删除或更新信息，请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

圆筒型陶瓷-钛合金-芳纶三单元层复合靶板结构抗弹性能数值模拟及其内在机理

本站小编 Free考研考试/2021-12-21
本文二维码信息
二维码（扫一下试试看！）
圆筒型陶瓷-钛合金-芳纶三单元层复合靶板结构抗弹性能数值模拟及其内在机理
Ballistic Performance Simulation of Cylindrical Ceramic/ Titanium/Aramid Three-Layered Composite Targets and the Underlying Mechanism
投稿时间：2019-04-26
DOI：10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2019.135
中文关键词:圆筒型复合靶板结构陶瓷单元层数值模拟抗弹性能内在机理
English Keywords:cylindrical composite targetsceramic layernumerical simulationballistic performanceunderlying mechanism
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
范群波北京理工大学 材料学院, 北京 100081
李鹏茹北京理工大学 材料学院, 北京 1000811057892791@qq.com
周豫北京理工大学 材料学院, 北京 100081
刘昕北京理工大学 材料学院, 北京 100081
摘要点击次数:683
全文下载次数:421
中文摘要:
针对53式7.62 mm口径穿甲燃烧弹对圆筒型陶瓷-钛合金-芳纶三单元层复合靶板结构的侵彻过程，本文开展了抗弹性能数值模拟研究.模拟结果表明，弹体垂直入射将造成陶瓷块开裂破碎，最终撞击在钛合金单元层上形成凹坑，复合靶板穿深与试验所测结果吻合良好，相对误差仅为9.4%；陶瓷、钛合金、芳纶三个单元层消耗的能量所占百分比分别为83.77%，13.77%，2.46%.在此基础上，通过设置0°~70°系列不同初始时刻入射姿态角θ0，发现弹体侵彻过程中陶瓷单元层耗散的能量占复合靶板耗散总能的比值始终最大.进一步分析陶瓷单元层可知，随着θ0的增大，陶瓷单元层受力峰值总体呈减小的趋势.且入射姿态角不同，弹靶作用模式也存在差异.对陶瓷单元层进行耗能分析，可知其与质量损失变化大体一致.但初始时刻入射姿态角为30°时，由于弹靶作用过程以弹身接触靶板为主，靶板质量损伤大但能量获取相对较少.
English Summary:
Focusing on the process of the 53 type 7.62 mm armour-piercing projectile penetrating into the cylindrical ceramic/titanium/aramid three-layered composite targets, a study on ballistic performance numerical simulation was carried out. The simulation results show that the vertical incidence of projectile can cause cracks and fragmentations of ceramic layer, and eventually form pits on the titanium layer. The penetration depth of composite targets well agree with the experimental result, the relative error is only 9.4%. The percentages of energy dissipated by ceramic, titanium alloy and aramid layers are 83.77%, 13.77% and 2.46%, respectively. On this basis, setting the initial incident attitude angle θ0 from 0° to 70°, it is found that the ratio of energy dissipated by ceramic layer to the total energy is the largest in the process of projectile penetrating into targets. Further analysis of the ceramic layer shows that with the increase of initial incident attitude angle θ0, the maximum force of ceramic layer decreases. Moreover, the action modes of projectile and target vary with the initial incident attitude angle. Energy analysis of ceramic layer shows that, the action mode is basically consistent with the mass loss. However, when θ0 is 30°, the mass loss of ceramic layer is large, but the dissipated energy is relatively less.
查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器
相关话题/北京理工大学 材料 北京 结构 中文

Free考研考试FreeKaoYan.Com
欢迎来到Free考研考试，"为实现人生的Free而奋斗"

© 2020 FreeKaoYan! . All rights reserved.