might be due to the$ n\to {\mathrm{\pi }}^{\mathrm{*}} $ transition of the intermediate products, such as aldehyde or ketone. The increasing absorbance of other parts comes from the formation of yellow precipitates Fe(OH)n, which absorb light in the short wavelength, not from the oxidation products of MACR (Fig. A6). The clear yellow precipitates are produced in the late stage of the reaction. This finding indicates that the absorbance change caused by Fenton reaction might be an ignored factor, which would change the optical properties of aerosols and has implications for radiative forcing (Pillar-Little and Guzman, 2018). Figure10. The UV-Vis spectra of the photooxidation of MACR in Fe(III)-Ox system after filtering with 0.22 μm filter ([Fe(III)]0 = 100 μM, [Oxalate]0 = 1000 μM, [MACR]0 = 500 μM, pH 4.0 ± 0.1, air-saturated solution).
FigureA6. The UV-Vis spectra of filtered (0.22 μm) and unfiltered (a) photolysis of the Fe(III)-Ox system, and (b) the photooxidation of MACR in the Fe(III)-Ox system ([Fe(III)]0 = 100 μM, [Oxalate]0 = 1000 μM, [MACR]0 = 500 μM, pH 4.0 ± 0.1, air-saturated solution).