冀祥德，汉族，山东省青州市人，北京大学法学博士，中国社会科学院法学博士后。先后从事过警察、教师、律师、检察、科研职业。曾任山东德扬律师事务所主任、北京市崇文区人民检察院副检察长、中国社会科学院法学研究所所长助理、方志出版社总编辑等职。曾获北京大学研究生“学术十杰”、中国社会科学院首届“十大杰出法学博士后”、全国优秀教师、全国优秀辩护律师等称号。现就职于中国社会科学院，任中国地方志指导小组秘书长，中国地方志指导小组办公室党组书记、主任，方志出版社社长，中国社会科学院法学研究所研究员、博士生导师，中国社会科学院研究生院法学系常务副主任、教授。
主要研究方向：
刑事诉讼法学，证据法学，司法制度学，法律教育学，近年开始从事方志学研究。
主要社会兼职：
中国地方志学会副会长兼秘书长，中国地方志学会方志学研究会会长，中国地方志学会年鉴研究会会长，中国法学教育研究会副会长，中国法学教育研究会诊所法律教育专业委员会副主任，中国刑事诉讼法学研究会、中国监狱工作协会、中国司法行政戒毒工作协会等学会、协会常务理事，临沂大学法学院名誉院长，北京大学法学院、中国人民大学法学院等院校博士论文答辩委员会委员，复旦大学、广西大学、烟台大学等院校兼职研究员、教授，民政部等部委法律顾问，北京、山东、河北等政法系统专家咨询委员，最高人民法院博士后合作导师。
主要学术成果：
《劳教制度废除后国家制裁体系之重构》（专著）；《控辩平等论》（专著）；《建立中国控辩协商制度研究》（专著）；《婚内强奸问题研究》（专著）；《建立中国刑事辩护准入制度理论与实证研究》（著作第一作者）；《中国法学教育现状与发展趋势》（著作第一作者）；《法律教育学的新发展》（著作第一作者）；《监所暴力与监所体制改革研究》（著作第一作者）；《中国改造罪犯模式之转型》（著作第一作者）；《协商性纠纷解决机制比较研究》（主编）；《司法制度新论》（主编）；《法学教育的中国模式》（主编）；《依法治国与深化司法体制改革》（主编）；《中国刑事诉讼法学发展与展望》（主编）；《最新刑事诉讼法释评》（主编）；《法律视野下的十大社会热点问题》（主编）；另主编、合著、参编著作、教材四十余部，发表学术论文二百余篇。为中央宣传部社科规划办、全国哲学社会科学规划办《成果要报》《中国社会科学院要报》《领导参阅》《学术动态》等选用科研成果、研究报告四十余项篇。
承担主要课题：
独立完成的重要法学课题有：国家社会科学基金课题“构建我国刑事诉讼中的控辩平等”；国家社会科学基金后期资助课题“世界刑事诉讼的四次革命”；全国博士后管理委员会资助项目、中国社会科学院创新工程学术出版资助项目“劳教制度废除与国家制裁体系重构”；中国博士后科学基金项目“建立中国控辩协商制度研究”；加拿大国际开发署提供资助的加拿大律师协会与中华全国律师协会国际刑事辩护与司法改革课题；中外合作国际课题“协商性纠纷解决机制比较研究”；中荷法律制度改革研究课题之子课题“辩护律师的角色定位与准入制度”。
主持完成的重要法学课题有：中国社会科学院重大、重点课题“和谐社会语境下的控辩关系”“法学教育的中国模式”“建立中国刑事辩护准入制度研究”“法律监督统一立法研究”；中国社会科学院法治国情重大课题“改造罪犯的中国模式”等；最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题“疑罪不诉的证据问题研究”等；中国法学会课题“遏制监所暴力与监所体制改革研究”等。
独立承担或者主持的方志学课题有：国家社科基金重大专项工程“中国抗日战争志”；中国社会科学院、中国地方志指导小组重大课题“中国南海志”；国务院办公厅、财政部、中国地方志指导小组重大课题“民族地区与经济欠发达地区志书出版资助工程”“民族地区与经济欠发达地区年鉴出版资助工程”“中国名镇志文化工程”“中国名村志文化工程”“中国志书精品工程”“中国年鉴精品工程”“中国地方志‘一体两翼’工程”“方志馆研究建设与全国地方志出版基地建设工程”“全国数字方志与信息方志建设工程”“中国地方志学科建设与队伍建设工程”“中国方志文化走向世界工程”“中国名山志文化工程”“中国名水志文化工程”“中国名街志文化工程”“中国名酒志文化工程”等。
主要学术获奖：
第一届全国法学博士后科研成果一等奖（专著类）；第二届中国法学优秀成果一等奖（专著类）；中国法学会中青年刑事诉讼法学成果一等奖（专著类）；第三届全国法学教材及科研成果奖二等奖（科研成果类）；第三届中国法学教育研究成果奖二等奖；中国法学会、最高人民检察院、司法部、教育部等单位优秀科研成果一、二、三等奖若干。
主要学术观点
一、提出并论证了“刑事诉讼第四次革命”的命题。认为：刑事诉讼的第一次革命是司法权与行政权的分离；刑事诉讼的第二次革命是审判权与控诉权的分离；刑事诉讼的第三次革命是控辩平等（或者控辩平衡）；目前，世界正在进行刑事诉讼的第四次革命--控辩关系从以对抗为主、合作为辅，转向以合作为主、对抗为辅。
二、提出并论证了“建立中国控辩协商制度”。在致力于解决中国转型时期纠纷多发与有限司法资源矛盾的对策研究中，提出了“控辩协商”的概念，倡导并构建适应中国实际需要、富有中国特色、具有中国气派、切合二十一世纪法治时代精神的中国控辩协商制度，在保证司法公正的前提下，提高司法效率。
三、发展了“控辩平等理论”。在法学界关于控辩平等主要是"平等武装"的传统理论基础之上，提出并论证了“平等对抗”、“平等保护”和“平等合作”的新学说，赋予了控辩平等新的内涵；以论证控辩平等应当是形式平等与实质平等的统一为理论基础，结合实证研究剖析了现行刑事诉讼法备受诟病的根由，主张应当通过平等武装和平等保护，实现平等合作与平等对抗。
四、提出并论证了在建设和谐社会的语境之下，重构中国控辩关系的设想。即从目前控辩双方的“敌视”、“非理性、不平等对抗”，转向“控辩平等”；在控辩平等的基础上，控辩双方既可以平等对抗，也可以平等合作。基本方案是：控辩双方在平等的基础上，首先寻求平等合作，用以解决80%左右的案件，以进一步提高诉讼效率；合作不成的20%左右的案件，平等对抗，以促进实现公正；通过刑事诉讼程序一体化改造，实现建立公正、权威、高效司法制度的目标。
五、提出并论证了以“简者更简、繁者更繁”为中心的中国刑事诉讼制度改革的基本模式。主张以证据开示为前提，设置问罪程序，通过罪状认否对案件予以繁简分流。被追诉人作有罪答辩的，进入正当简易程序，视案情清楚与否及证据充分与否而分别适用速决程序或者控辩协商程序，简化庭审前的准备与庭审程序中的诸多环节，做到"简者更简"；被追诉人作无罪答辩的，进入正当普通程序，赋予被追诉人及其辩护人全面的实体与程序的权利保障，实现“繁者越繁”。
六、提出并论证了“附定罪条件逮捕制度”。认为应当建立在对提请或者移送批准逮捕案件作分流处理的前提下，以证明标准的层次性理论为正当性基础，以附定罪条件为实质，以特殊犯罪控制与一般人权保障为诉讼价值追求，以国际公约与国际刑事司法准则为设计坐标，立足中国刑事司法现状，对我国强制措施制度予以诉讼化改造。该论证对于纠正实务界错误认识，澄清学术界的误解，建构逮捕制度的正当性起到了积极推动作用。
七、在刑事辩护领域率先提出“刑事辩护三难说”。即1996年刑事诉讼法修改和1997年刑法增加第306条后，刑事辩护中的会见难、阅卷难、调查取证难，被法学界和法律界引用至今。
八、提出并论证了“公检法律车轮说”。认为“在法治视野之下的法律职业共同体中，公、检、法、律是推进社会法治进程不可或缺的四个车轮，缺乏现代辩护律师制度的刑事司法制度，永远不可能驶入现代法治的轨道。为此，公安司法机关必须改变过去长期以来形成的那种律师参与刑事诉讼会给侦查、起诉、审判工作造成困难的观念，树立律师参与诉讼是为了保障被追诉人的合法权益、保障程序公正的现代法治观念，在刑事诉讼中平等的、善意的对待辩护律师，与辩护律师携手并肩，共同推动我国法治建设的进程。”
九、提出并论证了“刑事辩护准入说”。关于在我国建立刑事辩护准入制度的总体构想是：必须取得司法部统一颁发的刑事辩护执业证书的律师才能从事刑事辩护。凡是取得法律职业资格，从事律师业务三年以上，并通过专门的刑事辩护考试者，可以在基层法院从事刑事辩护；在基层法院从事三年以上刑事辩护的律师，经过培训考核合格者，可以在中级法院从事一般刑事案件的辩护；在中级法院从事五年以上一般刑事案件辩护的律师，经过培训考核合格者，可以从事死刑案件的辩护。同时，建立与准入机制相配套的培训机制、考核机制和退出机制。
十、提出并论证了“刑事辩护木桶说”。指出：一个国家稳定和发展最不可或缺的制度莫过于法律制度，法律制度中最不可或缺的制度当是刑事司法制度，而一个国家的刑事司法制度又依赖于刑事辩护制度，特别是辩护律师能否真正履行好辩护的职责以及辩护律师能否建立起公众的信赖。形象地说：法治是“社会木桶”最短的一块木板，刑事法治是“法治木桶”最短的一块木板，刑事辩护是“刑事法治木桶”最短的一块木板。评价一个国家的法治水平，从其刑事辩护状况的考察中即可得出确定性结论。
十一、提出并论证了“婚内强奸犯罪化”主张。提出了婚内强奸犯罪化立论的新原点--“耦合权利义务说”。揭示出婚内强奸的起动原因乃性违约，由于性违约从而导致性暴力。但是，从法律逻辑上，性违约则不一定必然导致性暴力，尤其不必然导致性暴力之合法性。认为在权利规范从社会本位走向权利本位之后，人权保障功能和提供社会公正功能将是任何一项法律制度所不可或缺的功能。这种理念反映在对婚内强奸问题的认识上，即是冲破婚姻关系对妇女性权利保护的羁绊，走出“只要夫妻正常婚姻关系存续，即足以阻却婚内强奸行为成立犯罪”的误区，实现“告诉乃论”为前提之婚内强奸犯罪化立论。
十二、提出并论证了“法学教育中国模式初步形成”主张。认为：新中国成立60多年来，中国法学教育经历了从新中国成立初期的学习苏联模式，到有计划商品经济时期的借鉴大陆法系模式，又到建立社会主义市场经济体制时期的混合模式，再到科学发展观提出后中国特色模式初步形成的变迁过程。法学教育中国模式初步形成的基本标志集中体现在如下五个方面：第一，以法学学士、硕士、博士教育为主体，以法学专科教育等为补充的多层次高等法学教育体系已趋成熟；第二，法学的基本教育、特色教育和继续教育有机结合的多元化法律人才培养模式基本形成；第三，普通高校、科研机构的法律素质教育和专门学校的法律职业教育与全民的普法教育互相衔接的多轨制法学教育制度初步完善；第四，法学教育和统一司法考试与法律职业密切关联的互动型教育就业机制逐步建立；第五，教育行政部门的行政管理和司法行政部门的行业指导与法学教育行业协会的自律性管理及法学院校的自我管理四位一体的法学教育管理体制日益协调。
十三、提出并论证了中国法科研究生培养模式正在从以培养法学硕士为主转向以法律硕士为主。认为：中国2009年法律硕士（法学）的恢复招生，标志着法科研究生从以培养法学硕士为主到以法律硕士为主转型的开始。在未来中国法科研究生的发展和培养方向上，政法系统在职攻读法律硕士专业学位已经完成了其历史使命，行将停招；全日制法律硕士（非法学）专业学位研究生应当将培养目标定位于复合型、实践型高级专业人才，主要为机关、团体、企业、事业单位培养法律知识与相应系统专业知识复合的实践应用人才；全日制法律硕士（法学）专业学位研究生应当将培养目标定位于专业型、实践型高级法律人才，主要培养法官、检察官、律师和高级警官；法学硕士的培养目标定位于学术型、研究型高级法律人才，主要为法律高等院校、科研机构等单位培养教师和科研人员。
十四、在法学界、方志学界首倡“依法治志”，论证了依法治志的内涵、外延、价值、目标及其实现路径，观点被国务院办公厅采纳，依法治志被写入《全国地方志事业发展规划纲要（2015—2020年）》，成为指导全国地方志事业发展的六大基本原则之一。
十五、提出并论证了“修志问道，执笔著史”的方志人精神，“修志问道，执笔著史的方志人精神”由国务院办公厅写入《全国地方志事业发展规划纲要（2015—2020年）》。
十六，提出并论证了新时代地方志工作的定位是“修志问道，以启未来”“ 为当代提供资政辅治之参考，为后世留下堪存堪鉴之记述”；新时代方志人的定位是“执笔著信史，彰善引风气”。
十七、提出并论证了“新时代地方志三大创新目标”，即地方志要以国家利益为导向开拓创新；地方志要围绕经济社会发展中心工作开拓创新；地方志要围绕接地气、走进千家万户开拓创新。
十八、提出并论证了树立方志文化自信。认为方志的民族性、地域性、包容性、功能性、资料性、权威性是方志文化自信的生成基础，方志文化自身的特殊属性和独特魅力成为推动中华文化繁荣发展取之不尽、用之不竭的智慧宝库，在中华优秀传统文化中具有独特地位和作用，是世界历史文化长河中最灿烂的文化瑰宝，在世界文化之林也占有独特位置和功能，具有不可替代的价值和影响力。在中华文化走出去战略实现过程中，方志文化应该也必须有所作为，发挥引领作用；在中华文化走出去战略目标实现后，方志文化应当站在世界文化舞台的中央。
Xiangde Ji, born in Qingzhou City, Shandong Province, Doctorate in Law from Peking University Law School, Post-Doctoral Research in Law at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, where he continues to work as a Researcher at the Law Institute. He has had successive careers in the fields of law enforcement, teaching, lawyering, procuratorate and legal research. He has served as the director of Deyang law firm, Shandong, as the deputy procurator-general in People's Procuratorate, Chongwen District, Beijing, as the Assistant Director of the Law Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, and as the Chief Editor of Publishing House of Local Records. His honors include having been recognized as One of Ten Academically-Outstanding Graduate Students at Peking University, One of Ten Outstanding Postdoctors of Laws of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, One of China's Most Outstanding Teachers, One of China's Most Outstanding Criminal Defense Attorneys, and as One of China's Most Outstanding Educational Managers, among other awards. He is currently working at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, where he holds the positions of Secretary General of Chinese Local Records Guidance Group, Official Secretary of Party Committee of Local Records Guidance Group, President of Publishing House of Local Records, Research Fellow of the Institute of Law , Executive vice director, Professor , Doctoral Supervisor and Postdoctoral mentor in the Law Department at the Law Institute.
Principal Research Fields
Criminal procedure law, criminal law, evidence law, the justice system, empirical law, legal education. In recent years, he has been engaged in research of local Chronicles.
Principal Professional and Service Activities
Deputy Director and General Secretary of the Chinese Local Records Association; Director of Local Records Discipline Research Institute in Chinese Local Records Association; Director of Yearbook Research Institute in Chinese Local Records Association; Deputy Director, China Legal Education Research Association; Deputy Director, China Behavioral Law Association's Commission on the Study of Lawyers' Professional Behavior; Deputy Director, Chinese Committee of Clinical Legal Education of China Legal Education Research Association; Managing Director,Chinese Criminal Procedural Law Research Association; Managing Director, China Prison Administration Association; Managing Director, China Judicial Administration of Rehabilitation Association; Honorary Dean of Law School of Linyi University; Member, Doctoral Dissertation Defense Council at Law School of Peking University, RenMin University and other academic institutions. Holds positions of Research Fellow or Professor at: Fudan University, Guangxi University, Yantai University, and other academic institutions; Legal Advisor, Ministry of Civil Affairs and other ministries; Expert Member of the Committees on political and legal systems in Beijing, Shandong Province and Hebei Province; Postdoctoral mentor, the Law Institute within Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China.
Principal Academic Achievements
“Reconstruction of National Sanction System after Abolishment of Reeducation through Labor System”(sole author), "Equality of Prosecution and Defense" (sole author), "On the Construction of Plea Bargaining System in China" (sole author), "Study of Issues of Rape During Marriage" (sole author), "Establishing a System of Access to Criminal Defense in China: Theory and Empirical Research" (first author), “Current Situation and Development Trend of Chinese Legal Education”(first author), "New development of Legal Studies" (first author), "Study on Curbing the Violence and Reform of their Systems in Places for Custody in China" (first author), "Transformation of Chinese Model of Rehabilitation of Offenders"(first author), "The Comparative Study of the Negotiated Dispute Resolution" (editor), "New Theory of the Judicial System" (editor), "Model of Legal Education in China" (editor), “Rule of Law and Deepening the Reform of Judiciary System”(editor), "Development and Expectation of the Study on Criminal Procedural Law in China" (editor), "Explanations and Review of the Revised Criminal Procedure Law " (editor), “Ten Social Hot Issues in Legal Perspective”(editor), and more than forty sets of publications and teaching materials as editor, co-author, or co-editor, and over two hundred published academic papers. More than forty sets of published research results and reports, selected for the "Results Journal" by the Social Science Planning Office of the Publicity Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, together with the National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science, "Journal of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences", "Leaders' Reference Guide", "Academic Trends", and other journals.
Principal Research Projects
Independently completed the National Social Science Fund project "Establishing Equality of Prosecution and Defense in Criminal Procedure in China"; independently completed the National Social Science Late Fund project" Four Revolutions in the Criminal Justice System"; independently completed China's Postdoctoral Science Fund program "On the Construction of Plea Bargaining System in China"; independently conducted the Canadian Bar Association and the All China Lawyers Association's International Criminal Defense and Judicial Reform project, funded by the Canadian International Development Agency; independently completed the Sino-Foreign Cooperative International Project "The Comparative Study of the Negotiated Dispute Resolution"; independently completed the Sino-Dutch Legal System Reform Research Project's project on "The Role and Status of Defense Attorneys, and the System of Access to Criminal Defense.
Directed and completed the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences' Major or Key Projects: "The Relationship of Prosecution and Defense in a Harmonious Society", "Model of Legal Education in China", "Establishing a System of Access to Criminal Defense in China: Theory and Empirical Research", "A Study on Unified Legislation of Legal Supervision"; directed and completed the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences' National Condition of Rule-of-Law Research Project: "Model of rehabilitation of Offenders in China", the Supreme People's Procuratorate's Prosecutorial Theory Research Project: "A Study on Evidentiary Problems Leading to the Inability to Prosecute When the Crime is in Doubt", the China Law Society's Research Project: "A Study on Curbing the Violence and Reform of their Systems in Places for Custody in China", and others.
Independently completed or directed Local Records project: National Social Science Fund significant and specific project “Chinese War of Resistance Against Japan Records”; Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Chinese Local Records Guidance Group significant project “South Chinese Sea Records”; General Office of the State Council, Ministry of Finance, Chinese Local Records Guidance Group significant project “Records Publishing Funding Project in Ethnic Minority Areas and Economic Less-developed Areas”, ”Yearbook Publishing Funding Project in Ethnic Minority Areas and Economic Less-developed Areas”, “Culture Project of Local Records of China’s Famous Towns”, “Culture Project of Local Records of China’s Famous Villages”, “High Quality Project of China’s Local Records”, “High Quality Project of China’s Yearbook” “Chinese Local Records ’One Body and Two Wing’ Project”, “Local Records Museum Building and National Local Records Publishing Base Building Project”, “National Digital Local Records and Informational Local Records Building Project”, “Chinese Local Records Subject and Team Building Project”, “Chinese Local Records Going Global Project”, “Culture Project of Local Records of China’s Famous Mountains”, “Culture Project of Local Records of China’s Famous Rivers”, “Culture Project of Local Records of China’s Famous Streets”, “Culture Project of Local Records of China’s Famous Wines”.
Principal Academic Awards
He has won the first prize of the National Law Postdoctoral Scientific Research Achievements (Monographs), the first prize of "the Outstanding Achievements (Monographs) in China Legal Science", the first prize of "the Academic Achievements(Monographs) on Criminal Procedure Law"among the young-and-middle-aged experts awarded by China Law Society, the second prize of the Third National Legal Teaching Materials and Research Achievements(Scientific Research Achievement), the second prize of the Third Chinese Legal Educational Research Achievements, and several first, second or third prizes of the Outstanding Achievements awarded separately by China Law Society, Supreme People's Procuratorate, P.R.C, Ministry of Justice, P.R.C, Ministry of Education, P.R.C, and other entities.
Principal Contributions to Academic Discourse
1)Proposing a "Fourth Revolution in the Criminal Justice System". The opinion is that: the first revolution in the criminal justice system is the separation of judicial and administrative authority; the second revolution is the separation of adjudicative and prosecutorial authority; the third revolution is the equality of prosecution and defense; currently, the world is undergoing a fourth revolution in criminal justice-the relationship between the prosecution and defense is going from one focusing on confrontation and supplemented by cooperation, to one focusing on cooperation and supplemented by confrontation.
2)Raising the issue of "Establishing a System of Plea Bargaining in China". In the process of studying the measures taken to resolve the issue of increasing numbers of disputes and limited judicial resources during China's transformative period, I have discussed the concept of "plea bargaining", proposed and constructed a Chinese system of plea bargaining that would suit China's practical needs, would be rich in Chinese characteristics, have a dignified, Chinese style, and would befit the rule-of-law spirit of the twenty-first century.
3)Developing the "Theory of Equality of Prosecution and Defense". The legal field's traditional theoretical concept of the equality of prosecution and defense is essentially one of "equality arms". Based on this notion, I have discussed and demonstrated the importance of the new doctrines of "equality in confrontation", "equal protection", and "equal cooperation", assigning new meaning to the equality of prosecution and defense. I have also demonstrated that the equality of prosecution and defense must be the combination of equality in form and equality in substance; combined the empirical research analyzing the reasons underlying critiques of current criminal procedure law; and advocated that equal cooperation and equality in confrontation must be achieved through equality of arms and equal protection.
4)Raising the importance, in the context of establishing a harmonious society, of reconstructing the concept of the relationship between prosecution and defense in China. Taking the current state of "hostile", "irrational and unequal confrontation" between prosecution and defense, and transforming it into a state of "equality of prosecution and defense"; on the basis of equality of prosecution and defense, the two sides will be able both to confront one another on equal footing and to cooperate in an equal manner. The basic plan is the following: starting from a state of equality between prosecution and defense, first seek equal cooperation in order to resolve around 80% of cases and thereby increase the efficiency of litigation; the approximately 20% of cases that cannot be resolved through cooperation should use equal confrontation to promote the realization of justice; and through the streamlining of criminal procedure, achieve the goal of establishing a fair, authoritative, and efficient justice system.
5)Discussing the importance of using the principle: "simplifying the simple; expanding the complex"（简者更简，繁者更繁）as the center of the basic model for the reform of China's criminal litigation system. In order to separate cases into complex or simplified, the first prerequisite is the presentation of the evidence; next, a procedure must be established to determine the initial plea of the accused. For all cases in which the defendant enters an initial plea of guilty, the cases will enter a system of simplified procedure requiring due process. If the facts of such cases are clear and the evidence is sufficient, a "high-speed" simplified procedure may be used. However, if the facts are not clear or the evidence is insufficient, the case would enter "plea negotiation" simplified procedure. Either way, cases involving an initial plea of guilty will undergo simplified pretrial preparations and trial procedure, thereby achieving the "simplification of the simple". When, on the other hand, the defendant enters an initial plea of not guilty, the case will enter a system of ordinary procedure requiring due process, granting the defendant and his attorney comprehensive substantive and procedural rights and protections, and thereby achieving the goal of "expanding the complex".
6)Discussing and demonstrating the importance of a "system requiring a charge prior to formal arrest". I believe that we must establish a system in which, when handling the categorization of cases requested or transferred for formal arrest approval, using the theory of a level of standard-of-proof as a basis for due process, using the criminal charge as a substantive prerequisite, and using the dual goals of crime control and human rights protections as the values to strive for in litigation, and adopt international conventions, international criminal justice norms, and the contemporary situation of Chinese criminal justice as the coordinates upon which to map the reforms of China's system of detention and arrest. This would redress the misconceptions of practitioners, clarify the misunderstandings of academia, and play a positive role in building the legitimacy of the system of formal arrest.
7)In the field of criminal defense, originating the term and raising the issue of "the three difficulties of criminal defense". The terms I coined to describe criminal defense, of "difficulty of client visits", "difficulty of discovery", and "difficulty of investigation and evidence collection" have been cited in the legal academic field and by legal profession, from the 1996 revisions of the Criminal Procedure Law and the 1997 addition to the Criminal Law of article 306, to this day.
8)Creating the concept of "the police, prosecution, judiciary, and attorneys as the four "wheels of justice". I believe that, in envisioning a legal and professional community under the rule of law, the police, prosecution, judiciary, and attorneys are the four indispensable wheels driving the rule of law in society; without the current system of defense lawyers, the justice system would be far from able to progress on the current path to the rule of law. For this reason, the public security and judicial organs must change from their long-held view of lawyers' participation in criminal litigation as something that makes the work of investigation, prosecution and adjudication more onerous, and establish a modern view consistent with the rule-of-law, that the participation of lawyers in litigation is to protect the legal rights and privileges of defendants and to ensure the fairness of procedure. During criminal litigation, those organs should treat attorneys with goodwill, as equals, walking with them and shoulder to shoulder, pushing together for progress in establishing the rule of law in China.
9)Coining the phrase in Chinese and advocating for "access to criminal defense". The overall concept of establishing a system of access to criminal defense in China is the following: there must be a unified system, promulgated by the Ministry of Justice for professional certification to handle criminal defense cases. All those who obtain professional qualification to be an attorney, who have been handling cases as an attorney for over three years, and have passed a specialized criminal defense examination, may handle criminal defense cases in the basic level courts. Of those lawyers who have handled criminal defense cases in the basic level courts for more than three years, those who have been qualified through a training and assessment may handle defense in ordinary criminal cases in the mid-level courts. Lawyers who have handled defense in ordinary criminal cases in the mid-level courts for over five years, who are qualified through a training and assessment, may handle defense in death penalty cases. At the same time, mechanisms must be established for training, assessment, qualification, and attorney disqualification that correspond with the mechanism of access to defense.
10)Coining the phrase and describing "the criminal defense cask". The meaning of this concept is that: no system is more indispensable to a country's stability and development than its legal system; a legal system's most important system is its criminal justice system; therefore, a country's criminal justice system relies on its criminal defense system, especially on whether or not its defense attorneys can fulfill their professional responsibility to provide a good defense, and whether or not they can establish public trust. The metaphor poses that the rule of law is the shortest plank in "society's cask"; analogously, criminal rule of law is the shortest plank in the "rule of law cask". Finally, criminal defense is the shortest plank in the "criminal rule of law cask". Evaluating the level of rule of law attained by a country can only be accomplished with certainty by consulting the state of its criminal defense system.
11)Raising the importance of advocating for the "criminalization of rape during marriage". Discussing the theoretical basis, "coupling rights and duties," underlying academic discourse on rape during marriage. Revealing the belief of many men, that sexual refusal during marriage constitutes a breach of contract, and that the perceived breach of contract engenders sexual violence. However, in legal logic, the perceived breach of contract regarding sexual relations does not necessarily lead to sexual violence, and it certainly does not legitimize sexual violence. It is my belief that, as the emphasis of legal rights regulation shifts from social to individual rights, the ability to protect human rights and provide for social justice becomes indispensable, in any legal system. This notion, as reflected in the issue of marital rape, entails the elimination of restrictions on the protection of women's sexual rights in marital relationships and the need to break free from the misunderstanding that "the marital relationship alone is sufficient to prevent marital rape from constituting a crime."
12)Discussing and demonstrating the importance of promoting "the progressive development of the Chinese model of legal education". It is my belief that, in the over-60 years since the founding of the New China, Chinese legal education has undergone a process of change, from studying the Soviet model in the initial period of the New China, to the planned commodity economy period when lessons were being drawn from the European Civil Law model, to the period of building the socialist market economy system's mixed model, then, following the introduction of the concept of scientific development, on to the preliminary formation of the model with Chinese characteristics. Signs of the gradual formation of a Chinese model of legal education can be observed in the following five phenomena: number one, the multilevel system focusing on legal education in bachelor's, master's, and doctoral degrees in law, and supplemented by vocational legal education, and other types, has already reached maturity; number two, the model of training versatile legal professionals with an organic combination of basic, specialized, and continuing education in law, is essentially fully-formed; number three, the multi-track system of legal education is gradually being perfected, as the all-around legal education at institutions of higher learning and research institutes, continuing professional legal training at specialized schools, and the general legal education of the populace increasingly complement one another; number four, interactive legal education and employment mechanisms are gradually being constructed by the close relationship between academic legal education's integrated judicial examination, and the legal profession; number five, the management of legal education is increasingly being coordinated and harmonized via the quadripartite mechanism of professional guidance in the form of administrative management by educational ministries on one hand and judicial administration departments on the other, the self-management of professional legal education associations, and of the legal academy.
13)Describing the current transition of China's graduate legal education system from a focus on academic Master of Laws degrees to a focus on professional Master of Laws degrees. In my opinion: the resumption in 2009 of enrollment in China's Master of Laws (academic law) degree programs indicates the beginning of a shift in the priorities of graduate students in law from the academic to the professional Master of Laws degree. In the development and training of future Chinese graduate students in law, specialized, practice-oriented Master of Laws degree programs for working professionals in the political and legal system have already completed their historical mission. Full-time specialized professionally-oriented Master of Laws degrees (non-academic law) will have complex training objectives, aiming at the development of specialized professionals with high-level practice skills, especially geared towards career and employment training for work in government organs, groups, and enterprises, professional legal knowledge and corresponding specialized complex system knowledge and a practically-oriented workforce. Full-time specialized Master of Laws (academic law) degree programs will set their training goals as to facilitate the development of professionalized, legal professionals with a high level of practice skills, especially training judges, prosecutors, lawyers and high-level police sergeants; the training goals of academic Master of Laws degrees are academic, research-oriented advanced legal personnel, especially institutions of higher learning, research institutions, and other employers seeking teachers and researchers.
14)In the filed of law and local chronicles, he initially presented the concept of “Governing the Local Chronicles by Law” and demonstrated the connotation, extension, value, goals and implementation path, which had been adopted by General Office of the State Council and written in “National Local Records Career Development Outline(2015-2020)”, and become one of the fundamental principles that guide the development of local chronicles.
15)Raising and arguing the spirit of local recorders, that is “Compiling records, searching for path, and continuing to record the history”, which had been written in “National Local Records Career Development Outline(2015-2020)” by General Office of the State Council.
16)Presenting the orientation of local chronicles in the new age is to “Compiling records and searching for path to enlighten the future” “Providing governance reference for the present and bequeathing the beneficial legacy for the future”; the determination of local recorders in the new age is “Recording the true history, honoring good to lead great general mood of society”.
17)Discussing the “Three innovation goals of local records in the new age” is to innovating for the national interest, for the central work in the development of economy and society, for getting down to earth and going into every home.
18)Promoting and discussing Chinese Local Chronicles Culture Confidence. The confidence is based on local chronicles’ nationality, locality, inclusivity, functionality, anthenticity and authority. The specific characters and unique fascination of Chinese local chronicles made it the inexhaustible wisdom repository for the prosperity of Chinese culture. Local Chronicles Culture holds a special situation and role in excellent Chinese traditional culture and the whole world culture. The irreplaceable value and effect also made it become the glorious treasure in the river of world history and culture. During the process of the Chinese culture going global, the Chinese Local Chronicles Culture should actively play the leading rule; after the achievement of Chinese culture going global, the Chinese Local Chronicles Culture should stand at the center of the world stage.
最新作品
展望控制犯罪与刑事诉讼形态——文化国视野下的理论展开
论方志文化自信
冀祥德：以诊所法律教育统领法律实践教育:可行性及制度设计
论依法治志
合力稳妥促进司法改革
司法改革的“上海方案”瞄准了什么
律师缘何“死磕”？
检察学研究的现状与展望
李林、冀祥德主编《依法治国与深化司法体制改革》出版
劳教制度废除后的两种路径选择
冀祥德主编、田夫副主编《聆听法治——在最高学术殿堂》（第二卷）出版
完善被性侵女童权利的法律保护制度
深化我国司法体制改革的基本立场
论我国看守所管理模式的四个转变
优化司法职权配置的两个要素
步出荆湘，云书法治——恭贺李步云先生八十寿诞
劳教制度废除后的立法模式选择
应尽快设立性侵儿童罪
冀祥德：在2013年毕业典礼上的讲话
冀祥德：古风五言一首：庆祝中国社会科学博士后制度实施二十周年
庆祝中国社会科学博士后制度实施二十周年诗两首
反思错案根源 实现公平公正
劳教制度：向死而生
中国律师定位再认识
律师的五重境界
见证辉煌
过 年（诗歌）
法科研究生在建设法治国家中的担当
德行，言行，身行
增加法治木桶中最短木板的高度
论中国法科研究生培养模式之转型
刑事辩护准入制度与有效辩护及普遍辩护
人民法院参与社会管理创新的实践探索
《聆听法治——在最高学术殿堂》序言
《聆听法治——在最高学术研究殿堂》（第一卷）导读
祝贺《聆听法治——在最高学术殿堂》（第一卷）出版
从“杭州经验”看公安工作模式转型
刑诉法修正案的进步与争议
亲历2012年刑事诉讼法修正案——《最新刑事诉讼法法释评》后记
人权保障的显著进步与期待——2012年刑事诉讼法修正案评介
冀祥德主编：《最新刑事诉讼法释评》首发
从对抗转向合作：中国控辩关系新发展
深入研究分析协商性纠纷解决机制的理论与中外实践
《法学教育的中国模式》成果介绍
法律人的敬仰与激励
关于检察机关创新案件管理模式的若干思考
论法学教育中国模式的初步形成
“社科法硕”的过去、现在与未来
刑事诉讼法修改能否解决辩护“三难”
诊所法律教育：中国法律硕士培养制度改革的基本方向
中国刑事辩护若干问题调查分析
送别2011届法学系毕业同学
程序法治的航船
“达标”还是“倒退”：直面中国刑事辩护制度30年
我国辩护律师执业环境亟待改善
论辩诉交易制度的生命基础
《建立中国刑事辩护准入制度理论与实证研究》序言
论控辩平等的功能
王家之福，国家之福
附定罪条件逮捕制度论
罗彩霞事件若干法律问题拷问
通过建立刑事辩护准入制度 实现刑事辩护专业化
请给教育以信仰与德性
再论刑事辩护准入制度的建立
对罪犯改造模式的转变
关于控辩平等原则演进的思考
加快建立刑事辩护准入制度
控辩平等之现代内涵解读
沉默权与辩诉交易在中国法下的兼容
再论公、检、法、律是推进社会法治进程不可或缺的四个车轮
律师是“社会正义的工程师”——看上去很美
建立中国控辩协商制度实证研究报告
在北京大学2006年度优秀博士论文颁奖大会上的发言
法学所两年
中国刑事审判程序改造的基本立场:简者更简，繁者更繁
治安管理处罚权的扩张与规制
中国未决羁押制度批判性重构
婚内强奸：从客观事实到法律事实的演进
耦合权利义务说：婚内强奸立论的理论原点
公诉词能否构成诉之指控
英国保释制度对我国取保候审制度之借鉴
中国刑事辩护本体省思
论刑事诉讼价值追求的转变
社评社论：证人何以方能出庭
直面死刑复核程序
论量刑建议权的生命基础
辩诉交易中国化之契约观视角
证明标准及其功能与层次
杂志文选
以诊所法律教育统领法律实践教育：可行性及制度设计
司法改革“上海方案”价值评析
全面深化司法体制改革的两个支点
为少年犯融入社会创造条件
网络表达并非“想说就说”
司法公开要注意范围及程序
司法公开的审查和限制——以法官和媒体在审判公开中的角色为视角
司法改革的“上海方案”瞄准了什么
律师在法庭上能否保持沉默_冀祥德
律师缘何_死磕_冀祥德
建立少年家事法庭 顺应少年审判发展趋势
婚内强奸入罪正当化分析
犯罪形势现状与趋势分析_冀祥德
司法公开要注意范围及程序
完善被性侵女童权利的法律保护制度
深化我国司法体制改革的基本立场
律师缘何“死磕”?
论司法权配置的两个要素
扒窃行为如何适用法律
论法学教育中国模式的初步形成
中国刑事辩护若干问题调查分析
诊所法律教育:中国法律硕士培养制度
中国刑事诉讼制度发展的“八个转向”
从对抗转向合作:中国控辩关系新发展
中国特色社会主义法学教育模式的基本特征
冀祥德：对中国法学教育全面反思与展望
诊所法律教育:中国法律硕士培养制度
协商性纠纷解决路径的现实与未来
对中国法学教育全面反思与展望
论辩诉交易制度的生命基础
建立刑事辩护准入制度实现刑事辩护专业化
附定罪条件逮捕制度论
中国刑事辩护制度发展的命运
用制度保证死刑判决的慎重与公正
死刑复核程序的现代定位
英国保释制度对我国取保候审制度之借鉴
设置量刑建议权要体现控辩协商的价值
让证人出庭作证:最需要的是制度保障
量刑建议权的理论基础与价值基础
治安管理处罚权的扩张与规制
票据侵权问题刍议
控辩平等之现代内涵解读
耦合权利义务说：婚内强奸立论的理论原点
证据开示·沉默权·辩诉交易关系论
精神损害对法律救济的质问
民愤的正读
借鉴域外经验,建立控辩协商制度
构建中国的量刑建议权制度
论土地法定优先承包权
鉴定结论有罪推定现象批判
罪刑法定的本体溯求与启蒙
再论刑事辩护准入制度的建立
论口供获取与人权保障
构建我国救济程序中的控辩平等
死刑复核程序理论反思
论控辩平等的功能
非法证据诉讼价值解读
未决羁押制度的比较分析
控辩平等之现代内涵解读
律师见证与公证比较研究
建立刑事辩护律师专业资格制度的法律思考
建立刑事辩护专业资格的法律思考
建立中国控辩协商制度实证研究报告
对婚内强奸的理性分析与思考
完善破产案件审判监督制度的构想
婚内强奸：从客观事实到法律事实的演进
域外辩诉交易的发展及其启示
域外婚内强奸法之发展及其启示
和谐社会语境下的控辩平等
合同债权损害解读（下）
合同债权损害解读（上）
刑事辩护:本体属性
刑事司法中的概括故意教唆
军队律师不应介入社会法律服务市场
再审程序反思性检讨
关于控辩平等原则演进的思考
借鉴域外经验,建立控辩协商制度
侦查程序中口供获取与人权保障
为什么要明确检察机关的量刑建议权
中国刑事辩护的困境与出路
中国刑事辩护本体省思
中国刑事辩护制度发展的命运
立法法的规范功能
行踪
2018年
莫纪宏等参加《中华人民共和国地方志法》立法专家论证会
2017年
周汉华、王敏远、柳华文、冀祥德获得国务院政府特殊津贴
冀祥德研究员参与点评2016年度人民法院十大司法政策
2016年
中国刑事诉讼法学研究会第二次会员代表大会暨2016年年会成功召开
法学系常务副主任冀祥德教授出席中国法学教育研究会2016年年会
2015年
刘仁文、冀祥德、王敏远出席第九届尚权刑辩论坛
冀祥德教授赴安阳师范学院讲学
冀祥德、刘晨琦出席全国法律专业学位研究生教育指导委员会会议暨第八届法律硕士教育论坛
2014年
法治中国与法学教育研讨会成功举行
“社科法硕”法律诊所教师座谈会顺利召开
2014-2015学年度“社科法硕”法律诊所开班仪式隆重举行
黄太云主任做客第四十二届“社科法律人”高级学术论坛暨“社科法硕”学术沙龙活动第一百一十期
“社科法硕”十周年系列活动：刑事诊所新问题研讨暨诊所教师培训会议成功举行
2014届法学系研究生毕业典礼隆重举行
“社科法硕”法律诊所公开示范课顺利举行
"法治与改革"学术研讨会成功举行
“新刑事诉讼法实施状况”研讨会召开
减少死刑与废止劳教后法制改革研讨会召开
2013年
法治中国与司法公开：浙江法院阳光司法指数新闻发布会暨司法公开研讨会在京召开
冀祥德《法学教育的中国模式》著作获"第三届中国法学教育研究成果奖二等奖"
冀祥德研究员参加劳教制度废除后的二届四次常务理事会议
冀祥德、席月民、刘晨琦共同出席全国第七届法律硕士教育论坛
2013-2014学年度“社科法硕”法律诊所开班仪式隆重举行
冀祥德研究员做客“燕大法律讲坛”
冀祥德教授做客第三十二届“社科法律人”高级学术论坛 暨“社科法硕”学术沙龙活动第一百期
法学系2013级研究生开学典礼隆重举行
冀祥德研究员出席中央电视台法治栏目改版专家座谈会
陈甦书记主持召开法硕办工作交接会
“劳教制度改革的路径与方案研讨会”在京举行
冀祥德教授获第八届优秀高等教育论文奖
冀祥德教授参加贯彻“卓越法律人才教育培养计划”若干问题研讨会
冀祥德教授出席全国法律专业学位研究生教育综合改革试点项目验收汇报会
冀祥德研究员在中央电视台谈超市对顾客的搜身行为
冀祥德教授应邀在中央电视台谈“吸金”黑洞
冀祥德研究员参加中国监狱工作协会2013年课题评审会议
冀祥德教授参加“山东省特色名校工程”建设方案专家论证会
冀祥德教授在山东师范大学“社科大讲堂”发表演讲
冀祥德研究员出席中国监狱工作协会会议谈罪犯改造的中国模式
王敏远、冀祥德研究员参加看守所管理机制创新与新刑事诉讼法实施研讨会
冀祥德教授应邀为滕州市司法行政培训班作学术报告
冀祥德、沈涓研究员获第一届法学博士后科研成果奖一、二等奖
中国社科院法学所新刑事诉讼法实施状况研究课题组赴山东巨野开展调研活动
死刑与劳教制度改革研讨会在海南举行
2012年
冀祥德教授参加中央电视台《法制编辑部》节目创作研讨会
冀祥德研究员倡议创立“中国刑事辩护论坛宣言”
冀祥德所长助理出席第二届中欧法学院院长联席会议
“死刑制度改革研讨会”在牡丹江召开
台湾法曹协会代表团访问法学所
冀祥德研究员出席山东巨野县政法大讲堂启动仪式并作首场报告会
冀祥德研究员应邀到山东警察学院作专题讲座
冀祥德教授、徐炳教授出席2012中美法学院院长论坛
冀祥德研究员主持全国刑事法律诊所研讨暨培训会议并作示范教学
冀祥德研究员应邀做客人民网谈公安机关人性化执法
冀祥德研究员在中央电视台-1《中国警察》电视片中谈执法规范化建设
冀祥德研究员在全国诊所法律教育会议上致辞并作主旨演讲
《中国的法学教育》编写启动会京召开 冀祥德研究员提出撰写建议
冀祥德研究员应邀到贵州省律师协会作2012年刑事诉讼法修正案释评讲座
法学系2011级在职法律硕士研究生开学典礼隆重举行
2011年
热烈祝贺冀祥德研究员荣获第二届“中国法学优秀成果奖”专著类一等奖
冀祥德研究员当选为中国法学教育研究会副会长
王敏远、冀祥德、熊秋红研究员参加中国刑事诉讼法学研究会第一次会议
周汉华、冀祥德研究员参加公安部公安执法规范化建设理论研讨会
法学所牵头协调的“中国刑事诊所经验交流暨教师培训会议”在烟台召开
冀祥德研究员参加“民主与法制巡回讲坛”首坛四川站演讲
热烈祝贺“社科法硕”辩论队勇夺北京市法科研究生辩论赛冠军
冀祥德研究员在《中国法治蓝皮书》中公布关于公设辩护人制度的最新研究成果
冀祥德研究员出席完善刑事辩护立法 提高刑事辩护能力学术研讨会
2010年
中国社会科学院法学研究所研究生教学基地2011年元旦联欢会隆重举行
冀祥德教授应邀到南宁市检察系统讲座
2010年法学所、国际法所领导班子年度考核测评会在新会议室举行
“台湾地区戒严时期言论自由的规制问题”专题讲座成功举办
刘作翔、冀祥德教授应邀参加最高人民法院“全国法院第22届学术讨论会优秀论文定评会”
第60期“社科法硕”学术沙龙在研究生教学基地成功举行
第59期“社科法硕”学术沙龙在研究生教学基地成功举行
2010-2011学年度“社科法硕”综合法律诊所中级班开课
冀祥德应邀培训山西省检察机关参加全国十佳公诉人比赛选手
冀祥德再次应邀担任北京市检察机关“全国十佳公诉人”评选参赛选手培训专家
法学系研究生入党宣誓仪式在教学基地举行
陈甦书记率领法学所代表团出席两岸四地法律发展学术研讨会
冀祥德研究员获司法部第六届“中国司法杯”优秀论文二等奖
冀祥德接受人民法院报记者采访稿
冀祥德教授在全国法律硕士教育论坛上作主题发言
2009年
冀祥德荣获《法学杂志》2008年“优秀文章”奖
冀祥德应邀出席“反对针对妇女暴力和男性参与国际学术研讨会”并作主题演讲
第三届全国法学教材与科研成果奖获奖成果的公告
2008年
法学所成功举办中国刑事辩护30年暨刑事辩护准入制度国际研讨会
建言献策
2017年
冀祥德：走向中国控辩关系的第四种样态：控辩合作
冀祥德：点评《最高人民法院关于审理毒品犯罪案件适用法律若干问题的解释》
冀祥德：点评《最高人民法院最高人民检察院关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》
2014年
冀祥德研究员做客央视评“两高”报告
冀祥德研究员接受《光明日报》记者采访
2013年
冀祥德研究员建议加快违法行为教育矫治立法
冀祥德：三儿童“撞”老太太案彰显法治中国建设追求
冀祥德：劳教制度是强制戒毒制度的前车之辙
冀祥德、陈卫东谈三中全会《决定》对法院检察院的改革
冀祥德：公正与权威是审判权检察权独立运行的根本追求
冀祥德研究员就公安执法规范化改革接受《中国人大》采访
冀祥德：扒窃行为如何适用法律
冀祥德研究员接受《人民公安报》记者采访谈错案防范
冀祥德研究员做客中央电视台谈打工妹的权利保护
2012年
冀祥德研究员连续三次做客中央电视台谈法治实践
2011年
王敏远、冀祥德谈隔离式量刑程序
冀祥德：建立我国刑事辩护准入机制的时机已经成熟
2010年
冀祥德：刑事诉讼的第四次革命已经到来
冀祥德：律师借协商性调解机制转型
外文文集
LEGAL EDUCATION